Double Braiding Majoranas for Quantum Computing and Hamiltonian Engineering
Not Available
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
For a considerable time, large datasets containing problem instances have proven valuable for analyzing computer hardware, software, and algorithms. One notable example of the value of large datasets is ImageNet [1], a vast repository of images that has been instrumental in testing numerous deep learning packages. Similarly, in the domain of computational chemistry and materials science, the availability of extensive datasets such as the Protein Data Bank [2], the Materials Project [3], and QM9 [4] has greatly facilitated the evaluation of new algorithms and software approaches, while also promoting standardization within the field. These well-defined datasets and problem instances, in turn, serve as the foundation for creating benchmarking suites like MLPerf [5] and LINPACK [6], [7]. These suites enable fair and rigorous comparisons of different methodologies and solutions, fostering continuous advancements in various areas of computer science and beyond.
Not Available
Deep learning can provide a better complementary link between the theoretical models and experimental results in magnetism.
The 3α phenomenological model describes the structure of the carbon-12 nucleus as a cluster of three alpha particles. This model includes a pairwise α–α interaction and a three-body force. To fit the three-body potential, the 12 C data are used, while ensuring that the pair potential reproduces the α–α scattering data. Alternatively, the mass-energy compensation (MEC) effect can be used to simulate the effect of the three-body potential by adjusting the mass of the α particle within the effective-mass approach. We demonstrate the MEC effect for the 3α ground state by numerically solving the differential Faddeev equation, in which the α–α interaction is described by the Ali-Bodmer potential. The effective masses of α particles are evaluated for the ground and excited 0 + and bound 2 + states. Here, we demonstrate a coupling between the ground and first excited 0 + states, indicated by an anti-crossing of these energy levels in the energy–mass coordinates. A correspondence between the effective mass and a three-body potential is demonstrated. We discuss the results of the 0$^{+}_{2}$ calculations for various models of the α–α interaction.
Short and revised version of SAND2024-14806O, to be published in the Proceedings of the ACM STOC 2025
Recent advances in programmable quantum devices brought to the fore the intriguing possibility of using them to realise and investigate topological quantum spin liquid phases. This new and exciting direction brings about important research questions on how to probe and determine the presence of such exotic, highly entangled phases in a noisy quantum environment. One of the most promising tools is investigating the behaviour of the topological excitations, and in particular their fractional statistics. In this work we put forward a generic route to achieve this, and we illustrate it in the specific case of \mathbb{Z}_2 ℤ 2 topological spin liquids implemented with the aid of combinatorial gauge symmetry. We design a convenient architecture to study signatures of fractional statistics via quasiparticle interferometry, and we assess its robustness to diagonal and off-diagonal disorder, as well as to dephasing - effects that are generally pervasive in current quantum programmable devices. Interestingly, when turned on its head, our scheme provides a remarkably clear test of the “quantumness” of these devices, with robust signatures that crucially hinge on quantum coherence and quantum interference effects, and cannot be mimicked by classical stochastic processes.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.