SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Deep”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Deep Space Network (DSN): Mission Services and Operations Interface for Small Deep Space Missions
No abstract available
Testing and Maturing a Mass Translating Mechanism for a Deep Space CubeSat Mechanism for a Deep Space CubeSat
No abstract available
Results of the Deep Space Atomic Clock Deep Space Navigation Analog Experiment
No abstract provided
Scheduling the NASA Deep Space Network with Deep Reinforcement Learning
No abstract provided
Deep Space Ops for Small Spacecraft; Lecture 2: Challenges of Deep Space
No abstract provided
NASA’s Deep Space Network and the Challenges of Deep Space Communications
No abstract provided
NASA’s Deep Space Network and Plans for Deep Space Optical Communications
No abstract provided
NASA’s Deep Space Network and the Challenges of Deep Space Communications
No abstract provided
Deep Learning for Environmental and Ecological Prediction, Evaluation and Insight With Ensembles of Water Quality (Deep-View)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Deep space communication - A one billion mile noisy channel
Deep space exploration is concerned with the study of natural phenomena in the solar system with the aid of measurements made at spacecraft on deep space missions. Deep space communication refers to communication between earth and spacecraft in deep space. The Deep Space Network is an earth-based facility employed for deep space communication. It includes a network of large tracking antennas located at various positions around the earth. The goals and achievements of deep space exploration over the past 20 years are discussed along with the broad functional requirements of deep space missions. Attention is given to the differences in space loss between communication satellites and deep space vehicles, effects of the long round-trip light time on spacecraft autonomy, requirements for the use of massive nuclear power plants on spacecraft at large distances from the sun, and the kinds of scientific return provided by a deep space mission. Problems concerning a deep space link of one billion miles are also explored.
Influence of ocean surface conditions on atmospheric vertical thermodynamic structure and deep convection
The authors analyze the influence of Sea Surface Temperature (SST) and surface wind divergence on atmospheric thermodynamic structure and the resulting effects on the occurrence of deep convection using National Meteorological Center radiosonde data and International Satellite Cloud Climatology Program data for July 1983-July 1985. The onset of deep convection requires not only the existence of positive convective available potential energy (CAPE), but also an unstable planetary boundary layer (PBL). A stable PBL is observed to suppress deep convection even when CAPE is positive. Variations of SST have a major effect on CAPE, but surface wind divergence can also affect deep convection by changing the lapse rate in the lower troposphere and humidity in the PBL. Specifically, when SST is greater than or equal to 28 C, CAPE is always positive, and surface wind divergence does not qualitatively change the buoyancy profile above the PBL. Strong surface wind divergence, however, stabilizes the PBL so as to suppress the initiation of deep convection. In warm SST regions, CAPE is greater than 0 regardless of assumptions about condensate loading, although the pseudoadiabatic limit is more consistent with the observed deep convection than the reversible moist-adiabatic limit under these circumstances. When SST is less than 27 C, CAPE is usually negative and inhibits convection, but strong surface wind convergence can destabilize the inversion layer and moisten the PBL enough to make the atmosphere neutrally stable in the mean. As a result, deep convection is generally enhanced either when SST is greater than or equal to 28 C in the absence of strong surface wind divergence or when strong surface wind convergence occurs even if SST is less than 27 C. The anomalous suppression of deep convection in the warm area of the equatorial west Pacific lying between the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and south Pacific convergence zone (SPCZ) is probably caused by dryness in the PBL and an inversion in that area. The seasonal cycles of deep convection and surface wind divergence are in phase with the maximum solar radiation and lead SST for one to three months in the central Pacific. The change of PBL relative humidity plays a critical role in the changeover to convective instability in this case. The seasonal change of deep convection and associated clouds seems not to have important effects on the seasonal change of local SST in the central Pacific.
