Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Small Modular”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Neutronic analysis of a PWR-type SMR core using duplex ThO{sub 2}-UO{sub 2} in TRISO fuel particles

Currently, studies on small modular reactors (SMRs) present an important development due to the potential they represent in terms of safety, operational flexibility, economy, and non-energy applications. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in studying the use of thorium as fuel, as an effective way to solve problems such as the shortage of uranium reserves, reduction of nuclear waste and nuclear proliferation. Also, the use of thorium combined with highly enriched uranium TRISO particles has been studied, showing proper performance. In this work, the concept of ThO{sub 2}-UO{sub 2} duplex fuel is used, for the core configuration of a PWR type SMR that uses TRISO fuel, designed to achieve extended fuel cycles. Three distribution cases of ThO{sub 2} and UO{sub 2} in TRISO particles inside the fuel rods are compared. First, particles composed by a homogeneous mixture of ThO{sub 2} and UO{sub 2} are distributed inside of fuel elements. Second, the fuel zone of the fuel elements is divided into two radially, an internal one where the TRISO particles composed of ThO{sub 2} are distributed and the external one where the TRISO particles composed of UO{sub 2} are distributed. The third case is like the previous one, except that the particles that contain UO{sub 2} are distributed in the inner zone and those that contain ThO{sub 2} in the outer zone of the fuel elements. The comparison of the cases is carried out in terms of cycle main isotopes' mass transmutation, power distribution and temperature reactivity coefficients. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Simulations of a Helical Tube Bundle in Cross-Flow for Application to Flow-Induced Vibration

Helical tubes have been used in a number of systems, including the energy and chemical processing industries. Helical-Coil Steam Generators (HCSGs) in particular have special application in systems for which spatial constraints are important. Variants of these designs are notably included in a number of integral-vessel small modular reactor (SMR) designs which are currently in development by multiple companies. These designs typically have the primary side located within the vessel, with the secondary side flowing upward through the helical tubes. One complexity in implementing an HCSG within the reactor pressure vessel is that any potential flow-induced vibration (FIV) can impact reactor safety. In a typical power plant, heat exchanger tube failures caused by FIV can be costly, but generally do not have immediate impact on the core safety due to their relative isolation from the core area. In an integral-vessel design, a tube rupture could eject material from the secondary side into the primary flow, potentially damaging the core itself or other crucial components. Thus a higher degree of confidence in predicting and/or preventing FIV should be attained for implementing the helical tubes in these designs. A significant campaign is currently underway to address the topic of FIV in helical tube arrays. The U.S. Department of Energy, under the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) initiative, has deemed this a 'high-impact problem'. This will include both experimental and computational contributions from a consortium consisting of multiple universities, industry partners, and national laboratories, including Argonne National Laboratory. The primary industrial partner is NuScale, which will see direct benefits from this initiative to the development of their SMR and its component design. The primary focus of this paper is to establish some of the computational efforts that have been made to this stage and the initial benchmarking of computational tools. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Operational performance risk assessment in support of a supervisory control system - 251

A supervisory control system is being developed for multiunit advanced small modular reactors to minimize human interventions during normal and abnormal operations. In the supervisory control system, control action decisions are made based on a probabilistic risk assessment that employs event trees and fault trees. Although traditional probabilistic risk assessment tools are implemented, their scope is extended to normal operations, and the application is reversed to assess the success of non-safety related systems and to enable continued operation of the plant. This extended probabilistic risk assessment approach is called operational performance risk assessment (OPRA). OPRA helps to identify available paths, combine control actions for maintaining plant conditions within operational limits, and to quantify the likelihood of success of these operational trajectories to optimize the selection of alternative actions without activating reactor protection system. In this paper, a case study of OPRA in a supervisory control system is demonstrated for the Advanced Liquid Metal Reactor (ALMR) Power Reactor Inherently Safe Module (PRISM) design, specifically the power conversion system. The scenario investigated involved a condition in which the feedwater control valve that was observed to be drifting to the closed position. Alternative plant configurations that would allow the plant to continue to operate at full or reduced power were identified using OPRA. Dynamic analyses were performed with a thermal-hydraulic model of the ALMR PRISM system using Modelica to evaluate the magnitude of safety margins. Successful recovery paths for the selected scenario were identified and quantified using the supervisory control system. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Code Validation of a SBLOCA test in SMART Integral Test Loop

