Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Instruments”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18

Global SO 2 Data Record from OMPS Instruments on the JPSS Constellation

NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS) SO 2 climate data record (CDR) started in 2004, with the launch of the Aura/Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and is now being continued with the SNPP/Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) launched in 2011. Both OMI and SNPP/OMPS SO 2 CDRs are produced with the Goddard principal component analysis (PCA) spectral fitting algorithm. An advantage of the data-driven PCA retrieval technique is that it enables highly consistent retrievals from different instruments, by inherently accounting for various instrumental factors. To further extend the EOS SO 2 CDR, we are implementing the PCA SO 2 retrieval algorithm with the L1B measurements from OMPS instruments flying on the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) constellation. In this presentation, we will provide an update on our progress in NOAA-20 (launched in 2017) and NOAA-21 (launched in 2022) PCA SO2 retrievals. We will focus on our new NOAA-20/OMPS PCA SO 2 EOS continuity product, to be publicly released in fall of 2023. We will present statistical analyses on the quality of NOAA-20 PCA SO 2 product, including retrieval noise, biases over background areas, and long-term stability. We will compare our PCA SO 2 retrievals from NOAA-20 with those from OMI, SNPP/OMPS, and S5P/TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) for anthropogenic sources as well as large volcanic plumes. We will also discuss the application of a new machine learning technique that helps to further reduce the noise of NOAA-20 SO 2 retrievals. In addition, we will present preliminary PCA SO 2 retrievals from NOAA-21/OMPS, including those from direct readout implementation for aviation disaster avoidance. Finally, we will share some first results applying the PCA algorithm to NASA’s geostationary TEMPO (Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution) instrument to obtain hourly, high resolution SO 2 data over North America.

SO2↗

Continuing Long-term Global SO 2 Data Record with JPSS OMPS Instruments

NASA’s long-term Earth Observing System (EOS) SO 2 climate data record (CDR) started with Aura/Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI, launched in 2004) and is now being continued with the SNPP/Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS, launched in 2011). Both OMI and SNPP/OMPS SO 2 CDRs are produced with the Goddard principal component analysis (PCA) spectral fitting algorithm. By inherently accounting for various instrumental factors, the PCA technique enables highly consistent retrievals between different instruments. In this presentation, we will provide an overview on our effort to further extend the EOS SO 2 CDR, by implementing the PCA SO 2 algorithm with multiple OMPS instruments flying on the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) constellation, including NOAA-20 (launched in 2017) and NOAA-21 (launched in 2022). We will present results analyzing our new NOAA-20/OMPS PCA SO 2 EOS continuity product, to be publicly released in fall of 2023. We will show statistical analyses on the quality of NOAA-20 PCA SO 2 product, such as retrieval noise, biases over background areas, and long-term stability. We will employ a previously established top-down method to estimate SO2 emissions from selected large point sources, using NOAA-20 SO 2 retrievals and assimilated wind fields as input. The SO 2 emission estimates derived from NOAA-20 retrievals will be compared with those from OMI, SNPP/OMPS, and S5P/TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument). We will also demonstrate the application of a new machine learning technique that further reduces the noise of NOAA-20 SO 2 retrievals. Finally, we will present preliminary PCA SO 2 retrievals from recently launched satellite sensors, including NOAA-21/OMPS and NASA’s geostationary TEMPO (Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution) instrument.

SO2↗

Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation Issue 10

The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) program, on its seventh fiscal year, continues to address key technology gaps for future nuclear energy systems. ASI’s goal is to enable the advanced instrumentation and control (I&C) technologies essential to the Office of Nuclear Energy’s research and development (R&D) efforts needed to realize its mission goals. Information on our projects can be found in our ASI annual awards summaries, annual review webinars, and newsletters posted in the Office of Nuclear Energy website (energy.gov/ne). This year, we have initiated three newly awarded projects in the area of data analytics. We also initiated a project to develop and demonstrate a prototype passive wireless sensor network. This sensor will use advanced manufacturing and printing, and be tested and demonstrated at a U.S. nuclear power plant facility. In addition, we are developing a sensor database to capture advanced sensor and instrumentation technology that is applicable to nuclear power plants. Under the In-Pile Instrumentation program, we continue to develop unique in-pile sensors and instrumentation to provide real-time, accurate, and spatially resolved information regarding the performance of fuels and materials. Due to the closure of the Halden reactor, we are focusing our near-term research in providing equivalent capability for the instrumentation of irradiation experiments in the U.S. that are needed by the nuclear industry. As the ASI program continues to award projects through competitive solicitations, we encourage the I&C community to visit our website for current funding opportunity announcements, especially for the industry-focused solicitation entitled, “U.S. Industry Opportunities for Advanced Nuclear Technology Development.”

