Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Appendices”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19

Phase transformations in metastable liquids combined with polymerization

Here, we report on the theory of nucleation and growth of crystals in a metastable polymer melt with allowance for the polymerization of a monomer. A mathematical model consisting of the heat balance equation, equations governing the particle-radius distribution function and the polymerization degree is formulated. The exact steady-state analytical solutions are found. In the case of unsteady-state crystallization with polymerization, the particle-size distribution function is determined analytically for different space–time regions by means of the Laplace transform. Two functional integro-differential equations governing the dimensionless temperature and polymerization degree are deduced. These equations are solved by means of the saddle-point technique for the evaluation of a Laplace-type integral. The time-dependent distribution function, temperature and polymerization degree at different polymerization rates and nucleation kinetics are derived with allowance for the main contribution to the Laplace-type integral. In addition, the general analytical solution by means of the saddle-point technique and an example showing how to construct the analytical solutions in particular cases are given in the appendices. The analytical method developed in this paper can be used to describe the similar phase transition phenomena in the presence of chemical reactions.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes

Here, this volume contains the edition of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes that was presented in draft form and available for comment at the Plenary Session of the Fourteenth International Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology (BAM), Montréal, 2014, together with updated lists of conserved and rejected bacterial names and of Opinions issued by the Judicial Commission. As in the past it brings together those changes accepted, published and documented by the ICSP and the Judicial Commission since the last revision was published. Several new appendices have been added to this edition. Appendix 11 addresses the appropriate application of the Candidatus concept, Appendix 12 contains the history of the van Niel Prize, and Appendix 13 contains the summaries of Congresses.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Quantifying correlated truncation errors in effective field theory

Effective field theories (EFTs) organize the description of complex systems into an infinite sequence of decreasing importance. Predictions are made with a finite number of terms, which induces a truncation error that is often left unquantified. Here, we formalize the notion of EFT convergence and propose a Bayesian truncation error model for predictions that are correlated across the independent variables, e.g., energy or scattering angle. Central to our approach are Gaussian processes that encode both the naturalness and correlation structure of EFT coefficients. Our use of Gaussian processes permits efficient and accurate assessment of credible intervals, allows EFT fits to easily include correlated theory errors, and provides analytic posteriors for physical EFT-related quantities such as the expansion parameter. Furthermore, we demonstrate that model-checking diagnostics—applied to the case of multiple curves—are powerful tools for EFT validation. As an example, we assess a set of nucleon-nucleon scattering observables in chiral EFT. In an effort to be self-contained, appendices include thorough derivations of our statistical results. Our methods are packaged in Python code, called gsum, that is available for download on GitHub.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Dark energy survey operations: years 4 and 5

The Dark Energy Survey is a “stage III” dark energy experiment, performing an optical imaging survey to measure cos-mological equation of state parameters using four independent methods. The scope and complexity of the survey, originallyscheduled for 525 nights of observing spread over five years and combining a 5000 degree wide survey with a 10 field weeklytime-domain survey, introduced complex strategic and tactical scheduling problems that needed to be addressed. We beginwith an overview of the process used to develop DES strategy and tactics, from the inception of the project, to task forces thatstudied and developed strategy changes over the course of the survey, to the nightly pre-observing meeting in which imme-diate tactical issues were addressed. We then summarize the strategic choices made for each sub-survey, including metrics,scheduling considerations, choice of time domain fields and their sequences of exposures, and wide survey footprint andpointing layout choices. We go on to describe the detailed process that determined which specific exposures were taken atwhich specific times. We give a chronology of the strategic and tactical peculiarities of each year of observing, including theproposal and execution of a sixth year. We give an overview ofobstac, the implementation of the DES scheduler used to sim-ulate and evaluate strategic and tactical options, and automate exposure scheduling; and describe developments inobstacfor use after DES. Appendices describe further details of data quality evaluation,τ, andteff; airmass calculation; and model-ing of the seeing and sky brightness. The significant corpus of DES data indicates that the simple scaling relations for seeingas a function of wavelength and airmass derived from the Kolmogorov turbulence model work adequately for exposureplanning purposes: deviations from these relations are modest in comparison with short time-scale seeing variations

