Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “gpu”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

VASP calculations on Chicoma: CPU vs. GPU [Slides]

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the VASP code provide insight into materials behavior. In particular, the behavior of Pu still poses challenges to our understanding. Calculations for a 108-atom system that represents delta phase Pu with one substitutional Ga show a significant speedup running on GPUs vs CPUs. The gain in speed (2.7), however, remains well below the ratio of SU per node hour conversions, 540/108 = 5.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

GPU Acceleration of a Diagnostic Wind Solver

Reducing QUIC-Fire simulation runtimes is crucial in enabling simulation ensembles to guide science-driven prescribed fire planning in regions of complex terrain. Utilizing GPUs through OpenACC and Kokkos frameworks to accelerate generation of 3D windfields in QUIC-Fire would provide substantial speedup to the runtime of the code. Using GPUs for the Successive Over-Relaxation (SOR) algorithm utilized in QUIC-Fire will require deriving a ‘four colored’ version of the well explored ‘Red-Black’ SOR parallelization scheme. This effort could open the door for utilizing GPUs in other portions of the QUIC-Fire algorithm, increasing its viability in more complex and larger domains.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Comparison of GPU-Accelerated Multiphase CFD Solvers on the Polaris Supercomputer: Part 1

This report is in support of the Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (INCITE) program sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE). With INCITE-level resources, one project, titled BubblyFlow, was granted computational resources for the 2025 calendar year on the Polaris supercomputer at the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF). The project aims to conduct simulations to understand the fundamental characteristics of turbulent bubbly flow phenomena in nature. Staff at the ALCF and Argonne’s Computational Science division, along with collaborators at the City College of New York and University of Illinois at Chicago, helped a summer student to assess the accuracy and performance of two high performance computing (HPC) codes. Both codes, ImExLBM and FluTAS, are fundamentally different in their mathematical and numerical modeling. However, both may be used to solve the same physical problem. The collaboration sought to better understand the differences between both codes in terms of accuracy and efficiency. This would ultimately help the BubblyFlow project better utilize resources and establish a knowledge-base of code capabilities in future simulation campaigns. We compare ImExLBM and FluTAS, two high-performance multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers, in terms of physical fidelity, time-to-solution, and parallel efficiency. We validate ImExLBM (Implicit-Explicit Lattice Boltzmann Method) against a canonical benchmark and assess it’s performance relative to FluTAS (Fluid Transport Accelerated Solver), a well-established open-source CFD code.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