Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “KESTREL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

36 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1998

Cooperation Among Theorem Provers

In many years of research, a number of powerful theorem-proving systems have arisen with differing capabilities and strengths. Resolution theorem provers (such as Kestrel's KITP or SRI's SNARK) deal with first-order logic with equality but not the principle of mathematical induction. The Boyer-Moore theorem prover excels at proof by induction but cannot deal with full first-order logic. Both are highly automated but cannot accept user guidance easily. The purpose of this project, and the companion project at Kestrel, has been to use the category-theoretic notion of logic morphism to combine systems with different logics and languages.

Waldinger, Richard J.↗
NASA NTRS2004

On-Orbit Software Analysis

The On-Orbit Software Analysis Research Infusion Project was done by Intrinsyx Technologies Corporation (Intrinsyx) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center (ARC). The Project was a joint collaborative effort between NASA Codes IC and SL, Kestrel Technology (Kestrel), and Intrinsyx. The primary objectives of the Project were: Discovery and verification of software program properties and dependencies, Detection and isolation of software defects across different versions of software, and Compilation of historical data and technical expertise for future applications

Moran, Susanne I.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Computational Component Build-Up for the X-57 Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft

A computational study of the wing for the distributed electric propulsion X-57 Maxwell airplane configuration at cruise and takeoff/landing conditions was completed. Three unstructured-mesh, Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics methods, FUN3D, USM3D and Kestrel, were used to predict the performance buildup of components to the full X-57 configuration. The goal of the X-57 wing and distributed electric propulsion system design was to meet or exceed the required lift coefficient of 3.95 for a stall speed of 58 knots. The X-57 Maxwell airplane was designed with a small, high aspect ratio cruise wing that was designed for a high cruise lift coefficient of 0.75 at a cruise speed of 150 knots and altitude of 8,000 ft, with an angle of attack of approximately 0deg. The computational data indicates that the X-57 full aircraft drag would meet the cruise drag goal with a 25 count drag margin. The cruise configuration maximum lift coefficient is 2.07 and without including the stabilator is 1.86 at an angle of attack of 14 deg, predicted with the USM3D flow solver using the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. The maximum lift coefficient for the high-lift wing (with the 30deg flap deflection) without the stabilator contribution is 2.60 at an angle of attack of 13 deg. For high-lift blowing conditions with 13.7 hp/prop, the maximum lift coefficient excluding the stabilator is 4.426 at (alpha) = 13 deg. Therefore, the lift augmentation from the high-lift propellers is 1.7 and the total lift augmentation from the high-lift system (30 deg flap deflection and the high-lift blowing) is 2.38. The drag for the high-lift wing with 30 deg flap deflection is much higher than the cruise wing configuration, but the high-lift system is used only during a small portion of the flight envelope. The pitching moment is relatively constant for both blown and unblown conditions when the stabilator is excluded. Modeling the full geometry has indicated some adverse effects from the fuselage on the wing and stabilator. At high angles of attack, the solutions with the USM3D flow solver using the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model indicates large flow separation on the wing upper surface between the two high-lift nacelles near the fuselage, and also a reduction in sectional lift on the stabilator in the first 50 percent of the stabilator semispan. However, the large flow separation near the fuselage is mostly eliminated in the solutions predicted with two codes, USM3D and Kestrel, using Hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation turbulence models.

Deere, Karen A.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Unstructured Grid Development for the Space Launch System Liftoff and Transition Lineloads Computational Analysis

Production of aerodynamic lineloads databases for the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle at Liftoff and Transition (LOT) conditions has required the development of a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) workflow capable of producing high-quality solutions for this unique phase of flight. Aerodynamic considerations included a wide range of flow angles (from 0°up to 90°total angle of attack), resulting leeside separation, and interaction effects between the three bodies of the integrated SLS vehicle, as well as the nearby launch tower. Computational mesh development for similar problems at the NASA Langley Research Center (such as for the Constellation/Ares launch vehicles) has primarily relied on in-house tools such as VGRID/POSTGRID, with grids designed for NASA-developed and maintained flow solvers such as USM3D and FUN3D. The workflow for such problems has evolved over the development of the various SLS configurations to incorporate new tools such as the Heldenpatch/Heldenmesh grid generator (Helden Aerospace) and CREATE-AV Kestrel (US Department of Defense) flow solver. This paper describes efforts to benchmark a grid generation approach for LOT problems using Heldenpatch/Heldenmesh and Kestrel, verified against prior best practices from VGRID/POSTGRID. Parameters studied include surface grid density, first-layer viscous cell height, and volume grid growth rate parameters. Resulting solutions are compared based on total force and moment values, sectional line loads, and surface pressures, all validated against existing wind tunnel aerodynamic databases where available for the SLS Block 1B Cargo configuration.

