Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “covalency”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Liquid-free covalent reinforcement of carbon nanotube dry-spun yarns and free-standing sheets

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) possess exceptional mechanical properties, surpassing stiffness and strength metrics of common materials such as steel alloys by 100× at the nanoscale. However, when myriads of individual CNTs are bundled together into macroscopic ensembles like fibers or sheets, the result is a 100-fold drop in strength compared to its individual components. Here we present a general strategy aimed to close this gap in property scaling. By using vapor-phase polymerization of a crosslinkable polymer, we reinforced the weak interlinkages among individual CNTs within both yarns and sheets to promote a better transference of mechanical load across the structure. Furthermore, after the treatment, dry-spun, low-density 2.3 μm thin yarns increased their elastic moduli by at least 300%, and free-standing CNT sheets exhibited a 10× boost. In-situ synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering revealed that polymer-reinforced yarns undergo limited CNT bundle rearrangement when subjected to tensile loads compared to pristine yarns. This evidence supports the hypothesis that the polymer hinders CNTs slippage, the root cause of the poor scaling of mechanical properties in these materials. While we demonstrated this reinforcement method for CNT structures, it is not specific to CNTs and could be used in a wide variety of other hierarchical nanostructured ensembles.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Revealing the mechanism of action of a first-in-class covalent inhibitor of $\mathrm{KRASG12C}$ $\mathrm{(ON)}$ and other functional properties of oncogenic $\text{KRAS}$ by 31 P $\mathrm{NMR}$

Individual oncogenic KRAS mutants confer distinct differences in biochemical properties and signaling for reasons that are not well understood. KRAS activity is closely coupled to protein dynamics and is regulated through two interconverting conformations: state 1 (inactive, effector binding deficient) and state 2 (active, effector binding enabled). Here, we use 31 P NMR to delineate the differences in state 1 and state 2 populations present in WT and common KRAS oncogenic mutants (G12C, G12D, G12V, G13D, and Q61L) bound to its natural substrate GTP or a commonly used nonhydrolyzable analog GppNHp (guanosine-5'-[(β,γ)-imido] triphosphate). Our results show that GppNHp-bound proteins exhibit significant state 1 population, whereas GTP-bound KRAS is primarily (90% or more) in state 2 conformation. This observation suggests that the predominance of state 1 shown here and in other studies is related to GppNHp and is most likely nonexistent in cells. We characterize the impact of this differential conformational equilibrium of oncogenic KRAS on RAF1 kinase effector RAS-binding domain and intrinsic hydrolysis. Through a KRAS G12C drug discovery, we have identified a novel small-molecule inhibitor, BBO-8956, which is effective against both GDP- and GTP-bound KRAS G12C. We show that binding of this inhibitor significantly perturbs state 1–state 2 equilibrium and induces an inactive state 1 conformation in GTP-bound KRAS G12C. In the presence of BBO-8956, RAF1–RAS-binding domain is unable to induce a signaling competent state 2 conformation within the ternary complex, demonstrating the mechanism of action for this novel and active-conformation inhibitor.

31P NMR↗
DOE OSTI2020

Controlling Covalency and Anion Redox Potentials through Anion Substitution in Li-Rich Chalcogenides

Development of next-generation battery technologies is imperative in the pursuit of a clean energy future. Toward that end, battery chemistries capable of multielectron redox processes are at the forefront of studies on Li-based systems to increase the gravimetric capacity of the cathode. Multielectron processes rely either on the iterative redox of transition metal cations or redox involving both the transition metal cations and the anionic framework. Targeting coupled cation and anion redox to achieve multielectron charge storage is difficult, however, because the structure–property relationships that govern reversibility are poorly understood. In an effort to develop fundamental understanding of anion redox, we have developed a materials family that displays tunable anion redox over a range of potentials that are dependent on a systematic modification of the stoichiometry. We report anion redox in the chalcogenide solid solution Li 2 FeS 2–y Se y , wherein the mixing of the sulfide and selenide anions yields a controllable shift in the high voltage oxidation plateau. Electrochemical measurements indicate that reversible multielectron redox occurs across the solid solution. X-ray absorption spectroscopy supports the oxidation of both iron and selenium at high states of charge, while Raman spectroscopy indicates the formation of Se–Se dimers in Li 2 FeSe 2 upon Li deintercalation, providing insight into the charge mechanism of the Li-rich iron chalcogenides. Anion substitution presents direct control over the functional properties of multielectron redox materials for next generation battery technologies.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