Sulfur studies on lithium sulfur dioxide batteries
Studies investigating the chemistry of the lithium SO2 batteries are described.
Dey, A. N.↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Lithium sulfur”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Lithium-sulfur battery with high sulfur loading
A lithium-sulfur battery cathode including conductive porous carbon particles vacuum infused with sulfur and a conductive collector substrate to which the sulfur infused porous carbon particles are deposited. The sulfur infused carbon particles are encapsulated by an encapsulation polymer, the encapsulation polymer having ionic conductivity, electronic conductivity, polysulfide affinity, or combinations thereof. A lithium-sulfur battery including the lithium-sulfur battery cathode, a lithium anode and an electrolyte disposed between the sulfur cathode and the lithium anode is also provided. Methods of producing the sulfur cathode for use in a lithium-sulfur battery by a hybrid vacuum-and-melt method are also provided.
Henslee, Brian E.↗
The Role of Functionalized Conducting Polymer Binders in Improving Power Density and Cycle Life of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Lithium-Sulfur batteries are promising as the next-generation of low-cost, high-energy rechargeable batteries. However, the commercialization of this battery has been limited by poor rate capability and cycle life. To improve the performance of Li-S cells, we have investigated the role of two n-dopable conducting polymers, N2200 and N2200-OE, as binders for the sulfur cathode. The electron and ion transport properties of these polymer binders, along with their strong affinity for polysulfides, results in significantly enhanced performance compared to cells with the traditional insulating PVDF binder. The role of these conducting polymer binders in enhancing the performance of the cells is analyzed using impedance spectroscopy, shuttle current measurements, conductivity measurements, UV–vis spectroscopy, GIWAXS studies and post-cycling analysis of the anodes. The conducting polymer binders reduce the cell impedance by a factor of four leading to a marked improvement in rate capability. The shuttling of the polysulfides and the formation of insoluble sulfides at the anode is curtailed by the interaction of the polysulfides with the backbone of the polymer binders, leading to an impressive capacity retention of 82% after 500 cycles. These studies demonstrate the benefit of tailored polymer binders at the sulfur electrode in addressing the limitations of lithium-sulfur batteries.
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
Lithium-sulfur battery with lithium polysulfide catholyte
A liquid catholyte for a Li-S battery comprises a non-aqueous solution of at least one lithium polysulfide of formula Li 2 S x (wherein x is selected from 4, 6, and 8) and an anion receptor compound capable of complexing with polysulfide anion. The non-aqueous solution typically is composed of the Li 2 S x and the anion receptor compound dissolved in a non-aqueous solvent (e.g., one or more organic ether or fluorinated ether solvents). The anion receptor compound typically is present in the catholyte at a concentration of about 0.1 M to about 4 M. Li-S batteries comprise a metallic lithium anode; a porous conductive substrate; a separator membrane between the anode and the porous conductive substrate; and the liquid catholyte composition within pores of the substrate.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Effect of Antagonistic Binder–Catalyst Interactions on Catalytic Activity in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are a promising next-generation energy storage solution, as they can reduce reliance on critical transition metals while offering high energy densities. However, their deployment is hindered by low sulfur utilization and the formation/diffusion of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). While transition-metal catalysts and polymeric binders have been independently developed to enhance redox kinetics and LiPS adsorption, their mutual compatibility has remained largely unexplored. We show here that binder-catalyst interactions can significantly impact catalytic performance. Employing TiO 2 as a generic catalyst, the electrochemical performance is shown to depend strongly on the binder environment. TiO 2 paired with lithiated polyacrylic acid (LiPAA) shows benign interactions, resulting in enhanced cycle life. In contrast, pairing TiO 2 with protonated PAA produces antagonistic interactions that hinder Li 2 S growth. A mechanistic analysis unveils that the carboxylic H atom in PAA promotes COO − coordination to Ti sites, occupying catalytic centers and suppressing LiPS adsorption, increasing charge transfer and diffusion resistances. This phenomenon is observed across multiple catalysts, indicating that COOH-functionalized binders may broadly hinder catalytic activity. Overall, this study underscores the need for holistic cathode design and identifies binder-catalyst compatibility as an important parameter for high-performance Li-S batteries.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Comprehensive Characterization of Multi-Phase Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Cathodes for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) is considered one of the most promising cathode materials to overcome the operational challenges that plague lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. However, material properties and electrochemical performance implications of SPAN prepared under different synthesis conditions are not yet fully investigated. In this study, we show the impacts of different synthesis conditions on the formation of sulfur to PAN bonds and redox reaction mechanisms of multi-phase SPAN via comprehensive material and electrochemical characterizations. In-situ Raman analysis was first applied to study the multi-phase SPAN-based Li-S cells. We found that both elemental sulfur and chemically bonded sulfur are present under the synthesis condition of 300 degree C/3 h along with unreacted PAN. The incompletely sulfurized, multi-phase SPAN exhibited an unusually rapid capacity degradation in the resultant Li-S cells, which is attributed to polysulfide formation and continuously growing interfacial impedance in the Li-S cells. On the other hand, SPAN samples prepared under the synthesis condition of 350 degree C/3 h are found completely sulfurized with chemically bonded sulfur to the PAN backbone without the presence of free elemental sulfur. Complete sulfurization of SPAN led to exceptionally stable cycle performance due to excellent reversible redox processes of chemically bonded sulfur with Li+ in the Li-S cells.
DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION,ENERGY STORAGE↗
In-situ ionothermal synthesis of nanoporous carbon/oxide composites: A new key to functional separators for stable lithium-sulfur batteries
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) with high energy density are promising for energy storage. However, conventional polypropylene-based separator cannot avoid polysulfides shuttling which impedes the practical application of LSBs. Herein, an in-situ ionothermal synthesis strategy that concurrently applies ionic liquid as the solvent, template and high-yield carbon source is proposed for the facile preparation of nanoporous carbon/oxide composite separator modifiers. The composites exhibit features of high polarity, self doping, oxygen vacancy, heteroatom doping, abundant defects and high electronic conductivity. Theoretical and experimental studies suggest that the composites can efficiently trap and convert polysulfides for high-performance LSBs. Indeed, in the composite-modified LSBs with next-generation roll-to-roll dry-processed high-loading sulfur cathodes, enhanced performance is achieved, revealing the effectiveness of the composites as functional materials towards separator modification. Therefore, the proposed strategy and its delivered nanoporous composites exhibit excellent versatility and practicality for high-performance LSBs.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Electrochemically Stable High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Lithium-Sulfur batteries (LSB) have emerged as one of the strong contenders for high energy density rechargeable batteries in the Li-ion battery domain. The LSB system is considered as the most promising to achieve the next milestone in energy density of 500 Wh/kg. However, the LSB system is plagued with problems of polysulfide formation which are soluble in the organic electrolyte leading to loss in capacity and eventual cell failure. The problem is further compounded by dendrite formation on the Li anode during electrochemical cycling leading to puncturing of the separator causing eventual short-circuiting of the cell and consequent heat generation resulting in major safety hazards of flammability of the organic liquid electrolyte and impending explosion. This chapter describes various approaches developed to combat both cathode and anode issues. These involve synthesis and characterization of complex framework materials (CFMs) for confining the polysulfides and sulfur in the LSB cathodes. The CFMs include a CFM host and a coating applied to the CFM host, which includes one or more form of an electronic conductor, a lithium-ion conductor and a functional electrocatalyst for electrocatalytically converting the soluble polysulfides to Li 2 S. Further, sulfur is infiltrated into the CFM host creating a sulfur-carbon linkage serving as effective anchors for trapping the ensuing polysulfides. The systems have been tested in coin cells and pouch cells with metallic Li anodes under lean electrolyte conditions of 3-4 μl/mg of electrolyte (E) to sulfur (S) ratios showing promise and feasibility. New emergent dendrite-free alloys have also been identified to test against pure Li and CFM cathodes in coin cell and pouch cell configurations under lean electrolyte conditions. Results of these studies are described and discussed with thoughts on future directions.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Design Strategies Based on Electronic Interactions for Effective Catalysts in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered promising next‐generation batteries due to their high energy density (>500 W h kg −1 ). However, LSBs exhibit an unsatisfactory energy density (<400 W h kg −1 ) and cycle life (<300 cycles) because of the shuttle effect caused by soluble lithium polysulfide (LiPS) intermediates and the sluggish conversion reaction kinetics caused by insulating sulfur (S 8 ) and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S). Although various types of catalysts, including metal‐based compounds to single‐atom catalysts, have been reported to address these issues, most catalysts exhibited limited catalytic activity under practical lean electrolyte conditions (<5 µL mg −1 ). A comprehensive understanding of the synthetic strategy and catalytic mechanism of catalysts is essential for their design, but understanding the electronic effects of the catalysts and LiPS is more important. Furthermore, the electronic design of these catalysts is not well understood. In this review, we introduce the catalytic mechanisms in LSBs and discuss catalyst design strategies in terms of electronic effects on the interactions between reactants and catalysts, with a primary focus on heterogeneous catalytic systems. We additionally consider how the electronic property of homogeneous systems, particularly redox mediators, affects catalytic behavior under lean electrolyte conditions and propose future research directions for catalyst development in LSBs.
