Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Interplanetary Small Satellite”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Inflatable Antenna for CubeSat: A New Spherical Design for Increased X-Band Gain

Interplanetary CubeSats and small satellites have potential to provide means to explore space and to perform science in a more affordable way. As the goals for these spacecraft become more ambitious in space exploration, the communication systems currently implemented will need to be improved to support those missions. One of the bottlenecks is the antennas’ size, due to the close relation between antenna gain and dimensions. Hence, a possible solution is to develop inflatable antennas which can be packaged efficiently, occupying a small amount of space, and they can provide, once deployed, large dish dimension and correspondent gain. A prototype of a 1 m inflatable antenna for X-Band has been developed in a joint effort between JPL and ASU. After initial photogrammetry tests and radiation tests, it was discovered that the design was not able to meet the required gain. As a result, a new design, based on a spherical inflatable membrane, is proposed. This new design will allow reaching a more stable inflatable surface, hence improving the electromagnetic performance. This paper will detail the principle challenges in developing this new antenna focusing on: design, EM analysis, fabrication and tests.

Babuscia, Alessandra↗
NASA NTRS2020

Small Business Launches Down-to-Earth Products via NASA SBIR Program

Through the SBIR program, DSSP developed a multi-pulse solid rocket motor for NASA that will enable stabilized interplanetary flight for small satellites. Another of DSSP’s core innovations with roots in the SBIR program is already having an even greater impact. Originally proposed to fuel a microsatellite thruster for Earth-observation missions, DSSP’s HAN-based green electric monopropellants (GEM and AF-M315E) technology is powering larger satellites, enhancing downhole oil and gas recovery, and much more. Highly insensitive to ignition by spark, flame, or shock, GEM-based innovations are stable, non-toxic, and more controllable than conventional propellants.

Bruce R Cogan↗
DOE OSTI2024

CubeSat Interplanetary Exploration: A Deep Dive into Nuclear Propulsion and Astrodynamics for Small Satellites

CubeSats are small satellites most commonly used by universities, however, nowadays places like NASA are looking to CubeSats for interplanetary missions. Because of their universal form fit it makes them cost effective, economical, and therefor desirable for deep space. To achieve deep space exploration, we must explore the applications of propulsion and astrodynamics on small satellites. This paper will touch on one scaling Ion and chemical propulsion as well as nuclear kilo reactors. Two choreographing a flight path for these small satellites and lastly designing an efficient cost-effective platform for CubeSats to get to deep space territory.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS2014

Small Spacecraft System-Level Design and Optimization for Interplanetary Trajectories

The feasibility of an interplanetary mission for a CubeSat, a type of miniaturized spacecraft, that uses an emerging technology, the CubeSat Ambipolar Thruster (CAT) is investigated. CAT is a large delta-V propulsion system that uses a high-density plasma source that has been miniaturized for small spacecraft applications. An initial feasibility assessment that demonstrated escaping Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and achieving Earth-escape trajectories with a 3U CubeSat and this thruster technology was demonstrated in previous work. We examine a mission architecture with a trajectory that begins in Earth orbits such as LEO and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) which escapes Earth orbit and travels to Mars, Jupiter, or Saturn. The goal was to minimize travel time to reach the destinations and considering trade-offs between spacecraft dry mass, fuel mass, and solar power array size. Sensitivities to spacecraft dry mass and available power are considered. CubeSats are extremely size, mass, and power constrained, and their subsystems are tightly coupled, limiting their performance potential. System-level modeling, simulation, and optimization approaches are necessary to find feasible and optimal operational solutions to ensure system-level interactions are modeled. Thus, propulsion, power/energy, attitude, and orbit transfer models are integrated to enable systems-level analysis and trades. The CAT technology broadens the possible missions achievable with small satellites. In particular, this technology enables more sophisticated maneuvers by small spacecraft such as polar orbit insertion from an equatorial orbit, LEO to GEO transfers, Earth-escape trajectories, and transfers to other interplanetary bodies. This work lays the groundwork for upcoming CubeSat launch opportunities and supports future development of interplanetary and constellation CubeSat and small satellite mission concepts.

Spangelo, Sara↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Low-Thrust Transfer to Interplanetary Trajectories from Lunar Trajectories with Rideshare

Accessing interplanetary space is challenging when using low thrust systems. Injecting spacecraft onto interplanetary trajectories is difficult with small launch vehicles, but it is possible to instead transfer to an interplanetary trajectory from a lunar flyby. Such cases are useful, for example, in rideshares between lunar and interplanetary missions. This work examines the problem of rideshare for small satellites onto lunar flyby trajectories, with transfers to an interplanetary trajectory. Low thrust interplanetary trajectories are examined starting from a rideshare mission on a lunar trajectory using delivery systems based on a modified Rocket Lab USA Electron vehicle and Photon stage.