Life Support for Deep Space and Mars
How should life support for deep space be developed? The International Space Station (ISS) life support system is the operational result of many decades of research and development. Long duration deep space missions such as Mars have been expected to use matured and upgraded versions of ISS life support. Deep space life support must use the knowledge base incorporated in ISS but it must also meet much more difficult requirements. The primary new requirement is that life support in deep space must be considerably more reliable than on ISS or anywhere in the Earth-Moon system, where emergency resupply and a quick return are possible. Due to the great distance from Earth and the long duration of deep space missions, if life support systems fail, the traditional approaches for emergency supply of oxygen and water, emergency supply of parts, and crew return to Earth or escape to a safe haven are likely infeasible. The Orbital Replacement Unit (ORU) maintenance approach used by ISS is unsuitable for deep space with ORU's as large and complex as those originally provided in ISS designs because it minimizes opportunities for commonality of spares, requires replacement of many functional parts with each failure, and results in substantial launch mass and volume penalties. It has become impractical even for ISS after the shuttle era, resulting in the need for ad hoc repair activity at lower assembly levels with consequent crew time penalties and extended repair timelines. Less complex, more robust technical approaches may be needed to meet the difficult deep space requirements for reliability, maintainability, and reparability. Developing an entirely new life support system would neglect what has been achieved. The suggested approach is use the ISS life support technologies as a platform to build on and to continue to improve ISS subsystems while also developing new subsystems where needed to meet deep space requirements.
Moss Tolerance of Deep Space-Like Ionizing Radiation, Singular or Combined With Spaceflight Microgravity-Preparation for the BRIC-27 Experiment to the ISS
Understanding how terrestrial life perceives and tolerates deep space environments is essential to advancing human space exploration missions and searching for life beyond our solar system. Throughout evolution moss adapted to living in extreme environments from the edge of habitability. Moss inhabits areas with high UVB/UVC photon levels such as polar regions subject to ozone holes, high elevation mountain environments, and sites with elevated ionizing particle levels such as those found at nuclear plant accident sites, atomic bomb test sites or radioactive element-rich regions. We investigate if moss tolerance of ionizing radiation encounter terrestrially extends to resistance to deep space ionizing radiation. We exposed moss to high energy ion beams simulating Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCRSim) and Solar Particle Event (SPESim) (NSRL, BNL) that permeate deep space, and moss was unharmed. We also exposed moss to high doses of gamma rays as released in astrophysical events, and moss survived absorption of extremely high doses. Next, we ask if moss tolerance of deep space-like ionizing radiation observed terrestrially differs from that in other deep space environments. In the upcoming BRIC-27 spaceflight experiment we will sequentially expose Antarctic moss C.purpureus to GCRSim and SPESim followed by exposure to spaceflight microgravity and compare gene expression profiles in deep space-like ionizing radiation, singular or combined with spaceflight microgravity. Additionally, we will compare gene expression profiles in spaceflight microgravity, singular or combined with deep space-like ionizing radiation. Hence, BRIC-27 will advance our understanding of the combined effects of both deep space ionizing radiation and microgravity, which may have different and more profound effects on plant physiology and performance than each condition separately.
Mass extinctions in the deep sea
The character of mass extinctions can be assessed by studying extinction patterns of organisms, the fabric of the extinction, and assessing the environmental niche and mode of life of survivors. Deep-sea benthic foraminifera have been listed as little affected by the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) mass extinction, but very few quantitative data are available. New data on deep-sea Late Maestrichtian-Eocene benthic foraminifera from Maud Rise (Antractica) indicate that about 10 percent of the species living at depths of 2000 to 2500 m had last appearances within 1 my of the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary, versus about 25 percent of species at 1000 to 1500 m. Many survivors from the Cretaceous became extinct in a period of global deep-sea benthic foraminiferal extinction at the end of the Paleocene, a time otherwise marked by very few extinctions. Preliminary conclusions suggest that the deep oceanic environment is essentially decoupled from the shallow marine and terrestrial environment, and that even major disturbances of one of these will not greatly affect the other. This gives deep-sea benthic faunas a good opportunity to recolonize shallow environments from greater depths and vice versa after massive extinctions. The decoupling means that data on deep-sea benthic boundary was caused by the environmental effects of asteriod impact or excessive volcanism. The benthic foraminiferal data strongly suggest, however, that the environmental results were strongest at the Earth's surface, and that there was no major disturbance of the deep ocean; this pattern might result both from excessive volcanism and from an impact on land.