Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Neptune”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1989

The Voyager 2 mission to Neptune

Voyager 2 and its twin, Voyager 1, were launched in 1977. Both spacecraft investigated Jupiter's and Saturn's systems. Voyager 2 continued on to fly past Utranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989, while Voyager 1 headed out of the solar system. The mission at Neptune presented many engineering and scientific challenges. Neptune is about 30 Astronomical Units (AU) from the sun and earth, resulting in extremely low lights levels (nearly 1000 times lower than at earth) and in communication distances of nearly 4.5 billion kilometers. To compensate for the long communication distances, several new techniques were developed. As at Uranus, an onboard backup computer compressed the imaging data. In addition, the data return was further improved by electronically arraying and expanding several receiving antennas. As a result, the data rates from Neptune were about the same as they were from Saturn, even though the distance was three times greater. Several changes were made in the onboard software to optimize Voyager's operations at the very low light levels at Neptune. Finally, to obtain the maximum information from the Neptune encounter, a trajectory was selected which passed within just 5000 kilometers of Neptune's atmosphere, but which also posed several possible environmental hazards.

Haynes, Norman R.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Occultation by a possible third satellite of Neptune

The 24 May 1981 close approach of Neptune to an uncataloged star was photoelectrically monitored from two observatories separated by 6 kilometers parallel to the occultation track. An 8.1-second drop in signal, recorded simultaneously at both sites, is interpreted as resulting from the passage of a third satellite of Neptune in front of the star. From the duration of the event, the derived minimum diameter for an object sharing Neptune's motion is 180 kilometers. If the object was in Neptune's equatorial plane and there are no significant errors in the prediction ephemeris, the object was located at a distance of 3 Neptune radii from Neptune's center.

Reitsema, H. J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Observational constraints on the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune from new measurements near 10 micron

Uranus was detected at 10.3, 11.6 and 12.5 micrometers approximately 1 micrometer spectral bandpasses, with respective brightness temperatures of 74.0 + 0.9 or -1.1, 67.6 + 0.5 or -0.7, and 65.5 + 0.6 or -0.7 K and the first detection of Neptune at 10.3 micrometers with a brightness temperature of 77.5 + 0.7 or -0.9 K. We also detected Neptune at 11.36 micrometers with 2% spectral resolution at 81.0 + 0.8 or -0.9 K. The 10 micrometers continuous of both Uranus and Neptune may in part be due to reflected solar radiation as well as thermal emission. If all of the observed flux is reflected light, then the maximum geometric albedo of Uranus is 0.115 + or - 0.020, and that of Neptune is 0.229 + or - 0.043. In the context of previous observations in this region, the maximum stratospheric C2H6 mixing ratio is found to be 3 x 10 to the -8 power for Uranus and 3 x 10 to the -6 power for Neptune. A value for the maximum mixing ratio in the stratosphere of Neptune on the order of 1 - 0.004 appears to be consistent with the available data.

Orton, G. S.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Observational constraints on the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune from new measurements near 10 micrometers

Uranus was detected at 10.3, 11.6 and 12.5 micrometers approximately 1 micrometer spectral bandpasses, with respective brightness temperatures of 74.0 + 0.9 or -1.1, 67.6 + 0.5 or -0.7, and 65.5 + 0.6 or -0.7 K and the first detection of Neptune at 10.3 micrometers with a brightness temperature of 77.5 + 0.7 or -0.9 K. We also detected Neptune at 11.36 micrometers with 2 percent spectral resolution at 81.0 + 0.8 or -0.9 K. The 10 micrometers continuous of both Uranus and Neptune may in part be due to reflected solar radiation as well as thermal emission. If all of the observed flux is reflected light, then the maximum geometric albedo of Uranus is 0.115 + or - 0.020, and that of Neptune is 0.229 + or - 0.043. In the context of previous observations in this region, the maximum stratospheric C2H6 mixing ratio is found to be 3 x 10 to the -8 power for Uranus and 3 x 10 to the -6 power for Neptune. A value for the maximum mixing ratio in the stratosphere of Neptune on the order of 1 - 0.004 appears to be consistent with the available data. Previously announced in STAR as N83-29155