Gruendl, Robert A.↗

TH-A-207B-00: Shear-Wave Imaging and a QIBA US Biomarker Update

Imaging of tissue elastic properties is a relatively new and powerful approach to one of the oldest and most important diagnostic tools. Imaging of shear wave speed with ultrasound is has been added to most high-end ultrasound systems. Understanding this exciting imaging mode aiding its most effective use in medicine can be a rewarding effort for medical physicists and other medical imaging and treatment professionals. Assuring consistent, quantitative measurements across the many ultrasound systems in a typical imaging department will constitute a major step toward realizing the great potential of this technique and other quantitative imaging. This session will target these two goals with two presentations. A. Basics and Current Implementations of Ultrasound Imaging of Shear Wave Speed and Elasticity - Shigao Chen, Ph.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Introduction: Importance of tissue elasticity measurement Strain vs. shear wave elastography (SWE), beneficial features of SWE The link between shear wave speed and material properties, influence of viscosity Generation of shear waves External vibration (Fibroscan) ultrasound radiation force Point push Supersonic push (Aixplorer) Comb push (GE Logiq E9) Detection of shear waves Motion detection from pulse-echo ultrasound Importance of frame rate for shear wave imaging Plane wave imaging detection How to achieve high effective frame rate using line-by-line scanners Shear wave speed calculation Time to peak Random sample consensus (RANSAC) Cross correlation Sources of bias and variation in SWE Tissue viscosity Transducer compression or internal pressure of organ Reflection of shear waves at boundaries B. Elasticity Imaging System Biomarker Qualification and User Testing of Systems – Brian Garra, M.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Goals Review the need for quantitative medical imaging Provide examples of quantitative imaging biomarkers Acquaint the participant with the purpose of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance and the need for such an organization Review the QIBA process for creating a quantitative biomarker Summarize steps needed to verify adherence of site, operators, and imaging systems to a QIBA profile Underlying Premise and Assumptions Objective, quantifiable results are needed to enhance the value of diagnostic imaging in clinical practice Reasons for quantification Evidence based medicine requires objective, not subjective observer data Computerized decision support tools (eg CAD) generally require quantitative input. Quantitative, reproducible measures are more easily used to develop personalized molecular medical diagnostic and treatment systems What is quantitative imaging? Definition from Imaging Metrology Workshop The Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Formation 2008 Mission Structure Example Imaging Biomarkers Being Explored Biomarker Selection Groundwork Draft Protocol for imaging and data evaluation QIBA Profile Drafting Equipment and Site Validation Technical Clinical Site and Equipment QA and Compliance Checking Ultrasound Elasticity Estimation Biomarker US Elasticity Estimation Background Current Status and Problems Biomarker Selection-process and outcome US SWS for Liver Fibrosis Biomarker Work Groundwork Literature search and analysis results Phase I phantom testing-Elastic phantoms Phase II phantom testing-Viscoelastic phantoms Digital Simulated Data Protocol and Profile Drafting Protocol: based on UPICT and existing literature and standards bodies protocols Profile-Current claims, Manufacturer specific appendices What comes after the profile Profile Validation Technical validation Clinical validation QA and Compliance Possible approaches Site Operator testing Site protocol re-evaluation Imaging system Manufacturer testing and attestation User acceptance testing and periodic QA Phantom Tests Digital Phantom Based Testing Standard QA Testing Remediation Schemes Profile Evolution Towards additional applications Towards higher accuracy and precision Supported in part by NIH contract HHSN268201300071C from NIBIB. Collaboration with GE Global Research, no personal support.; S. Chen, Some technologies described in this presentation have been licensed. Mayo Clinic and Dr. Chen have financial interests these technologies.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

TH-A-207B-01: Basics and Current Implementations of Ultrasound Imaging of Shear Wave Speed and Elasticity

