Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “AWARD”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management in the United States: What Have We Wrought? The Richard S. Hodes, M.D. Honor Lecture Award - 12222

In 1979, radioactive waste disposal was an important national issue. State governors were closing the gates on the existing low-level radioactive waste disposal sites and the ultimate disposition of spent fuel was undecided. A few years later, the United States Congress thought they had solved both problems by passing the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1981, which established a network of regional compacts for low-level radioactive waste disposal, and by passing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to set out how a final resting place for high-level waste would be determined. Upon passage of the acts, State, Regional and Federal officials went to work. Here we are some 30 years later with little to show for our combined effort. The envisioned national repository for high-level radioactive waste has not materialized. Efforts to develop the Yucca Mountain high-level radioactive waste disposal facility were abandoned after spending $13 billion on the failed project. Recently, the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future issued its draft report that correctly concludes the existing policy toward high-level nuclear waste is 'all but completely broken down'. A couple of new low-level waste disposal facilities have opened since 1981, but neither were the result of efforts under the act. What the Act has done is interject a system of interstate compacts with a byzantine interstate import and export system to complicate the handling of low-level radioactive waste, with attendant costs. As this paper is being written in the fourth-quarter of 2011, after 30 years of political and bureaucratic turmoil, a new comprehensive low-level waste disposal facility at Andrews Texas is approaching its initial operating date. The Yucca Mountain project might be completed or it might not. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is commencing a review of their 1981 volume reduction policy statement. The Department of Energy after 26 years has yet to figure out how to implement its obligations under the 1985 amendments to the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act. But, the last three decades have not been a total loss. A great deal has been learned about radioactive waste disposal since 1979 and the efforts of the public and private sector have shaped and focused the work to be done in the future. So, this lecturer asks the question: 'What have we wrought?' to which he provides his perspective and his recommendations for radioactive waste management policy for the next 30 years. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

TelemeTrak Final Technical Report – Award DE-SC0022722

We developed a browser-based simulation tool to evaluate whether buffering can be advantageous in various climate zones. This tool leverages the Amazon cloud services to process hundreds of simulations in a parametric sweep. This tool, still under development, will ultimately be usable by installers to determine exactly how much storage of what type to include.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Richard Hodes Memorial Award Lecture - Development and Certification of New Type-B Containers for the Recovery of High-Activity Sealed Sources - 18710

The US Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Off-Site Source Recovery Program (OSRP) has successfully completed a project to design, test, and certify two new Type-B transportation packages. Since about 2011 a shortage of these containers has significantly constrained the recovery and disposal of commercially licensed high activity radioactive sealed sources. These new packages will enable NNSA/OSRP to transport a majority of the high-activity Cs-137 and Co-60 devices encountered in the coming years and decades. The 435-B is an unshielded, leak-tight container, which can be used to ship common shielded devices, such as the teletherapy source drawers and irradiators that contain high-activity Co-60 and Cs-137 sources. The 380-B is a much larger, leak-tight, lead-shielded Type B cask capable of transport by truck, rail, ship, or air. Additionally, to encourage and facilitate the development of transportation capacity, DOE/NNSA intends to make the design documentation available at no cost to commercial vendors. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

An Overview on the role of nuclear data: analysis and evaluation - invited Eugene P. Wigner Reactor Physicist Award Winner

The design and calculation of a nuclear system requires the generation of cross-section libraries in the multi-group or continuous-energy form that is suitable for use in reactor physics computer codes. These working libraries are derived from general purpose libraries, named evaluated nuclear data libraries that are constructed based on data evaluations using physical models and theories. Presently, the most common used evaluated nuclear data libraries are the ENDF/B, JEFF, JENDL, CENDL, and BROND. These general purpose nuclear data libraries are the backbone of any design involving neutron-target interactions. The data for neutron interaction in these libraries spans from fractions of electron-volts (eV), that is 10-5 eV, up to millions of electron-volts (MeV), that is 20 MeV or even higher energies. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview on the approach used to generate nuclear data for practical applications especially in the resonance energy region. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Resonance Self-Shielding Using Deterministic Transport Methods with Pointwise Cross Sections (Invited) - Eugene P. Wigner Reactor Physics Award

The difficulty of predicting resonance absorption has been recognized since the birth of reactor physics. A paper published by Wigner, et al. in 1955 describes pioneering theoretical work done in 1941 to provide an estimate for the resonance absorption in heterogeneous uranium lattices. This work introduced many fundamental concepts, including the narrow resonance (NR) approximation and the Wigner rational expression for the escape probability from a fuel lump, and it established an equivalence relation for resonance absorption in homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. During the 1960's, Bondarenko proposed an approach in which resonance shielding factors are precomputed and parametrized as a function of the background cross section by using the NR approximation and equivalence theory. This provided an efficient technique for treating resonance absorption in reactor lattices. The Bondarenko method and its modern variations (e.g., certain subgroup techniques) have become the predominate method for resonance shielding calculations in reactor physics. However, this approach has several limitations, most of which are well known, such as the treatment of resonance interference effects and its reliance on homogeneous-heterogeneous equivalence theory relationships. Other limitations are more subtle and less generally recognized, such as neglecting the impact of self-shielding the multigroup (MG) elastic removal cross section and the effects of directionally dependent shielding on the total cross section. This paper and the accompanying presentation apply deterministic solutions of the continuous energy (CE) neutron transport equation to examine common approximations made in resonance methods for a uniform lattice. The calculated fine-structure spectra are used to calibrate the impact of the approximations and describe how results from CE flux solution can be incorporated in the Bondarenko self-shielding method to improve the accuracy. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