Evaluation of semi-empirical soot models for nonpremixed flames with increased stoichiometric mixture fraction and strain
Due to the size and complexity of industrial-scale systems and computing limitations, semi-empirical soot models are often employed in CFD simulations rather than computationally-expensive detailed models. Many of these models were developed for specific applications with unique characteristic timescales and/or validated only under fuel-air combustion conditions. Hence, their use in different contexts, such as oxy-combustion, could lead to inaccurate predictions. In this study, twelve semi-empirical models (1-step or 2-step) are evaluated on their ability to respond to changes in stoichiometric mixture fraction (Z st ) and strain in a series of ethylene counterflow flames which span the experimental sooting-to-non-sooting (yellow to blue) transition. A unique approach of plotting soot formation rate in normalized, local equivalence ratio space is introduced to aid in the analysis. Results show that no existing model is able to predict a blue flame when Z st is increased beyond the experimentally-measured sooting limit. Many models give the counter-intuitive result of increasing peak and/or integrated soot volume fraction (svf) as Z st increased, contrary to experimental observations. Two models are able to successfully predict a blue flame upon increase of strain to the sooting limit value. For two-step models, the strong dependence of growth rate on surface area results in high sensitivity of svf to changing flame boundary conditions, but with mixed accuracy. There is still a significant need for a robust semi-empirical model which can accurately predict soot fraction in systems with oxygen-enrichment or variable strain.