Tokunaga, A. T.↗
NASA NTRS1984

Physical Properties of Neptune and Triton Inferred from the Orbit of Triton

The orbital motion of Triton was redetermined from photographic data spanning the interval 1899-1981. The resulting ephemeris should provide Triton positions with respect to Neptune with an accuracy of plus or minus 500 km through the end of the century. The following physical results follow from the orbit solution. The inverse mass of Neptune + Triton is solar mass over (c sub N + m sub T) = 19490 plus or minus 40. No acceleration of the mean motion nor orbital eccentricity were detected, thus constraining the tidal dissipation factors of Neptune and Triton to O sub N less than or equal to 650 and QT less than or equal to 10,000. Tidal heating of Triton is presently insignificant. The gravitational harmonic J sub 2 of Neptune is 0.0043 plus or minus 0.0003 if Triton is as massive as m sub T/ M sub N = 0.00128, and if Neptune's spin is prograde with P approximately 18(h), or J sub 2 = 0.0037 plus or minus 0.0002 if Triton is much less massive. Triton undergoes extreme climatic variations due to the combined motion of it's orbit plane and Neptune's orbital motion. Approximately 10% of Triton's surface is presently hidden from diurnal insolation, which may provide a powerful cold trap for atmospheric voltatiles.

A W Harris↗
NASA NTRS1993

Tidal interaction: A possible explanation for geysers and other fluid phenomena in the Neptune-Triton system

Discovery of geyser-like plumes on the surface of Triton was a highlight of Voyager 2's passage through the Neptune planetary system. Remarkable as these observations were, they were not entirely without precedent. Considering the confirmed predictions for the 1979 Voyager Jovian passage, it was logical to consider other solar system bodies beside Io where tidal effects could be a significant factor in surface processes. It was our intuition that the Neptune-Triton gravitational bond acting at high inclination to the Neptune equator and the fact that Neptune was a fluid body was significant oblateness would produce tidal and mechanical forces that could be transformed into thermal energy vented on Triton's surface. Prior to the Voyager flyby, others have noted that capture and evolution of Triton's orbit from extreme eccentricity to near circular state today would have resulted in significant tidal heating, but these analysts disregard current day forces. Our calculations indicate that the time varying forces between Neptune-Triton fall midway between those exerted in the Earth-Moon and Jupiter-Io systems, and considering the low level of other energy inputs, this source of internal energy should not be ignored when seeking an explanation for surface activity. In each planet-satellite case, residual or steady-state eccentricity causes time-varying stresses on internal satellite strata. In the case of Jupiter the residual eccentricity is due largely to Galilean satellite interactions, particularly Io-Europa, but in the case of Neptune-Triton, it is the effect of Triton's inclined orbit about an oblate primary.

Kelly, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Mapping the stability region of the 3:2 Neptune-Pluto resonance

Pluto and Charon are most likely the remnants of a large number of objects that existed in the Uranus-Neptune region at early epochs of the solar system. Numerical integrations have shown that, in general, such objects were ejected from the planetary region on timescales of approximately 10(exp 7) years after Neptune and Uranus reached their current masses. It is thought that the Pluto-Charon system survived to current times without being dynamically removed in this way because it is trapped in a set of secular and mean motion resonances with Neptune. The best-known Pluto-Neptune orbit coupling is the 3:2 mean motion resonance discovered almost 30 years ago by C. Cohen and E. Hubbard. These workers showed that the resonance angle, delta is equivalent to 3(lambda(sub P)) - 2(lambda(sub N)) - omega-bar(sub P) where omega-bar(sub P) is the longitude of perihelion of the Pluto-Charon system, and lambda(sub N) and lambda(sub P) are the mean longitude of Neptune and Pluto-Charon respectively, librates about 180 deg with an amplitude, A(sub delta), of 76 deg. A numerical simulation project to map out the stability region of the 3:2 resonance is reported. The results of these simulations are important to understanding whether Pluto's long-term heliocentric stability requires only the 3:2 resonance, or whether it instead requires one or more of the other Pluto-Neptune resonances. Our study also has another important application. By investigating stability timescales as a function of orbital elements, we gain insight into the fraction of orbital phase space which the stable 3:2 resonance occupies. This fraction is directly related to the probability that the Pluto-Charon system (and possibly other small bodies) could have been captured into this resonance.