Imaging of tissue elastic properties is a relatively new and powerful approach to one of the oldest and most important diagnostic tools. Imaging of shear wave speed with ultrasound is has been added to most high-end ultrasound systems. Understanding this exciting imaging mode aiding its most effective use in medicine can be a rewarding effort for medical physicists and other medical imaging and treatment professionals. Assuring consistent, quantitative measurements across the many ultrasound systems in a typical imaging department will constitute a major step toward realizing the great potential of this technique and other quantitative imaging. This session will target these two goals with two presentations. A. Basics and Current Implementations of Ultrasound Imaging of Shear Wave Speed and Elasticity - Shigao Chen, Ph.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Introduction: Importance of tissue elasticity measurement Strain vs. shear wave elastography (SWE), beneficial features of SWE The link between shear wave speed and material properties, influence of viscosity Generation of shear waves External vibration (Fibroscan) ultrasound radiation force Point push Supersonic push (Aixplorer) Comb push (GE Logiq E9) Detection of shear waves Motion detection from pulse-echo ultrasound Importance of frame rate for shear wave imaging Plane wave imaging detection How to achieve high effective frame rate using line-by-line scanners Shear wave speed calculation Time to peak Random sample consensus (RANSAC) Cross correlation Sources of bias and variation in SWE Tissue viscosity Transducer compression or internal pressure of organ Reflection of shear waves at boundaries B. Elasticity Imaging System Biomarker Qualification and User Testing of Systems – Brian Garra, M.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Goals Review the need for quantitative medical imaging Provide examples of quantitative imaging biomarkers Acquaint the participant with the purpose of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance and the need for such an organization Review the QIBA process for creating a quantitative biomarker Summarize steps needed to verify adherence of site, operators, and imaging systems to a QIBA profile Underlying Premise and Assumptions Objective, quantifiable results are needed to enhance the value of diagnostic imaging in clinical practice Reasons for quantification Evidence based medicine requires objective, not subjective observer data Computerized decision support tools (eg CAD) generally require quantitative input. Quantitative, reproducible measures are more easily used to develop personalized molecular medical diagnostic and treatment systems What is quantitative imaging? Definition from Imaging Metrology Workshop The Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Formation 2008 Mission Structure Example Imaging Biomarkers Being Explored Biomarker Selection Groundwork Draft Protocol for imaging and data evaluation QIBA Profile Drafting Equipment and Site Validation Technical Clinical Site and Equipment QA and Compliance Checking Ultrasound Elasticity Estimation Biomarker US Elasticity Estimation Background Current Status and Problems Biomarker Selection-process and outcome US SWS for Liver Fibrosis Biomarker Work Groundwork Literature search and analysis results Phase I phantom testing-Elastic phantoms Phase II phantom testing-Viscoelastic phantoms Digital Simulated Data Protocol and Profile Drafting Protocol: based on UPICT and existing literature and standards bodies protocols Profile-Current claims, Manufacturer specific appendices What comes after the profile Profile Validation Technical validation Clinical validation QA and Compliance Possible approaches Site Operator testing Site protocol re-evaluation Imaging system Manufacturer testing and attestation User acceptance testing and periodic QA Phantom Tests Digital Phantom Based Testing Standard QA Testing Remediation Schemes Profile Evolution Towards additional applications Towards higher accuracy and precision Supported in part by NIH contract HHSN268201300071C from NIBIB. Collaboration with GE Global Research, no personal support.; S. Chen, Some technologies described in this presentation have been licensed. Mayo Clinic and Dr. Chen have financial interests these technologies.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

TH-A-207B-02: QIBA Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging System Biomarker Qualification and User Testing of Systems

