Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fuel Reprocessing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Developing Tomorrows Nuclear Professionals - Apprentice and Graduate Development at PFCS, Sellafield - 19013

The Pile Fuel Cladding Silo (PFCS) at Sellafield, originally built in 1949/50 to receive and store fuel cladding from reprocessing Windscale Pile fuel, has been used to store this material and other waste from the UK nuclear programme ever since. However, the Silo is unsuitable for indefinite storage of the waste; its age, condition and inventory, combined with significant uncertainty in all these factors, rank the facility among the most hazardous in Western Europe. In 2012, Sellafield Ltd began a highly collaborative relationship with its supply chain partners Bechtel Cavendish Nuclear Solutions (BCNS), to undertake a suite of projects to create a capability for retrieving waste. In doing so, the team has discovered a shared passion for graduate student and apprenticed trades development, which has led to the team goal of becoming the number one destination for training secondments within the associated businesses. This paper describes how the team has leveraged the unique challenge of the project, the extensive experience of the delivery team, and the capabilities of the contributing organisations to create a structure secondment experience aimed at maximizing learning and generating enthusiasm for nuclear clean-up. The scheme was developed and implemented, based on some very simple but consistent feedback from the trainee community on what differentiates a good and bad secondment. The paper includes three case studies from individuals who have participated in the programme and the analysis of overall feedback from all programme trainees. Universally, the scheme has been well received with a significant number of trainees coming back to the project to begin their professional careers. The simple differentiators between a good and bad secondment provide a good basis for those wishing to develop similar schemes. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

An Alternative to the Continued Accumulation of Separated Plutonium in Japan: Dry Cask Storage of Spent Fuel

As of the end of 2017, Japan had a stockpile of 48 tons of separated plutonium. It will take more than a decade for Japan to convert most of that plutonium into “mixed-oxide” (MOX) fuel and load it into power reactors licensed to use such fuel. This is a very costly program. Including the cost of reprocessing, MOX fuel costs about ten times more than the low-enriched-uranium fuel that otherwise would be used by these reactors. Yet Japan has a policy to start separating more plutonium from spent reactor fuel as soon as the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant can be put into operation – currently projected for 2021 after 24 years of delay due to a variety of technical problems and upgrades in safety requirements. Japan’s government remains committed to this costly and troubled program primarily because, pending the availability of additional spent-fuel storage space on or off site, reprocessing is seen as the only way to get spent fuel out of reactor pools that are getting full. Because of concerns about the safety of dense-packed spent-fuel pools, however, the prefectures and towns hosting Japan’s power reactors are beginning to accept on-site storage of spent fuel in dry casks. This is the option the United States and many other countries chose after they cancelled their reprocessing programs and their powerplant pools filled up. Its increasing availability in Japan, if backed by a determined policy to accelerate its introduction, should make it possible to cancel reprocessing in Japan as well.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

NO 2 -mediated voloxidation for iodine separation from cesium iodide surrogates

Heterogeneous NO 2 -mediated oxidation of uranium, also known as advanced voloxidation, is a proposed head-end reprocessing method for used nuclear fuel. An advantage of advanced voloxidation is the removal of volatile fission products, which complicate downstream separation and containment challenges leading to increased processing economics. Iodine, one of the volatile species of interest, has exhibited varied results in this process. Using CsI as a surrogate material, this work mimics the effect of NO 2 -based voloxidation on iodine and sheds light on the factors that influence the solid–gas phase reaction. Solid-state analysis using Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy confirmed the conversion of CsI to CsNO 3 . Iodine separation ranged from 46% to 100% across multiple tests. Iodine separation was most effective when multiple recharges of NO 2 were administered. In conclusion, at the bench scale, liberating iodine from CsI appears to occur within 1 h, but the presence of surface H 2 O and the composition of the NO x reagent mixtures greatly influence its success.

