Evaluation program for secondary spacecraft cells - Acceptance test of McDonnell Douglas, Astropower Division 5.0 ampere- hour silver-zinc cells
Acceptance testing of 5.0 ampere-hour silver zinc secondary spacecraft cells
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Acceptance testing of 5.0 ampere-hour silver zinc secondary spacecraft cells
Acceptance tests of 5.0 ampere-hour silver-zinc cells for spacecraft power supplies
Space shuttle trajectory performance data for east and west test range launch simulations
Low speed wind tunnel tests of subsonic aerodynamic properties of generic high cross range shuttle orbiter
Space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - booster proximity data, Mach number 5
Space Shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - orbiter proximity data, Mach number 5
Space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - booster proximity data, Mach number 3
Space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - orbiter proximity data, Mach number 3
Space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - booster proximity data, Mach number 2
Space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel tests of orbiter and booster vehicles - orbiter proximity data, Mach number 2
The development of an inorganic separator material for use in construction of 40 ampere-hour silver zinc cells is discussed. Acceptance tests were conducted to determine real quality, physical defects and ampere-hour capacity. All acceptance tests were performed at an ambient temperature of 23 to 27 C at existing relative humidity and atmospheric pressure. Of the 63 cells tested, only one failed to meet the equipment specifications.
The results are presented of a wind tunnel test program to determine surface pressures and flow field properties on the space shuttle booster configuration. The tests were conducted in September 1971. Data were obtained at a nominal Mach number of 8 at angles of attack of 40 and 50 deg and at a free stream unit Reynolds number of 3.7 million per foot.
Aerodynamic data obtained from a space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel test are presented. The .00556 scale models of the orbiter and booster configuration were tested in close proximity using dual balances during the time period of April 21 to April 27 1971. Data were obtained for both booster and orbiter over an angle of attack range from -10 to 10 deg for zero degree sideslip angle. The models were tested at several relative incidence angles and separation distances and power conditions. Plug nozzles utilizing air were used to simulate booster and orbiter plumes at various altitudes along a nominal ascent trajectory. Powered conditions were 100, 50, 25 and 0 percent of full power for the orbiter and 100, 50 and 0 percent of full power for the booster. Pitch control effectiveness data were obtained for both booster and orbiter with power on and off. In addition, launch vehicle data with and without booster power were obtained utilizing a single balance in the booster model. Data were also obtained with the booster canard off in close proximity and for the launch configuration.
Heat transfer tests for the delta wing orbiter were conducted in a hypervelocity wind tunnel. A 1.1 percent scale model was tested at a Mach number of approximately 10.5 over an angle of attack range from 10 to 60 degrees over a length Reynolds number range from 5 times 10 to the 6th power to 24 times 10 to the 6th power. Heat transfer results were obtained from model surface heat gage measurements and thermographic phosphor paint. Limited pressure measurements were obtained.
For abstract, see .
A high-speed wind tunnel test was conducted to determine the effect on cruise performance of installing long-duct refan-engine nacelles on the DC-8-50 and -61 models. Drag data and wing/pylon/nacelle channel pressure data are presented. At a typical cruise condition there exists a very small interference drag penalty of less than one-percent of total cruise data for the Refan installation. Pressure data indicate that some supersonic flow is present in the inboard channel of the inboard refan nacelle installation, but it is not sufficient to cause any wave drag on boundary layer separation. One pylon modification, which takes the form of pylon bumps, was tested. It resulted in a drag penalty, because its design goal of eliminating shock-related interference drag was not required and the bump thus became a source of additional parasite drag.
A high speed wind tunnel test has been conducted to determine the effect on cruise drag for installing larger JT8D Refan engine nacelles on the Douglas DC-9. Drag data and wing- and nacelle/pylon/fuselage-channel pressure data are presented. Reduced pylon spares, required to minimize effects of the nacelle installation on low-speed deep stall, were investigated. The reduce span pylons resulted in no adverse interference effects. At typical cruise Mach numbers the measured penalty for the Refan installation was less than estimated due to a favorable effect of the larger entering engine stream tube suppressing the wing upper-surface velocities with subsequent wing compressibility drag reduction. Channel pressures show no shock waves or boundary layer separations.
A low speed wind tunnel test was conducted to assess the effects of the larger JT8D refan nacelles on the stability and control characteristics of the DC-9-30, with emphasis on the deep stall regime. Deep stall pitching moment and elevator hinge moment data, and low angle of attack tail-on and tail-off pitching moment data are presented. The refan nacelle was tested in conjunction with various pylons of reduced span relative to the production DC-9-30 pylon. Also, a horizontal tail that was larger than the production tail was tested. The data show that the refan installation has a small detrimental effect on the DC-9-30 deep stall recovery capability, that recovery characteristics are essentially independent of pylon span, and that the larger horizontal tail significantly increases recovery margins. The deep stall characteristics with the refan installation, within the range of pylon spans tested, are acceptable with no additional design changes anticipated.