SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “LWRS Program”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Assembly and Delivery of Rabbit Capsules for Irradiation of Silicon Carbide Cladding Tube Specimens in the High Flux Isotope Reactor

Neutron irradiation of silicon carbide (SiC)-based fuel cladding under a high radial heat flux presents a critical challenge for SiC cladding concepts in light water reactors (LWRs). Fission heating in the fuel provides a high heat flux through the cladding, which, combined with the degraded thermal conductivity of SiC under irradiation, results in a large temperature gradient through the thickness of the cladding. The strong temperature dependence of swelling in SiC creates a complex stress profile in SiCbased cladding tubes as a result of differential swelling. The Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) Program within the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy is supporting research efforts to improve the scientific understanding of the effects of irradiation on SiC cladding tubes. Ultimately, the results of this project will provide experimental validation of multi-physics models for SiC-based fuel cladding during LWR operation. The first objective of this project is to irradiate tube specimens using a previously developed design that allows for irradiation testing of miniature SiC tube specimens subjected to a high radial heat flux. The previous “rabbit” capsule design uses the gamma heating in the core of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) to drive a high heat flux through the cladding tube specimens. A compressible aluminum foil allows for a constant thermal contact conductance between the cladding tubes and the rabbit housing despite swelling of the SiC tubes. To allow separation of the effects of irradiation from those due to differential swelling under a high heat flux, a new design was developed under the NSUF program. This design allows for irradiation of similar SiC cladding tube specimens without a high radial heat flux. This report briefly describes the irradiation experiment design concepts, summarizes the irradiation test matrix, and reports on the successful delivery of six rabbit capsules to the HFIR. Rabbits of both low and high heat flux configurations have been assembled, welded, evaluated, and delivered to the HFIR along with a complete quality assurance fabrication package. These rabbits contain a wide variety of specimens including monolith tubes, SiC fiber SiC matrix (SiC/SiC) composites, duplex specimens (inner composite, outer monolith), and specimens with a variety of metallic or ceramic coatings on the outer surface. The rabbits are targeted for insertion during HFIR cycle 475, which is scheduled for September 2017.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2012

Uranium mononitride as a potential commercial LWR fuel

This paper evaluated uranium mononitride (UN) as a potential replacement for 5% enriched UO{sub 2} fuel in Generation III and III+ commercial light water reactors (LWRs). Significant improvement in LWR performance depends on developing and implementing changes in the nuclear fuel used in these reactors. Compared to UO{sub 2}, UN offers several advantages such as higher uranium loading and better thermal conductivity. In this paper, the thermal safety margin of UN was evaluated at both normal and accident conditions using a readily available coupled CFD model developed for the US DOE CASL program. One of the prime technical challenges in utilization of UN as LWR fuel is the water compatibility because pure phase UN is not stable in water at 350 deg. C. The water corrosion resistance of UN and the corrosion mechanism were reviewed and mitigation methods were proposed. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Regulatory Gap Analysis of Select NUREG-0800 Chapters for Applicability to Molten Salt Reactors

The past licensing approach for advanced reactors was based on adapting the current LWR-based NRC process that exists today to the advanced reactor concept. This is the approach used by advanced technologies such as the Pebble Bed Reactor licensing application, the Clinch River Breeder Reactor licensing application, and more recently the NuScale licensing application. Current Standard Review Plan (SRP) guidance for large LWRs is available in NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: Light Water Reactor (LWR) Edition. However, the SRP is cumbersome to apply to liquid-fueled molten salt reactor (MSR) technologies. Therefore, a thoughtful licensing approach for MSRs is necessary.This report documents for DOE-NE an additional regulatory gap analysis of select chapters from the LWR SRP to further inform a generic nonpower MSR test program. Although the review process outlined in NUREG-0800 is LWR-specific, the plant functions and processes to be reviewed will be similar for the MSR. Therefore, a well-planned nonpower MSR test program can provide the performance data needed to better facilitate the eventual commercial-sized MSR review. The LWR SRP chapters dealing with the reactor, reactor coolant, engineered safety features, auxiliary systems, and waste management systems were reviewed.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Behavior of high-burnup advanced LWR fuels under accident conditions