Integrated small modular reactors (iSMRs) are favored because of their unique characteristics, such as enhanced safety without any large break loss of coolant accidents (LBLOCAs), low initial construction costs, and multi-use of desalination and electricity generation. Many iSMRs have been developed thus far. In Korea, an iSMR called SMART was developed after a thorough validation of the components and systems, and finally received its design certificate in 2012 for the first time in the world. To ensure the performance of its safety systems, an integral test loop, SMART-ITL, is constructed. It contains the primary system, secondary system, passive safety systems, and an auxiliary system. The passive safety systems include a passive residual heat removal system (PRHRS), passive injection system with a core makeup tank (CMT) and a safety injection tank (SIT), and an automatic depressurization system (ADS). The height is preserved while the diameter is scaled down to 1:7. A series of SBLOCA tests have been performed with 4 trains of PRHRS, 1 train of CMT and SIT, and ADS. In parallel with the experiments, simulation of a representative test has been conducted to track the underlying thermal hydraulics. SMART-ITL is an integral test loop for SMART and a series of SBLOCA tests for confirming the performance of passive safety systems have been conducted. In this paper, a system code simulation on a SBLOCA test using SMART-ITL is presented. The reactor vessel water level, break flow rate, and CMT and SIT water levels are predicted well. (authors)

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Waste Management: Challenges and the Integrated Waste Strategy - 19160

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) currently faces various waste management challenges and CNL's Integrated Waste Strategy is adapting to manage them. As Canada's premier nuclear science and technology organization, CNL is a global leader in developing peaceful and innovative applications from nuclear technology through its expertise in the scientific field, including physics, metallurgy, chemistry, biology and engineering. As demands change, CNL is shifting its focus to alpha therapies for cancer treatments and sustainable energy solutions. The next decade will see CNL decommission the sites it manages across Canada, whilst transforming Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) into a new, world-class facility which will have the capability to demonstrate the commercial viability of advanced reactor designs including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). This is being enabled through an accelerated decommissioning program for all CNL operated sites, while renovating CRL, which includes revitalizing essential site infrastructure, and investment in new, world-class science facilities in a modern campus environment. With decommissioning and revitalization occurring simultaneously, the long-term strategy and vision for CNL presents some unique challenges to waste management. Therefore, integrated, collaborative and coordinated waste management is a vital component to ensuring a successful future. The Integrated Waste Strategy coordinates, and provides alignment of, waste management across CNL and: - Includes all CNL operated (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) owned) sites; - Considers all CNL managed waste (including radioactive and non-radioactive operational, decommissioning, legacy and historic waste) for the planned lifetime of the sites; - Defines waste routes using a life cycle approach (from the generation of waste to final disposal) A baseline Integrated Waste Strategy and associated action plan to mitigate identified gaps and issues have been produced. A program of work is underway to close those gaps identified in a consistent, transparent, prioritized and justified manner. One of the key challenges is to ensure that waste management planning is completed effectively and in a timely manner. This will enable the provision of suitable and sufficient waste capability to meet CNL's long-term strategy. The Integrated Waste Strategy has been developed and maintained through engagement at all levels across CNL, ensuring buy-in of proposed solutions. Key process stakeholders include generators of CNL managed waste to ensure integrated consideration of legacy, current and future waste generation; waste management personnel to identify requirements, including processing, storage, transport and disposal; AECL as the client and waste liability owner; and the public to ensure they understand the 'big picture' regarding waste strategy. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

TORCHE - Toolbox for Reactor Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers

As interest within the scientific community for the development of small modular reactors (SMRs) grows, utilizing compact and cross-flow heat exchangers present many design advantages. Cross-flow configurations of tube bundles allow water, liquid metal, or a molten salt to be contained within the tube side or shell side in an efficient spatial arrangement. The goal of this project is to provide the user with an easy-to-use set of tools for cross-flow heat exchanger design. The tools are intended to require little to no geometric set-up like meshing in a CFD code in order to enable rapid preliminary design and optimization. With this set of simple Python scripts, the user can determine the necessary quantities and correctional factors in order to assess the heat exchanger characteristics. The two characteristics used in designing novel and efficient heat exchangers incorporated into this work currently are pressure drop and heat transfer coefficients. In support of these efforts, the literature has been scoured for sources of experimental data and proposed methods for calculating pressure drop and heat transfer in cross-flow tube banks. Several empirical correlations and methodologies for calculating pressure drop and heat transfer incorporated into the Toolbox for Reactor Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers (TORCHE). TORCHE is an expansion on the cross-flow pressure drop scripts reported by Haefner et al.. Presented in this summary is a synopsis of the empirical correlations and methodologies of pressure drops and heat transfer coefficient. A validation effort of these models is also presented to provide confidence in the implementation. For this validation of TORCHE, experimental data has been gathered and extracted from graphs in the literature. Error bars were not reported in the experimental data used in this summary and therefore is not included in the analysis.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Design of a Thermal Energy Storage System for SMR's