Space launch systems↗
NASA NTRS2024

Computational Techniques to Generate Space Launch System Aerodynamic Databases

This document describes the reasoning and trade studies used to evaluate tools for constructing the aerodynamic lineload databases for the liftoff and transition phases of flight for the Space Launch System. Three computational fluid dynamics codes (USM3D, FUN3D, Kestrel) were investigated with various turbulence models, as well as detached eddy simulation variants for the launch vehicle in free air and in proximity to the tower. Decisions were made mostly based on results from brief developmental studies performed in response to specific, unforeseen challenges that were encountered in the analysis of a given configuration. The need to develop databases in a timely manner, as well as accurately capture the expected leeward-wake flowfield characteristics, led to the selection of the Kestrel flow solver with its delayed detached eddy simulation method, the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model, and the adaptive mesh refinement capability in the off-body Cartesian grid region.

Karen A. Deere↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

RANS Predictions of Inlet/Isolator Unstart at Mach 4

This paper describes several approaches to back pressuring an inlet/isolator model at Mach 4.0 and the differences in unstart predictions using common RANS simulation methods. The CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel were used for this work. Verification and validation was conducted on a relevant shock-wave-boundary-layer-interaction case with both solvers. Using aftmounted back pressure flaps did not produce a stable pre-combustion shock train. An unstart comparison between CFD codes OVERFLOW and CREATE-AV Kestrel as well as common 2-equation turbulence models was conducted with numerical back pressure. Unstart predictions using a novel louver back pressure mechanism was done with OVERFLOW. There is notable differences in shock train travel and predicted unstart limit due to turbulence modeling, temporal resolution, and use of the 2D simplification.

CFD↗
NASA NTRS2014

Comparison of Computational Approaches for Rapid Aerodynamic Assessment of Small UAVs

Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) methods were used to determine the basic aerodynamic, performance, and stability and control characteristics of the unmanned air vehicle (UAV), Kahu. Accurate and timely prediction of the aerodynamic characteristics of small UAVs is an essential part of military system acquisition and air-worthiness evaluations. The forces and moments of the UAV were predicted using a variety of analytical methods for a range of configurations and conditions. The methods included Navier Stokes (N-S) flow solvers (USM3D, Kestrel and Cobalt) that take days to set up and hours to converge on a single solution; potential flow methods (PMARC, LSAERO, and XFLR5) that take hours to set up and minutes to compute; empirical methods (Datcom) that involve table lookups and produce a solution quickly; and handbook calculations. A preliminary aerodynamic database can be developed very efficiently by using a combination of computational tools. The database can be generated with low-order and empirical methods in linear regions, then replacing or adjusting the data as predictions from higher order methods are obtained. A comparison of results from all the data sources as well as experimental data obtained from a wind-tunnel test will be shown and the methods will be evaluated on their utility during each portion of the flight envelope.

Shafer, Theresa C.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Characterizing Aerodynamic Damping of a Supersonic Missile with CFD

Time accurate solutions of the Euler and Navier{Stokes equations are used as an approach to elucidate aerodynamic coefficients that include rigid body motion effects. The Army-Navy Finner geometry is used for work flow development due to its simple shape, inexpensive grid generation, and available literature that include aerodynamic damping derivatives obtained from ight test, wind tunnel tests, and computational fluid dynamics. Supersonic conditions for pitch and roll damping include angles of attack up to 90 deg. Aerodynamic responses due to rigid body maneuvers with prescribed wind incidence angles and body rates are computed using the DoD CREATE Kestrel and NASA FUN3D flow solvers. First, reference numerical and experimental results provide validation of aero- dynamic damping terms computed by traditional periodic motion in roll and pitch. Next, individual, impulse motion inputs provide the canonical responses for general input-output modeling based on classical superposition and convolution concepts. Finally, simultaneous impulse excitation of all inputs provides an efficient system identification training scenario for accurate aerodynamic model construction in state space via the NASA Sys- tem/Observer/Controller Identification Toolbox.