Advanced fuels for LWRs which consist of cladding materials with high corrosion resistance and pellets with lower fission gas release have been developed by utilities and fuel vendors to improve the fuel performance even in the high burnup region and also raise the safety level of current nuclear power plants to a higher one. In order to evaluate the adequacy of present safety criteria and safety margins in terms of such advanced fuels and provide a database for future regulation of them, JAEA has started a new extensive research program called ALPS-II program. The ALPS-II program is primarily composed of tests simulating a RIA (Reactivity Initiated Accident) (VA-5 and -6 tests) and a LOCA (Loss Of Coolant Accident) on high burnup advanced fuels irradiated in commercial PWR or BWRs and started in JFY 2008. Recently, post-test examinations on the fuel rods after the pulse irradiation tests of VA-5 and -6 were performed and the relationship between the failure limits of the high burnup advanced fuels with M-MDA{sup TM} cladding and the morphology of the hydrides precipitated in the cladding during normal operation was investigated. The difference in the crack surface morphology was observed between tests VA-5 and-6, which seemed to reflect the difference in the direction along which hydrides precipitate in the cladding. This indicates that the hydride precipitated in the cladding, which is considered to be dependent on the final heat treatment at fabrication, affects the fuel enthalpy at failure. In terms of the simulated LOCA test, integral thermal shock tests and high temperature oxidation tests have been conducted on high burnup PWR and BWR fuel cladding with advanced materials, and their fracture limits, high temperature oxidation rates, etc. were investigated. In the recent integral thermal shock tests for high burnup BWR cladding, namely Zry-2/LK3 material, no fractures were observed. In terms of the oxidation rate tests, the oxidation rate of irradiated M5{sup TM} was similar to those of unirradiated Zry-4 and M5{sup TM} and lower than the values estimated by the Baker-Just equation. From the results of these tests, it was found that in terms of these materials the fracture boundaries do not decrease and the oxidation does not significantly accelerate in the burnup level examined.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2015

Transition Analysis of Promising U.S. Future Fuel Cycles Using ORION

The US Department of Energy Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies performed an evaluation and screening (E&S) study of nuclear fuel cycle options to help prioritize future research and development decisions. Previous work for this E&S study focused on establishing equilibrium conditions for analysis examples of 40 nuclear fuel cycle evaluation groups (EGs) and evaluating their performance according to a set of 22 standardized metrics. Following the E&S study, additional studies are being conducted to assess transitioning from the current US fuel cycle to future fuel cycle options identified by the E&S study as being most promising. These studies help inform decisions on how to effectively achieve full transition, estimate the length of time needed to undergo transition from the current fuel cycle, and evaluate performance of nuclear systems and facilities in place during the transition. These studies also help identify any barriers to achieve transition. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Fuel Cycle Options Campaign team used ORION to analyze the transition pathway from the existing US nuclear fuel cycle—the once-through use of low-enriched-uranium (LEU) fuel in thermal-spectrum light water reactors (LWRs) —to a new fuel cycle with continuous recycling of plutonium and uranium in sodium fast reactors (SFRs). This paper discusses the analysis of the transition from an LWR to an SFR fleet using ORION, highlights the role of lifetime extensions of existing LWRs to aid transition, and discusses how a slight delay in SFR deployment can actually reduce the time to achieve an equilibrium fuel cycle.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2011

Improved Creep-Fatigue Models on Advanced Materials for SFR Applications (Final Report)