A potential deployment strategy for Small Modular Reactors (SMR's) is in hybrid energy systems where the presence of intermittent energy sources (wind and/or solar) subjects the reactor to a time varying electric load (1). Proposed options for accommodating this load have included operating the reactor in a load follow mode, or operating the reactor at or near steady state and bypassing steam around the turbine directly to the condenser (2). Both of these strategies result in lost energy potential. With the large financial investment associated with a nuclear power plant there is strong economic incentive to run the plant at maximum capacity. One method to accomplish this is the installation of Thermal Energy Storage (TES) that can be charged when grid demand is less than 100% plant capacity. The thermal energy can then be recovered, either as a supplement to the power plant during peak demand times, or can be used for other processes (1). Sensible heat thermal energy storage systems have been proposed for solar energy systems (3). This paper describes such a system for SMRs. These results show the feasibility of a TES system alongside a nuclear power plant that can limit load following operations for the reactor. Load following results in a decrease of capacity factor for the plant along with imposing significant stresses to plant equipment. With the implementation of a TES system these stresses can be transferred from the nuclear plant to the TES system. Not only does this equate to a longer overall life of the plant's hardware, but it also will dramatically increase the capacity factor of the system. This increase in capacity factor will lead to an improved economic return over the lifespan of the reactor. Future development in the near term will focus on coupling the TES system to the dynamic response of the reactor and energy conversion system and developing the models necessary to implement the discharge mode. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Experimental Study for Two Phase Flow Instability in the PCHE Type Steam Generator in SMR

Conventional U-tube type heat exchangers have some limitations when applied to Small Modular Reactor (SMRs). In particular, the size of steam generators is important in the SMR, as it greatly affects the size, and thus the cost, of the reactor vessel.. Therefore, the circuit heat exchanger (PCHE) is suggested as an alternative. PCHE, a compact type heat exchanger manufactured by HEATRIC, has several advantages such as the reduced size, wide operation range until 900? and 900 bar and high power density due to the large heat transfer area over volume ratio. Recently, it is newly suggested as an application of a steam generator. MIT and KAIST have already conceptually suggested PCHE as a steam generator. Under boiling condition, flow instability is one of the critical issues-resulting in unstable mass flow rate, sudden temperature change and system control failure. According to the flow mechanism, there are various types of instabilities in the heat exchanger and each flow tendency is different. Typical examples are Ledinegg instability of the static instability and pressure-drop oscillation and density-wave oscillation of the dynamic instability. The characteristic of Ledinegg instability is that the flow under unstable condition changes into the stable flow. The characteristic of dynamic instability is that the flow fluctuates continuously. Pressure-drop oscillation has the period of tens of seconds and the system pressure also highly oscillates with the period of flow instability. In comparison, the density-wave oscillation has the period of few seconds and the system pressure is relatively stable. Previous studies on flow instability are focused on the single channel flow and helical tube type heat exchanger. There has been very limited experimental research on flow instability using PCHE. In KAIST, the test facility was constructed to study the thermal hydraulics in PCHE. The objectives of our test facility are: (1) to identify the occurrence of instability under two phase and super-heated steam flow in PCHE, and (2) to examine whether it can operate normally using throttling effect. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Advanced Reactor Technology -- Regulatory Technology Development Plan (RTDP)