Darcey R Graham↗
NASA NTRS2015

Solar Sail Propulsion for Interplanetary Cubesats

NASA is developing two small satellite missions as part of the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Program, both of which will use a solar sail to enable their scientific objectives. Solar sails use sunlight to propel vehicles through space by reflecting solar photons from a large, mirror‐like sail made of a lightweight, highly reflective material. This continuous photon pressure provides propellantless thrust, allowing for very high (Delta)V maneuvers on long‐duration, deep space exploration. Since reflected light produces thrust, solar sails require no onboard propellant. Solar sail technology is rapidly maturing for space propulsion applications within NASA and around the world.

Johnson, Les↗
NASA NTRS2017

Exospheric Escape: A Parametrical Study

The study of exospheres can help us understand the long-term loss of volatiles from planetary bodies due to interactions of planets, satellites, and small bodies with the interplanetary medium, solar radiation, and internal forces including diffusion and outgassing. Recent evidence for water and OH on the Moon has spurred interest in processes involving chemistry and sequestration of volatile species at the poles and in voids. In recent years, NASA has sent spacecraft to asteroids including Vesta and Ceres, and ESA sent Rosetta to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and the asteroids Lutetia and Steins. Japan's Hayabusa spacecraft returned a sample from asteroid Itakowa, and OSIRIS-REX will return a sample from a primitive asteroid, Bennu, to Earth. In a surface-bounded exosphere, the gases are derived from the surface and thus reflect the composition of the body's regolith, although not in a one-to-one ratio. Observation of an escaping exosphere, termed a corona, is challenging. We have therefore embarked on a parametrical study of exospheres as a function of mass of the exospheric species, mass of the primary body and source velocity distribution, specifically thermal (Maxwell-Boltzmann) and sputtering. The goal is to provide a quick look to determine under what conditions and for what mass of the primary body the species of interest are expected to be bound or escaping and to quickly estimate the observability of exospheric species. This work does not provide a comprehensive model but rather serves as a starting point for further study. These parameters will be useful for mission planning as well as for students beginning a study of planetary exospheres.

Volatilels↗
NASA NTRS2017

Exospheric Escape: A Parametrical Study

The study of exospheres can help us understand the long-term loss of volatiles from planetary bodies due to interactions of planets, satellites, and small bodies with the interplanetary medium, solar radiation, and internal forces including diffusion and outgassing. Recent evidence for water and OH on the Moon has spurred interest in processes involving chemistry and sequestration of volatile species at the poles and in voids. In recent years, NASA has sent spacecraft to asteroids including Vesta and Ceres, and ESA sent Rosetta to comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko and the asteroids Lutetia and Steins. Japan's Hayabusa spacecraft returned a sample from asteroid Itakowa, and OSIRIS-REX will return a sample from a primitive asteroid, Bennu, to Earth. In a surface-bounded exosphere, the gases are derived from the surface and thus reflect the composition of the body's regolith, although not in a one-to-one ratio. Observation of an escaping exosphere, termed a corona, is challenging. We have therefore embarked on a parametrical study of exospheres as a function of mass of the exospheric species, mass of the primary body and source velocity distribution, specifically thermal (Maxwell-Boltzmann) and sputtering. The goal is to provide a quick look to determine under what conditions and for what mass of the primary body the species of interest are expected to be bound or escaping and to quickly estimate the observability of exospheric species. This work does not provide a comprehensive model but rather serves as a starting point for further study. These parameters will be useful for mission planning as well as for students beginning a study of planetary exospheres.