Chemistry↗
Super p-sulfur cathodes for quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur-batteries
Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries have become a promising candidate to meet the current energy storage demand, with its natural abundance of materials, high theoretical capacity of 1672 mAhg-1, high energy density of 2600 Whkg-1, low cost and lower environmental impact. Sulfide based solid state electrolytes (SSEs) have received greater attention due to their higher ionic conductivity, compatible interface with sulfur-based cathodes, and lower grain boundary resistance. However, the interface between SSEs and cathodes has become a challenge in all solid-state Li-S batteries due to the rigidity of the participating surfaces. A hybrid electrolyte containing SSE coupled with a small amount of ionic liquid, was essential to improve the interface contact of the SSE with the electrodes. Coating-based cathodes were successfully fabricated using water-based carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solution and Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) as the binder with low sulfur loading (0.70 mgcm-2) as well as high sulfur loading (4.0 mgcm-2). Solid-state composite powder-based cathodes pressed onto SSE (loading 4.0 mgcm-2) with enhanced electronic and ionic conductivity were fabricated with Super P: Sulfur (SP:S) and SSE. Ionic Liquids (IL) prepared using Lithium bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) as salt, with premixed pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethyl sulfonyl)imide (PYR) as solvent and 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) as diluent were used to wet both SSE-electrode interfaces. The effect of IL dilution, co-solvent amount, LiTFSI concentration, C rate at which the batteries are tested and the effect of SSE inside the cathode, were systematically studied and optimized to develop a quasi-solid-state electrolyte Li-S battery (QSSLSB) with higher capacity retention and cyclability. LiTFSI (2M) dissolved in PYR:DOL(1:1) found to be optimum IL combination for low sulfur loading QSSLSBs reaching 500 mAh/g after 100 cycles while LiTFSI (3M) in PYR:DOL(1:3) was the optimum IL concentration for higher loading QSSLSBs reaching 400 mAh/g after 100 cycles. This work reports promising results of QSSLSB based on novel Li6PS5F0.5Cl0.5 Li-argyrodite solid-state electrolyte (SSE) with minute amount of IL, Super P-Sulfur (SP:S) cathode, and Li-anode. It also offers a new insight into the intimate interfacial contacts between the SSE and carbon-sulfur cathodes, which will be critical for improved electrochemical performance of quasi-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with high sulfur loading in the future.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile for High-Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: In-Depth Computational Approach Revealing Multiple Sulfur’s Reduction Pathways and Hidden Li + Storage Mechanisms for Extra Discharge Capacity
Like no other sulfur host material, polyacrylonitrile-derived sulfurized carbon (SPAN) promises improved electrochemical performance for lithium–sulfur batteries, based on its compatibility with carbonate solvents and ability to prevent self-discharge and shuttle effect. However, a complete understanding of the SPAN’s lithiation mechanism is still missing because its structural features vary widely with synthesis conditions, and its electrochemical performance deviates from elemental sulfur. This study continues our research on the elucidation of the SPAN’s structural characteristics and lithiation mechanisms via computational approaches. Here, our models reproduce most experimental data regarding carbon’s graphitization level and conjugated ordering, sulfur–carbon covalent bonding, sulfur loading, and elemental composition. Our simulations emulate the discharge voltage observed in experiments for the first discharge, which reveals that sulfur follows multiple reduction pathways based on its interaction with the carbon backbone. Sulfur reduction takes place above 1.0 V vs Li/Li + mostly in the SPAN-like material, with no long-chain lithium polysulfide formation. Below 1.0 V vs Li/Li + , the backbone’s electrochemical activity occurs via multiple C–Li and N–Li interactions, mostly with edge carbon atoms and pyridinic nitrogen. Moreover, we identify Li + binding sites throughout the graphitized backbone that might lead to prohibited energy costs for Li + deintercalation, which may explain the irreversible capacity loss between the first and second discharges. This work improves understanding of lithiation mechanisms in sulfurized carbon, which is useful for rationally designing SPAN synthesis pathways tailored to increase sulfur loading and enhanced electrochemical performance.