Shelton, Andrew↗
NASA NTRS2019

Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods Used in the Development of the Space Launch System Liftoff and Transition Lineloads Databases

The objective of this paper is to document the reasoning and trade studies that supported the selection of appropriate tools for constructing aerodynamic lineload databases for the Liftoff and Transition phases of flight for launch vehicles. These decisions were made amid the maturation of an evolving workflow for generating databases on variants of the Space Launch System launch vehicle, with most being based on results from brief developmental studies performed in response to specific, unforeseen challenges that were encountered in analyzing a given configuration. This report is intended to provide a summary of the results and the decision-making processes chronologically over the design cycles of various configurations, starting with isolated free-air bodies for the Block 1 Crew, then the Block 1B Crew and Cargo configurations, and most recently the Block 1B Crew configuration in proximity to the launch tower. The results from these analyses led to the selection of the CREATE-AV Kestrel flowsolver for simulating these problems. The need to accurately capture the expected leeward-wake flow field characteristics required the use of Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES) method, for which the vorticity magnitude was employed as the solution Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) function over the off-body Cartesian grid region. In addition, the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model is used to account for the flow turbulence effects.

Ratnayake, Nalin A.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Generation of a Reduced-Order Model of an Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Using Indicial Response Functions

Within the NATO STO AVT-251 Task Group, a generic Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle (UCAV) planform was redesigned based on requirements derived from parts of the flight envelope of the defined mission. Because of the lambda-shape planform and associated flow phenomena including shocks and vortices, the aerodynamic design process relies heavily on high-fidelity predictions from computational fluid dynamics (CFD). These simulations enable accurate flight dynamics predictions, allowing for the identification of any potential performance issues early in the design process. Potentially, a complete flight dynamics model can be derived from CFD calculations provided that the underlying reduced order model (ROM) captures the underlying physics contained within the CFD results. This work investigates the creation of a nonlinear ROM using indicial response functions. The response functions are obtained using a grid motion approach that separates the effects of angle of attack and pitch rate. This approach is demonstrated using three different CFD codes from various organizations: ENSOLV at Royal Netherlands Aerospace Centre, USM3D at NASA Langley Research Center, and Kestrel at the United States Air Force Academy. ROM predictions were generated for a manoeuver resembling a low-speed pull-up. The predictions are found to be sensitive to the quality of the steady-state solutions from which step-response calculations were started, as well as the convergence of the step responses themselves. Nevertheless, the indicial response method is shown to provide aerodynamic predictions with acceptable accuracy including transient effects, and as such is a promising method for computationally efficient flight dynamics predictions.

Michel P.C. van Rooij↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Influence of Computer Architecture on Performance and Scaling for Hypersonic Flow Simulations

It is critical to understand how hypersonic simulation tools perform on a range of computational platforms. This information will aid in the acquisition of appropriate hardware and the potential refactoring of hypersonic codes to run on different systems. In this paper, we consider two representative high-speed reacting flow cases: a model Mach 8 hypersonic waverider glide vehicle and a model hydrocarbon-fueled hypersonic ramjet propulsion system. In both scenarios, the flow fields are in chemical non-equilibrium and are modeled by the multi-species reacting Navier-Stokes equations. For these simulations we use several hypersonic simulation tools, including US3D, Kestrel, FUN3D, and the JENRER© flow solver. We explore several high performance computing systems containing IntelR© XeonR© Platinum processors, AMD EPYCTM7702 processors, and NVIDIAR© Tesla V100 devices. We compare performance and strong scaling between the different systems.

CPU↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Performance of Coupled Physics Solvers for Multidisciplinary Hypersonic Flow Simulations on Several Classes of Computer Architectures

The application of hypersonic flow simulation tools to realistic flight scenarios will require the coupling of multiple physical effects to the baseline fluid dynamics. Such multiphysics effects can include the aerooelastic response of the airframe or engine components, dynamic transport of atmospheric particles, the deformation of solid-fluid interfaces that can ablate, pyrolyze, or erode, as well as a host of other processes, all of which are governed by unique sets of physical equations and models. Coupling multiple (and potentially disparate) physics solvers to a robust compressible flow solver poses additional challenges related to the stability, performance and scalability of the combined solver. The choices made during the software design process can therefore lead to a variation in simulation efficiency across different computer architectures. In this paper, we will consider two representative multiphysics hypersonic flow scenarios: the interaction of solid particulates with the flow field created by a hypersonic lifting body and the aerooelastic deformation of a model airframe under high-Mach-number flow conditions. For these simulations we explore the behavior of several hypersonic simulation tools, including Kestrel, FUN3D, US3D, and JENRE multiphysics framework, on several high performance computing systems containing various CPU and GPU architectures.