This DOE-NE Advanced Small Modular Reactor (AdvSMR) regulatory technology development plan (RTDP) will link critical DOE nuclear reactor technology development programs to important regulatory and policy-related issues likely to impact a “critical path” for establishing a viable commercial AdvSMR presence in the domestic energy market. Accordingly, the regulatory considerations that are set forth in the AdvSMR RTDP will not be limited to any one particular type or subset of advanced reactor technology(s) but rather broadly consider potential regulatory approaches and the licensing implications that accompany all DOE-sponsored research and technology development activity that deal with commercial non-light water reactors. However, it is also important to remember that certain “minimum” levels of design and safety approach knowledge concerning these technology(s) must be defined and available to an extent that supports appropriate pre-licensing regulatory analysis within the RTDP. Final resolution to advanced reactor licensing issues is most often predicated on the detailed design information and specific safety approach as documented in a facility license application and submitted for licensing review. Because the AdvSMR RTDP is focused on identifying and assessing the potential regulatory implications of DOE-sponsored reactor technology research very early in the pre-license application development phase, the information necessary to support a comprehensive regulatory analysis of a new reactor technology, and the resolution of resulting issues, will generally not be available. As such, the regulatory considerations documented in the RTDP should be considered an initial “first step” in the licensing process which will continue until a license is issued to build and operate the said nuclear facility. Because a facility license application relies heavily on the data and information generated by technology development studies, the anticipated regulatory importance of key DOE reactor research initiatives should be assessed early in the technology development process. Quality assurance requirements supportive of later licensing activities must also be attached to important research activities to ensure resulting data is usable in that context. Early regulatory analysis and licensing approach planning thus provides a significant benefit to the formulation of research plans and also enables the planning and development of a compatible AdvSMR licensing framework, should significant modification be required.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Advanced Reactor Technologies - Regulatory Technology Development Plan (RTDP)

This DOE-NE Advanced Small Modular Reactor (AdvSMR) regulatory technology development plan (RTDP) will link critical DOE nuclear reactor technology development programs to important regulatory and policy-related issues likely to impact a “critical path” for establishing a viable commercial AdvSMR presence in the domestic energy market. Accordingly, the regulatory considerations that are set forth in the AdvSMR RTDP will not be limited to any one particular type or subset of advanced reactor technology(s) but rather broadly consider potential regulatory approaches and the licensing implications that accompany all DOE-sponsored research and technology development activity that deal with commercial non-light water reactors. However, it is also important to remember that certain “minimum” levels of design and safety approach knowledge concerning these technology(s) must be defined and available to an extent that supports appropriate pre-licensing regulatory analysis within the RTDP. Final resolution to advanced reactor licensing issues is most often predicated on the detailed design information and specific safety approach as documented in a facility license application and submitted for licensing review. Because the AdvSMR RTDP is focused on identifying and assessing the potential regulatory implications of DOE-sponsored reactor technology research very early in the pre-license application development phase, the information necessary to support a comprehensive regulatory analysis of a new reactor technology, and the resolution of resulting issues, will generally not be available. As such, the regulatory considerations documented in the RTDP should be considered an initial “first step” in the licensing process which will continue until a license is issued to build and operate the said nuclear facility. Because a facility license application relies heavily on the data and information generated by technology development studies, the anticipated regulatory importance of key DOE reactor research initiatives should be assessed early in the technology development process. Quality assurance requirements supportive of later licensing activities must also be attached to important research activities to ensure resulting data is usable in that context. Early regulatory analysis and licensing approach planning thus provides a significant benefit to the formulation of research plans and also enables the planning and development of a compatible AdvSMR licensing framework, should significant modification be required.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Phase 1 NuScale SMR FOAK Nuclear Demonstration Readiness Project (Final Scientific/Technical Report)

The overarching objective of the Phase 1 NuScale SMR First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) Nuclear Demonstration Readiness Project was to enhance competitiveness of the U.S. nuclear industry by enabling timely deployment of the NuScale small modular reactor (SMR). The scope of this Phase 1 project continued to advance the licensing and design maturity, particularly in those areas related to supporting customer readiness, supply chain integration, cost competitiveness, and cost confidence. This investment provided by the Government has accelerated development of these designs and technologies so that the existing domestic fleet of nuclear power plants remains viable and the most mature in the nuclear industry. The intent is to have the new, advanced U.S. designs be deployed as early 2026, and be globally competitive. As a part of the First-of-a-Kind Nuclear Demonstration Readiness Project, NuScale has been developing an advanced reactor design, leading the path for other development projects or complex technology advancements for existing plants that have significant technical and licensing risk. The NuScale Power team (NuScale) is advancing licensing, engineering, supply chain development, testing, and other required activities to enhance the innovation and competitiveness of the U.S. nuclear industry by enabling timely deployment of the NuScale SMR. Specifically, NuScale is performing the following activities in Phase 1. Fully supporting the NRC review of the NuScale DCA to ensure approval of a final safety evaluation report by the end of 2020. Improving plant cost confidence and cost competitiveness through design and supply chain advancement, incorporation of constructability best practices, and margin recovery to increase plant power output. Accelerating design maturity, technology development, and operational program readiness to support a customer commitment for plant deployment. The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), a unit of the Office of Science, fulfills agency-wide responsibilities to collect, preserve, and disseminate both unclassified and classified scientific and technical information (STI) emanating from DOE-funded research and development (R&D) activities at DOE national laboratories and facilities and at universities and other institutions nationwide. This scientific and technical report provides summaries of the analyses and research that was performed by NuScale under this project that achieves the objective of disseminating information to the nuclear industry to ensure the innovations realized are shared for the benefit of the industry at large.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Panel reports session

