Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Domain decomposition”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Support of domain decomposition-based solvers in Chroma

In multilevel integration, the correlation functions are decomposed into factors that depend only on fields localized into lattice subdomains so that they can be independently integrated. Although the standard formulation of the LQCD action is not local in the presence of fermions, past studies have shown approximations of the quark propagator and the fermionic determinant dependent on the gauge fields within specific subdomains can still be effective. We will present our current progress in supporting domain decomposition within Chroma, which is necessary for multilevel integration approaches. The efforts are focused on extending the code base to efficiently manipulate subdomains for lattice fields and operators and performing inversions and eigendecompositions within domains.

Alcalde, Eloy Romero↗
DOE OSTI2023

An Infinite Domain 3D Poisson Solver Based on the Barnes-Hut Algorithm

We present a domain decomposition method for the solution of the 3D Poisson equation with infinite domain boundary conditions. The method is based on an application of the Barnes-Hut tree particle scheme adapted to gridded data. Long range interactions are computed using the first two terms in the Cartesian multipole expansion of Green’s function convoluted with the charge while short range computations are performed using Hockney’s domain doubling algorithm. A standard domain decomposition strategy requires O(N 2 ) applications of Hockney’s algorithm, where N is the number of subdomains that intersect that charge support, while in the present approach only O(Nlog 2 N) such computations suffice. The discretization scheme employed is a sixth order Mehrstellen approximation of the 3D Laplace opera tor. The method exhibits satisfactory accuracy at a substantially reduced computational cost compared to the full domain decomposition Hockney’s algorithm.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

An Investigation of using FleCSI for Monte Carlo Radiation Transport

This document details the attempt to use FleCSI to provide MPI parallelization and domain decomposition for a Monte Carlo radiation transport application. FleCSI is a framework designed to support multi-physics application development with a focus on task-based parallelism and domain decomposition [1]. FleCSI also supports performance portability via a wrapper around a back-end performance portability layer. The goal of this work is to use FleCSI for domain decomposition and MPI parallelization inside of a Monte Carlo radiation transport application and document any pain points and shortcomings. The following section introduce the nomenclature used in FleCSI and its potential benefit for physics code developers, detail the code used to explore using FleCSI in a Monte Carlo radiation transport solver, and list the issues and concerns discovered during the work.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Adaptive Interface-PINNs (AdaI-PINNs) for inverse problems: Determining material properties for heterogeneous systems

Here, we determine spatially varying discontinuous material properties using a domain-decomposition based physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) framework named the Adaptive Interface-PINNs or AdaI-PINNs (Roy et al., 2024). We propose the use of distinct neural networks for the field variables and material properties within each material, utilizing adaptive activation functions. While the neural networks across different materials share the same weights and biases, their activation functions are uniquely tailored using a hyperparameter that influences the slope of the activation function. The proposed framework is tested on several one-dimensional and two-dimensional benchmark examples, and its performance is compared with conventional PINNs and existing domain-decomposition PINNs frameworks, namely, the Multi-domain physics-informed neural network (M-PINN), and the eXtended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs). The results demonstrate that the proposed approach can determine randomly distributed discontinuous material properties with an L 2 error of $\mathscr{O}$ (10 -3 ) for the material property and the root-mean-square error of $\mathscr{O}$ (10 -3 ) for the primary variable while the other approaches yield errors that are approximately two orders of magnitude larger (that is, $\mathscr{O}$ (10 -1 )). Moreover, the spatial distribution of material properties obtained using the proposed framework is in close agreement with the true distribution, whereas the other approaches fare much worse. Additionally, the proposed approach is approximately 40% faster than its competitors, indicating its potential as a robust alternative for solving inverse problems in heterogeneous materials.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Hybrid Domain Overlapping Method for Coupling System Thermal Hydraulics and CFD Codes

A hybrid multiscale coupling methodology based on a domain overlapping approach has been developed for coupling System Thermal Hydraulics (STH) and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes. The method has been implemented between the modern STH code SAM and the CFD code NekRS, using the coupling tool Cardinal. The coupling aims to extend the STH code's applicability to scenarios where local momentum and energy transfers are important yet difficult for STH codes to capture, such as three-dimensional mixing. Two coupling strategies are implemented and compared: a hybrid domain overlapping method and the conventional domain decomposition method. Here, the strategies are applied to two closed-loop applications, and the present method shows superior stability behavior when compared to the domain decomposition method. Then, the present coupling method is validated against experimental data from a double T-junction experiment. The present STH/CFD coupling shows improved agreement with experimental data when compared to STH standalone simulations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

When Do Extended Physics-Informed Neural Networks (XPINNs) Improve Generalization?

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have become a popular choice for solving high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) due to their excellent approximation power and generalization ability. Recently, extended PINNs (XPINNs) based on domain decomposition methods have attracted considerable attention due to their effectiveness in modeling multiscale and multiphysics problems and their parallelization. However, theoretical understanding of their convergence and generalization properties remains unexplored. In this study, we take an initial step towards understanding how and when XPINNs outperform PINNs. Specifically, for general multilayer PINNs and XPINNs, we first provide a prior generalization bound via the complexity of the target functions in the PDE problem and a posterior generalization bound via the posterior matrix norms of the networks after optimization. Moreover, based on our bounds, we analyze the conditions under which XPINNs improve generalization. Concretely, our theory shows that the key building block of XPINN, namely, the domain decomposition, introduces a tradeoff for generalization. On the one hand, XPINNs decompose the complex PDE solution into several simple parts, which decreases the complexity needed to learn each part and boosts generalization. On the other hand, decomposition leads to less training data being available in each subdomain, and hence such a model is typically prone to overfitting and may become less generalizable. Empirically, we choose five PDEs to show when XPINNs perform better than, similar to, or worse than PINNs, hence demonstrating and justifying our new theory.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