This report provides an update on the materials performance criteria and methodology relevant to sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs). The report is the second deliverable (Level 2) in FY11 (M2A11AN040303) under the work package A-11AN040303 “Materials Performance Criteria and Methodology” as part of the Advanced Structural Materials Program for the Advanced Reactor Concepts. The overall objective of the Materials Performance Criteria and Methodology work project is to evaluate the key requirements for the ASME Code qualification and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approval of advanced structural materials in support of the design and performance of sodium-cooled fast reactors. Advanced materials are a critical element in the development of fast reactor technologies. Enhanced materials performance not only improves safety margins and provides design flexibility, but also is essential for the economics of future advanced fast reactors. Qualification and licensing of advanced materials are prominent needs for the development and implementation of advanced fast reactor technologies. Nuclear structural component designs in the U.S. comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code Section III (Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components), and the NRC grants licensing. As the SFRs will operate at higher temperatures than the current light water reactors (LWRs), the design of elevated-temperature components must comply with ASME Section III Subsection NH (Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service). A number of technical issues relevant to materials performance criteria and high temperature design methodology in the SFR were identified and presented in earlier reports. A viable approach to resolve these issues and the R&D priority were also recommended. The development of mechanistically based creep-fatigue interaction models for life prediction and reliable data extrapolation was chosen to be the central focus in near-term efforts. Our current focus is on the creep-fatigue damage issue in high-strength ferritic/martensitic steels such as mod.9Cr-1Mo (G91) and NF616 (G92) steels. The current ASME creep-fatigue design rule puts severe limits of fatigue and creep loads for G91 steel, the lead structural material for fast reactors. High-strength ferritic/martensitic steels behave fundamentally differently from austenitic stainless steels, for which the current ASME creep-fatigue design rules were developed. The unique deformation and damage characteristics in G91 steel, e.g. cyclic softening, degradation of creep and rupture strength during cyclic service, demands a new creep-fatigue design procedure that explicitly accounts for the material’s unique creep-fatigue behavior. G92 steel, a variant of G91 steel, is the lead candidate in the Advanced Alloy Development program. There is currently no creep-fatigue design rule available for this advanced alloy. To support the predictive model development and resolve the over-conservative issue with the ASME design rule for G91 steel, we recovered stress relaxation data from thirteen creep-fatigue tests conducted in the late 1980s and early 1990s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and conducted extensive data analysis in FY10. Based on this database and available literature data, we have developed a Cyclic Softening Model and a Stress Relaxation Model specifically applied to G91 steel. The Cyclic Softening Model describes the cyclic stress variation as a function of cycle number during creep-fatigue loading, and well captures the cyclic softening effect in G91 steel. The Stress Relaxation Model predicts the stress relaxation curve during the hold time of cyclic loading, and its dependence on the cyclic softening effect of G91 steel. Two creep-fatigue test systems have been set up to conduct model-oriented creep-fatigue experiments. Results from three creep-fatigue experiments on Heat 30176 of G91 steel are presented in the report: (1) a test performed at 550°C with total strain amplitude of 0.25% and a hold time of 60 s applied at peak strains in both tension and compression, (2) a test performed at 400°C with total strain amplitude of 0.5% and a tension and compression hold time of 60 s, and (3) a test performed at 20°C with total strain amplitude of 0.5% and a tension and compression hold time of 60 s. Three different test temperatures were chosen for two primary reasons: to determine the transition temperature of creep-fatigue interaction from a plasticity-dominated process to a creep-dominated process; to develop unified creep-fatigue models applicable for a wide range of temperatures. With the detailed information obtained in the creep-fatigue experiments, we have further refined the Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model. The Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model were incorporated into the Bilinear Creep-Fatigue Damage Model, forming a powerful framework for the life prediction by an improved creep-fatigue evaluation methodology. The cyclic softening and consecutive stress relaxation responses in G91 steel can be considered for each cycle of the entire cyclic process in the model calculation. The creep-fatigue damage in G91 steel was evaluated using the improved Bilinear Creep-Fatigue Damage Model without any safety margins. It was found that due to the significant cyclic softening in G91 steel, the unit creep damage in each cycle decreased continuously with increasing number of cycles. This continuous change in creep damage with cycling has significant implication in the evaluation of the total creep-fatigue damage. The total creep damage can be one order of magnitude lower when the unit creep damage at half-life was used in the evaluation in comparison with the calculations using the unit creep damage at cycle 10. An important conclusion was that the accurate assessment of the creep-fatigue damage in G91 steel must consider the history of cycling. This analysis provides a more realistic assessment of creep-fatigue damage and identifies critical factors that must be considered in the development of future advanced models for high-strength ferritic/martensitic alloys. An accelerated creep-fatigue testing methodology is proposed for the design of model-oriented experiments to guide and validate model developments. Future work will focus on creep-fatigue experiments of both G91 and G92 steels, and development of creep-fatigue models applicable to advanced ferritic/martensitic alloys. The Cyclic Softening Model and Stress Relaxation Model will be improved by incorporating microstructural parameters of dislocation density, subgrain structure, and second-phase particles. Collaborative modeling of combined Cyclic Softening Model, Stress Relaxation Model, and Interactive Damage Rate Model will be pursued for life prediction under creep-fatigue loading with extended hold time. Accelerated, well-controlled creep-fatigue tests will be conducted to provide high-quality experimental data to refine key material parameters and validate models.

