Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Boom”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1990

Sonic boom signature data from cruciform microphone array experiments during the 1966-1967 EAFB national sonic boom evaluation program

Tables are provided of measured sonic boom signature data derived from supersonic flyover tests of the XB-70, B-58 and F-104 aircraft for ranges of altitude and Mach number. These tables represent a convenient hard copy version of available electronic files and complement preliminary information included in a reference National Sonic Boom Evaluation Office document.

Hubbard, H. H.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Sonic boom (human response and atmospheric effects) outdoor-to-indoor response to minimized sonic booms

The preferred descriptor to define the spectral content of sonic booms is the Sound Exposure Spectrum Level, LE(f). This descriptor represents the spectral content of the basic noise descriptors used for describing any single event--the Sound Exposure Level, LE. The latter is equal to ten times the logarithms, to the base ten, of the integral, over the duration of the event, of the square of the instantaneous acoustic pressure, divided by the square of the reference pressure, 20 micro-Pa. When applied to the evaluation of community response to sonic booms, it is customary to use the so-called C-Weighted Sound Exposure Level, LCE, for which the frequency content of the instantaneous acoustic pressure is modified by the C-Weighting curve.

Brown, David↗
NASA NTRS1973

Research on the sonic boom problem. Part 1: Second-order solutions for the flow field around slender bodies in supersonic flow for sonic boom analysis

A second-order theory for supersonic flow past slender bodies is presented. Through the introduction of characteristic coordinates as independent variables and the expansion procedure proposed by Lin and Oswatitsch, a uniformly valid solution is obtained for the whole flow field in the axisymmetric case and for far field in the general three-dimensional case. For distances far from the body the theory is an extension of Whitham's first-order solution and for the domain close to the body it is a modification of Van Dyke's second-order solution in the axisymmetric case. From the theory useful formulas relating flow deflections to the Whitham F-function are derived, which permits one to determine the sonic boom strength from wind tunnel measurements fairly close to the body.

Landahl, M.↗
NASA NTRS2002

Helicopter Tail Boom With Venting for Alleviation and Control of Tail Boom Aerodynamic Loads and Method Thereof

In at least one embodiment, the apparatus of the invention is a flight vehicle tail assembly having an exterior surface, at least one first vent in the exterior surface, at least one second vent in the exterior surface, and an air passage connecting the at least one first vent to the at least one second vent allowing air to flow there between. Where the at least one first vent is located near a high air pressure area acting on the exterior surface during a range of predefined flight conditions, Further, the at least one second vent is located near a low air pressure area acting on the exterior surface during the predefined flight conditions. So that at the predefined flight conditions adverse loads on the tail assembly are reduced by venting air from the high pressure area, through the tail assembly, to the low pressure area. The method of the present invention includes the steps of: receiving air through the at least one first vent in the exterior surface, passing the air through the tail assembly from the at least one first vent to at least one second vent in the exterior surface. and ejecting the air out of the tail assembly at the at least one second vent.

Daniel W Banks↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

multidisciplinary optimization↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

low-boom supersonic transports↗
NASA NTRS2021

Integration of Low-Fidelity MDO and CFD-Based Redesign of Low-Boom Supersonic Transports

A mixed-fidelity low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) problem is formulated for integration of low-fidelity MDO and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based low-boom inverse design optimization. The mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem aims to enforce the weight consistency for CFD-based low-boom inverse design optimization: the optimum low-boom configuration is designed for the weight at the start of cruise of the same configuration for the low-boom overland mission. Moreover, it also seeks the optimum trades among the maximum takeoff gross weight (MTOGW), cruise Mach, and range for the low-boom overland mission while meeting the requirement of flying a transatlantic overwater mission. A block coordinate optimization (BCO) method is developed to find an approximate solution of the mixed-fidelity low-boom MDO problem. The BCO method is successfully applied to generate two CFD-based low-boom configurations that closely match two reversed equivalent area targets with ground noise levels below 70 PLdB, respectively. Moreover, these CFD-based low-boom configurations can be obtained with minor wing modifications from the solutions of the low-fidelity MDO problem. The low-fidelity MDO solutions are Pareto points for constrained multiobjective optimization of MTOGW, low-boom cruise Mach, and low-boom range. The best low-boom concept has a predetermined fuselage shape tailored for passengers and main gear storage, carries 40 passengers at seat pitch of 48 in, flies a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach of 1.8 and range of 2,950 nm, cruises overwater at Mach 1.8 with range of 3,600 nm, satisfies the specified constraints for landing/cruise/takeoff, has MTOGW of 145,164 lb, trims the low-boom cruise flight with fuel redistributions instead of control surface deflections, and has a reversed equivalent area distribution closely matching a target with ground noise level below 70 PLdB.

low-boom supersonic transports↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Triangular Rollable and Collapsible Composite Booms Under the Effects of Gravity and Twist

