Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “CONICAL NOZZLE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Experimental study of wall boundary layer growth in the 10 deg half angle conical nozzle of a reflected shock tunnel

Calibration studies of shock-tunnel nozzle flow were made in both N2 and Ar for a reservoir temperature of 2000 deg K and reservoir pressures of 15, 85, and 130 atm. The results for both test gases showed that the boundary layer was turbulent and the growth nonlinear, with the thickness being greater in Ar than N2 at comparable reservoir conditions. The boundary-layer thickness decreased with increasing reservoir pressure, but only small differences occurred between the two largest reservoir pressures. Good correlations of the boundary layer and displacement thickness were obtained for both N2 and Ar in terms of Reynolds number based on a reference temperature.

Menees, G. P.↗

Overexpanded Performance of Conical Nozzles with Area Ratios of 6 and 9 With and Without Supersonic External Flow

An investigation of the thrust characteristics and internal pressure distributions of two convergent-divergent 15 deg. half-angle exhaust nozzles having area ratios of 6 and 9 was made in the NASA Lewis 10- by 10-foot supersonic wind tunnel. The tests were conducted at free-stream Mach numbers of 0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 over a range of nozzle pressure ratios from 3 to 105. Attempts were made to induce separation of the overexpanded nozzle flow using secondary airflow and a wedge. Nozzle flow expansion under all free-stream conditions followed one-dimensional theory until separation from the nozzle wall occurred. In quiescent air the nozzle flow expanded to a pressure approximately one-half the base pressure before separation. When the nozzles were tested with supersonic external flow at the same effective pressure ratios, the nozzle flow separated with negligible expansion below the base pressure. The effect of a supersonic stream on internal nozzle flow separation characteristics was well defined only at a free-stream Mach number of 2.0. Thrust data at supersonic free-stream conditions indicate that only a small percentage of the ideal nozzle thrust will be available at nozzle pressure ratios below design. However, the overexpanded primary nozzle thrust loss was decreased by injecting large quantities of secondary air near the nozzle exit. In most cases no net gain in thrust resulted from secondary-air injection when the nozzle thrust was compared with the ideal thrust of both the primary and secondary airflows.

Musial, Norman T.↗

Performance of Several Method-of-Characteristics Exhaust Nozzles

Nozzle performance data were obtained with three "method-of-characteristics" nozzles and a 150 conical nozzle at pressure ratios up to 130. Each basic configuration was cut off and tested at expansion ratios of 25, 20, 15, and 10. Unheated dry air was used at nozzle inlet pressures up to 22,000 pounds per square foot absolute. Nozzle thrust data were extrapolated to infinite pressure ratio (zero discharge pressure). As much as 1-percent increase in thrust with no increase in nozzle surface area (weight), can be obtained by using a method-of-characteristics, nozzle instead of a 15 conical nozzle when operating with a nozzle expansion ratio of 25 and nozzle pressure ratios from 200 to infinity. Conversely, for the same thrust, reductions in nozzle divergent surface area in the order of 25 percent are possible. The thrust performance of the method-of-characteristics nozzle was not as good as that of the 150 conical nozzle when operating at pressure ratios considerably below design (below 100 for the expansion ratio 25 nozzles). Theoretical and measured nozzle momentum coefficients agreed within about 0.6 percent. This is the order of accuracy of both the measured and theoretical values.

Farley, John M.↗

Static source locations for four nozzles mounted on a J-85 engine

The test nozzles included a round 17.5 in. diameter variable flap ejector (VFE) nozzle, a round 'stovepipe' nozzle, and a 104 tube suppressor nozzle operated both with and without an ejector shroud. The velocities tested ranged from 600 to 1600 fps at an approximate total temperature of 1400 R. The axial position of the noise sources during static operation was determined by jet velocity, Strouhal number, and direction of propagation. The velocity dependence was more evident for the 104 tube suppressor nozzle than for the conical nozzles tested. The results for both the VFE conical nozzle and the stovepipe conical nozzle indicate source locations to be much closer to the jet exit plane than expected. Corrections for near field effects were found to differ slightly for each nozzle tested. The corrections presented are simply the differences between the measured near field levels and the required near field levels if spherical spreading is assumed from source to far field.

