Sample Selection and Bright Star Masking in DELVE
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In potential future arms reduction treaties in which the numbers of nuclear warheads may approach small numbers, using delivery systems as a proxy for the warheads themselves may be insufficient. Therefore, a technical means of verifying the presence of a nuclear warhead may become necessary. Verifying that a declared item actually is a warhead is technically challenging within a verification regime: providing assurance to the monitoring party that a presented item is a warhead while protecting sensitive information about that warhead may be required. It is generally believed that strong assurance will require the confirmation of key attributes that may reveal closely-guarded critical design information. This provides high confidence to the monitoring party, but presents a risk of information loss to the host. A verification system must overcome this hurdle. Over the last several decades, systems have been developed that balance host and monitoring partner needs by using sensitive information to confirm treaty accountable items (TAI) as warheads while sequestering that information behind an information barrier (1). These are designed to meet the needs of the host but places the onus on the monitor to authenticate the hardware, firmware, and software. Authentication requires that the monitor confirm that all components of the system have not been modified and work as intended. In 2014, Glaser et al. proposed applying the concept of “zero knowledge protocols” (ZKP) from the field of cryptography to the problem of warhead verification (2). In mathematical cryptography, ZKP is accomplished by challenging one party to solve a problem that is only possible if that party possesses the information being authenticated. After repeated challenges, the party provides confidence that it possesses this information without revealing any details about the information itself. Systems have been in development based on this idea at both Princeton and MIT (2) (3) (4). The final measurement results produced by these systems can be viewed by both the host and the monitoring party without the worry of revealing sensitive information. However, in both of these physical implementations, there remains an information barrier within the system. The need for a digital information barrier to protect a measurement result is eliminated, but it has been replaced with the need to sequester physical components of the system, potentially obfuscating the measurement process itself. Both implementations physically insert information into the system that requires protection to prevent undesired disclosure of sensitive information: in the Princeton method, one must physically load the complement of the expected image of a true warhead into the system, and in the MIT technique, one loads a collection of spectator foils whose thicknesses physically encrypt a measured spectrum. This complicates authentication of the hardware and measurement process. The CONFIDANTE/COGNIZANT concept developed in this project do not load sensitive information into the system at any time, and could therefore open the possibility of allowing the inspector to not only view the final data but also the measurement as it is being performed and all associated equipment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This dataset was used to train MultiSolSegment, a multi-channel segmentation model for photovoltaic defect detection.
This repository includes the cloud detection algorithm used in the manuscript 'Topography controls variability in circumpolar permafrost thaw pond expansion' by Abolt et al. It also includes a demonstration of the algorithm's use at a survey area in northern Alaska and a demonstration of training the algorithm. This dataset includes .pt place-text, .py python, .tif image, .ipynb Jupyter notebook, and .txt text files.The Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments: Arctic (NGEE Arctic) was a research effort to reduce uncertainty in Earth System Models by developing a predictive understanding of carbon-rich Arctic ecosystems and feedbacks to climate. NGEE Arctic was supported by the Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research. The NGEE Arctic project had two field research sites: 1) located within the Arctic polygonal tundra coastal region on the Barrow Environmental Observatory (BEO) and the North Slope near Utqiagvik (Barrow), Alaska and 2) multiple areas on the discontinuous permafrost region of the Seward Peninsula north of Nome, Alaska. Through observations, experiments, and synthesis with existing datasets, NGEE Arctic provided an enhanced knowledge base for multi-scale modeling and contributed to improved process representation at global pan-Arctic scales within the Department of Energy's Earth system Model (the Energy Exascale Earth System Model, or E3SM), and specifically within the E3SM Land Model component (ELM).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Production methods for contact prints in emulsions or chromium coated glass plate
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The times during which MSFN stations can view the moon are tabulated. Station view periods for each month are given. All times and dates refer to Greenwich Mean Time. AOS and LOS refer to the center of the moon at zero degrees elevation for moon rise and set, respectively.
All program options and a detailed definition of the format of each input card (with examples) are given. Output options and their applications are detailed. A listing of the main program is provided and all update points are explained. All information required for a designer/draftsman (for program use) is provided, and it will not be necessary to become intimately familiar with the internal operations to effectively use the extensive capability it has to offer.
Demonstration that the depth sensations normally associated with disparity may be cancelled or reduced by the addition of small, extraneous surround objects. For example, when a large bar is altered by adding much smaller bars to its ends, the disparity of the added ends plays a very significant role in the depth of the original bar. If the sign of the disparity of the added ends is opposite that of the larger inner bar, the depth of the configuration may be lost completely or be reversed in reference to the fixation plane. The effects of such small surrounds upon the primary central stimulus reveal new properties of stereoscopic mechanisms and have implications for electrophysiological studies.