advanced voloxidation↗
DOE OSTI2017

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis – 2017 Edition

This report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), provides a comprehensive set of cost data supporting a cost analysis for the relative economic comparison of options for use in the DOE Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) Program (previously the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) and the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI)). The report describes the NTRD cost basis development process, reference information on NTRD cost modules, a procedure for estimating fuel cycle costs, economic evaluation guidelines, and a discussion on the integration of cost data into economic computer models. This report contains reference cost data for numerous fuel cycle cost modules (modules A-O) as well as cost modules for a number of reactor types (R modules). The fuel cycle cost modules were developed in the areas of natural uranium mining and milling, thorium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, depleted uranium disposition, fuel fabrication, interim spent fuel storage, reprocessing, waste conditioning, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) packaging, long-term monitored retrievable storage, managed decay storage, recycled product storage, near surface disposal of low-level waste (LLW), geologic repository and other disposal concepts, and transportation processes for nuclear fuel, LLW, SNF, transuranic, and high-level waste. Since its inception, this report has been periodically updated. The last such internal document was published in August 2015 while the last external edition was published in December of 2009 as INL/EXT-07-12107 and is available on the Web at URL: www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4536700.pdf. This current report (Sept 2017) is planned to be reviewed for external release, at which time it will replace the 2009 report as an external publication. This information is used in the ongoing evaluation of nuclear fuel cycles by the NE NTRD program.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2013

New method of uranium and plutonium extraction in reprocessing of the spent nuclear fuel

It is shown that a two-stage process of uranium and plutonium extraction during the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel solves the problem of obtaining a high-concentrated extract without increasing the loss risk with raffinate and avoids the accumulation of plutonium in the unit. A possible further optimization of the process would be the creation of steps inside the stages.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Impacts of Tritium Management Approaches on Tritium Distribution and Capture Requirements for UNF Reprocessing

Four radionuclides have been identified as being sufficiently volatile in reprocessing of nuclear fuel that their gaseous release needs to be controlled to meet U.S. regulatory requirements. These radionuclides are {sup 3}H, {sup 14}C, {sup 85}Kr, and {sup 129}I. Although iodine has been the focus of a number of studies due to the high decontamination factor (DF) requirements on multiple escape pathways, it is clear from prior studies that the control of tritium will also be a significant issue for future reprocessing plants, especially if processing relatively short-cooled fuels (<10 yr post reactor discharge). Tritium contained in a used nuclear fuel (UNF) matrix will be released into the liquid and off-gas streams during fuel reprocessing. The amounts released into the process streams are a function of the type and burnup of the fuel processed, and the chemical processes employed within the reprocessing plant. Previous studies have examined the tritium capture requirements for the reprocessing facility assuming that all of the tritium is volatilized in the head-end operations; i.e., tritium pretreatment is employed and tritium is completely released from the cladding. This scenario tends to limit the release pathway to the head-end off-gas stream. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

EURATOM safeguards efforts in the development of spent fuel verification methods by non-destructive assay

The back end of the nuclear fuel cycle continues to develop. The European Commission, particularly the Nuclear Safeguards Directorate of the Directorate General for Energy, implements Euratom safeguards and needs to adapt to this situation. The verification methods for spent nuclear fuel, which EURATOM inspectors can use, require continuous improvement. Whereas the Euratom on-site laboratories provide accurate verification results for fuel undergoing reprocessing, the situation is different for spent fuel which is destined for final storage. In particular, new needs arise from the increasing number of cask loadings for interim dry storage and the advanced plans for the construction of encapsulation plants and geological repositories. Various scenarios present verification challenges. In this context, EURATOM Safeguards, often in cooperation with other stakeholders, is committed to further improvement of NDA methods for spent fuel verification. In this effort EURATOM plays various roles, ranging from definition of inspection needs to direct participation in development of measurement systems, including support of research in the framework of international agreements and via the EC Support Program to the IAEA. This paper presents recent progress in selected NDA methods. These methods have been conceived to satisfy different spent fuel verification needs, ranging from attribute testing to pin-level partial defect verification. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR) Graphite Pebble Fuel: Review of Technologies for Reprocessing