Imaging of tissue elastic properties is a relatively new and powerful approach to one of the oldest and most important diagnostic tools. Imaging of shear wave speed with ultrasound is has been added to most high-end ultrasound systems. Understanding this exciting imaging mode aiding its most effective use in medicine can be a rewarding effort for medical physicists and other medical imaging and treatment professionals. Assuring consistent, quantitative measurements across the many ultrasound systems in a typical imaging department will constitute a major step toward realizing the great potential of this technique and other quantitative imaging. This session will target these two goals with two presentations. A. Basics and Current Implementations of Ultrasound Imaging of Shear Wave Speed and Elasticity - Shigao Chen, Ph.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Introduction: Importance of tissue elasticity measurement Strain vs. shear wave elastography (SWE), beneficial features of SWE The link between shear wave speed and material properties, influence of viscosity Generation of shear waves External vibration (Fibroscan) ultrasound radiation force Point push Supersonic push (Aixplorer) Comb push (GE Logiq E9) Detection of shear waves Motion detection from pulse-echo ultrasound Importance of frame rate for shear wave imaging Plane wave imaging detection How to achieve high effective frame rate using line-by-line scanners Shear wave speed calculation Time to peak Random sample consensus (RANSAC) Cross correlation Sources of bias and variation in SWE Tissue viscosity Transducer compression or internal pressure of organ Reflection of shear waves at boundaries B. Elasticity Imaging System Biomarker Qualification and User Testing of Systems – Brian Garra, M.D. Learning objectives-To understand: Goals Review the need for quantitative medical imaging Provide examples of quantitative imaging biomarkers Acquaint the participant with the purpose of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance and the need for such an organization Review the QIBA process for creating a quantitative biomarker Summarize steps needed to verify adherence of site, operators, and imaging systems to a QIBA profile Underlying Premise and Assumptions Objective, quantifiable results are needed to enhance the value of diagnostic imaging in clinical practice Reasons for quantification Evidence based medicine requires objective, not subjective observer data Computerized decision support tools (eg CAD) generally require quantitative input. Quantitative, reproducible measures are more easily used to develop personalized molecular medical diagnostic and treatment systems What is quantitative imaging? Definition from Imaging Metrology Workshop The Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Formation 2008 Mission Structure Example Imaging Biomarkers Being Explored Biomarker Selection Groundwork Draft Protocol for imaging and data evaluation QIBA Profile Drafting Equipment and Site Validation Technical Clinical Site and Equipment QA and Compliance Checking Ultrasound Elasticity Estimation Biomarker US Elasticity Estimation Background Current Status and Problems Biomarker Selection-process and outcome US SWS for Liver Fibrosis Biomarker Work Groundwork Literature search and analysis results Phase I phantom testing-Elastic phantoms Phase II phantom testing-Viscoelastic phantoms Digital Simulated Data Protocol and Profile Drafting Protocol: based on UPICT and existing literature and standards bodies protocols Profile-Current claims, Manufacturer specific appendices What comes after the profile Profile Validation Technical validation Clinical validation QA and Compliance Possible approaches Site Operator testing Site protocol re-evaluation Imaging system Manufacturer testing and attestation User acceptance testing and periodic QA Phantom Tests Digital Phantom Based Testing Standard QA Testing Remediation Schemes Profile Evolution Towards additional applications Towards higher accuracy and precision Supported in part by NIH contract HHSN268201300071C from NIBIB. Collaboration with GE Global Research, no personal support.; S. Chen, Some technologies described in this presentation have been licensed. Mayo Clinic and Dr. Chen have financial interests these technologies.

60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES↗

Jets production in peripheral interactions of high energy leptons, quarks, photons, and gluons with the proton

The paper presents short historical reviews of the processes of lepton pairs production in peripheral interaction of leptons and ions at high energies. The orders of magnitude of the QED and QCD cross sections with the production of two and three jets are given. The technique of the analysis is described in detail based on the parameterization of Sudakov 4-momentum tasks and writing the amplitude in an explicit gaugeinvariant form. Based on this formalism the differential cross sections of QCD processes gp→(ggg)p;qp→(q Q-bar Q)p;gp→(gQ Q-bar )P were obtained, including the distribution on transverse momentum component of jets fragments. It was shown that the role of the contribution of “non-Abelian” nature may become dominant in a particular kinematics of the final particles. The kinematics, in which the initial particle changes the direction of movement to the opposite one, was considered in the case of heavy quark-antiquark pair production. In the appendices, the details of the calculations and the explicit form of the differential cross sections are given. Some extended comments on the frequently used cross sections of the pair production in the case of two-photon scattering are presented. In particular, the degree of the longitudinal polarization of the positron, the interaction polarized initial electron, was calculated. The method of calculating the cross sections of the 2 → 2 processes in QCD, based on the isolation of irreducible color structures and the method CALCUL of spiral amplitudes, was discussed in detail.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗

Linear response time-dependent density functional theory of the Hubbard dimer

The asymmetric Hubbard dimer is used to study the density-dependence of the exact frequency-dependent kernel of linear-response time-dependent density functional theory. The exact form of the kernel is given, and the limitations of the adiabatic approximation utilizing the exact ground-state functional are shown. The oscillator strength sum rule is proven for lattice Hamiltonians, and relative oscillator strengths are defined appropriately. The method of Casida for extracting oscillator strengths from a frequency-dependent kernel is demonstrated to yield the exact result with this kernel. An unambiguous way of labelling the nature of excitations is given. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem is proven for the ground-state exchange-correlation energy. The distinction between weak and strong correlation is shown to depend on the ratio of interaction to asymmetry. A simple interpolation between carefully defined weak-correlation and strong-correlation regimes yields a density-functional approximation for the kernel that gives accurate transition frequencies for both the single and double excitations, including charge-transfer excitations. In conclusion, many exact results, limits, and expansions about those limits are given in the Appendices.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

Validation of Jezebel Reactivity Coefficients and Sensitivity Analysis

Nuclear data validation is often performed today using criticality measurements. The gold standard for criticality measurements is the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiment Project (ICSBEP). The validation specifically focuses on the effective multiplication factor ($k_{eff}$). $K_{eff}$ is a relatively easy parameter to infer and has reduced uncertainty due to being at or above critical. However, while $k_{eff}$ is the most documented parameter and its uncertainties and sensitivities have been evaluated in great detail, it cannot be used as a standalone metric to determine inaccuracies in nuclear data (e.g., cross section data, PFNS, nu), which is based on theory, physics, and differential measurements. The Experiments Underpinned by Computational Learning for Improvements in nuclear Data (EUCLID) project aims to identify compensating errors in specific isotope nuclear data by optimally designing experiments that are, or are not sensitive to a suite of measurement parameters beyond $k_{eff}$. By identifying parameters that are sensitive to each other, oppositely sensitive, or have substantial magnitude differences in sensitivity, experiments can be designed to constrain questionable nuclear data. One sensitivity that is of particular interest to this project includes the sensitivity of reactivity coefficients. Reactivity coefficients compare reactivity, which is related to $k_{eff}$ at two different states therefore being sensitive to small changes in the system. The most common type of reactivity coefficient measurements is comparison to void for a small sample within the assembly. It is key that the sample sizes are small enough to not affect the flux of the full system. Reactivity coefficients were evaluated for many early experiments to better understand transport corrected cross sections. In fact, ICSBEP includes reactivity coefficient results as “Supplemental Measurements” in appendices for a handful of older benchmarks. One of those benchmarks is Jezebel, the bare Pu critical assembly. This paper compares new simulations of reactivity coefficients for Jezebel, and explores the sensitivity of reactivity coefficients to small changes in nuclear data.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Utah FORGE: Final Topical Report 2018

This is the final topical report for the Phase 2B Utah FORGE project, which is located near Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah. This PDF format report details results associated with the conceptual geologic model, deep well 58-32, rock geomechanics, reservoir temperatures, seismic surveys, seismic monitoring, certainty, and NEPA. The report also provides an overview of all of the deliverables which were used to produce the results and full appendices.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

Utah FORGE: Phase 2C Topical Report

This is the topical report that wraps up the work and results achieved during Utah FORGE Phase 2C. The zip file includes several folders containing (1) an overview; (2) the results; (3) the lessons learned; and (4) the conclusions. It also contains a folder containing appendices including (1) the updated permitting inventory; (2) the updated site characterization data inventory; (3) the updated conceptual geological model; and (4) the stakeholders engagement and outreach status.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

