Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Mars mission”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Mars 2024/2026 Pathfinder Mission: Mars Architectures, Systems, and Technologies for Exploration and Resources Project

Integrate In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) sub-systems and examine advanced capabilities and technologies to verify Mars 2024 Forward architecture precursor pathfinder options: Integrated spacecraft/surface infrastructure fluid architecture: propulsion, power, life support center dot Power system feed and propellant scavenging from propulsion system center dot High quality oxygen for life support and EVA Fluid/cryogenic zero-loss transfer and long-term storage center dot Rapid depot-to-rover/spacecraft center dot Slow ISRU plant-to-ascent vehicle Integration of ISRU consumable production center dot Oxygen only from Mars atmosphere carbon dioxide center dot Oxygen, fuel, water, from extraterrestrial soil/regolith Test bed to evaluate long duration life, operations, maintenance on hardware, sensors, and autonomy

Technology Portfolio System↗

The Moon as a Stepping Stone to Human Mars Missions

Human space mission designers stretching back to von Braun and beyond have envisioned the moon as a waypoint to the more challenging missions to Mars. The moon is seen as a potential proving ground for technologies, equipment and operations, and a venue upon which to learn the art of surface exploration. Mars missions are years in duration with very limited Earth return opportunities, but the moon provides the opportunity to perfect exploration concepts while being only a few days from Earth. Though the environment and gravity differ from Mars, and will thereby not provide a perfectly analogous environment, the remoteness, limited logistics, and harsh conditions on the Moon provide an environment that can be used to stress many systems that will be used or will be extensible to hardware and operations that will be used on Mars. This paper begins by describing the systems, or options for systems, that together comprise a human Mars architecture. With this human Mars operational concept as a basis of comparison, each of these systems is analyzed in the context of a range of potential exploration missions that first targets lunar exploration experience, examining how the lunar experience can be best used to prepare for the eventual human mission to Mars. The paper concludes with a concise summary of specific areas that have the strongest applicability between exploration experience on the lunar surface and extensibility to human Mars exploration.

Connolly, John F.↗

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This presentation was made at the “COSPAR Planetary Protection Knowledge Gaps for Human Missions to Mars” virtual workshop. As the workshop title implies, the presentation is intended to explain basic features of current human Mars surface mission scenarios being analyzed by NASA. The specific scenario details described is documented in HEOMD-415 “Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization.” Other workshop presentations will expand on details related to scientific investigations that could have planetary protection impacts.

Mars↗

Environmental Assurance Program for the Phoenix Mars Mission

The Phoenix Mars mission involves delivering a stationary science lander on to the surface of Mars in the polar region within the latitude band 65 deg N to 72 deg N. Its primary objective is to perform in-situ and remote sensing investigations that will characterize the chemistry of the materials at the local surface, subsurface, and atmosphere. The Phoenix spacecraft was launched on August 4, 2007 and will arrive at Mars in May 2008. The lander includes a suite of seven (7) science instruments. This mission is baselined for up to 90 sols (Martian days) of digging, sampling, and analysis. Operating at the Mars polar region creates a challenging environment for the Phoenix landed subsystems and instruments with Mars surface temperature extremes between -120 deg C to 25 deg C and diurnal thermal cycling in excess of 145 deg C. Some engineering and science hardware inside the lander were qualification tested up to 80 deg C to account for self heating. Furthermore, many of the hardware for this mission were inherited from earlier missions: the lander from the Mars Surveyor Program 2001 (MSP'01) and instruments from the MSP'01 and the Mars Polar Lander. Ensuring all the hardware was properly qualified and flight acceptance tested to meet the environments for this mission required defining and implementing an environmental assurance program that included a detailed heritage review coupled with tailored flight acceptance testing. A heritage review process with defined acceptance success criteria was developed and is presented in this paper together with the lessons learned in its implementation. This paper also provides a detailed description of the environmental assurance program of the Phoenix Mars mission. This program includes assembly/subsystem and system level testing in the areas of dynamics, thermal, and electromagnetic compatibility, as well as venting/pressure, dust, radiation, and meteoroid analyses to meet the challenging environment of this mission.

thermal testing↗

The Effect of Forebody Geometry on Turbulent Heating and Thermal Protection System Sizing for Future Mars Mission Concepts

Past Mars entry missions have made extensive use of 70° sphere-cone forebody heatshields. This shape was chosen for its aerodynamic stability during direct entry, either ballistic or low L/D trajectories. Historic missions, including Viking in 1976, Pathfinder in1997, and Mars Rover in 2004, have provided a large aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic database for the70° sphere-cone shape that perpetuates continued use for future Mars missions. Using 3D Real-Gas Navier-Stokes simulations, we show that once turbulent heating occupies a significant portion of the mission trajectory, undesirable aerothermodynamic properties arise associated with the 70° sphere-cone heatshield geometry. As an additional consideration, the pitch angle to achieve high L/D of a Mars aerocapture trajectory mitigates the stability justification for the 70° sphere-cone. This suggests that alternative forebody geometries should be considered for future Mars missions.