This report reviews literature on reprocessing high temperature gas-cooled reactor graphite fuel components. A basic review of the various fuel components used in the pebble bed type reactors is provided along with a survey of synthesis methods for the fabrication of the fuel components. Several disposal options are considered for the graphite pebble fuel elements including the storage of intact pebbles, volume reduction by separating the graphite from fuel kernels, and complete processing of the pebbles for waste storage. Existing methods for graphite removal are presented and generally consist of mechanical separation techniques such as crushing and grinding chemical techniques through the use of acid digestion and oxidation. Potential methods for reprocessing the graphite pebbles include improvements to existing methods and novel technologies that have not previously been investigated for nuclear graphite waste applications. The best overall method will be dependent on the desired final waste form and needs to factor in the technical efficiency, political concerns, cost, and implementation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Tritium Management Requirements and Approaches for UNF Reprocessing

Four radionuclides have been identified as being sufficiently volatile in reprocessing of nuclear fuel that their release to the environment needs to be controlled to meet U.S. regulatory requirements. These radionuclides are {sup 3}H, {sup 14}C, {sup 85}Kr, and {sup 129}I. While iodine has been the focus of a number of studies due to the high decontamination factor (DF) requirements on multiple escape pathways, it is clear from prior studies that the control of tritium will also be a significant issue for future reprocessing plants, especially if processing relatively short-cooled fuels (<10 yr post-reactor discharge). Tritium contained in a used nuclear fuel (UNF) matrix will be released into the liquid and off-gas streams during fuel reprocessing. The amounts released into the process streams are a function of the type and burnup of the fuel processed and the chemical processes employed within the reprocessing plant. Previous studies have examined the tritium capture requirements for the reprocessing facility assuming that all of the tritium contained in the fuel matrix is volatilized in the head-end operations; i.e., tritium pretreatment is employed and tritium is completely released from the cladding. This scenario tends to limit the release pathway to the headend off-gas stream. Previous studies by Jubin and Spencer examined the accumulation and distribution of tritium in an aqueous-based reprocessing plant.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Advanced Burner Reactor with Breed-and-Burn Thorium Blankets for Improved Economics and Resource Utilization

This study assesses the feasibility of designing Seed and Blanket (S&B) Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) to generate a significant fraction of the core power from radial thorium fueled blankets that operate on the Breed-and-Burn (B&B) mode without exceeding the radiation damage constraint of presently verified cladding materials. The S&B core is designed to maximize the fraction of neutrons that radially leak from the seed (or “driver”) into the subcritical blanket and reduce neutron loss via axial leakage. The blanket in the S&B core makes beneficial use of the leaking neutrons for improved economics and resource utilization. A specific objective of this study is to maximize the fraction of core power that can be generated by the blanket without violating the thermal hydraulic and material constraints. Since the blanket fuel requires no reprocessing along with remote fuel fabrication, a larger fraction of power from the blanket will result in a smaller fuel recycling capacity and lower fuel cycle cost per unit of electricity generated. A unique synergism is found between a low conversion ratio (CR) seed and a B&B blanket fueled by thorium. Among several benefits, this synergism enables the very low leakage S&B cores to have small positive coolant voiding reactivity coefficient and large enough negative Doppler coefficient even when using inert matrix fuel for the seed. The benefits of this synergism are maximized when using an annular seed surrounded by an inner and outer thorium blankets. Among the high-performance S&B cores designed to benefit from this unique synergism are: (1) the ultra-long cycle core that features a cycle length of ~7 years; (2) the high-transmutation rate core where the seed fuel features a TRU CR of 0.0. Its TRU transmutation rate is comparable to that of the reference Advanced Burner Reactor (ABR) with CR of 0.5 and the thorium blanket can generate close to 60% of the core power; but requires only one sixth of the reprocessing and fabrication capacity per unit of core power. Nevertheless, these high-performance cores were designed to set upper bounds on the S&B core performance by using larger height and pressure drop than those of typical SFR design. A study was subsequently undertaken to quantify the tradeoff between S&B core design variables and the core performance. This study concludes that a viable S&B core can be designed without significant deviation from SFR core design practices. For example, the S&B core with 120cm active height will be comparable in volume, HM mass and specific power with the S-PRISM core and could fit within the S-PRISM reactor vessel. 43% of this core power will be generated by the once-through thorium blanket; the required capacity for reprocessing and remote fuel fabrication per unit of electricity generated will be approximately one fifth of that for a comparable ABR. The sodium void worth of this 120cm tall S&B core is significantly less positive than that of the reference ABR and the Doppler coefficient is only slightly smaller even though the seed uses a fertile-free fuel. The seed in the high transmutation core requires inert matrix fuel (TRU-40Zr) that has been successfully irradiated by the Fuel Cycle Research & Development program. An additional sensitivity analysis was later conducted to remove the bias introduced by the discrepancy between radiation damage constraints -- 200 DPA applied for S&B cores and fast fluence of 4x1023 n(>0.1MeV)/cm2 applied for ABR core design. Although the performance characteristics of the S&B cores are sensitive to the radiation damage constraint applied, the S&B cores offer very significant performance improvements relative to the conventional ABR core design when using identical constraint.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (HTGR) Graphite Pebble Fuel: Review of Technologies for Reprocessing