Exospheres↗
NASA NTRS2015

NEA Scout and Lunar Flashlight: Two NearTerm Interplanetary CubeSat Missions

NASA is developing two small satellite missions as part of the Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Program, both of which will use a solar sail to enable their scientific objectives. Solar sails reflect sunlight from a large, mirror‐like sail made of a lightweight, highly reflective material to provide thrust. This continuous photon pressure provides propellantless thrust, allowing for very high delta V maneuvers in space. Lunar Flashlight, managed by the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, will search for and map volatiles in permanently shadowed lunar craters using a solar sail as a gigantic mirror to steer sunlight into them, then examine the reflected light with a spectrometer. The Lunar Flashlight spacecraft will also use the solar sail to maneuver into a lunar polar orbit. The mission will demonstrate a low‐cost capability to explore, locate and estimate the size and composition of ice deposits on the Moon. The Near Earth Asteroid (NEA) Scout mission, managed by the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center will survey and image a Near Earth Asteroid for possible future human exploration using a smallsat propelled by a solar sail. Detections of NEAs are expected to grow in the near future, offering increasing target opportunities. Obtaining and analyzing relevant data about these bodies via robotic precursors before committing a crew to visit them is essential. The NEA Scout spacecraft is nearly identical to the one being developed for Lunar Flashlight, with the science instrument package being the primary difference. The NEA Scout solar sail will provide the primary propulsion taking the 6U cubesat from near the Earth to its final asteroid destination and the Lunar Flashlight sail will provide the propulsion necessary for its spacecraft to enter lunar orbit. Both projects will use an 85 m2 solar sail developed by NASA MSFC. The NEA Scout and Lunar Flashlight flight systems are based on a 6U cubesat form factor, with a stowed envelope of 10 x 20 x 30 cm and a mass of less than 12 kg. The solar sail for NEA Scout and Lunar Flashlight will be based on the technology developed and flown by the NASA NanoSail‐D and The Planetary Society's Lightsail‐A. Four 7 m stainless steel booms wrapped on two spools (two overlapping booms per spool) will be motor deployed and pull the sail from its stowed volume. The sail material will be 3 micron CP1, an aluminized polyimide that was extensively tested for solar sail applications. The sail will spooled rather than Z‐folded. This paper will describe both the Lunar Flashlight and NEA Scout missions and their solar sails.

Johnson, Les↗
NASA NTRS1991

Balancing reliability and cost to choose the best power subsystem

A mathematical model is presented for computing total (spacecraft) subsystem cost including both the basic subsystem cost and the expected cost due to the failure of the subsystem. This model is then used to determine power subsystem cost as a function of reliability and redundancy. Minimum cost and maximum reliability and/or redundancy are not generally equivalent. Two example cases are presented. One is a small satellite, and the other is an interplanetary spacecraft.

Suich, Ronald C.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Balancing reliability and cost to choose the best power subsystem

The justification of the increased cost of a more reliable power subsystem is discussed. A mathematical model is presented for computing total spacecraft subsystem cost including both the basic subsystem cost and the expected cost due to the failure of the subsystem. This is then used to determine the power subsystem cost as a function of reliability and redundancy. Minimum cost and maximum reliability and/or redundancy are not generally equivalent. Two example cases are presented. One is a small satellite, and the other is an interplanetary spacecraft.

Suich, Ronald C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Low Leakage Valves for Long Duration Missions

I.Nomenclaturemtypical_mission=internal mass of propellant lost over the course of a mission with Qtypicalmmission_goal=mass of propellant loss over the course of a mission with Qgoaltmission=theoretical mission durationQtypical=internal leakage rate found in commercially available valvesQgoal=internal leakage rate design goalρH2_STP=density of hydrogen at standard temperature and pressure.1NASA AST, Liquid Propulsion Valve Engineer.Valves, Actuators, and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14)2NASA AST, Liquid Propulsion Valve Engineer.Valves, Actuators, and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14)3NASA AST, Liquid Propulsion Valve Engineer (Retired).Valves, Actuators, and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14)4JSEG ESSCA, Engineering Specialist.Valves Actuators and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14)5NASA AST, Liquid Propulsion Valve Engineer.Valves, Actuators, and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14)6JSEG ESSCA, Valve Design and Development Engineer.Valves Actuators and Ducts Design and Development Branch (ER14) II.IntroductionCurrent aerospace cryogenic valves present challenges to potential long duration missions that utilize cryogenic propellants. Small interplanetary and long-life communication satellites typically utilize hypergolic propellants that operate at higher temperatures, making it easier to achieve very low internal leakage rates. Larger vehicles for long duration missions will likely need to utilize cryogenic-based chemical and nuclear systems to achieve mission requirements. Some early propulsion concepts are projected to require valves with a nominal size ranging from 3” to 10”.Currently available cryogenic aerospace valves typically have internal leakage rates which can range from 100 to 300 SCIM for 3” valves, or upwards of 2,000 SCIM for 10” valves. With just a few of these valves in a system, internal leakage could account for multiple tons of propellant loss over the course of a potential Mars mission, as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1 - Potential Propellant Loss Over the Course of a Long Duration MissionMost internal leakage rates can be attributed to inherent imperfections and misalignments, which result in imperfect contact between sealing surfaces, as shown in Figure 2.Figure 2 - Imperfections and Misalignments Between Sealing Surfaces The ER14 Branch at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has created a self-aligning seat and poppet design (shown in Figure 3) that allows a valve to be more tolerant of imperfect contacts. This design utilizes a metallic poppet head with five degrees of freedom that allows the poppet toself-align with the seat, reducing the need for tight tolerances.Figure 3 - Self-Aligning Seat and Poppet DesignIII.Test Valve DescriptionA series of development tasks have been conducted to study potential improvements to internal leakage rates. These tasks include 3 test valves (shown in Figure 4) to demonstrate the potential application to various configurations and sizes:A 3” isolation valve for liquid flows (similar to a fill and drain valve)A 3” relief valve for low temperature gas flows.An 8” pre-valve (similar to the engine isolation valve needed on a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) engine).Figure 4 - Low Leakage Development Test ValvesThese valves have been developed and are currently being tested at liquid nitrogen (LN2) temperatures, and are anticipated to undergo testing at liquid hydrogen (LH2) temperatures in late 2022