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Neutron Instruments for Research in Coordination Chemistry

Here, neutron diffraction and spectroscopies offer unique insight into structures and properties of solids and molecular materials. All neutron instruments located at the various neutron sources are distinct, even if their designs are based on similar principles, and thus, are usually less familiar to the community than commercial X–ray diffractometers and optical spectrometers. Major neutron instruments in the USA, which are open to scientists around the world, and examples of their use in coordination chemistry research are presented here, along with a list of similar instruments at main neutron facilities in other countries. The reader may easily and quickly find from this mini–review an appropriate neutron instrument for research. The instruments include single–crystal and powder diffractometers to determine structures, inelastic neutron scattering (INS) spectrometers to probe magnetic and vibrational excitations, and quasielastic neutron scattering (QENS) spectrometers to study molecular dynamics such as methyl rotation on ligands. Key and unique features of the diffraction and neutron spectroscopies that are relevant to inorganic chemistry are reviewed.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Development of Advanced Instrumentation for Transient Testing

A fuel safety research program centered on in-pile transient testing experiments is being developed to support assessment and qualification of advanced nuclear fuel systems using the recently restarted Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). While resumption of transient testing at TREAT is crucial to enable these programs, full recovery and cutting-edge transient testing capability also requires a well-coordinated and innovative instrumentation development and qualification program to support near-term and future objectives. This paper summarizes the experimental approach of transient testing to focus on measuring the response of nuclear fuel to off-normal (or power-cooling mismatch) conditions for modern and advanced reactor environments requiring capabilities extending over wide measurement and environment conditions. It also highlights unique attributes of transient testing of importance to in-pile instruments including relatively low total neutron fluence, high gamma heating, and the need for well-defined and possibly short time response. Historical approaches to instrumentation for transient testing are also reviewed to provide context to the modern instrument strategy. The instrumentation needs of a modern transient testing are detailed while summarizing several ongoing R&D activities are supporting the development of state-of-the-art and ‘advanced’ measurement technologies that will provide baseline capability for Light Water Reactor (LWR) and Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) experiment objectives, while extending to other advanced reactor needs and advanced sensing technology opportunities. Examples of specific sensors planned for near-term deployment with ongoing development includes prompt-response self-powered neutron detectors (SPND), miniature fission chambers, optical-fiber-coupled infrared pyrometer, cladding surface thermocouples, electrical-impedance based boiling detector, and Linear Variable Differential Transformer (LVDT) based sensors for fuel elongation and pressure measurement.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ProtoDESI: First On-Sky Technology Demonstration for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) is under construction to measure the expansion history of the universe using the baryon acoustic oscillations technique. The spectra of 35 million galaxies and quasars over 14,000 square degrees will be measured during a 5-year survey. A new prime focus corrector for the Mayall telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory will deliver light to 5,000 individually targeted fiber-fed robotic positioners. The fibers in turn feed ten broadband multi-object spectrographs. We describe the ProtoDESI experiment, that was installed and commissioned on the 4-m Mayall telescope from 2016 August 14 to September 30. ProtoDESI was an on-sky technology demonstration with the goal to reduce technical risks associated with aligning optical fibers with targets using robotic fiber positioners and maintaining the stability required to operate DESI. The ProtoDESI prime focus instrument, consisting of three fiber positioners, illuminated fiducials, and a guide camera, was installed behind the existing Mosaic corrector on the Mayall telescope. A fiber view camera was mounted in the Cassegrain cage of the telescope and provided feedback metrology for positioning the fibers. ProtoDESI also provided a platform for early integration of hardware with the DESI Instrument Control System that controls the subsystems, provides communication with the Telescope Control System, and collects instrument telemetry data. In conclusion, lacking a spectrograph, ProtoDESI monitored the output of the fibers using a fiber photometry camera mounted on the prime focus instrument. ProtoDESI was successful in acquiring targets with the robotically positioned fibers and demonstrated that the DESI guiding requirements can be met.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Simulating and benchmarking neutron total scattering instrumentation from inception of events to reduced and fitted data