This report reviews literature on reprocessing high temperature gas-cooled reactor graphite fuel components. A basic review of the various fuel components used in the pebble bed type reactors is provided along with a survey of synthesis methods for the fabrication of the fuel components. Several disposal options are considered for the graphite pebble fuel elements including the storage of intact pebbles, volume reduction by separating the graphite from fuel kernels, and complete processing of the pebbles for waste storage. Existing methods for graphite removal are presented and generally consist of mechanical separation techniques such as crushing and grinding and chemical techniques through the use of acid digestion and oxidation. Potential methods for reprocessing the graphite pebbles include improvements to existing methods and novel technologies that have not previously been investigated for nuclear graphite waste applications. The best overall method will be dependent on the desired final waste form and needs to factor in the technical efficiency, political concerns, cost, and implementation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Performance Criteria for Capture and/or Immobilization Technologies - Milestone Report

The capture and subsequent immobilization of the four regulated volatile radionuclides ( 3 H, 14 C, 85 Kr, and 129 I) from the off-gas streams of a used nuclear fuel (UNF) reprocessing facility has been a topic of substantial research interest for the US Department of Energy and its international colleagues. Removal of some or all of these radionuclides (e.g., based upon fuel burnup, fuel type, cooling time) from the plant effluent streams prior to discharge to the environment is required to meet regulations set forth by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Upon removal, the radionuclide, as well as associated sorbents that cannot be cost-effectively regenerated, is destined for conversion to a waste form. Research in separation and capture methodologies has included a wide range of technologies, including liquid caustic scrubbing systems, solid adsorbents, and cryogenic distillation. The studies of waste forms have been correspondingly diverse. In considering the technologies available for future development and implementation of both sorbents and waste forms, it is necessary to identify benchmark measures of performance to evaluate objectively each sorbent system or waste form.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

A Degradation Model and Testing Protocol for Metallic Waste Forms

Metallic waste forms developed to immobilize high-level radioactive wastes generated in advanced (closed) fuel cycles are being evaluated as part of the US DOE Fuel Cycle Research and Development program. The electrometallurgical reprocessing of used metallic fuels to recover U and Pu generates two waste streams: salt waste comprised of electro-refiner salt contaminated with oxidized fission products and metallic waste comprised of activated cladding and metallic fission products that were not oxidized under the processing conditions. Metallic waste forms can be made by directly melting the cladding and fuel wastes with small amounts of trim metals to form a multiphase alloy material in which radionuclides and other waste constituents are immobilized within chemically durable intermetallic and iron-based solid solution phases. Some components of the waste streams serve as important constituents of phases comprising the waste form, such as Mo and Zr, which form Fe{sub 2}Mo and Fe{sub 2}Zr intermetallic phases. Other waste constituents are accommodated as substitutional contaminants, such as Tc within the Fe{sub 2}Mo intermetallic and U/TRU within the Fe{sub 2}Zr intermetallic. Sufficient amounts of these host phases must be available to accommodate all radionuclides in the waste stream. The compositional flexibility of the host phases to incorporate waste components is being utilized to formulate metal waste forms that will accommodate variations in waste streams compositions that will occur over long-term fuel reprocessing operations. Small amounts of trim metals can be added to tailor the phase assembly to match the waste stream composition and facilitate waste form processing. For example, additional Zr may be added during waste form production to ensure all U/TRU is sequestered in a durable Fe{sub 2}Zr host phase and trim Cr, Mo, and Ni can be added to supplement the amounts provided by the steel cladding to improve the durability of a metallic waste form. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Organic Iodine Adsorption by AgZ under Prototypical Vessel Off-Gas Conditions