architecture↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of NASA Langley Low-Speed CFD Contributions to the Space Launch System Program

In this review paper, low-speed computational work from NASA Langley in support of the Space Launch System (SLS) is discussed. This information includes both historic and present efforts with the Kestrel CFD solver. The low-speed aerodynamics of SLS is highly complex and analysis of the unsteady flowfield requires significant computational efforts. The SLS mission profile varies from the vehicle static on the launch pad through high-speed ascent, and this paper focuses on the prelaunch as well as liftoff and transition portions of the flight both in proximity to the launch tower and in isolation. High-alpha conditions, as large as 90~deg, result in a flowfield dominated by massive, large-scale flow separation and asymmetric vortices. High-fidelity solutions require an unsteady computational formulation to accurately capture the aerodynamics of the vehicle. A detailed discussion of the computational approach is presented, followed by key efforts to support the program.

Brent W Pomeroy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental and Computational Examination of the Coandă Effect on the Space Launch System at Liftoff Conditions

During development of an aerodynamic database to cover ground wind loads, uncertaintyquantification to account for the Coandă effect forced a closer look into how this phenomenonmanifests on the Space Launch System. Aerodynamic data collected across the life of the pro-gram is explored to look for trends and the ability to characterize not just the bounds of forcesand moments but also better understand their distributions. Experimental data collected inthe NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel is used to explore integrated forces andmoments. This is followed up by a similar exploration using computational data generatedusing the Kestrel flow solver. After a survey of the data at large which confirms the existenceof the Coandă states throughout the history of the program, a few highlighted cases are usedto characterize the flow physics. This characterization is used to summarize how each Coandăstate is predicted to load the vehicle

Coandă Effect↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental and Computational Examination of the Coandă Effect on the Space Launch System at Liftoff Conditions

During development of an aerodynamic database to cover ground wind loads, uncertainty quantification to account for the Coandă effect forced a closer look into how this phenomenon manifests on the Space Launch System. Aerodynamic data collected across the life of the pro-gram is explored to look for trends and the ability to characterize not just the bounds of forces and moments but also better understand their distributions. Experimental data collected in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel is used to explore integrated forces and moments. This is followed up by a similar exploration using computational data generated using the Kestrel flow solver. After a survey of the data at large which confirms the existence of the Coandă states throughout the history of the program, a few highlighted cases are used to characterize the flow physics. This characterization is used to summarize how each Coandă state is predicted to load the vehicle.

Coandă Effect↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Computational Analysis on the Effects of High-lift Propellers and Wingtip Cruise Propellers on X-57 Airplane

This study presents the computational study of the effects of high-lift system and wingtip-mounted cruise propellers on the flow physics and forces and moments of the X-57 Mod III/Mod IV configuration. Results were compared against previously published data on the powered-off configuration to determine the performance benefit. Simulations were performed using four different computational fluid dynamics solvers: STAR-CCM+, Launch Ascent Vehicle Aerodynamics, Kestrel, and USM3D. The high-lift system was shown to increase lift and lift-curve slope of the airplane. Additionally, the high-lift system was shown to increase the maximum lift coefficient and improve flow separation behavior at high anglesof-attack. Wingtip-mounted cruise propellers were shown to decrease the drag of the airplane. Simulation results showed that the drag decreased with increased thrust generated by the wingtip cruise propellers. The primary factor of the decrease in drag was a result of reduction in pressure drag of the wing. At the thrust setting of 230.1 lbf, results showed a reduction of 49-drag counts.

Seung Y. Yoo↗
NASA NTRS2024

Low-Speed Space Launch System Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Comprehensive Overview

In this review paper, low-speed computational work from NASA Langley in support of the Space Launch System (SLS) is discussed. This information includes both historic and present efforts with the Kestrel CFD solver. The low-speed aerodynamics of SLS is highly complex and analysis of the unsteady flowfield requires significant computational efforts. The SLS mission profile varies from the vehicle static on the launch pad through high-speed ascent, and this paper focuses on the prelaunch as well as liftoff and transition portions of the flight both in proximity to the launch tower and in isolation. High-alpha conditions, as large as 90 deg, result in a flowfield dominated by massive, large-scale flow separation and asymmetric vortices. High-fidelity solutions require an unsteady computational formulation to accurately capture the aerodynamics of the vehicle. A detailed discussion of the computational approach is presented, followed by key efforts to support the program, both historic and present, including information which has been either previously published or that has never before published external to NASA.

Brent Pomeroy↗