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Understanding Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Formation at the Lithium Metal Anode of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are one of the most promising chemistries for the next generation of energy storage devices. In a standard Li-S cell, the metallic lithium anode is an essential component of the battery due to its low density, extremely high theoretical specific capacity, and very low negative electrochemical potential. However, several challenges related to the use of Li metal have prevented this battery technology from becoming commercially available. For instance, Li-anodes are highly reactive, which results in the continuous decomposition of the electrolyte and the formation of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer. This, combined with the non-uniform deposition of Liions during plating at the anode surface, can seriously affect the performance, cycling, and safety of the battery. In addition, it has been suggested that a controlled SEI formation at the metallic Li anode can yield enhanced battery performance. Hence, a comprehensive understanding of how the SEI layer is formed can help elucidate improvements in this battery technology. In this work, the formation of the SEI layer in Li-S batteries is investigated using density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations. The stability of liquid organic-based electrolyte components, salt concentration, electron-rich environments, and the use of inorganic solid-state electrolyte (SSE) materials are explored in order to provide molecular-level fundamental insights into how the nature and composition of the electrolyte can alter the initial stages of the SEI formation. The products of electrolyte decomposition and electro-/chemical reaction pathways of liquid electrolyte component such as solvent and salts are predicted from AIMD simulations of electrolyte-anode interfaces. Energetics of reactions from DFT ground-state optimizations are also presented to confirm the decomposition mechanisms. Some significant differences are then drawn regarding the use of low and high salt concentrations. Simulations under electron-rich environments show additional multielectron electrochemical reactions of solvent and salt decomposition taking place due to the excess of electrons and the presence of radical anions in the solution. Finally, the initial stages of formation, stability, and main constituents of interfaces between Li-metal and Sbased electrodes with sulfide-based SSEs are characterized in detail.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Anode‐Free Lithium–Sulfur Cells Enabled by Rationally Tuning Lithium Polysulfide Molecules
Abstract The two major barriers of practical lithium–sulfur batteries are the poor reversibility of lithium‐metal anode and sluggish kinetics of sulfur cathode. Here, we report a simple yet cogent, molecular tailoring approach for lithium polysulfides, enabling a synergistic enhancement of anode reversibility and cathode kinetics. We show that SnI 4 coordinates with lithium polysulfides to form soluble complexes, resulting in a Li 2 SnS 3 ‐rich anode interphase layer. As Li 2 SnS 3 is stable against parasitic reactions and has a lower ionic resistance over cycling, the Li plating/stripping efficiency is greatly improved. In addition, the formation of soluble complexes between SnI 4 and lithium polysulfides play a non‐negligible role in suppressing the clustering behavior of lithium polysulfide molecules, resulting in a significant enhancement in sulfur conversion kinetics under lean electrolyte conditions. The synergistic improvement is validated in anode‐free, lean‐electrolyte pouch cells with a Li 2 S cathode that displays capacity retention of 78 % after 100 cycles.