In the design and realization of modern neutron scattering instrumentation, particularly when designing beamline concepts from the ground up, it is desirable to fully benchmark against realistically simulated data. This is especially true for total scattering beamlines, where the future deliverable data is to be analysed in both reciprocal- and real-space representations, and needs must be carefully balanced to ensure sufficient range, resolution and flux of the instrument. An approach to optimize the design of neutron scattering instrumentation via a workflow including ray-tracing simulations, event-based data reduction, heuristic analysis and fitting against realistically simulated spectra is demonstrated here. The case of the DISCOVER beamline concept at the Spallation Neutron Source is used as an example. The results of the calculations are benchmarked through simulation of existing instrumentation and subsequent direct comparison with measured data. Finally, on the basis of the validated models, the ability to explore design characteristics for future beamline concepts or future instrument improvements is demonstrated through the examples of detector tube size and detector layout.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Fukushima Daiichi—A Case Study for BWR Instrumentation and Control Systems Performance During a Severe Accident, Rev 1

This report provides an assessment of the performance of various instrumentation and control (I&C) and monitoring systems, with a focus on the first few days of the Fukushima Daiichi accident starting on March 11, 2011. Similar to what occurred at the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) accident in 1979, operator responses were challenged when information on key parameters was lost, erroneous, or misleading. While numerous improvements in instrumentation capabilities have been made since the TMI-2 event, the accident at Fukushima Daiichi suggests the potential for further improvement. The objective of this research is to review the performance of the Fukushima Daiichi Units 1–3 instrumentation systems that could have helped ensure that plant operators and emergency responders had relevant, accurate, and timely knowledge of plant conditions as they managed the accident response. As was the case with TMI-2, forensic analyses of plant instrumentation failures will be a long-term effort. As an introduction to this long-term research, this report focuses on the information available in the control room during the accident and illustrates the challenges to operators in their understanding of plant conditions during the progression of the accident. I&C systems monitor the success or failure of achievement of light water reactor safety principles in which the protection of the reactor fuel, reactor coolant system, and reactor containment is accomplished. This report (1) provides an overview of the safety principles; (2) notes parameters associated with the boiling water reactor (BWR)/3 and BWR/4 protection, actuation, and monitoring systems as they relate to the achievement of these principles; (3) presents data from past research on predicted instrumentation performance during severe accidents, and (4) assesses performance of the key I&C and monitoring systems associated with BWR/3 and BWR/4 reactors like those at Fukushima Daiichi. Lessons learned or potential improvements associated with the performance of these systems in the context of severe accidents are delineated. As background information, an overview of key BWR/3- and BWR/4-Mark I reactor designs (BWR/3 and BWR/4 with a Mark I containment) reactor protection, engineered safety features actuation, and accident monitoring systems is provided. A brief description of plant safety systems used to prevent or mitigate reactor accidents is also provided. This background information provides context for the brief discussion of previous research that has been conducted on BWR severe accidents and for the discussion of the accident sequences, which led to core damage at Fukushima Daiichi Units 1–3. The progression of the accident sequences at Fukushima Daiichi Units 1–3 occurred very much as predicted in prior severe accident research conducted in the United States and internationally, given the complete station blackout that occurred when the tsunami generated by one of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded rolled onshore.

Accident Tolerant Equipment↗

Modern Trends in Neutron Scattering Instrument Technologies

This article reviews some current trends that can be observed in the development of neutron scattering instrument technologies. While the number of neutron scattering facilities worldwide and the number of beam days they offer are largely stable, their scientific impact is increasing through improving instrumental capabilities, new and more versatile instruments, and more efficient data collection protocols. Neutron beams are becoming smaller but more intense, and instruments are being designed to utilize more ‘useful’ neutrons in unit time. This article picks and discusses a few recent developments in the areas of integrated source and instrument design, use of computational tools, new detectors, and experiment automation.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Laboratory and field assessment of mid-infrared absorption (MIRA) instrument performance for methane and ethane dry mole fractions