U.S. regulations will require the removal of 129 I from the off-gas streams of any used nuclear fuel (UNF) reprocessing plant prior to discharge of the off-gas to the environment. Multiple off-gas streams within a UNF reprocessing plant combine prior to release, and each of these streams contains some amount of iodine. For an aqueous UNF reprocessing plant, these streams include the dissolver off-gas, the cell off-gas, the vessel off-gas (VOG), the waste off-gas and the shear off-gas. To achieve regulatory compliance, treatment of multiple off-gas streams within the plant must be performed. Preliminary studies have been completed on the adsorption of I 2 onto silver mordenite (AgZ) from prototypical VOG streams. The study reported that AgZ did adsorb I 2 from a prototypical VOG stream, but process upsets resulted in an uneven feed stream concentration. The experiments described in this document both improve the characterization of I 2 adsorption by AgZ from dilute gas streams and further extend it to include characterization of the adsorption of organic iodides (in the form of CH 3 I) onto AgZ under prototypical VOG conditions. The design of this extended duration testing was such that information about the rate of adsorption, the penetration of the iodine species, and the effect of sorbent aging on iodine removal in VOG conditions could be inferred.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

MARIE: A Python-Based Framework for Comprehensive Fuel Recycling Modeling

One of the most pressing challenges to the continued deployment of nuclear energy systems is in the ultimate management and disposition of discharged fuel assemblies. While reprocessing and recovery of valuable materials from UNF assemblies has been considered as part of an overall strategy for minimization of the volume of reactor-based wastes to be managed, the deployment of commercial-scale reprocessing facilities presents an enormous economic challenge. The MARIE software package has been developed as a means of confronting this challenge. Representing components of a generic fuel reprocessing operation as individual physical processes, MARIE is designed as a modular framework intended to allow for analysis and cost-optimization for a hypothetical reprocessing facility while realistically accounting for the physical characteristics of the used fuel source term, such as decay heat, activity, and radiation dose (informing corresponding shielding requirements). Capabilities supported by MARIE include head-end operations such as fuel shearing, voloxidation, and dissolution; generic solvent extraction operations informed by available open-literature data; a suite of unit operations intended to represent electrochemical processing of used fuel assemblies (i.e., oxide reduction, electrorefining, and electrowinning); and finally, accounting for both costs and physical features of discharged waste streams, which can be used to inform follow-on analyses such as the feasibility of deep-borehole disposal of HLW. This paper presents an overview of the MARIE software capabilities, including how individual unit operations are implemented to enable a larger-scale optimization of a hypothetical reprocessing operation on aspects such as cost and recovery of valuable materials.

Skutnik, Steve [ORNL] (ORCID:000000016441135X)↗
DOE OSTI2017

Evaluation of Tritium Management Approaches on Tritium Waste Volumes in Reprocessing Plants