Ren, Yuxun↗
Anode-Free Lithium–Sulfur Cells Enabled by Rationally Tuning Lithium Polysulfide Molecules
The two major barriers of practical lithium–sulfur batteries are the poor reversibility of lithium-metal anode and sluggish kinetics of sulfur cathode. Here, we report a simple yet cogent, molecular tailoring approach for lithium polysulfides, enabling a synergistic enhancement of anode reversibility and cathode kinetics. In this study, we show that SnI 4 coordinates with lithium polysulfides to form soluble complexes, resulting in a Li 2 SnS 3 -rich anode interphase layer. As Li 2 SnS 3 is stable against parasitic reactions and has a lower ionic resistance over cycling, the Li plating/stripping efficiency is greatly improved. In addition, the formation of soluble complexes between SnI 4 and lithium polysulfides play a non-negligible role in suppressing the clustering behavior of lithium polysulfide molecules, resulting in a significant enhancement in sulfur conversion kinetics under lean electrolyte conditions. The synergistic improvement is validated in anode-free, lean-electrolyte pouch cells with a Li 2 S cathode that displays capacity retention of 78 % after 100 cycles.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Scalable Metal Phosphides as a Dual-Function Catalyst and Lithium–Metal Stabilizer for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Although lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising approach for achieving high energy density, their commercial viability is limited by poor sulfur redox kinetics, polysulfide shuttling, and lithium metal instability. To resolve these issues concurrently, we utilize titanium phosphides (TiP x ) as dual-function materials to catalyze the sulfur redox kinetics at the cathode and stabilize the lithium metal at the anode. Importantly, these phosphides are synthesized via a facile, highly scalable one-step mechanochemical ball-milling process that does not generate toxic phosphine gas as a byproduct, making it more viable compared to traditional synthesis routes. At the cathode, we find that higher phosphorus contents in the phosphide as in TiP 2 leads to superior redox kinetics and reduced polysulfide shuttling due to improved polysulfide adsorption ability. Meanwhile, at the anode, TiP 2 acts as a lithiophilic seed in a 3-dimensional carbonaceous host that can be lithiated to form a Li-TiP 2 /C composite. This composite alleviates the volume changes of lithium metal while utilizing TiP 2 to form a more favorable solid-electrolyte interface (SEI). Full coin cells employing TiP 2 in the cathode and anode were assembled with a sulfur loading of 4 mg cm -2 and a negative to positive capacity (N/P) ratio of 6. After 50 cycles, the TiP 2 full cells retain a higher capacity of 643 mA h g -1 compared to 422 mA h g -1 for the conventional cell, despite the higher N/P ratio of 12 for the conventional cell. Altogether, we showcase the viability of employing metal phosphides as catalysts in practical lithium-sulfur batteries.
25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
Phloroglucinol–2,6‐Diaminoanthraquinone as a Durable Redox Mediator for Enhancing Conversion Reaction Kinetics in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries
Abstract Lithium‐sulfur batteries, despite being a promising solution for next‐generation secondary batteries, require substantial efforts to overcome the challenges of sluggish sulfur redox kinetics, polysulfides shuttling, and Li metal instability before achieving practical viability. Conventional strategies that utilize metal catalysts or soluble redox mediators (RMs) are limited by either impractical producing processes or unsatisfactory service life. Herein, an electrochemically active organic material, phloroglucinol – 2,6‐diaminoanthraquinone (PG‐DAAQ) is synthesized through a green and facile polymerization process to better resolve these issues. Serving as an RM at the cathode, PG‐DAAQ exhibits enduring redox activity within the sulfur operating potential window, leading to enhanced redox kinetics and sulfur utilization. Remarkably, even without any metal elements, PG‐DAAQ exhibits an excellent affinity to polysulfides, thereby suppressing the shuttling and facilitating the formation of a more favorable solid‐electrolyte interface to stabilize Li deposition at the anode. As a result, Li‐S cells employing PG‐DAAQ show significantly enhanced cycling and rate performances than the control cells. Even with a low electrolyte‐to‐sulfur ratio of 6, pouch cells with PG‐DAAQ deliver a reversible discharge capacity of 821 mA h g −1 after 100 cycles at a C/10 rate.
Lai, Tianxing↗