Concurrent measurements of methane (CH 4 ) and ethane (C 2 H 6 ) can be used to identify and separate methane sources, as ethane is present in thermogenic sources (e.g., oil and natural gas) but not in biogenic sources (e.g., agriculture). In this study, we evaluated the performance of multiple Aeris MIRA Ultra instruments (Versions 1 and 2) through controlled laboratory tests and tower-based deployments under field conditions. The systems were modified with an external pump, flow control, a Nafion dryer, and a custom-built auxiliary box to automate the system and transmit near real-time data. We determined the best calibration approach for our application, given practical limitations, to be a full calibration cycle (with ambient and high calibration cylinders) about once per day and an ambient calibration cylinder sampled hourly. Measurement uncertainty was assessed, including the uncertainty due to instrument noise as a function of calibration frequency, uncertainty in the water vapor correction, and cylinder assignment uncertainty. Instrument noise was the dominant source of uncertainty for C 2 H 6 , while the water vapor correction dominated the CH 4 uncertainty. For Version 2 systems with hourly calibrations and a Nafion dryer with counterflow, the mean total uncertainty, including both systematic errors and noise, of hourly averages was 0.8–3.0 ppb CH 4 and 0.35–0.37 ppb C 2 H 6 . Laboratory intercomparisons showed network compatibility within 1.2 ppb CH 4 and 0.23 ppb C 2 H6, and a collocated deployment with a NOAA Picarro system agreed within 1.8 ppb CH 4 . Instrument noise varied substantially amongst the instruments, with errors reaching up to 11 ppb CH 4 and 2 ppb C 2 H 6 for hourly means, with similar variability indicated in a 50 h cylinder test. With appropriate engineering and calibration, the Aeris MIRA Ultra has the potential to distinguish regional methane emission sources in many field settings.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Instrumentation for Hanford Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste Real-Time, In-Line Process Monitoring - 18339

The direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) process will utilize facilities in the Hanford tank farms to stage tank waste feed, a new facility to pretreat the tank waste feed, and facilities in the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to immobilize the low-activity waste (LAW) and disposition effluents from the vitrification process. Process sampling is used extensively throughout the DFLAW process to qualify waste feeds, control the process, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory and contractual commitments. The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of River Protection (ORP) has started a program to evaluate the potential benefits of replacing some sample collection requirements with realtime, in-line monitoring (RTIM). The program will identify, develop, and evaluate technologies that can reduce the number of samples required for WTP operation. Potential benefits of RTIM include elimination of process holds for sample analysis, a reduction in worker exposure to radiation and chemical hazards, decreased secondary waste volume, reducing the cost for sample collection and analysis, an improvement in product quality, and timely indication of process anomalies. In order to incorporate RTIM, the process control strategy for the overall process, as well as each unit operation, was reviewed and revisions to the strategies proposed. The following items were identified for incorporation of RTIM: - Real-time material balance calculations linked to the process control system; - Use of RTIM instruments to validate the material balance for selected analytes; - Anion analysis for determination of selected semi-volatile species (e.g., chlorine, sulfur, and fluorine) in the recycle stream. Based on the proposed process control strategy, a preliminary list of potential analytical equipment was developed. This was followed by a preliminary survey of instrument technologies currently on the market building on surveys performed for ORP, literature reviews, vendor web sites, and subject matter experts from the Savannah River National Laboratory and other U.S. Department of Energy national laboratories. Each technology was evaluated for measurement capability, operations and maintenance requirements, space requirements, and potential for application as process control instrumentation. The instrument technologies were chosen based on the following criteria: - Ability to perform analyses needed; - Potential to be used or adapted for use as process control instruments; - Potential to be adapted to size and operational constraints of standard WTP sample cabinets; - Operational and maintenance requirements. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Raman spectroscopy coupled with ambient ionization mass spectrometry: A forensic laboratory investigation into rapid and simple dual instrumental analysis techniques

We present a laboratory experiment, developed around a pair of instrumental analysis techniques, Raman spectroscopy and ambient ionization mass spectrometry (MS), conducted by senior chemistry undergraduate students for bulk analysis of over-the-counter drugs using benchtop versions of the two instruments, as well as trace analysis of illicit drugs utilizing the corresponding portable instruments. The identification and confirmation of seized drugs is a routine operation in forensic laboratories that can be simplified using these two instrumental techniques in tandem. Bulk samples are readily analyzed using conventional Raman spectroscopy followed by paper cone spray ionization (PCSI) MS, while trace analysis is allowed by a simple single-substrate dual-analyzer method using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) from paper followed by paper spray ionization (PSI) MS. The introduction of these novel strategies to the students exposed them to potential career paths in forensic science by means of a hands-on experience that provided fundamental knowledge about this set of analytical methods, including intercomparisons of their performance, as well as practical issues like costs, regulations and databases. The use of portable instrumentation represents an additional learning experience for the students, considering that it is cutting-edge technology that is just now being transferred from academic to industrial labs and that it allows a valuable discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of bringing the laboratory to the field.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

How are Heterogeneous Nucleation Rate Observations Influenced by Instrument Resolution?