Four radionuclides have been identified as likely to be volatilized during the reprocessing of nuclear fuel in amounts such that their gaseous release needs to be controlled to meet US regulatory requirements. These radionuclides are 3 H, 14 C, 85 Kr, and 129 I. While iodine has been the focus of a number of studies due to the high decontamination factor (DF) requirements on multiple off-gas pathways, it is also clear that the control of tritium could also be a significant issue for future reprocessing plants, especially if processing relatively short-cooled fuels (e.g., <10-yr post reactor discharge). Like iodine, tritium contained in a used nuclear fuel (UNF) matrix will be released into the liquid and off-gas streams during fuel reprocessing. The amount released into the process streams is a function of the type and burnup of the fuel processed, and the chemical processes and processing conditions employed within the reprocessing plant. The required DF for 3 H could be as high as 200, depending on the age of the fuel processed. This study examines three main cases with a number of subcases for comparative purposes.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Microfluidic Liquid-Liquid Extraction Chip with Integrated Raman Sensors (Phase I and Phase II Final Report)

As demand for electricity continues to increase worldwide, the world’s nuclear power generating capacity will continue to grow. Nuclear power is the most environmentally benign way of producing electricity on a large scale. The long-term successful use of nuclear power, however, is critically dependent upon adequate and safe processing and disposal of spent nuclear fuels. A very important feature of nuclear energy is that spent fuels can be reprocessed to recover fissile and fertile materials that can then be used as fresh fuel for nuclear power plants. The DOE-NE Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCR&D) is currently developing nuclear material reprocessing technologies. In a typical nuclear fuel reprocessing system, centrifugal contactors are used as liquid-liquid extraction devices where two immiscible liquids are mixed at high speeds using a rotor, which creates a fine dispersion of droplets of organic phase in an aqueous phase that contains the analyte. Understanding the extraction efficiency at these contactors through modeling and simulation is important in the development of reprocessing technologies and the optimization of current technologies such as the PUREX process. The outcome of this program will be a liquid-liquid microfluidic flow cell chip with embedded spectroscopic sensors for the analysis of extracted analytes. This device will be useful in the optimization of new fuel reprocessing schemes as well as existing reprocessing processes by providing a microfluidic modeling platform to optimize extraction parameters. The Phase I and Phase II work developed a microfluidic chip design that allows integration of Raman and absorption fiber optic probes and successfully demonstrated the feasibility of using Raman and absorption probes to detect key analytes that partition into the aqueous and organic phases.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2019

Modification of an Agitated Tube Reactor for use in the Reprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel

Aims: Convert an Agitated Tube Reactor (ATR) into a counter-current solvent extraction device. Assess effect of liquid fill level on liquid dispersion. The agitated tube reactor (ATR) is an array of connected tubes. The ATR laterally shakes in a sinusoidal path, moving the agitator bar to create mixing. Originally designed by AM Technology as a cocurrent reactor, the ATR has many features that are potentially useful in the nuclear industry: Tubes are connected by non-moving seals; Reduction in seal damage and reduced risk of expensive repairs in radioactive environments; Minimal axial dispersion within a tube; Plug flow; Narrower residence time distributions that traditional technology; Multiple tubes allow for multiple reactions in series; Converting to a counter-current design allows the ATR to be used for solvent extraction; Reprocessing or decommissioning. A 180 ml PERSPEX ATR tube with no liquid flow through was constructed and filled with a 1:1 solvent:aqueous ratio of kerosene and water. The tube was filled such that the total liquid filled 25 %, 50 %, 75 % or 100 % of the tube. A Photron Fastcam SA5, positioned at the side and the end of the tube was set to a frame rate of 5400 fps with a resolution of 1024 x 1024 and 6000 fps with a resolution of 1024 x 896 respectively. Droplets were recorded after 2 minutes of shaking to ensure good mixing. Droplet sizes are used to determine optimum fill level in the ATR. The shaking frequency follows a sinusoidal path and was set to 5 Hz. The images shown in the results section were taken at the peak of the sinusoidal motion. To convert to a counter-current design the two liquids need to be separated at the end of each tube. Liquids have been allowed to separate under gravity separation. Inclusion of baffles to reduce remixing by sloshing. Wall with height corresponding to 25 % fill volume allows kerosene to overflow into separate outlet. Increase in liquid fill level decreases the dispersion of the two liquid phases. Higher dispersion of droplets decreases surface area and therefore increases mass transfer in solvent extraction. 25 % should provide the greatest mass transfer though more work needs to completed to confirm this.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