Cody L Gilliland↗
NASA NTRS1971

1971 Aeronautics and Space Highlights

These highlights include Mariner orbit of Mars, Interplanetary Monitoring Platform, Orbiting Solar Observatory, small scientific satellite, sounding rockets, Stratoscope 11, earth resources, aeronautics, jet noise abatement, airport runway safety, Apollo 14 and 15, and Skylab.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA's Space Launch System: Deep-Space Delivery for SmallSats

Designed for human exploration missions into deep space, NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) represents a new spaceflight infrastructure asset, enabling a wide variety of unique utilization opportunities. While primarily focused on launching the large systems needed for crewed spaceflight beyond Earth orbit, SLS also offers a game-changing capability for the deployment of small satellites to deep-space destinations, beginning with its first flight. Currently, SLS is making rapid progress toward readiness for its first launch in two years, using the initial configuration of the vehicle, which is capable of delivering more than 70 metric tons (t) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO). On its first flight, an uncrewed test of the Orion spacecraft into distant retrograde orbit around the moon, accompanying Orion on SLS will be 13 small-satellite secondary payloads, which will deploy in cislunar space. These secondary payloads will include not only NASA research, but also spacecraft from industry and international partners and academia. The payloads also represent a variety of disciplines including, but not limited to, studies of the moon, Earth, sun, and asteroids. The Space Launch System Program is working actively with the developers of the payloads toward vehicle integration. Following its first flight and potentially as early as its second, SLS will evolve into a more powerful configuration with a larger upper stage. This configuration will initially be able to deliver 105 t to LEO, and will continue to be upgraded to a performance of greater than 130 t to LEO. While the addition of the more powerful upper stage will mean a change to the secondary payload accommodations from those on the first launch, the SLS Program is already evaluating options for future secondary payload opportunities. Early discussions are also already underway for the use of SLS to launch spacecraft on interplanetary trajectories, which could open additional opportunities for small satellites. This presentation will include an overview of the SLS vehicle and its capabilities, including the current status of progress toward first launch. It will also explain the opportunities the vehicle offers for small satellites, including an overview of the CubeSat manifest for Exploration Mission-1 in 2018 and a discussion of future capabilities.

Robinson, Kimberly F.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Research in space science and technology

Progress in various space flight research programs is reported. Emphasis is placed on X-ray astronomy and interplanetary plasma physics. Topics covered include: infrared astronomy, long base line interferometry, geological spectroscopy, space life science experiments, atmospheric physics, and space based materials and structures research. Analysis of galactic and extra-galactic X-ray data from the Small Astronomy Satellite (SAS-3) and HEAO-A and interplanetary plasma data for Mariner 10, Explorers 47 and 50, and Solrad is discussed.

Beckley, L. E.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Bring'em Back Alive or at Least Carefully

Within the next decade, the world's space agencies plan to launch a variety of robotic spacecraft that will return samples from the surface of Mars, the tail of a comet, the nucleus of a comet, the surface of an asteroid, and the solar wind. Most of these places are not considered likely spots for life, but any mission returning from a location with the potential for harboring life will require special containment and handling because of the possible inclusion of living entities within returned samples. In its 1997 report on sample return from Mars, the Space Studies Board of the National Research Council (NRC) noted that the only risk of significant adverse effects would be from returning a replicating organism. Furthermore, the report noted: 'While the probability of returning a replicating biological entity in a sample from Mars' is judged to be low and the risk of pathogenic or ecological effects is lower still, the risk is not zero. Therefore, it is reasonable that NASA adopt a prudent approach, erring on the side of caution and safety when dealing with returned samples. More recently, a 1998 NRC report on small solar system bodies (asteroids, comets, planetary satellites, and interplanetary dust) recommended a similarly cautious approach for samples returned from anywhere else within the solar system that could have environmental conditions conducive for harboring life. We have not detected life elsewhere in the solar system, at least not yet. Nonetheless, the rationale behind the conservative approach to sample handling is similar to the environmental, health, and safety measures taken on Earth when transporting or handling infectious agents or importing non-native organisms to a new area. Better safe than sorry.

Race, Margaret S.↗