Experimental measurements of the heterogeneous nucleation rate rely on counting the number of nuclei with time. However, the size of a thermodynamically stable nucleus is often a few nanometers in diameter and is below the resolution of most (in situ) measurement techniques that provide a statistically valid sample. Due to the finite resolution of the instruments and analysis methods, it is challenging to capture the incipient nuclei and the subsequent evolution of nuclei density over time. In this work, we demonstrate the impact of instrument resolution on observed nuclei densities by comparing numerical modeling with experimental results. Further, to achieve this, we implemented heterogeneous nucleation within the pore-scale reactive transport modeling framework using classical nucleation theory (CNT). We compared the modeling results with nucleation rates measured using X-ray nanotomography (XnT) and evaluated how these impact the apparent values of the prefactor and interfacial energy based on CNT and the crystal growth rate. Specifically, we applied a resolution threshold (artificial resolution limit) in the model during nuclei counting to resemble an experimental resolution, ranging from 15 to 500 nm. The findings reveal that the instrument resolution significantly impacts the apparent prefactor and interfacial energy. Both apparent prefactor and interfacial energy decrease with a decrease in the instrument resolution. While deviation in the prefactor due to resolution is anticipated, those in the interfacial energy are unexpected. The approach described here allows one to correct apparent nucleation rates that depend on the instrument’s resolution to derive “intrinsic” CNT parameters for the prefactor and interfacial energy.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

A new generation of x-ray spectrometry UHV instruments at the SR facilities BESSY II, ELETTRA and SOLEIL

A novel type of ultra-high vacuum instrument for X-ray reflectometry and spectrometry-related techniques for nanoanalytics by means of synchrotron radiation (SR) has been constructed and commissioned at BESSY II. This versa-tile instrument was developed by the PTB, Germany’s national metrology institute, and includes a 9-axis manipulator that allows for an independent alignment of the samples with respect to all degrees of freedom. In addition, it integrates a rotational and translational movement of several photodiodes as well as a translational movement of a beam-geometry-defining aperture system. Thus, the new instrument enables various analytical techniques based on energy dispersive X-ray detectors such as reference-free X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis, total-reflection XRF, grazing-incidence XRF, in addition to optional X-Ray Reflectometry (XRR) measurements or polarization-dependent X-ray absorption fine structure analyses (XAFS). Samples having a size of up to (100 × 100) mm{sup 2}; can be analyzed with respect to their mass deposition, elemental, spatial or species composition. Surface contamination, nanolayer composition and thickness, depth pro-file of matrix elements or implants, nanoparticles or buried interfaces as well as molecular orientation of bonds can be accessed. Three technology transfer projects of adapted instruments have enhanced X-Ray Spectrometry (XRS) research activities within Europe at the synchrotron radiation facilities ELETTRA (IAEA) and SOLEIL (CEA/LNE-LNHB) as well as at the X-ray innovation laboratory BLiX (TU Berlin) where different laboratory sources are used. Here, smaller chamber requirements led PTB in cooperation with TU Berlin to develop a modified instrument equipped with a 7-axis manipulator: reduced freedom in the choice of experimental geometry modifications (absence of out-of-SR-plane and reference-free XRS options) has been compensated by encoder-enhanced angular accuracy for GIXRF and XRR.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Instrumentation and Control Selection for the 12 GeV Hall-B Magnets at Jefferson Lab

Here, as part of the Jefferson Lab 12 GeV accelerator upgrade, the Experimental Physics Hall B detector system requires two superconducting magnets – a Torus and a Solenoid. The specifications required maximum space for the detectors which led to the choice of conduction cooling for each magnet. The Torus consists of 6 trapezoidal 'race-track'-type coils connected in series with an operating current of 3770 A. The Solenoid is an actively shielded 5 Tesla magnet consisting of 5 coils connected in series operating at 2416 A. Within the hall the two magnets are located in close proximity to each other and are surrounded by particle detectors. We describe the philosophy behind the instrumentation selection and control design that accounts for this proximity and other challenging working conditions. We describe the choice of sensor technologies, as well as the control and data acquisition methods. The magnet power and cryogenic control sub-systems are implemented using Allen Bradley Control Logix 1756-L72 Programmable Logic Controllers. Sensor instrumentation read-backs are routed into the PLC via National Instruments cRIO hardware (Field Programmable Gate Arrays or FPGA/RT application) using Jefferson Lab designed FPGA-based multi-sensor-excitation-chassis. Configuration, monitoring, and alarm handlers for the magnet systems are provided via an Experimental Physics Instrumentation & Control System interface (EPICS). Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the requirement to monitor critical parameters during operation guided the selection of instrumentation and associated hardware. The design of the quench protection and voltage tap sub-systems was driven by the anticipated level of voltages developed during a magnet quench. The primary hard-wired quench detection and protection sub-system together with the secondary PLC-based protection sub-system is also discussed. The successful commissioning and subsequent performance of these magnets demonstrates the robustness of the design and implementation approach that was adopted by the Jefferson Lab team and serves as an excellent 'How To' guide for future projects of this size and complexity.