Levison, H. F.↗
NASA NTRS1995

An Analysis of Neptune's Stratospheric Haze Using High-Phase-Angle Voyager Images

We have inverted high-phase-angle Voyager images of Neptune to determine the atmospheric extinction coefficient as a function of altitude and the scattering phase function at a reference altitude. Comparisons between theoretical model and observations help separate the contributions from molecular Rayleigh and aerosol scattering and help determine the variation of the aerosol size, concentration, and scattering properties with altitude. Further comparisons between models and data allow us to place constraints on the location and composition of the hazes, the concentration and downward flux of certain condensible hydrocarbon gases, the eddy diffusion coefficient in the lower stratosphere, and the thermal profile in parts of Neptune's stratosphere. We find that a distinct stratospheric haze layer exists near 12(sub -1, sup +1) mbar in Neptune's lower stratosphere, most probably due to condensed ethane. The derived stratospheric haze production rate of 1.0(sub -0.3, sup +0.2) x 10(exp -15) g cm(exp -2) sec(exp -1) is substantially lower than photochemical model predictions. Evidence for hazes at higher altitudes also exists. Unlike the situation on Uranus, large particles (0.08-0.11 microns) may be present at high altitudes on Neptune (e.g., near 0.5 mbar), well above the region in which we expect the major hydrocarbon species to condense. Near 28 mbar, the mean particle size is about 0.13(sub -0.02, sup +0.02) microns with a concentration of 5(sub -3, sup +3) particles cm(exp -3). The cumulative haze extinction optical depth above 15 mbar in the clear filter is approx. 3 x 10(exp -3), and much of this extinction is due to scattering rather than absorption; thus, if our limb-scan sites are typical, the hazes cannot account for the stratospheric temperature inversion on Neptune and may not contribute significantly to atmospheric heating. We compare the imaging results with the results from other observations, including those of the Voyager Photopolarimeter Subsystem, and discuss differences between Neptune and Uranus.

Moses, Julianne I.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Neptune's Eccentricity and the Nature of the Kuiper Belt

The small eccentricity of Neptune may be a direct consequence of apsidal wave interaction with the trans-Neptune population of debris called the Kuiper belt. The Kuiper belt is subject to resonant perturbations from Neptune, so that the transport of angular momentum by density waves can result in orbital evolution of Neptune as well as changes in the structure of the Kuiper belt. In particular, for a belt eroded out to the vicinity of Neptune's 2:1 resonance at about 48 astronomical units, Neptune's eccentricity can damp to its current value over the age of the solar system if the belt contains slightly more than an earth mass of material out to about 75 astronomical units.

Ward, William R.↗
NASA NTRS2004

Aerocapture Guidance Performance for the Neptune Orbiter

A performance evaluation of the Hybrid Predictor corrector Aerocapture Scheme (HYPAS) guidance algorithm for aerocapture at Neptune is presented in this paper for a Mission to Neptune and the Neptune moon Triton'. This mission has several challenges not experienced in previous aerocapture guidance assessments. These challengers are a very high Neptune arrival speed, atmospheric exit into a high energy orbit about Neptune, and a very high ballistic coefficient that results in a low altitude acceleration capability when combined with the aeroshell LD. The evaluation includes a definition of the entry corridor, a comparison to the theoretical optimum performance, and guidance responses to variations in atmospheric density, aerodynamic coefficients and flight path angle for various vehicle configurations (ballistic numbers). The benefits of utilizing angle-of-attack modulation in addition to bank angle modulation to improve flight performance is also discussed. The results show that despite large sensitivities in apoapsis targeting, the algorithm performs within the allocated AV budget for the Neptune mission bank angle only modulation. The addition of angle-of-attack modulation with as little as 5 degrees of amplitude significantly improves the scatter in final orbit apoapsis. Although the angle-of-attack modulation complicates the vehicle design, the performance enhancement reduces aerocapture risk and reduces the propellant consumption needed to reach the high energy target orbit for a conventional propulsion system.