Li, Meimei↗

DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-4 and Module D1-5 Ceramic Pelletized Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) Fuel Fabrication Ceramic Vibrocompacted Fuel Fabrication

This is a cost module that is part of the Advanced Fuel Cycle -- Cost Basis Report. Module D1-4: Nature of this module update (Rev 1) from previous advanced fuel cycle cost basis reports (AFCCBRs): new life cycle cost data on U,Pu SFR mixed oxide (MOX) fuels is derived from the Nonproliferation Assessment Systems Analysis Program (NASAP) conducted in the late 1970s. Highassay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) ceramic fuel is also discussed in more detail compared to earlier AFC-CBRs, since some advanced SFR concepts currently under development will require this HALEU fuel type for startup. Module D1-5: Nature of this FY-21 module update from previous AFC-CBRs: this module includes a few new references and a somewhat expanded discussion of vibrocompaction fuel fabrication technology. The WIT values for VIPAC are pegged directly to those for conventional LWR and SFR pelletized U,Pu MOX (note that this module now includes VIPAC MOX fuel for LWRs in addition to SFRs). Based on information from Russia, where VIPAC has been studied extensively, the unit costs are expressed as a percentage of those in the new updated Module D1-2 (pelletized U,Pu MOX) and new updated Module D1-4 (pelletized U,Pu MOX) for large NOAK fabrication facilities of the same production capacity. Since both ceramic pelletized MOX Modules D1-2 and D1-4 benefitted from analysis of 1970s NASAP data, by extension this Module D1-5 also benefits.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

SURROGATE MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF REACTOR PRESSURE VESSELS

In nuclear light water reactors (LWRs), the reactor coolant, core and shroud are contained within a massive, thick walled steel vessel known as a reactor pressure vessel (RPV). Given the tremendous size of these structures, RPVs typically contain a large population of pre-existing flaws introduced in the manufacturing process. After many years of operation, irradiation-induced embrittlement makes these vessels increasingly susceptible to fracture initiation at the locations of the pre-existing flaws. Because of the uncertainty in the loading conditions, flaw characteristics and material properties, probabilistic methods are widely accepted and used in assessing RPV integrity. The Fracture Analysis of Vessels – Oak Ridge (FAVOR) computer program developed by researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is widely used for this purpose. This program can be used in order to perform deterministic and probabilistic risk-informed analyses of the structural integrity of an RPV subjected to a range of thermal-hydraulic events. FAVOR uses a one-dimensional representation of the global response of the RPV, which is appropriate for the beltline region, which experiences the most embrittlement, and employs an influence coefficient technique to rapidly compute stress intensity factors for axis-aligned surface-breaking flaws. The Grizzly code is currently under development at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to be used as a general multiphysics simulation tool to study a variety of degradation mechanisms in nuclear power plant components. The first application of Grizzly has been to study fracture in embrittled RPVs. Grizzly can be used to model the thermo-mechanical response of an RPV under transient conditions observed in a pressurized thermal shock (PTS) scenario. The global response of the vessel provides boundary conditions for local 3D models of the material in the vicinity of a flaw. Fracture domain integrals are computed to obtain stress intensity factors, which can in turn be used to assess whether a fracture would initiate at a pre-existing flaw. To use Grizzly for probabilistic analysis, it is necessary to have a way to rapidly evaluate stress intensity factors. To accomplish this goal, a reduced order model (ROM) has been developed to efficiently represent the behavior of a detailed 3D Grizzly model used to calculate fracture parameters. This approach uses the stress intensity factor influence coefficient method that has been used with great success in FAVOR. Instead of interpolating between tabulated solutions, as FAVOR does, the ROM approach uses a response surface methodology to compute fracture solutions based on a sampled set of results used to train the ROM. The main advantages of this approach are that the process of generating the training data can be fully automated, and the procedure can be readily used to consider more general flaw configurations. This paper demonstrates the procedure used to generate a ROM to rapidly compute stress intensity factors for axis-aligned flaws. The results from this procedure are in good agreement with those produced using the traditional influence coefficient interpolation procedure, which gives confidence in this method. This paves the way for applying this procedure for more general flaw configurations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Mechanistic Source Term Considerations for Advanced Non-LWRs