12 GeV↗

The Gem Infrasound Logger and Custom-Built Instrumentation

Here, we designed, built, and recorded data with a custom infrasound logger (referred to as the Gem) that is inexpensive, portable, and easy to use. We also describe its design process, qualities, and applications in this article. Field instrumentation is a key element of geophysical data collection, and the quantity and quality of data that can be recorded is determined largely by the characteristics of the instruments used. Geophysicists tend to rely on commercially available instruments, which suffice for many important types of fieldwork. However, commercial instrumentation can fall short in certain roles, which motivates the development of custom sensors and data loggers. Particularly, we found existing data loggers to be expensive and inconvenient for infrasound campaigns, and developed the Gem infrasound logger in response. In this article, we discuss development of this infrasound logger and the various uses found for it, including projects on volcanoes, high-altitude balloons, and rivers. Further, we demonstrate that when needed, scientists can feasibly design and build their own specialized instruments, and that doing so can enable them to record more and better data at a lower cost.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Instrumented Lid Detailed Design

This report describes the design of an instrumented lid assembly for remote sampling, monitoring, and radiation testing (SMART) for demonstration and surveillance of the dry storage environment and fuel conditions of aluminum clad spent nuclear fuel (ASNF) in a Department of Energy (DOE) standardized canister. The lid assembly consists of a custom-designed lid and hat, together with a custom fuel basket. The functions and designs of each component of the lid assembly and the general arrangement of the lid assembly are provided in this report. The Piping and Instrumentation Diagram for the corresponding instruments which will be connected to the lid assembly is shown in the appendix. Details of the system to provide characterization are provided in SRNL-L2240-2019-00002, "Instrumented Lid - System Final Design". The detailed drawings of the lid assembly will be prepared following the specification of the demonstration and surveillance system, including canister, design, to which the lid will be matched. Individual testing of the lid assembly sensor components will be performed in cold testing. The lid assembly including connection ports for gas sampling and thermowells will be fabricated. The tubing of the lid assembly to which the sensor components will be connected will not be assembled. The final design of the lid assembly connections to instrumentation is dependent on the staging of the demonstration and surveillance canister.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

Intercomparison of Aerosol Instrumental Responses Using AEROTRAK, SMPS, and APS in a Simulated Building

In this work, three aerosol instruments were intercompared by using data collected from field campaigns in a simulated building environment during the last quarter of 2020 from October to December at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The three aerosol instruments—AeroTrak Model 9110, Scanning Mobility Particle Spectrometer (SMPS) 3080L + 3025A, and Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) 3320—were manufactured by TSI Inc. to perform in situ measurements of particle number concentration in the air. These instruments were co-located in one room in which an aerosol generator was used to produce a defined aerosol population for the instruments to sample and detect in each campaign. The SMPS measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.01 to 0.7 µm, APS measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.5 to 20 µm, and AeroTrak measured aerosol particles with diameters from 0.1 to 10 µm. The results suggest that although AeroTrak is fast and easy to use, it does not provide measurements comparable with those obtained by SMPS and APS. The differences in particle counts were orders of magnitude in size (i.e., the AeroTrak data were unreasonably small in the tested scenarios). The results clearly indicate that AeroTrak should not be used in ambient applications in which the level of particle concentration is expected to be high. This would cause difficulty to a campaign in which the dilution factor is unknow a priori. The high particle concentration could also lead to an erroneous aerosol size distribution (e.g., a bimodal size distribution was measured as opposed to a single-mode one). The number concentration limit that AeroTrak is expected to run reliably (i.e., with a counting coincidence error less than ±10%) is approximately three to four per cubic centimeter. This suggests that the instrument is best used in a clean room environment, not in an ambient or indoor application, such as the Flexible Research Platform campaigns.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