Masciarelli, James P.↗
NASA NTRS2016

Spitzer Space Telescope Mid-IR Light Curves of Neptune

We have used the Spitzer Space Telescope in 2016 February to obtain high cadence, high signal-to-noise, 17 hr duration light curves of Neptune at 3.6 and 4.5 microns. The light curve duration was chosen to correspond to the rotation period of Neptune. Both light curves are slowly varying with time, with full amplitudes of 1.1 mag at 3.6 microns and 0.6 mag at 4.5 microns. We have also extracted sparsely sampled 18 hr light curves of Neptune at W1 (3.4 microns) and W2 (4.6 microns) from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE)/NEOWISE archive at six epochs in 2010-2015. These light curves all show similar shapes and amplitudes compared to the Spitzer light curves but with considerable variation from epoch to epoch. These amplitudes are much larger than those observed with Kepler/K2 in the visible (amplitude approximately 0.02 mag) or at 845 nm with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in 2015 and at 763 nm in 2016 (amplitude approximately 0.2 mag). We interpret the Spitzer and WISE light curves as arising entirely from reflected solar photons, from higher levels in Neptune's atmosphere than for K2. Methane gas is the dominant opacity source in Neptune's atmosphere, and methane absorption bands are present in the HST 763 and 845 nm, WISE W1, and Spitzer 3.6 micron filters.

Individual (Neptune)↗
NASA NTRS1984

Temperature Structures and Infrared-Derived Properties of the Atmosphere of Uranus and Neptune

Temperature structures of Uranus and Neptune are currently derivable from a combination of stellar occultation and thermal radiance observations. The globally averaged temperatures of Uranus and Neptune appear quite similar in their convective regions, reaching temperatures near 75 K at 1 bar and 150 K near 10 bar. Temperature minima near 200 mbar are also similar, near 53 to 55 K. The temperature in the stratosphere of Neptune rises much more steeply with altitude than for Uranus in the range of 0.1 to 100 mbar. Above this level, near 1 ubar, both atmospheres reach temperatures of 120 to 160 K. The bolometric radiant energy output is equivalent to the output of a blackbody at 58.3 + or - 2.0 K for Uranus and 60.3 + or - 2.0 for Neptune. These values imply approximate equilibrium with absorbed sunlight for Uranus but an internal energy source 1.9 to 2.6 times the absorbed sunlight for Neptune. The implication of the thermal spectra is that while the bulk composition may be consistent with a solar mixture of H2 and He, the mixing ratio of CH4 is probably about 2% in the deep atmospheres of both planets.

Glenn S Orton↗
NASA NTRS1986

JHK photometry of candidate stars for occultation by Neptune

Hubbard et al. (1985) have observed the occultation of a star by a ring-like arc of Neptune. The semitransparent, incomplete ring was located at a distance of about 67,000 km from Neptune. In connnection with the program for the Voyager 2 deep space probe to fly past Neptune in 1989 at this distance from the planet, it is urgent to determine the nature of this ring arc or arcs. The best approach to obtain the required information is related to an observation of occultations of stars by Neptune. In this context, a study has been conducted of six stars which will be occulted by Neptune during 1986 and 1987, taking into account their JHK photometry. The obtained data are presented in a table.