Hoglund, L. E.↗

A performance comparison of two small rocket nozzles

An experimental study was conducted on two small rockets (110 N thrust class) to directly compare a standard conical nozzle with a bell nozzle optimized for maximum thrust using the Rao method. In large rockets, with throat Reynolds numbers of greater than 1 x 10(exp 5), bell nozzles outperform conical nozzles. In rockets with throat Reynolds numbers below 1 x 10(exp 5), however, test results have been ambiguous. An experimental program was conducted to test two small nozzles at two different fuel film cooling percentages and three different chamber pressures. Test results showed that for the throat Reynolds number range from 2 x 10(exp 4) to 4 x 10(exp 4), the bell nozzle outperformed the conical nozzle. Thrust coefficients for the bell nozzle were approximately 4 to 12 percent higher than those obtained with the conical nozzle. As expected, testing showed that lowering the fuel film cooling increased performance for both nozzle types.

Arrington, Lynn A.↗

Performance of conical jet nozzles in terms of flow and velocity coefficients

Performance characteristics of conical jet nozzles were determined in an investigation covering a range of pressure ratios from 1.0 to 2.8, cone half-angles from 5 degrees to 90 degrees, and outlet-inlet diameter ratios from 0.50 to 0.91. All nozzles investigated had an inlet diameter of 5 inches. The flow coefficients of the conical nozzles investigated were dependent on the cone half-angle, outlet-inlet diameter ratio, and pressure ratio. The velocity coefficients were essentially constant at pressure ratios below the critical. For increasing pressures above critical pressure ratio, there was a small decrease in velocity coefficient that was dependent on pressure ratio and independent of cone half-angle and outlet-inlet diameter ratio. Therefore the variation in performance (air flow and thrust) of several nozzles, selected for the same performance at a particular design condition, was proportional to the ratio of their flow coefficients.

Grey, Ralph E↗

Mixer nozzle aeroacoustic characteristics for the energy efficient engine

Aeroacoustic tests are conducted on scale model mixer nozzle configurations, a separate flow nozzle, and a baseline conical nozzle in an anechoic chamber free-jet facility to investigate exhaust system designs. Far-field acoustic data and exhaust jet plume aerodynamic data are obtained for various combinations of exhaust jet velocity and simulated flight speed, with corrected microphone data at a constant 12.2 m arc distance, and scaled acoustic data at a sideline distance of 457 m. It is found that jet plume aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of lobed mixer exhaust systems are similar to those of a conical nozzle operating at the same specific thrust, although differences occur at high frequencies, where the sound pressure level of the mixer nozzle is 1-5 dB higher than that of a conical nozzle. In addition, no direct correlation is found between exit plane turbulence levels and plume development or acoustic characteristics for mixer exhaust configurations.

Gliebe, P. R.↗

On Characterization of Flow Disturbances in Arc-Jet Testing

This paper reports computational simulations and analysis of flow characterization tests in high enthalpy arc-jet facilities at NASA Ames Research Center. Flow disturbances and their characterization are presented through case studies, and their implications for testing are discussed. The case studies include free-jet test configurations from three different arc heaters and nozzles: the 60-MW IHF 30-inch conical nozzle, the 10-MW TP3 15-inch conical nozzle, and the 20-MW AHF 12-inch conical nozzle. For all cases, test articles are placed in the jet exiting the conical nozzle, and the existence of a flow disturbance is confirmed through flow survey data using pitot pressure and heat flux probes and accompanying analysis. The paper focuses on cases where the effects of the disturbances on test article surface quantities are important. The present analysis comprises computational fluid dynamics simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfield in the facility nozzles and test box, including the models tested. Comparisons of computations with the experimental measurements are presented. The computations that reproduce the probe sweep data approximately are essential to interpret the arc-jet test data accurately, while providing insights into several observed calorimeter anomalies caused by flow disturbances.