This section brings together the reports of the 31 panel sessions listed below: - Avoiding the Human Capital Cliff in the DOE (PS22); - Implementing Technically-Based Cleanup; US DOE Balancing Regulatory and Fiscal Complexity (PS24); - United Kingdom - Remediation of Sellafield Legacy Ponds and Silos (PS25); - Aligning Decision-Making to Deliver Timely Results in Large Clean-up Programs (PS38); - Transition to Government Owned-Contractor Operated Site at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (PS39); - Emerging Middle East Nuclear States' Status and Plans (PS40); - NPP Panel on Waste Management (PS41); - Robotics - International Innovations in Robotic Decommissioning Technology (PS43); - Fukushima Panel (1/2): Japan Fukushima Daiichi Decommissioning Update (PS54); - Fukushima Panel (2/2): Update on the Revitalization of Fukushima and the Surrounding Area (PS55); - US DOE LLW On-Site Disposal: LLW Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Review Process (PS56); - Challenges in DOE HLW Tank Management: Facility Start-up and Waste Disposition (PS57); - Waste Management Planning for Utility Small Modular Reactors (PS58); - US Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Disposal Issues (PS59); - DOE-EM Robotics and Emerging Technologies Road-map (4/8) (PS60); - Graduating Students and New Scientists and Engineers - Wants and Needs - Are Companies Even Listening? (PS63); - U.S. Nuclear Robotics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (5/8) (PS74); - US DOE Mixed Waste: Proposals for Dealing with Problematic Waste Streams and Policy Changes (PS76); - Current and Emerging US NRC LLW Regulatory Topics (PS77); - Agency Perspectives (US and International) on the Use of Risk and Dose Assessment Tools (PS80); - Progress on Deep Repository Programs Around the World (PS81); - US DOE Procurement and Contracting Opportunities (PS82); - Collaboration across Borders to Deliver Cleanup and Decommissioning Challenges (PS93a); - DOE Mission Success through Application of Practices and Solutions (PS94); - Challenges in Cask Certification - International Perspectives (PS96); - Robotics: Leveraging Innovations in Science and Technology to Benefit Safety Performance (PS98); - DOE Panel: DOE EM Featured Office - Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PS109); - Robotics: Lessons Learned from Industrial Robotics Deployment that can be Applied to the Nuclear Field (PS110a); - Roundtable: DOE Radioactive Management - Energy Facility Contractors Group - Waste Management Working Group (EFCOG WMWG) (PS118); - Thursday Topical Session 'Management of Used Nuclear Fuel: Will the United States Reengage and Align with International Efforts' (PS124); - Remotely Operated Vehicles for Emergency, Disaster, and Operational Upset Response (PS125)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Operating displays - new concept: high performance displays - 118

New control rooms in Nuclear Power Plants using digital Distributed Control System (DCS) operated with software displays, are providing thousands of signals to the operating crew. When an event happens, the Flood of information provided to operators could obscure the initiator event increasing the operator response time, work load and complicating the selection of the actions to be performed. There are some initiatives that are trying to minimize the 'avalanche effect' as the alarm engineering filtering and prioritization or diagnostic displays. Likewise, new control rooms are lost the availability to know the plant status just with a quick glance to the panel indicators. Regarding Small Modular Reactors, where in some cases four operators should monitor and control twelve reactors, these problems are even more significant. The challenge is to find a solution, based on current digital systems, that supply information to operators in order to prevent events and take early actions to minimize or avoid any unexpected incident. In order to minimize human errors, Tecnatom has developed a specific set of displays, called 'High Performance Displays' (HPD) based on objectives, work environment limitation, and non-anticipated events. These displays are being design following the HFE standards: applying the NUREG-0711 elements to identify the information that they have to content and the NUREG-0700 to design the interface. The function of these displays is monitoring the plant situation in a way that the operators are able to recognize any potential event at a simple glance but controlling thousands of signals through pattern recognition, symmetries, regular polygons and colors. The objective of the HPD is to provide an integrated function minimizing the tunnel effect and reduce the workload during the diagnosis phase. Moreover, HPD enhance operators to take the right actions to anticipate the response to any event, even avoiding it, if possible This paper analyzes how HPD's have been design as well as presents the results of a preliminary validation of their capabilities. The preliminary validation is a reduce validation in a full scope simulator running two representative scenarios of abnormal and emergency operation. The analysis is focused on the first stage of the event, i.e. the detection phase, HPD's have been installed in a generic full scope simulator of a nuclear power plant, digital controlled. Both scenarios have been performed by two different operator crews. The first operator shift has worked with the conventional human machine interface, that is, displays similar to the ones currently installed in existing nuclear power plant with digital control. The second crew, reproduce the same scenarios but with HPD available. The studio collects preliminary data in order to compare results, draw lesson learned from the experience to improve HPD design, and find solutions in terms of reducing human errors, human workload, and increase the availability of the plant. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Performance Analysis of the Passive Residual Heat Removal System of an Integral Reactor