Tidal Turbine Test, Downeast Turbines, July 12, 2021

Downeast Turbines tested a tidal turbine prototype with novel rotor/channel system and lateral effluent discharge apparatus (LEDA), during five days of testing in the flume at Alden Lab. Three days of testing (July 12-14, 2021) focused on turbine power metrics of torque and rpm, which were low, and then two days of follow-up testing (July 27-28, 2021) focused on LEDA performance metrics of pressure differential and rates of volumetric flow, with encouraging results. Next step is to to characterize, and even optimize, configurations of the LEDA, using 3D-CFD as a helpful tool, to refine its shape and explore its limits of performance as a means of effluent discharge that augments performance of an instream turbine. An improved configuration of the LEDA will be re-combined with the rotor/channel system of the turbine prototype, and ultimately, the rotor will be re-sized (enlarged), to better match the LEDA's performance capabilities in drawing through a rate of volumetric flow. This submission is Downeast Turbines' Post Access Report for the test event. It includes the files described here (next below), and several reference links. "Downeast TEAMER-Post-Access-Report...docx" is a document file containing the report. "Appendices A, B, and C" are included in this file, and so are "Figures #1-7." "Appendix D - Test Data Workbooks.zip" is an archive file containing all post access data (raw data tables, calculating tables, and graphs), presented in fourteen Excel workbooks as described in the report. "Appendix E - Post Access Figures.zip" is an archive file containing "Figures #8-52," of the report.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗

Materials for the 21st Century by David Segal

This reference book is aimed at high school students and the general public. It is written from the perspective that materials hold the key to solving 21st century problems, especially in the areas of energy, communications, and human health. The book has thirteen short chapters that span 112 pages. The next section is a descriptive glossary that lists 500 materials in alphabetical order and covers 191 pages. Furthermore, the list includes a variety of materials from acetylsalicylic acid to zircaloy. The appendices that follow direct the reader to a comprehensive list of books on materials science topics and selected patent documents.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Nuclear Wallet Cards

The Nuclear Wallet Cards present properties for ground and isomeric states of all known nuclides. It provides the following: Spin and parity assignments, Nuclear mass excesses, Half-lives, isotopic abundances, Decay modes. Appendices contain properties of elements, fundamental constants and other useful information.

Decay modes↗

Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program Groundwater And Surface Water Sampling And Analysis Plan For Calendar Year 2012

This plan provides a description of the groundwater and surface water quality monitoring activities planned for calendar year (CY) 2012 at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12) that will be managed by the Y-12 Groundwater Protection Program (GWPP). Groundwater and surface water monitoring performed by the GWPP during CY 2012 is in accordance with the following goals: (1) to protect the worker, the public, and the environment; (2) to maintain surveillance of existing and potential groundwater contamination sources; (3) to provide for the early detection of groundwater contamination and determine the quality of groundwater and surface water where contaminants are most likely to migrate beyond the Oak Ridge Reservation property line; (4) to identify and characterize long-term trends in groundwater quality at Y-12; and (5) to provide data to support decisions concerning the management and protection of groundwater resources. Groundwater and surface water monitoring will be performed in three hydrogeologic regimes at Y-12: the Bear Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (Bear Creek Regime), the Upper East Fork Poplar Creek Hydrogeologic Regime (East Fork Regime), and the Chestnut Ridge Hydrogeologic Regime (Chestnut Ridge Regime). The Bear Creek and East Fork regimes are located in Bear Creek Valley and the Chestnut Ridge Regime is located south of Y-12 (Figure A.1). Additional surface water monitoring will be performed north of Pine Ridge along the boundary of the Oak Ridge Reservation. Modifications to the CY 2012 monitoring program may be necessary during implementation. Changes in programmatic requirements may alter the analytes specified for selected monitoring wells or may add or remove wells from the planned monitoring network. Each modification to the monitoring program will be approved by the Y-12 GWPP manager and documented as an addendum to this sampling and analysis plan. The following sections of this report provide details regarding the CY 2012 groundwater and surface water monitoring activities. Section 2 describes the monitoring locations in each regime and the processes used to select the sampling locations. A description of the field measurements and laboratory analytes is provided in Section 3. Sample collection methods and procedures are described in Section 4, and Section 5 lists the documents cited for more detailed operational and technical information. The narrative sections of the report reference several appendices. Figures (maps and diagrams) and tables (excluding a data summary table presented in Section 4) are in Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively. Groundwater Monitoring Schedules (when issued throughout CY 2012) will be inserted in Appendix C, and addenda to this plan (if issued) will be inserted in Appendix D. Laboratory requirements (bottle lists, holding times, etc.) are provided in Appendix E, and an approved Waste Management Plan is provided in Appendix F.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