Arc-jet testing↗

On Characterization of Flow Disturbances in Arc-Jet Testing

This paper reports computational simulations and analysis of flow characterization tests in high enthalpy arc-jet facilities at NASA Ames Research Center. Flow disturbances and their characterization are presented through case studies, and their implications for testing are discussed. The case studies include free-jet test configurations from three different arc heaters and nozzles: the 60-MW IHF 30-inch conical nozzle, the 10-MW TP3 15-inch conical nozzle, and the 20-MW AHF 12-inch conical nozzle. For all cases, test articles are placed in the jet exiting the conical nozzle, and the existence of a flow disturbance is confirmed through flow survey data using pitot pressure and heat flux probes and accompanying analysis. The paper focuses on cases where the effects of the disturbances on test article surface quantities are important. The present analysis comprises computational fluid dynamics simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfield in the facility nozzles and test box, including the models tested. Comparisons of computations with the experimental measurements are presented. The computations that reproduce the probe sweep data approximately are essential to interpret the arc-jet test data accurately, while providing insights into several observed calorimeter anomalies caused by flow disturbances.

Arc-jet testing↗

DSMC simulation of low Reynolds number nozzle flows

A numerical analysis of low Reynolds number nozzle flows was performed to investigate the loss mechanisms involved and to determine the nozzle wall contour that minimizes these losses. DSMC was used to simulate flows through three different nozzle configurations at two different stagnation chamber temperatures so that the heat transfer losses could be separated from the wall contour effects on performance. A trumpet-shaped nozzle had 5 percent higher efficiency than a conical nozzle and a 3 percent higher efficiency than a bell-shaped nozzle with the unheated flow. With heated flow both the trumpet and bell-shaped nozzles had a 6.5 percent higher efficiency than the conical nozzle. The conical nozzle had the highest discharge coefficient of the three configurations, 0.92, and the trumpet-shaped nozzle had the lowest, 0.82. The discharge coefficient of each nozzle was unaffected by the change in stagnation temperature; however the increase in stagnation temperature increased the heat transfer and viscous losses in the boundary layer. These results suggest that the trumpet-shaped wall contour performed most efficiently except near the throat region, where it incurred large viscous losses. However, the bell-shaped nozzle may increase its overall performance with an increase in stagnation temperature.

Zelesnik, D.↗

Flight Reynolds number effects on a fighter-type, circular-arc-19 deg conic boattail nozzle at subsonic speeds

A circular-arc - conic boattail nozzle, typical of those used on a twin engine fighter, was tested on an underwing nacelle mounted on an F-106B aircraft. The boattail had a radius ratio r/r sub c of 0.41 and a terminal boattail angle of approximately 19 deg. The gas generator was a J85-GE-13 turbojet engine. The effects of Reynolds number and angle of attack on boattail pressure drag and boattail pressure profiles were investigated. Increasing Reynolds number resulted in reduced boattail drag at both Mach numbers of 0.6 and 0.9.

Chamberlin, R.↗

Turbulent-flow separation criteria for overexpanded supersonic nozzles

A comprehensive compilation of available turbulent flow separation data for overexpanded supersonic nozzles is presented with a discussion of correlation techniques, and prediction methods. Data are grouped by nozzle types: conical, contoured, and two dimensional wedge. Correlation of conical nozzle separation is found to be independent of nozzle divergence half-angle above the 9 deg, whereas the contoured nozzle data follow a different correlation curve. Zero pressure gradient prediction techniques are shown to predict adequately the higher divergence angle conical separation data, and an empirical equation is given for the contoured nozzle data correlation. Flow conditions for which the correlations are invalid are discussed and bounded. A nozzle boundary layer transition criterion is presented which can be used to show that much of the noncorrelating data in the literature are concerned with nonturbulent separation and which explains the previously reported external flow effects on nozzle separation.

Morrisette, E. L.↗