Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “VS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Noble Gas Management: SBMOF 1 vs. NUCON Carbon

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), in collaboration with Flibe Energy, Inc., demonstrated the fabrication of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) into engineered beads to manage off-gases released from molten salt reactors. Among the many MOF options, SBMOF 1 was selected as an ideal sorbent to manage off-gases released from a molten salt reactor because its pore size is optimal. The SBMOF 1 was synthesized and fabricated into engineered particles using three different methods, with and without polymers. All the engineered particles were exposed to Co-60 radiation (1,000 kGy) to demonstrate their radiation stability. Single column breakthrough experiments were performed at different temperatures, activation conditions, flow rates, and off-gas compositions to optimize the Xe capacity at the breakthrough point and at saturation. The Xe loading in SBMOF 1 was compared with that of standard solid sorbent (Nucon carbon) under identical conditions. Based on the single column experiments, SBMOF 1 outperforms the Nucon carbon at all the temperatures and reduces the mass (to as little as 55%) of sorbent needed to achieve the same performance as carbon. The bed volume is also reduced, down to 48% of that of Nucon carbon, when the MOF is used. These results clearly demonstrate improvement in the amount of adsorbent needed and show a reduction in bed volume compared to traditional sorbent material.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Spiner vs EOSPAC6: capabilities, performance, and accuracy considerations

The Cross-Cutting Capabilities Project (XCAP) has significant interest in collecting and implementing a common set of libraries to be used across the various production hydro-codes at LANL. A common set of libraries will help facilitate comparisons between codes. In addition to minimizing variables for comparisons and physics validation, efforts toward optimization and porting of packages for future architectures will be more efficient. As part of this push Singularity is being considered as an inclusive materials interface library. One crucial part of this library is the importing, inverting, and interpolation of equation of state (EOS) data. Currently the Lagrangian Applications Project (LAP) and Safety Applications Project (SAP) are using EOSPAC6 for delivery EOS data. The Eulerian Applications Project (EAP) has historically used TEOS and more recently an implementation of Singularly via a package called Spiner for EOS interpolation. Singularity currently has the option of using several analytical EOS models, directly employing SESAME via Spiner, or directly using SESAME via EOSPAC6 (not optimized yet). Assuming Singularity moves forward as a common platform for the implementation of materials models, a decision will need to be made on which EOS interpolation package XCAP should move forward with, given resources and people are finite. We will attempt to address pros and cons of Spiner and EOSPAC6 and the trade-offs that should be considered during the decision making process. This report is intended as an ASC-PEM-EOS perspective on what is needed in an EOS interpolation package. Performance and Accuracy sections will mostly address data from comparison studies in LA-UR-22-22699.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2024

U-235 vs Pu-239 Heating [Slides]

Problem: Despite Pu-239 having a larger Fission cross section than U-235, simulations and experiments have shown that U heats more than Pu during a reactor pulse.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Track vs Shower Discrimination in the Event Reconstruction of the ICARUS Experiment

The ICARUS collaboration has employed the 760-ton T600 liquid argon TPC detector in a successful three-year physics run at the underground LNGS laboratory, performing a sensitive search for LSND-like anomalous appearance in the CERN Neutrino to Gran Sasso beam, which contributed to the constraints on the allowed neutrino oscillation parameters to a narrow region around 1 eV. After a significant overhaul at CERN, the T600 detector has been installed at Fermilab. The detector commissioning phase lasted until June 2022, then ICARUS moved to data taking for neutrino oscillation physics collecting events from the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) and the Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) beam off-axis. The initial experiment goals are to either confirm or refute the claim by Neutrino-4 short-baseline reactor experiment, perform measurements of neutrino cross sections with the NuMI beam and several Beyond Standard Model searches. Then, ICARUS will jointly search for evidence of sterile neutrinos with the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND). In this contribution, we discuss recent changes to the standard TPC event reconstruction that uses Pandora, a pattern recognition software common to liquid argon-based detectors. In particular, we performed a new training of the Boosted Decision Tree (BDT) employed to separate track-like and shower-like reconstructed particles using Monte Carlo simulations of neutrino events from BNB in ICARUS. We compare the discrimination capabilities of the old and new BDT training and discuss further improvements of this algorithm.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Measured vs. Calculated Dose Rates During Ring Injection Dump Replacement

One of the most irradiated Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) accelerator components is the ring injection dump (RID), which is located downstream of the accumulator ring injection section. The unstripped and only partially stripped H - beam, about 5% of the full SNS beam current, is discarded in the injection into the accumulator ring and is redirected to the RID. According to the accelerator operation plan, the beam stop and the window assemblies of the existing RID are removed and replaced when they have reached their end-of-life owing to radiation exposure. This procedure, which includes multiple steps, took place during a facility maintenance period in March 2023. To support work planning and meet as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) requirements during removal and exchange of the components, dose rates were calculated for each stage of the exchange operation. During each stage, dose rates were measured before and after work. This comparison shows that measured dose rates are within a factor of 2 of the predicted (calculated) dose rates.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Comparison of Projections for a Short-Term Release, CAP88 vs NARAC

The purpose of this study was to compare the projected dose using different plume models, evaluating a short duration release of tritium to the 16 compliance sectors and 4 additional points of interest using local meteorology. This report is written as guidance to the decision makers when reviewing this specific Gaussian plume model intended for radiological dose assessment and regulatory compliance, called CAP88 1 , as compared to a more-complex model designed for emergency response. The emergency response model, NARAC 2 , can be used to supplement the CAP88 compliance model evaluations, since NARAC is intended for use in situations where releases are shorter in duration and have increased complexity in terrain and meteorology.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