Finite element analysis is used to investigate Triangular Rollable and Collapsible (TRAC) composite booms. The TRAC booms are subjected to a suite of loading conditions, including in-plane bending, out-of-plane bending, and axial compression. Simulations containing as-designed boom geometry are performed, as are simulations with geometric deviations associated with the as-built conditions of a sample TRAC boom. Namely, a cross-sectional twist along the length of the boom is incorporated into the analysis to study the effect of the twist on the deformation characteristics of the boom. Twisting in the sample boom was observed after short-term storage in a rolled configuration and may be attributed to differential creep deformation between the inner and outer flanges of the TRAC boom. Simulations are conducted with and without the effects of gravity to understand the significance of gravity on testing conditions. Booms of three lengths are evaluated: 3 meters, 7.5 meters and 30 meters. The mechanical responses of the TRAC booms are discussed with reference to the effects of gravity, boom length and cross-sectional twisting. Gravity is found to have a more significant effect on boom mechanical response as boom length is increased. Cross-sectional twisting is found to have a more significant effect on boom mechanical response in the shorter booms.

High-strain composites↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Analysis of Triangular Rollable and Collapsible (TRAC) Composite Booms under the Effects of Gravity and Twist

Finite element analysis is used to investigate Triangular Rollable and Collapsible (TRAC) composite booms. The TRAC booms are subjected to a suite of loading conditions, including in-plane bending, out-of-plane bending, and axial compression. Simulations containing as-designed boom geometry are performed, as are simulations with geometric deviations associated with the as-built conditions of a sample TRAC boom. Namely, a cross-sectional twist along the length of the boom is incorporated into the analysis to study the effect of the twist on the deformation characteristics of the boom. Twisting in the sample boom was observed after short-term storage in a rolled configuration and may be attributed to differential creep deformation between the inner and outer flanges of the TRAC boom. Simulations are conducted with and without the effects of gravity to understand the significance of gravity on testing conditions. Booms of three lengths are evaluated: 3 meters, 7.5 meters and 30 meters. The mechanical responses of the TRAC booms are discussed with reference to the effects of gravity, boom length and cross-sectional twisting. Gravity is found to have a more significant effect on boom mechanical response as boom length is increased. Cross-sectional twisting is found to have a more significant effect on boom mechanical response in the shorter booms.

High-strain composites↗
NASA NTRS2005

Research on Subjective Response to Simulated Sonic Booms at NASA Langley Research Center

Over the past 15 years, NASA Langley Research Center has conducted many tests investigating subjective response to simulated sonic booms. Most tests have used the Sonic Boom Booth, an airtight concrete booth fitted with loudspeakers that play synthesized sonic booms pre-processed to compensate for the response of the booth/loudspeaker system. Tests using the Booth have included investigations of shaped booms, booms with simulated ground reflections, recorded booms, outdoor and indoor booms, booms with differing loudness for bow and tail shocks, and comparisons of aircraft flyover recordings with sonic booms. Another study used loudspeakers placed inside people s houses, so that they could experience the booms while in their own homes. This study investigated the reactions of people to different numbers of booms heard within a 24-hour period. The most recent Booth test used predicted boom shapes from candidate low-boom aircraft. At present, a test to compare the Booth with boom simulators constructed by Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation and Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company is underway. The Lockheed simulator is an airtight booth similar to the Langley booth; the Gulfstream booth uses a traveling wave method to create the booms. Comparison of "realism" as well as loudness and other descriptors is to be studied.

Sullivan, Brenda M.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Propulsion-Airframe Integration for Conceptual Redesign of a Low-Boom Supersonic Transport

A low-boom supersonic transport was generated in a previous low-boom multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) study that used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) off-body pressure to compute the undertrack sonic boom ground signature and calibrated low-fidelity aerodynamics analyses to compute the mission performance metrics. This low-boom aircraft, referred to as the Mach 1.7 40-PAX concept, can carry 40 passengers for a low-boom overland mission with cruise Mach 1.7 for the airport pairs over the continental US and has the potential to achieve an undertrack sonic boom ground noise level below 70 perceived level of decibels at the start of overland cruise (SOC). The engine for the Mach 1.7 40-PAX concept was designed using the Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) for the mission analysis and modeled as a flow-through nacelle for CFD-based sonic boom analysis. To understand how the engine plume affects the undertrack ground signature, the Mach 1.7 40-PAX concept is redesigned in this paper after replacing the flow-through nacelles by CFD engines for sonic boom analysis using aeropropulsive CFD simulation. A process is developed for approximation of the NPSS engine at SOC by a CFD engine for aeropropulsive CFD simulation. The generated CFD engine has the identical nozzle boundary conditions and approximately the same mass flow and thrust as those of the NPSS engine at SOC. Then, the outer mold line of the configuration with the CFD engines is redesigned to approximately restore the low-boom characteristics of the Mach 1.7 40-PAX concept at SOC. Finally, the CFD simulation data for the redesigned concept with the CFD engines is used to calibrate the low-fidelity aerodynamic analyses for mission analysis of this concept. The cyclic dependency of the involved disciplinary analyses is resolved using an iteration method for a consistent coupling of the mission analysis, NPSS engine analysis, and low-boom redesign using the aeropropulsive CFD simulation. This low-boom redesign study is used as an example to demonstrate how the propulsion-airframe integration could be implemented for conceptual design of supersonic transports that satisfy both the low-boom and mission performance requirements.