A demand for small modular reactors (SMRs) is gradually emerging worldwide, especially in Middle East Asia and Africa. SMART (System-integrated Modular Advanced ReacTor) developed by KAERI (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) is the first mover among several SMRs. It is designed to produce 100 MW of electricity, or 90 MW of electricity and 40,000 tons of desalinated water concurrently, which is sufficient for 100,000 residents. SMART is currently holding the initiative as the first licensed integral reactor in the world since 4 July 2012, when the standard design approval (SDA) was officially issued by the Nuclear safety and security commission (NSSC). After that, the SMART safety enhancement project was successfully conducted with intense support of the Government, resulting in an in-depth development of the most advanced safety features including the passive residual heat removal system (PRHRS). Recently, an agreement between KAERI and King Abdullah city for atomic and renewable energy (K.A. CARE) was officially signed for the pre-project engineering (PPE) in pursuit of the construction of SMART and developing human resources capability. Both parties are currently conducting a three-year preliminary study to review the feasibility of building SMART and to prepare for its commercialization. KAERI also takes responsibility to train R and D personnel chosen from Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sooner or later, SMART will open the global market of SMR and be the best competitive pioneer. Since the Fukushima accident, the passive cooling system of a nuclear reactor has received a great amount of attention. SMART is designed with passive systems in order to ensure the safety of the reactor. The PRHRS is one of the passive safety systems, which is activated after an accident to remove the residual heat from the core and the sensible heat of the reactor coolant system (RCS) through the steam generators (SGs) until the condition of the RCS reaches a safe shutdown condition. In the present study, the thermal performance of the PRHRS is predicted by using in-house code. Temperature of the RCS and the cooling rate of the RCS are traced with time to see if it is satisfactorily designed to meet the design requirements of the PRHRS. The dependency of the mass flow rate of the natural circulation on the filling ratio (FR) is also discussed. The FR is arbitrarily chosen from 0.22 to 0.50 and further parametric study is needed in the future.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Application of quantitative methods for reliability testing of a nuclear power plant digital rod position indication diagnostic system - 391

Obsolescence, aging, reliability, and performance issues are driving nuclear facilities to replace conventional analog Instrumentation and Control (I and C) systems with digital technologies. In addition, the designs of the next generation of nuclear reactors, including Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), will incorporate digital I and C for most, if not all, of their safety and non-safety related functions. As part of an on-going research and development (R and D) effort under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Analysis and Measurement Services Corporation (AMS) is developing a platform to provide automated testing of digital I and C systems and create a standard method of evaluation for reliability assessments. This hands-on R and D effort has produced a Software Reliability Tester (SRT), which is a set of software and hardware tools designed to automate the testing of digital I and C systems to measure and quantify how well the systems perform under normal operating conditions and in the presence of faults. Furthermore, the SRT provides the foundation for a practical tool to automate verification and validation (V and V) activities and reduce the amount of testing time of digital I and C systems. When combined with its capabilities of integrating both reliability and fault tolerance quantification, the SRT can be used to ensure that digital I and C implementations are both safe and cost-effective for the nuclear industry. This paper describes the application of the SRT to perform V and V of a new Digital Rod Position Indication (DRPI) diagnostic system. The DRPI diagnostic system is a digital system that monitors the rod address and rod position data bus voltages of typical DRPI systems in nuclear power plants to detect and diagnose faults. For this application, the SRT was configured to exercise the inputs of the DRPI diagnostic system, and test cases were generated for common system faults such as address and data bit errors, bus voltage, and timing problems. These test cases were applied by the SRT hardware as voltage inputs to the DRPI diagnostic system and the outputs were compared to expected values generated by a model of the DRPI diagnostic system. Included in the paper is a description of the overall design of the SRT including the hardware and software architectures. Methodologies for automating test cases are also described. V and V using the SRT demonstrates the benefits of automated testing and qualification to provide a quantitative assessment of reliability and cost effective implementation of digital I and C in existing and next generation nuclear power plants. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Supervisory Control System for Multi-Modular Advanced Reactors