Aeroheating↗

Entry, Descent, and Landing for Human Mars Missions

One of the most challenging aspects of a human mission to Mars is landing safely on the Martian surface. Mars has such low atmospheric density that decelerating large masses (tens of metric tons) requires methods that have not yet been demonstrated, and are not yet planned in future Mars missions. To identify the most promising options for Mars entry, descent, and landing, and to plan development of the needed technologies, NASA's Human Architecture Team (HAT) has refined candidate methods for emplacing needed elements of the human Mars exploration architecture (such as ascent vehicles and habitats) on the Mars surface. This paper explains the detailed, optimized simulations that have been developed to define the mass needed at Mars arrival to accomplish the entry, descent, and landing functions. Based on previous work, technology options for hypersonic deceleration include rigid, mid-L/D (lift-to-drag ratio) aeroshells, and inflatable aerodynamic decelerators (IADs). The hypersonic IADs, or HIADs, are about 20% less massive than the rigid vehicles, but both have their technology development challenges. For the supersonic regime, supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) is an attractive option, since a propulsive stage must be carried for terminal descent and can be ignited at higher speeds. The use of SRP eliminates the need for an additional deceleration system, but SRP is at a low Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in that the interacting plumes are not well-characterized, and their effect on vehicle stability has not been studied, to date. These architecture-level assessments have been used to define the key performance parameters and a technology development strategy for achieving the challenging mission of landing large payloads on Mars.

Munk, Michelle M.↗

Mission profiles for human Mars missions

Strategies for round-trip missions to Mars with stopover are reviewed. The significant characteristics of the two main classes of stopover mission, whose midpiont corresponds either to the date of earth-Mars conjuction or opposition, are described. Strategies for round-trip flybys, fast round trips, and split missions are also considered. The latter involves a separate, prior mission in which cargo is sent to Mars.

Lineberry, Edgar C.↗

A preliminary analysis of advanced life support systems for manned Mars missions

This paper outlines the key parameters of the manned mission to Mars and presents some top-level requirements, issues, and constraints associated with a manned Mars mission that impact the life support system (LSS). Results are presented of a preliminary analysis for advanced LSSs based on physical/chemical reclamation processes, using as a baseline for the analysis the mission profile of a Split-Sprint class mission for an arrival date at Mars in the year 2009. Special attention is given to the potential cost savings as measured by reducing Mars spacecraft mass in LEO.

Wercinski, Paul F.↗

Interplanetary Mission Design Handbook: Earth-to-Mars Mission Opportunities and Mars-to-Earth Return Opportunities 2009-2024

This paper provides information for trajectory designers and mission planners to determine Earth-Mars and Mars-Earth mission opportunities for the years 2009-2024. These studies were performed in support of a human Mars mission scenario that will consist of two cargo launches followed by a piloted mission during the next opportunity approximately 2 years later. "Porkchop" plots defining all of these mission opportunities are provided which include departure energy, departure excess speed, departure declination arrival excess speed, and arrival declinations for the mission space surrounding each opportunity. These plots are intended to be directly applicable for the human Mars mission scenario described briefly herein. In addition, specific trajectories and several alternate trajectories are recommended for each cargo and piloted opportunity. Finally, additional studies were performed to evaluate the effect of various thrust-to-weight ratios on gravity losses and total time-of-flight tradeoff, and the resultant propellant savings and are briefly summarized.

George, L. E.↗

Influence of interplanetary trajectory selection on Earth atmospheric entry velocity of Mars missions

Many current manned Mars mission studies are using low lift-to-drag ratio vehicles to aerobrake at both Mars and Earth. This paper will demonstrate that if entry velocity constraints are incorporated into the interplanetary analysis of aerobraking Mars missions, more opportunities can be achieved for only a small increase in initial mass in low-Earth orbit (IMLEO). These additional opportunities result from varying the initial launch date and the encounter dates and possibly using a powered Venus swingby on either the inbound or outbound transfer. This paper not only presents unconstrained entry velocity missions but also includes results for entry velocities below 12.5 and 14 km/s on Earth return and between 6.0-8.5 km/s at Mars arrival. The results indicate that, regardless of the Mars entry velocity range selected, an Earth entry velocity below 14 km/s is easily attainable for a minimal IMLEO increase. Although there are fewer 12.5 km/s Earth entry velocity missions possible, both Mars entry velocity constraint cases have over 50 percent of their missions requiring a negligible IMLEO increase.