This report is a functional review of the radionuclide containment strategies of fluoride-salt-cooled high temperature reactor (FHR), molten salt reactor (IVISR) and high temperature gas reactor (HTGR) systems. This analysis serves as a starting point for further, more in-depth analyses geared towards identifying phenomenological gaps that still exist, preventing the creation of a mechanistic source term for these reactor types. As background information to this review, an overview of how a mechanistic source term is created and used for consequence assessment necessary for licensing is provided. How mechanistic source term is used within the LMP is also provided. Third, the characteristics of non-LWR mechanistic source terms are examined This report does not assess the viability of any software system for use with advanced reactor designs, but instead covers system function requirements. Future work within the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulations (NEAMS) program will address such gaps.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Mechanistic Source Term Considerations for Advanced Non-LWRs (Revision 1)

This report is a functional review of the radionuclide containment strategies of fluoride-salt-cooled high temperature reactor (FHR), molten salt reactor (MSR) and high temperature gas reactor (HTGR) systems. This analysis serves as a starting point for further, more in-depth analyses geared towards identifying phenomenological gaps that still exist, hindering the creation of a mechanistic source term for these reactor types. As background information to this review, an overview of how a mechanistic source term is created and used for consequence assessment necessary for licensing is provided. How a mechanistic source term is used within the Licensing Modernization Project (LMP) is also provided. Lastly, the characteristics of non-LWR mechanistic source terms are examined. This report does not assess the viability of any software system for use with advanced reactor designs, but instead covers system function requirements. Future work within the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulations (NEAMS) program will address such gaps. This document is an update of SAND 2020-6730. An additional chapter is included as well as edits to original content.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI1993

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 34, No. 1, January-March 1993]

Nuclear Safety is a review journal that covers significant developments in the field of nuclear safety. Its scope includes the analysis and control of hazards associated with nuclear energy, operations involving fissionable materials, and the products of nuclear fission and their effects on the environment. Primary emphasis is on safety in reactor design, construction, and operation; however, the safety aspects of the entire fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing, nuclear waste disposal, handling of radioisotopes, and environmental effects of these operations, are also treated. Table of Contents for this issue follows. GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 1 An Integrated Regional Approach To Risk Management of Industrial Systems, S. Chakraborty and R. Stratton; 9 Annual Technical Meeting of the NRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program, E. G. Silver; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 13 Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria as Severe Accident Design Criteria and Policy for the New Production Reactor-Heavy Water Reactor, P. T. Rhoads; 20 Proposed Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria for the Heavy Water Reactor-New Production Reactor Containment, K. D. Bergeron, S. E. Slezak, and C. E. Leach; 33 Quasi-Static Core Liquid Level Depression and Long-Term Core Uncovery During a PWR LOCA, Y. Kukita, R. R. Schultz, H. Nakamura, and J. Katayama; 49 LIRA: An Advanced Containment System to Minimize the Accidental Radioactivity Releases, A. Turricchia; 63 Errata to “A Review of Hydrogen Production During Melt/Water Interaction in LWRs,” Vol. 33, No. 4; CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION: 64 The Nuplex 80+™ Advanced Control Complex from ABB Combustion Engineering, F. Ridolfo, D. Harmon, and K. Scarola; DESIGN FEATURES: 76 A Scheme for Passive Isolation of the Containment of a Reactor, A. K. Ghosh, V. V. Raj, and K. Kakodkar; 84 Utility Requirements for Safety in the Passive Advanced Light-Water Reactor, T. U. Marston, W. H. Layman, and G. Bockhold, Jr.; WASTE AND SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT: 91 Activities Related to Waste and Spent Fuel Management, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 103 Testing Deficiencies in Auxiliary Systems Feedwater Systems, J. D. Kueck; 110 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; 113 Selected Safety-Related Events, Compiled by G. A. Murphy; 115 Operating U.S. Power Reactors, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 133 General Administrative Activities, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; 145 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Queener; 150 Proposed Rule Changes as of Sept. 30, 1992; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 75 Harvard Short Course on Risk: Science, Assessment, and Management; 102 International Conference on Reactor Physics and Reactor Computations; 102 The Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Waste Reprocessing and Waste Management [RECOD ’94]; 132 International Symposium on the Radiological Exposure of the Population of the European Community from Radioactivity in the Mediterranean Sea [MARINA-MED]; 162 International High-Level Radioactive Waste Conference ‘Technology Integration—Above and Below”; 154 The Authors; 158 Indexes to Nuclear Safety, Volume 33.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI1993

