Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Boosting”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1966

Commerical application of rocket engine turbopump technology

This paper describes how commercial pump technology was modified for rocket engine application by trading long life for low weight. The component life of typical turbopump components is presented, and the modes of failure will be discussed. A comparison of the basic commercial and rocket engine pump requirements such as flow, pressure, etc. is made. It is concluded that rocket engine pump technology can be applied directly only if similar basic requirements exist in emergency or stand-by equipment. The specific design requirements for rocket engine turbopumps are presented and the need for high speeds is explained by the weight-speed relationship and the optimum NPSH of the tank and pump system. The trend of required rocket engine pump discharge pressure and future operational requirements is predicted. The need for inducers and boost pumps in rocket engines is explained, and the results of the flat-plate-inducer cavitation therein are briefly presented. Design solutions and material selections for high-pressure pump housings, ultra-high tip speed impellers, and pump packaging are demonstrated. As a typical example of utilizing rocket engine technology for commercial application, a helicopter stand-by engine i shown. This standby engine is designed from existing rocket engine components, using JATO rockets as the prime energy source.

Turbopump↗
NASA NTRS1966

A Nike failure study

Combustion instability advanced as failure node of Nike-Apache boosted Aerobee rocket

NIKE-APACHE ROCKET↗
NASA NTRS1960

Vi. Hypersonic Cruise Vehicles

Interest has been recently expressed in the military use of hypersonic cruise vehicles as bombers, transports, reconnaissance aircraft, and perhaps recoverable boosters. The purpose of this paper is to give a very brief summary of the state of the art in aerodynamics, aerodynamic heating, propulsion, and to indicate the performance possibilities of such an aircraft based on this state of the art. A great deal of research applicable over broad regions of the hypersonic speed range is in progress (refs. 1 and 2, for example) but for the present purpose, discussion will be confined to cruising vehicles which are boosted to cruise speed and altitude. For this purpose a Mach number of 6 has been chosen as the design point, which is considered to be about the limiting Mach number for the use of hydrocarbon fuel and is also considered to be a logical starting point for the use of liquid hydrogen fuel.

Aerodynamic heating↗
NASA NTRS1967

Lunar Orbiter II - Photographic Mission Summary

Lunar Orbiter II photography of landing sites, and spacecraft systems performance. The second of five Lunar Orbiter spacecraft was successfully launched from Launch Complex 13 at the Air Force Eastern Test Range by an Atlas-Agena launch vehicle at 23:21 GMT on November 6, 1966. Tracking data from the Cape Kennedy and Grand Bahama tracking stations were used to control and guide the launch vehicle during Atlas powered flight. The Agena spacecraft combination was maneuvered into a 100-nautical-mile-altitude Earth orbit by the preset on-board Agena computer. In addition, the Agena computer determined the maneuver 1 and engine-bum period required to inject the spacecraft on the cislunar trajectory 20 minutes after launch. Tracking data from the downrange stations and the Johannesburg, South Africa station were used to monitor the entire boost trajectory.

LUNAR ORBITER↗
NASA NTRS1966

Launch booster gust alleviation.

Design of gust alleviation controls for boost phase flight of missiles incorporating random winds, time-varying missile dynamics, control problem, etc

WIND EFFECT↗
NASA NTRS1967

Sat V growth and flexibility.

Uprated Saturn V vehicles and intermediate payload Saturn vehicles, studying costs, flexibility, performance and boost-assist components

SATURN V LAUNCH VEHICLE↗
NASA NTRS1956

Ram-jet Performance

The ram jet is basically one of the most dimple types of aircraft engine. It consists only of an inlet diffuser, a combustion system, and an exit nozzle. A typical ram-jet configuration is shown in figure 128. The engine operates on the Brayton cycle, and ideal cycle efficiency depends only on the ratio of engine to ambient pressure. The increased, engine pressures are obtained by ram action alone, and for this reason the ram jet has zero thrust at zero speed. Therefore, ram-jet-powered aircraft must be boosted to flight speeds close to a Mach number of 1.0 before appreciable thrust is generated by the engine. Since pressure increases are obtained by ram action alone, combustor-inlet pressures and temperatures are controlled by the flight speed, the ambient atmospheric condition, and by the efficiency of the inlet diffuser. These pressures and temperatures, as functions of flight speed and altitude, are shown in figure 129 for the NACA standard atmosphere and for practical values of diffuser efficiency. It can be seen that very wide ranges of combustor-inlet temperatures and pressures may be encountered over the ranges of flight velocity and altitude at which ram jets may be operated. Combustor-inlet temperatures from 500 degrees to 1500 degrees R and inlet pressures from 5 to 100 pounds per square inch absolute represent the approximate ranges of interest in current combustor development work. Since the ram jet has no moving parts in the combustor outlet, higher exhaust-gas temperatures than those used in current turbojets are permissible. Therefore, fuel-air ratios equivalent to maximum rates of air specific impulse or heat release can be used, and, for hydrocarbon fuels, this weight ratio is about 0.070. Lower fuel-air ratios down to about 0.015 may also be required to permit efficient cruise operation. This fuel-air-ratio range of 0.015 to 0.070 used in ram jets can be compared with the fuel-air ratios up to 0.025 encountered in current turbojets. Ram-jet combustor-inlet velocities range from 150 to 400 feet per second. These high linear velocities combined with the relatively low pressure ratios obtainable in ram jets require that the pressure drop through the combustor be kept low to avoid excessive losses in cycle efficiency. It has been estimated that, for a long-range ram-jet engine, an increase in pressure loss of one dynamic head would require a compensating 1-percent increase in combustion efficiency. Therefore, combustor pressure-loss coefficients (pressure drop/impact pressure) of the order of 1 to 4 are found in most current engines. The operating conditions described impose major problems in the design of stable and efficient ram-jet combustion systems. This chapter presents a survey of ram-jet combustor research and, where possible, points out criteria that may be useful in the design of ram-jet combustion systems.

Cervenko, A. J.↗