Vilas, F.↗
NASA NTRS1986

On the oblateness and rotation rate of Neptune's atmosphere

Recent observations of a stellar occultation by Neptune give an oblateness of 0.022 + or - 0.004 for Neptune's atmosphere at the 1-microbar pressure level. This results is consistent with hydrostatic equilibrium at a uniform atmospheric rotation period of 15 hours, although the error bars on quantities used in the calculation are such that an 18-hour period is not excluded. The oblateness of a planetary atmosphere is determined from stellar occultations by measuring the times at which a specified point on immersion or emersion occultation profiles is reached. Whether this standard procedure for deriving the shape of the atmosphere is consistent with what is known about vertical and horizontal temperature gradients in Neptune's atmosphere is evaluated. The nature of the constraint placed on the interior mass distribution by an oblateness determined in this manner is consided, as is the effects of possible differential rotation. A 15-hour Neptune internal mass distribution is approximately homologous to Uranus', but an 18-hour period is not. The implications for Neptune's interior structure if its body rotation period is actually 18 hours are discussed.

Hubbard, W. B.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Neptune's story

It is conjectured that Triton was captured from a heliocentric orbit as the result of a collision with what was then one of Neptune's regular satellites. The immediate post-capture orbit was highly eccentric. Dissipation due to tides raised by Neptune in Triton caused Triton's orbit to evolve to its present state in less than one billion years. For much of this time Triton was almost entirely molten. While its orbit was evolving, Triton cannibalized most of the regular satellites of Neptune and also perturbed Nereid, thus accounting for that satellite's highly eccentric and inclined orbit. The only regular satellites of Neptune that survived were those that formed well within 5 Neptune radii, and they move on inclined orbits as the result of chaotic perturbations forced by Triton.

Goldreich, P.↗
NASA NTRS1989

A quiescent magnetosphere for Neptune

It is argued that, if Neptune has a large magnetic moment, a weak supply of plasma for its magnetosphere, and a magnetic moment that is in near alignment with the planetary spin axis, the Neptunian magnetosphere is almost completely quiescent except for a region near the magnetopause. There are two magnetic power sources: the flowing, magnetized solar wind, and the kinetic energy of planetery spin. It is predicted that Neptune has a magnetic moment of at least 1 G-RN to the 3rd, the sum of ionospheric and Triton injections of plasma into Neptune's magnetosphere is less than 1 kg/sec, and Neptune's dipole is aligned with the spin axis and located close to the center of the planet. The criterion for Neptune to be a quiescent magnetosphere is defined by the expenditure of less than 10 to the 9th Watts from all power sources.

Dessler, A. J.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Interior structure of Neptune - Comparison with Uranus

Measurements of rotation rates and gravitational harmonics of Neptune made with the Voyager 2 spacecraft allow tighter constraints on models of the planet's interior. Shock measurements of material that may match the composition of Neptune, the so-called planetary 'ice', have been carried out to pressures exceeding 200 gigapascals (2 megabars). Comparison of shock data with inferred pressure-density profiles for both Uranus and Neptune shows substantial similarity through most of the mass of both planets. Analysis of the effect of Neptune's strong differential rotation on its gravitational harmonics indicates that differential rotation involves only the outermost few percent of Neptune's mass.

Hubbard, W. B.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Plasma observations near Neptune - Results from Voyager 2

Results from observations made by the Plasma Science experiment on Voyager 2 at Neptune are reviewed. The magnetosphere of Neptune is filled with a tenuous plasma, which consists of at least two components: a light ion, probably H(+) and a heavy ion, probably N(+). Triton's atmosphere or ionosphere is thought to be the source of both heavy and light ions. Much of the low energy plasma in the inner magnetosphere is concentrated near the magnetic equator and near closest approach to the planet. The large tilt of the magnetic dipole axis from the rotation axis produces a dynamic magnetosphere which goes from an earthlike configuration to a pole-on configuration and back every 16 hours. The polar cusp regions change location and size as the planet rotates; at the time of the inbound magnetopause crossing, the phase of Neptune's rotation was such that the spacecraft entered the magnetosphere through the southern polar cusp region. Outbound from Neptune observations made in the magnetosheath show a possible signature of diurnal oscillation of the plasma mantle that grows, shrinks, and rocks, in a diurnal cycle. After the encounter with Neptune's magnetosphere, an upstream wave event was observed when the interplanetary magnetic field connected to the bow shock. The low frequency waves observed appear to be a mixture of Alfvenic and/or fast mode waves propagating away from the planet.

Zhang, Ming↗