DOE OSTI2018
Electrocatalytic hydrogenation is a fascinating strategy to hydrogenate biogenic compounds at ambient conditions by replacing the thermal and H2 inputs by cathodic potential. This work compares the performance of this approach (in aqueous phase at room temperature) for a variety of model oxygenated compounds reacted over a series of metals. The target functionalities were carbonyl groups, aromatic rings, and ether bonds. All metals explored (Pt, Rh, Pd, Cu) are active for the reduction of carbonyl compounds to alcohols. For instance, conversion rates of benzaldehyde increased as a function of metal as: Pt < Rh < Pd (Cu was tested at different conditions). In contrast, only Rh and Pt were found active for hydrogenation of aromatic rings (Rh was more active than Pt). Comparing among the target functionalities, carbonyl groups are more reactive than aromatic rings and ether bonds in phenolic compounds and di-aryl ethers on all explore metals. This carbonyl reactivity, however, is enabled by the aromaticity of the molecule. Hence, the reactivity trend of the examined molecules is: butyraldehyde < furfural < acetophenone < benzaldehyde. For phenolic compounds, phenol is more reactive than cresol and methoxy phenol. Thus, the presence of substituting groups at the functionality being converted (either carbonyl or aromatic ring) decreases conversion rates. Ether bonds are cleaved under electrocatalytic conditions, which opens two main pathways for the conversion of aryl ethers: hydrogenation of the aromatic ring and hydrogenolysis of the ether bonds, whereas hydrolysis occurs as a minor pathway. Electrocatalytic hydrogenation competes with the H2 evolution reaction at the conditions of the tests, therefore Faradaic efficiency (fraction of current utilized in hydrogenation) and hydrogenation rates are correlated. That is, within the potential range explored, increasing hydrogenation rates lead to higher Faradaic efficiencies. The slope of this correlation, however, depends on the potential and on the functionality being hydrogenated. Keywords: Hydrogenation, electrocatalysis, metal catalysis, aqueous phase hydrogenation, biomass conversion. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Yang Song, Prof. Johannes Lercher, and the group of Prof. Hubert A. Gasteiger at the Technische Universität München for advice and support. The authors are grateful to Donald M. Camaioni, Nirala Singh, and Juan Herranz for fruitful discussions. The research described in this paper is part of the Chemical Transformation Initiative at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), conducted under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at PNNL, a multi-program national laboratory operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Hydrogenation, electrocatalysis, metal catalysis, ↗