Engineering PapersSearch

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Doppler backscattering”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Best estimate of the planetary boundary layer height from multiple remote sensing measurements

Remote sensing measurements have been widely used to estimate the planetary boundary layer height (PBLHT). Each remote sensing approach offers unique strengths and faces different limitations. In this study, we use machine learning (ML) methods to produce a best-estimate PBLHT (PBLHT-BE-ML) by integrating four PBLHT estimates derived from remote sensing measurements at the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) observatory. Three ML models – random forest (RF) classifier, RF regressor, and light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM) – were trained on a dataset from 2017 to 2023 that included radiosonde, various remote sensing PBLHT estimates, and atmospheric meteorological conditions. Evaluations indicated that PBLHT-BE-ML from all three models improved alignment with the PBLHT derived from radiosonde data (PBLHT-SONDE), with LightGBM demonstrating the highest accuracy under both stable and unstable boundary layer conditions. Feature analysis revealed that the most influential input features at the SGP site were the PBLHT estimates derived from (a) potential temperature profiles retrieved using Raman lidar (RL) and atmospheric emitted radiance interferometer (AERI) measurements (PBLHT-THERMO), (b) vertical velocity variance profiles from Doppler lidar (PBLHT-DL), and (c) aerosol backscatter profiles from micropulse lidar (PBLHT-MPL). The trained models were then used to predict PBLHT-BE-ML at a temporal resolution of 10 min, effectively capturing the diurnal evolution of PBLHT and its significant seasonal variations, with the largest diurnal variation observed over summer at the SGP site. We applied these trained models to data from the ARM Eastern Pacific Cloud Aerosol Precipitation Experiment (EPCAPE) field campaign (EPC), where the PBLHT-BE-ML, particularly with the LightGBM model, demonstrated improved accuracy against PBLHT-SONDE. Analyses of model performance at both the SGP and EPC sites suggest that expanding the training dataset to include various surface types, such as ocean and ice-covered areas, could further enhance ML model performance for PBLHT estimation across varied geographic regions.

Zhang, Damao [Pacific Northwest National Laborator

Merged W-band radar and Ceilometer / Derived Data

The dataset contains the first three moments of radar Doppler spectra from the vertically pointing W-band radar and Ceilometer backscatter and cloud base heights at a uniform temporal and spatial resolution. The radar reflectivity and ceilometer backscatter has been calibrated.

17 WIND ENERGY

Merged W-band Radar and Ceilometer / Derived Data

The dataset contains the first three moments of radar Doppler spectra from the vertically pointing W-band radar and Ceilometer backscatter and cloud base heights at a uniform temporal and spatial resolution. The radar reflectivity and ceilometer backscatter have been calibrated.

17 WIND ENERGY

Detection of multi-modal Doppler spectra – Part 1: Establishing characteristic signals in radar moment data

Vertically pointing millimeter-wavelength radars provide a wealth of information about cloud and precipitation particle properties. Doppler spectral data can inform on how particles of varying vertical velocities contribute to the total backscattered power observed. It is more computationally cost effective to process moment data instead of spectra data, but doing so leaves valuable information on the cutting room floor. To confidently identify a multi-modal spectra event, in which two or more modes are present within a layer, Doppler spectral data are essential. This means long-term identification of layers featuring multi-modal spectra can be cost prohibitive. To address this, we explore three multi-modal spectra cases from winter precipitation events to determine characteristic signatures of these layers in the moment data averaged over short time periods (∼ 145 s) and explore how these layers differ from the rest of the vertical profiles. We find that the mean spectrum width and the standard deviation of mean Doppler velocity can be used to determine whether or not a layer is multi-modal. In particular, multi-modal layers in mixed-phase and ice clouds feature larger mean spectrum width (exceeding 0.17 m s −1 ) and smaller standard deviation of the mean Doppler velocity (below 0.1 m s −1 ). In Part 1 of this study, the identification criteria and methods are described. In Part 2 (Wugofski and Kumjian, 2025), we perform a verification of the method for three years of vertically pointing radar data, and explore the meteorological conditions associated with identified multi-modal spectral events.

Wugofski, Sarah [Pennsylvania State Univ., Univers

Lidar / Raw Data

This dataset contains raw data from the UND scanning Doppler lidar, consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

CACO Site - ANL Scanning Doppler Lidar / Processed Data

This dataset contains processed, standardized data from the ANL scanning Doppler lidar, consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

Lidar / Raw Data

This dataset contains raw data from the UND scanning Doppler lidar, consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

NANT Site - Lidar / Processed Data Reformatted

This dataset contains standardized data from the PNNL scanning Doppler lidar (S/N 184), consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

Lidar / Processed Data

This dataset contains processed, standardized data from the UND scanning Doppler lidar at WFIP3's BARG site, consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

Lidar / Processed Data

This dataset contains processed, standardized data from the UND scanning Doppler lidar at WFIP3's BARG site, consisting of range- and time-resolved measurements of radial velocity, attenuated backscatter, intensity, and spectral width. We note that the beam azimuth angles are NOT referenced to true north.

17 WIND ENERGY

AWAKEN Site A1 HALO XR Lidar (Cornell University) / Raw Data

These data are scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of a HALO XR at AWAKEN site A1. The measurements include calibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY

AWAKEN Site H HALO XR Lidar (Cornell University) / Raw Data

These data are scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of a HALO XR at AWAKEN site H. The measurements include calibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY

PNNL Scanning Lidar (184) / Reviewed data - with calibrated azimuth

These data include scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the PNNL HALO XR+ (s/n 184) at the Nantucket site. The measurements include calibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate. The data are provided in NetCDF.

17 WIND ENERGY

Lidar / Processed Data

These data include scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the PNNL HALO XR+ (s/n 184) at the Nantucket site. The measurements include calibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate. The data are provided in NetCDF.

17 WIND ENERGY

WFIP3 - BARG site - NREL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR+ #235) / Raw Data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the NREL Halo XR+ (s/n 235) at WFIP3's BARG. The raw measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate. Note: the measurements have NOT been corrected for the motion of the barge.

17 WIND ENERGY

AWAKEN Site A1 - NREL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR+ #235) / Raw data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the NREL HALO XR+ (s/n 235) at the A1 site. The raw measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY

AWAKEN Site A1 - NREL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR+ #235) / Processed Data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the NREL HALO XR+ (s/n 235) at the A1 site. The processed measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate.

17 WIND ENERGY

NOAA ship - NREL Scanning Lidar (Halo XR #235) / Raw Data

These data include raw scanning Doppler lidar measurements from the deployment of the NREL Halo XR+ (s/n 235) at WFIP3's NOAA ship. The raw measurements include uncalibrated beam azimuth angles, radial velocity, backscatter, signal to noise ratio per each line of sight, and range-gate. The location of the ship is provided separately.

17 WIND ENERGY