The proposed supervisory control system (SCS) may provide considerable benefits to advanced small modular reactors, including reduced plant staffing, optimized maintenance activities, greater plant availability, and higher operating efficiency. The SCS makes risk-informed decisions based on (1) a probabilistic assessment of the likelihood of success given the status of the plant/systems and component health, and (2) a deterministic assessment between plant operating parameters and reactor protection parameters to prevent unnecessary trips and challenges to plant safety system—one measure of SCS success. The probabilistic portion of the decision-making engine of the SCS is based on the control actions associated with an advanced liquid-metal reactor (ALMR) Power Reactor, Innovative, Small Module (PRISM). Within the SCS, the probabilistic assessment provides a ranking of viable control actions; however, certain instructions generated by the probabilistic model only include an abstract notion of action without specifications. For instance, one instruction may be to reduce power without specifying how much reduction is needed. The prognostic/diagnostic models incorporate the health of components into the decision-making process. Once the control options are identified and ranked based on the likelihood of success, the SCS transmits the options to the deterministic portion of the platform. The performance-based system models assess and rank each of the probabilistically identified control actions by taking into account the physical behavior (current and projected) of the system. The performance-based decision making module receives inputs from the probabilistic decision-making module and the ERM module to generate a single solution. Interfaces to these modules are defined later in the section. A utility theory algorithm factors into the decision making by estimating the distance from and approach to a trip setpoint for each control option. If the magnitude of a negative utility value increases rapidly as the system approaches the trip setpoint, that option is not likely to be the preferred option. This can lead to a re-ranking of the control options. The SCS then transmits a control signal(s) to a component or system and informs the operator of actions taken based on the action chosen. The SCS successfully coupled probabilistic and performance-based system models to arrive at optimal control decisions based on the actual status of the plant and components. The automatic, autonomous, and real-time performance requirements for a control system were met by the SCS. The value of coupling probabilistic and performance-based system models was demonstrated by the re-ranking of control options based on the use of a utility algorithm. The use of ERM monitors provides added value to the SCS as demonstrated by the re-ranking of control options based on a components degraded state.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Making Coal Relevant for Small Scale Applications: Modular Gasification for Syngas/Engine CHP Applications in Challenging Environments

This Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) study is funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), and managed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) through a Cooperative Agreement awarded to the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) to perform a technical and cost study for the design and installation of a Hamilton-Maurer International (HMI) gasifier for generating a clean syngas for firing in reciprocating engines. An existing diesel engine generator (DEG) and a commercially available spark ignition engine are used to generate electricity with the low-Btu syngas. Other than the HMI gasifier, only commercially available technologies were assumed for this study. An important objective of this design study was to estimate capital and operating costs of small modular coal and coal/biomass fired generating units to provide wind regulation services. Although this study is based on retrofitting an existing coal fired power plant with the HMI gasifier, sufficient data was developed to characterize greenfield units. The original concept was to provide clean syngas and tars/oils from the gasification process to the existing Colt-Pielstick PC2.6B diesel engine generator (9.6 MWe) installed at the UAF Atkinson Power Plant. The intent was to convert the diesel engine to operate in a dual fuel mode, firing both syngas and tars/oils. As the project progressed, Fairbanks Morse Engine (FME), current licensee for the Colt-Pielstick engine line, was not able to develop a modification package for the engine to allow for syngas firing. Although this type of modification is available for firing natural gas, the capability does not extend to syngas. Western Energy Systems, distributor for Innio Jenbacher, was able to offer the Jenbacher Model JMS620 engine. After review of available options, the project team selected a design configuration using two Jenbacher engines rated at 1965 kWe each to fire the syngas, with the oils/tars directed to the Colt Pielstick diesel to be blended with ultra-low sulfur diesel oil (ULSD). The Jenbacher engines are expected to operate at continuous base load, with some load-following ability, while the existing diesel engine will operate in grid support service, with loads varying from a nominal 25% to 100%. An annual capacity factor for the diesel engine is projected to be between 50% and 60%. The overall gasifier and gas clean-up system is sized to produce enough syngas to adequately fuel three Jenbacher Engines for a nominal power output of 5.9 MWe, but this study assumes that only two Jenbacher engines will be installed due to space constraints in the Atkinson Power Plant, and because of expected air emission permit limitations. There is still potential that the excess syngas capacity equivalent to about 2 MWe could be used as supplemental fuel for the DEG. The exhaust from the Jenbacher engines is passed through heat recovery units to generate low pressure steam, thereby providing a significant portion of the steam required for operating the gasifier. The overall performance of the HMI gasifier/engine configuration is summarized as follows: 1) Overall electric efficiency, Jenbacher and diesel engines, based on gasifier fuel production (syngas and pyrolysis liquids) is 35.2% LHV, 2) Overall cogenerating efficiency (electricity plus steam), based on gasifier fuel production (syngas and pyrolysis liquids) is 54.8% LHV, 3) Overall electric efficiency, Jenbacher and diesel engines, based on coal input, is 29.6% LHV, and 4) Overall cogenerating efficiency, electricity plus steam, based on coal input is 46.0%. This project is estimated to have a Bare Erected Cost (BEC) of $\$$ 33.4 million and a Total Plant Cost (TPC) of $\$$ 45.7 million. Based on the original scope, sending both the clean syngas and the oils and tars to the existing diesel engine, the BEC and TPC values would have been $\$$ 23.3 million and $\$$ 32.1 million, respectively. A variable Cost of Electricity (COE) is calculated to reflect only those costs that will be incurred by incremental operation of the system for the HMI gasifier/Jenbacher engine combination. Operation of the diesel engine is determined separately. The variable COE values are: Case 1: 100% Usibelli Coal: (a) HMI gasifier/Jenbacher Engines -- 8.3 cents/kWh; (b) Diesel Engine -- 20.2 cents/kWh, and Case 2: 80% Usibelli Coal + 20% wood chips (proportion based on Btu input, LHV basis): (a) HMI Gasifier/Jenbacher -- 13.7 cents/kWh; (b) Diesel Engine -- 20.2 cents/kWh. The incremental cost of operating the gasifier/Jenbacher system increases with co-firing of wood chips due to the high cost of this material, over five times as costly as Usibelli coal delivered to the Atkinson Power building. The diesel cost is constant as the oils and tars are priced at the same value as the ULSD for the purposes of fueling the diesel engine. Section 8 of this report provides details of the O&M costs. The overall power system is configured to be modular and scalable to provide a wide range of generating capacity using the same components. This allows for reduction in cost, risk, schedule time to engineer and construct, and provides some degree of repeatability for air permitting.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
NASA NTRS2002

Robosphere1: Building A Self-Sustaining Robotic Ecology for Mars Exploration

Robotic exploration of Mars has been a "one shot" approach where each surface mission is planned typically with a rover that will perform a series of experiments for a few weeks or months, until the robot becomes unable to operate in the harsh Mars conditions and simply "dies". It would clearly be desirable to have robots on Mars that can last for much longer periods of time, I propose that there is an approach to sustained robotic exploration that can also pave the way to future human presence. The idea is to continue building a robotic infrastructure with every mission we send. The approach is to built a team of modular robots that could repair individual members when they break down. We could "seed" areas of interest with sturdy power stations (solar, chemical) that teams of robots could use to recharge themselves. We could also seed parts and modules the robots could access for self-repair. No mission could really "fail" if we simply keep adding to and maintaining the existing infrastructure. Simply landing a package of parts will be a success. In time we create a loose infrastructure that can be controlled and augmented from earth on a continuing basis, and which could eventually pave the way for human exploration. I propose that we could begin to build this infrastructure from relatively simple modular robots. Imagine 2 "spider-like" robots built out of small modular snap-in pieces, a bin of these pieces and a bin of snap-in end effectors. One of the spiders breaks down, i.e. one of its modules needs to be replaced. The second spider comes to the rescue and helps the first one replace the broken module. Assuming the input of fresh modules, this process can continue indefinetly. Now start separating robotic explorers from robotic "mechanics", start adding, a category of mechanics that are able to fix at least some of the broken modules (and which in turn can be fixed by the original mechanics), The need for a fresh influx of modules is thus reduced. I submit that we could bootstrap a robotic ecology until it needs very little material from earth and can rely mostly on in-situ resources., We can experiment with this concept in an earthbound facility that can also simulate Mars conditions. I propose that we call this facility Robosphere1.

Colombano, Silvano P.↗