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 34, No. 1, January-March 1993]

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Analysis of Synergistic Fuel Cycle Options with Thorium and Heavy Water Reactors

Fuel cycle options (FCOs) with thorium-based fuels have characteristics that may have benefits for meeting certain objectives, such as transuranic actinide inventory management and overall natural resource utilization. Neutron irradiation of thorium and uranium-233 results in negligible production of transuranic actinides. This advantage is compromised, to a degree, when thorium fuels are used in conjunction with uranium-238; however, strategic reprocessing and fuel use (e.g., recycle of plutonium and/or minor actinides) can be used to manage this problem. Furthermore, thorium FCOs with reprocessing can extend the availability of natural nuclear resources by breeding new fissile material, recovering and recycling unused material, and achieving high burnups. In instances where natural thorium is more readily available than uranium, FCOs which use thorium may be preferable from sustainability and energy security perspectives. However, many hybrid uranium-thorium FCOs struggle to perform well in this regard, since large amounts of external fissile material (and therefore natural uranium) are required to breed the required uranium-233. DOE's evaluation and screening effort reports that for every metric ton (MT) of U-233 bred in a light water reactor for reuse, about 1000 MT of natural uranium are required to support such breeding, much of which is used inefficiently due to enrichment. The combination of HWRs and thorium-based fuels has the potential to reduce this consumption of natural uranium resources. Because heavy water moderates neutrons without significant absorption, fissile material requirements are lower compared to those of LWRs. This has enabled conventional 'once-through' HWRs to operate with only slightly-enriched or even natural uranium. Also, HWRs can be combined with LWRs in multistage FCOs where used LWR fuel can be processed and the remaining fissile content is sufficient to support use as fuel in HWRs in spite of the presence of neutron poisons (e.g., uranium-236); this concept has been demonstrated at a research scale in Korea. Thus, additional energy is extracted from the same initial natural uranium feed and uranium enrichment effort. Another consideration with using thorium-based fuels in HWRs is the current limited operational experience of the reactors and associated fuel cycle facilities using these fuels. However, work continues internationally towards gaining further experience. For example, at equilibrium the third stage of India's planned Three-Stage Nuclear Power Program uses thorium/uranium-233 or thorium/plutonium fuels with a fissile supply from second-stage fast reactors. Further, China plans to experiment with low-enriched uranium (LEU)-Th CANFLEX fuel bundles in a once-through configuration in its HWRs and a long-term objective is to transition to thorium use in a closed HWR FCO. Vanderbilt University (VU) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) are characterizing multi-stage, thermal-reactor FCOs that incorporate thorium and examining their potential performance. This paper presents insights from the examination of FCOs which consider the synergy of HWRs and thorium. Two multi-stage FCOs which incorporate thorium-based fuels in HWRs have been examined for their potential, one which uses recycled PWR uranium oxide fuel in conjunction with thorium in an HWR, and another that uses recycled HWR fuel in an MSR which also includes thorium. Both of the systems studied offer resource utilization improvements as compared to a once-through LWR fueled with low-enrichment uranium and highlight the potential synergy of thorium and HWRs. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2013