Striepe, Scott A.↗

Humans to Mars, but How Many? Trade Space Analyses for Mars Mission Crew Size

Missions to Mars will differ from previous human spaceflight missions in that the crew of astronauts will be required to operate in an Earth-independent manner due to the long communication delays. Without a systematic, repeatable process to determine the number and composition of crew necessary to successfully accomplish these missions, NASA increases the risk that crew sizes may be too small to meet primary mission objectives under nominal conditions and, more consequentially, that crewmembers may not have the expertise needed to successfully respond to unforeseen failures without the real-time expertise of the Mission Control Central (MCC) team NASA currently relies upon. The NASA Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) developed a methodology for assessing the trade space of factors that affect the number of crew for Mars missions based on human performance and expertise modeling. This methodology includes the consideration of results from three human performance models developed using the Improved Performance Research and Integration Tool (IMPRINT) modeling platform as well as a custom-built model on expertise trained within the crew based on NASA’s crew qualification and responsibilities matrix (CQRM). We present example model results and discuss implications on trade space analyses for Mars mission crew size.

Mars Mission↗

Optimizing Parking Orbits for Roundtrip Mars Missions

A roundtrip Mars mission presents many challenges to the design of a transportation system and requires a series of orbital maneuvers within Mars vicinity to capture, reorient, and then return the spacecraft back to Earth. The selection of a Mars parking orbit is crucial to the mission design; not only can the parking or-bit choice drastically impact the ΔV requirements of these maneuvers but also it must be properly aligned to target desired surface or orbital destinations. This paper presents a method that can optimize the Mars parking orbits given the arrival and departure conditions from heliocentric trajectories, and it can also en-force constraints on the parking orbits to satisfy other architecture design requirements such as co-planar subperiapsis descent to planned landing sites, due east or co-planar ascent back to the parking orbit, or low cost transfers to and from Phobos and Deimos.

Qu, Min↗

The Effect of a Mars Mission on Chromosome Damage in the Blood Lymphocytes of Astronauts

The radiation environment encountered during a manned mission to Mars will lead to significant elevation of biological damage in astronauts. Here we present estimates of the increased frequencies of chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of astronauts after a hypothetical Mars mission using radiation dose estimations and lymphocyte biology. Results will incorporate previously published data on in vivo induced chromosome damage in the blood lymphocytes of crewmembers after ISS and Mir missions, along with recent findings on the time dependant decay of chromosome aberrations after space flight.

George, Kerry A.↗

Medical Systems Engineering to Support Mars Mission Crew Autonomy

Human spaceflight missions to Mars face exceptionally challenging resource limitations that far exceed those faced before. Increasing transit times, decreasing opportunity for resupply, communications challenges, and extended time to evacuate a crew to definitive medical care dictate a level of crew autonomy in medical care that is beyond the current medical model. To approach this challenge, a medical systems engineering approach is proposed that relies on a clearly articulated Concept of Operations and risk analysis tools that are in development at NASA. This paper proposes an operational clinical model with key terminology and concepts translated to a controls theory paradigm to frame a common language between clinical and engineering teams. This common language will be used for design and validation of an exploration medical system that is fully integrated into a Mars transit vehicle. This approach merges medical simulation, human factors evaluation techniques, and human-in-the-loop testing in ground based analogs to tie medical hardware and software subsystem performance and overall medical system functionality to metrics of operational medical autonomy. Merging increases in operational clinical autonomy with a more restricted vehicle system resource scenario in interplanetary spaceflight will require an unprecedented level of medical and engineering integration. Full integration of medical capabilities into a Mars vehicle system may require a new approach to integrating medical system design and operations into the vehicle Program structure. Prior to the standing-up of a Mars Mission Program, proof of concept is proposed through the Human Research Program.

Antonsen, Erik↗

Mars Rover/Sample Return (MRSR) Mission: Mars Rover Technology Workshop

A return to the surface of Mars has long been an objective of NASA mission planners. The ongoing Mars Rover and Sample Return (MRSR) mission study represents the latest stage in that interest. As part of NASA's preparation for a possible MRSR mission, a technology planning workshop was held to attempt to define technology requirements, options, and preliminary plans for the principal areas of Mars rover technology. The proceedings of that workshop are presented.

Source record↗

Lunar and Planetary Science XXXV: Mars Missions

The session "Mars Missions" included the following reports:Future Planetary Surface Imager Development by the Beagle 2 Stereo Camera System Team; Localization, Localization, Localization; Preliminary Assessment of Mars Exploration Rover Landing Site Predictions; Spirit at Gusev Crater: Preliminary Observations, Potential Processes and Hypotheses; MER Field Geologic Traverse in Gusev Crater, Mars: Initial Results From the Perspective of Spirit; Coordinated Observations of Aeolian Features from the Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) and the Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera and Other Orbiters; Soil and Rock Physical Properties at the Mars Exploration Rover Landing Sites: Early Returns; Transient Liquid Water as a Mechanism for Induration of Soil Crusts on Mars; First Results of the Athena Microscopic Imager Investigation; APXS on Mars: Analyses of Soils and Rocks at Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum; Mars Exploration Rover Panoramic Camera Multidimensional Analyses and Surface Spectral Variability ; Hematite at Meridiani Planum: Detailed Spectroscopic Observations and Testable Hypotheses; Maussbauer Spectroscopy of Soils and Rocks at Gusev Crater and Meridiani Planum; and Student Interns Work on Mars.

Source record↗