Low-boom supersonic transport↗
NASA NTRS2017

Advanced Deployable Shell-Based Composite Booms for Small Satellite Structural Applications Including Solar Sails

State of the art deployable structures are mainly being designed for medium to large size satellites. The lack of reliable deployable structural systems for low cost, small volume, rideshare-class spacecraft severely constrains the potential for using small satellite platforms for affordable deep space science and exploration precursor missions that could be realized with solar sails. There is thus a need for reliable, lightweight, high packaging efficiency deployable booms that can serve as the supporting structure for a wide range of small satellite systems including solar sails for propulsion. The National Air and Space Administration (NASA) is currently investing in the development of a new class of advanced deployable shell-based composite booms to support future deep space small satellite missions using solar sails. The concepts are being designed to: meet the unique requirements of small satellites, maximize ground testability, permit the use of low-cost manufacturing processes that will benefit scalability, be scalable for use as elements of hierarchical structures (e.g. trusses), allow long duration storage, have high deployment reliability, and have controlled deployment behavior and predictable deployed dynamics. This paper will present the various rollable boom concepts that are being developed for 5-20 m class size deployable structures that include solar sails with the so-called High Strain Composites (HSC) materials. The deployable composite booms to be presented are being developed to expand the portfolio of available rollable booms for small satellites and maximize their length for a given packaged volume. Given that solar sails are a great example of volume and mass optimization, the booms were designed to comply with nominal solar sail system requirements for 6U CubeSats, which are a good compromise between those of smaller form factors (1U, 2U and 3U CubeSats) and larger ones (12 U and 27 U future CubeSats, and ESPA-class microsatellites). Solar sail missions for such composite boom systems are already under consideration and development at NASA, as well as mission studies that will benefit from planned scaled-up versions of the composite boom technologies to be introduced. The paper presents ongoing research and development of thin-shell rollable composite booms designed under the particular stringent and challenging system requirements of relatively large solar sails housed on small satellites. These requirements will be derived and listed. Several new boom concepts are proposed and other existing ones are improved upon using thin-ply composite materials to yield unprecedented compact deployable structures. Some of these booms are shown in Fig. 1. For every boom to be introduced the scalable fabrication process developed to keep the overall boom system cost down will be shown. Finally, the initial results of purposely designed boom structural characterization test methods with gravity off-loading will be presented to compare their structural performance under expected and general load cases.

Fernandez, Juan M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Rollable Corrugated Tubular Booms

A promising candidate for a new class of deployable composite boom is the COrrugated ROllable TUbular Boom (COROTUB), which is to be employed on future large space structures by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The COROTUB’s two corrugated thin shells form a closed section, which yields high bending and torsional stiffness, allowing for high dimensional stability. The corrugation geometry that dictates the boom cross-section shape was completely defined by closed-form analytical equations given a set of key design parameters. Parametric studies of two geometric variables were used to evaluate which parameters most influence the cross-section’s area moment of inertia and torsional constant. The number of corrugations, flattened height of the boom, and concave and convex corrugation radii were varied to study the complete boom design space. Deeper corrugations increased the local buckling (crimpling) loads of the thin-shell boom but reduced the area moment of inertia and therefore the global buckling load of the beam-column member, and thus a fine balance was sought. Finite element analyses of pure bending and compression load cases for short, 1.22-m-long fully-deployed booms ofeither the same size (flattened height) or similar inertia properties, were first carried out to efficiently study this design trade-off in detail.A second computational study evaluated the boom transition shape and the structural response of a 6-m-long partially-deployed boom, where the effects of partially bracing the root of the boom were also assessed. It was found that bracing length could greatly affect the strength and stiffness of this boom.Bracing type (as in the discrete number of clamps at the root) had no effect on stiffness, but particularly impacted strength for loading cases and boundary conditions that promoted the onset of local web buckling at the root. The corrugated designs were also found to improve, by as much as 20%, the boom bending and axial strength and boom transition length from flat to deployed when compared to a state-of-the-art boom alternative of the same size, for short bracing distances, such as those that would be required by small satellite applications. In addition, they showed a comparable structural response for longer bracing supports.

Booms↗