Fuel Cycle System Analysis Implications of Sodium-Cooled Metal-Fueled Fast Reactor Transuranic Conversion Ratio

If advanced fuel cycles are to include a large number of fast reactors (FRs), what should be the transuranic (TRU) conversion ratio (CR)? The nuclear energy era started with the assumption that they should be breeder reactors (CR > 1), but the full range of possible CRs eventually received attention. For example, during the recent U.S. Global Nuclear Energy Partnership program, the proposal was burner reactors (CR < 1). Yet, more recently, Massachusetts Institute of Technology's "Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle" proposed CR [approximately] 1. Meanwhile, the French company EDF remains focused on breeders. At least one of the reasons for the differences of approach is different fuel cycle objectives. To clarify matters, this paper analyzes the impact of TRU CR on many parameters relevant to fuel cycle systems and therefore spans a broad range of topic areas. The analyses are based on a FR physics parameter scan of TRU CR from 0 to [approximately]1.8 in a sodium-cooled metal-fueled FR (SMFR), in which the fuel from uranium-oxide-fueled light water reactors (LWRs) is recycled directly to FRs and FRs displace LWRs in the fleet. In this instance, the FRs are sodium cooled and metal fueled. Generally, it is assumed that all TRU elements are recycled, which maximizes uranium ore utilization for a given TRU CR and waste radiotoxicity reduction and is consistent with the assumption of used metal fuel separated by electrochemical means. In these analyses, the fuel burnup was constrained by imposing a neutron fluence limit to fuel cladding to the same constant value. This paper first presents static, time-independent measures of performance for the LWR [right arrow] FR fuel cycle, including mass, heat, gamma emission, radiotoxicity, and the two figures of merit for materials for weapon attractiveness developed by C. Bathke et al. No new fuel cycle will achieve a static equilibrium in the foreseeable future. Therefore, additional analyses are shown with dynamic, time-dependent measures of performance including uranium usage, TRU inventory, and radiotoxicity to evaluate the complex impacts of transition from the current uranium-fueled LWR system, and other more realistic impacts that may not be intuited from the time-independent steady-state conditions of the end-state fuel cycle. These analyses were performed using the Verifiable Fuel Cycle Simulation Model VISION. Compared with static calculations, dynamic results paint a different picture of option space and the urgency of starting a FR fleet. For example, in a static analysis, there is a sharp increase in uranium utilization as CR exceeds 1.0 (burner versus breeder). However, in dynamic analyses that examine uranium use over the next 1 to 2 centuries, behavior as CR crosses the 1.0 threshold is smooth, and other parameters such as the time required outside of reactors to recycle fuel become important. Overall, we find that there is no unambiguously superior value of TRU CR; preferences depend on the relative importance of different fuel cycle system objectives.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

CASL Verification and Validation Plan

This report documents the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) verification and validation plan. The document builds upon input from CASL subject matter experts, most notably the CASL Challenge Problem Product Integrators, CASL Focus Area leaders, and CASL code development and assessment teams. This document will be a living document that will track progress on CASL to do verification and validation for both the CASL codes (including MPACT, CTF, BISON, MAMBA) and for the CASL challenge problems (CIPS, PCI, DNB). The CASL codes and the CASL challenge problems are at differing levels of maturity with respect to validation and verification. The gap analysis will summarize additional work that needs to be done. Additional VVUQ work will be done as resources permit. This report is prepared for the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) CASL program in support of milestone CASL.P13.02.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

VERA-Grizzly Ex-Core Calculations: Watts Bar Unit 1 Cycles 1-2

The critical structures that comprise light-water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plants are subjected to operating environments that can challenge their integrity. Structures in close proximity to the reactor core, such as the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) and the biological shield wall, are subjected to high levels of radiation emanating from the core, as well as elevated temperatures. As the US fleet of operating LWRs ages, the effects of these operating environments on the integrity of these structures must be considered to ensure their continued safe operation. Extending the lifetime of commercial reactors and maintaining the aging reactor fleet require accurate prediction of the exposure of ex-core components to neutron and photon radiation. In particular, concrete degradation studies must be performed to evaluate the safety and long-term operation of reactors with lifetime extensions. The concrete reactor bioshield is important for providing radiological protection during operation and must last for the entire lifetime of the reactor. Recent interest in lifetime extensions furthers the need to accurately simulate concrete material degradation in the reactor bioshield. As a result of this need, the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program has funded this study to couple its tools, Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) and Grizzly. VERA allows users to set up models to calculate time-dependent and fully coupled solutions (with thermal feedback) for ex-core quantities of interest such as vessel and coupon fluence and detector responses for multiple statepoints and cycles. Grizzly is a finite-element application based on the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework that is used to enable aging materials calculations. This report highlights the work performed to calculate the fluence in the vessel and concrete for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 (WBN1) Cycles 1 and 2. The fluences obtained from VERA were successfully transferred to Grizzly using a Python script. Four simulations were run with Grizzly: (1) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the instantaneous modulus, (2) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the delayed modulus, (3) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the delayed modulus with the addition of the effects of micro-damage caused by irradiation, and (4) the Mazars model with the initial Young’s modulus being the instantaneous modulus, and with the addition of micro-damage and creep. Details regarding the methods used to obtain the fluence and the statistical errors associated with the VERA Monte Carlo Shift calculations are discussed in greater detail in this report. The results obtained from the four Grizzly models are also presented in this report.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2013

DOE-NE Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program

Nuclear power has safely, reliably, and economically contributed almost 20% of the total amount of electricity generated in the United States over the past two decades. High capacity factors and low operating costs make nuclear power plants (NPPs) some of the most economical power generators available. Further, nuclear power remains the single largest contributor (more than 60%) of non-greenhouse-gas-emitting electric power generation in the United States. Even when major refurbishments are performed to extend operating life, these plants continue to represent cost-effective, low-carbon assets to the nation’s electrical generation capability.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Effect of Reactor Radiation on the Thermal Conductivity of Graphite-based Dispersion Fuel

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in 2011 stimulated materials development efforts to improve the current fuel design for Light Water Reactors (LWRs). From fuel element to fuel cladding, new concepts in advanced nuclear fuel development have been proposed, studied, and tested. The new fuel systems are expected to have better resistance to damage, melting, and chemical reaction during accident scenarios. To test the performance and accident tolerance of the advanced fuel, it is highly preferable to simulate off-normal transients in addition to standard in-core fuel performance tests (available at High Flux Isotope Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Advanced Test Reactor at Idaho National Laboratory). The Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) is now being prepared to restart its operation, performing transient testing to assist advanced fuel development. TREAT was operated from 1959 to 1994, and was extensively used to generate thousands of reactor transients for different programs. The reactor has not operated since 1994. The original fuel used at TREAT was graphite-based dispersion fuel with highly-enriched uranium (HEU, 93.1% enriched uranium). For nonproliferation purposes, a fuel conversion program, supported by U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Safety Administration (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (NA-23) Reactor Conversion Program, is underway to develop a replacement core in which the UO{sub 2} contains only low-enriched uranium (LEU). The preliminary LEU core design has shown a much lower carbon/uranium atomic ratio and enrichment than in the HEU core design. To achieve performance similar to the HEU core, the prospective LEU core will contain a much higher density of UO{sub 2} particles. As a result, a higher level of radiation damage, particularly from fission fragments emerging from the UO{sub 2} particles, can be expected dependent on the UO{sub 2} particle size within the fuel. To support LEU fuel design, the present study investigates the effect of reactor radiations on the thermal conductivity of graphite-based dispersion fuel. Both neutron- and fission-radiation induced degradations of the fuel are modeled, and validated based on the available experimental data. In this study, the reactor-radiation induced thermal conductivity degradation of graphite-based dispersion fuel was analyzed. A semi-empirical method to model the relative thermal conductivity with reactor radiations was proposed and validated. The proposed method can be further applied to predict the changes in the thermal conductivity of the prospective LEU TREAT fuel during long-term operation. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