Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “solver”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupling a Particle Trajectory Capability to the US3D CFD Flow Solver

The purpose of the current research effort is to incorporate particle trajectory equations into the US3D CFD flow solver. The integrated code will allow higher-fidelity modeling of particle-fluid interactions and allow for the simulation of physical effects such as surface heating augmentation due to particle impacts. The key elements underpinning the current work are a robust tracking algorithm that can identify the encompassing mesh elements for individual particles and a point to point MPI frame-work. These developments combined with accurate property models and high-order time-stepping deliver realistic simulations on larger computational grids for a wide range of particle mass loadings. The coupled US3D-particle code will be applied to the Schiarparelli capsule and Earth-based experimental test cases.

A Sahai↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Three Dimensional Surface Redefinition Method for Computational Ice Accretion Solvers

Computational tools have been increasing in maturity and are thus commonly used in the engineering design process. Advancements in NASA’s current state of the art computational ice accretion tool are required to tackle the icing challenges of tomorrow. GlennICE, a next generation ice accretion solver, is under development at NASA to tackle these challenges. One of the elements of this migration is transitioning from a quasi-three dimensional strip theory based ice accretion methodology to a fully three dimensional methodology. This requires construction of a method to redefine or extrude a discretized or tessellated surface geometry based on the predicted volumetric ice growth for each tessellated surface triangle. This paper describes the methodology that is employed in the GlennICE software, and assesses the performance of the method in replicating a well defined analytical test case.

Computational↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Three Dimensional Surface Redefinition Method for Computational Ice Accretion Solvers

Computational tools have been increasing in maturity and are thus commonly used in the engineering design process. Advancements in NASA’s current state of the art computational ice accretion tool are required to tackle the icing challenges of tomorrow. GlennICE, a next generation ice accretion solver, is under development at NASA to tackle these challenges. One of the elements of this migration is transitioning from a quasi-three dimensional strip theory based ice accretion methodology to a fully three dimensional methodology. This requires construction of a method to redefine or extrude a discretized or tessellated surface geometry based on the predicted volumetric ice growth for each tessellated surface triangle. This paper describes the methodology that is employed in the GlennICE software, and assesses the performance of the method in replicating a well definied analytical test case.

Computational↗
NASA NTRS2021

Coupling of the FUN3D Unstructured Flow Solver and the LASTRAC Stability Code to Model Transition

We develop an iterative automated method to predict transition locations in boundary-layer flows by using the FUN3D solver to perform flow simulations and the LASTRAC code for linear stability computations. The coupling of FUN3D and LASTRAC allows for a robust physics-based approach to model boundary-layer transition by analyzing the growth of different instability waves and then using that information to iteratively update the resulting transition location. There is no user involvement during the iterative computations. We apply this automated method to subsonic flow over a flat plate with a sharp leading edge. The final solution has regions of laminar and turbulent flow with a transition onset location that agrees with experiments and stability-based correlations. This iterative automated method is also applied to an NLF(1)-0416 airfoil for conditions with and without a separation bubble. Along with predicting transition locations, we compare the streamwise distributions of surface-pressure and skin-friction coefficients to a transport-equation-based model. We consider a 6:1 prolate spheroid at three angles of attack, namely, five, ten, and fifteen degrees, where mixed-mode transition occurs due to both Tollmien-Schlichting and crossflow instabilities. The skin-friction contours and transition fronts at every angle of attack from our iterative automated method show good agreement with past experimental and computational results in the literature for the 6:1 prolate spheroid.

Transition↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Actuator Disk, Actuator Line and Sliding Mesh Methods within the LAVA Solver

In this study the implementation of actuator-disk, actuator-line and sliding-mesh methodologies in the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) solver is described and validated against several test-cases. The different models are validated against available numerical as well as experimental data. Both steady and unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations using the Spallart Allmaras (SA) turbulence model are performed for several different configurations representative of aeroscience applications. The first part of the paper is focused on the verification and validation of the implemented propulsor models. The first validation case is a theoretical rotor in hover, compared with the 1D analytical solution derived from momentum theory. The second validation is the Rotor-Airframe Interaction Model of Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT), representing the application of actuator disks to top-mounted rotorcraft vehicles or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The third case is a representative configuration for tip-mounted rotor-craft vehicles such as NASA’s X57 airplane. The second part of the paper shows the implemented models applied to realistic engineering configurations such as NASA’s X57 airplane and the R4 Advanced Ducted Propellor (ADT). A modification to the actuator line method in order to represent the blade geometry more closely is proposed and comparisons with simulations modeling the blade utilizing a sliding-mesh approach are made.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulation Method for Unstructured-Grid Navier-Stokes Solvers

This paper reports on the implementation and assessment of a Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation (WMLES) methodology in an unstructured-grid, node-centered flow solver, FUN3D that is developed and supported at the NASA Langley Research Center. Finite-volume (FV) and finite-element (FE) discretization schemes considered in the study provide formal second-order spatial accuracy. Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) resolve large-scale turbulent-flow features and filter out small-scale effects using the Vreman subgrid-scale model. At solid-wall boundaries, a shear-stress model is employed to provide a proper boundary-flux closure. The nonlinear equations are integrated in time using either an optimized backward difference formula or an implicit multistage Runge-Kutta temporal scheme. The implicit equations at each time step are solved by strong nonlinear iteration schemes. WMLES demonstrations are shown for two high-lift configurations, namely, the McDonnell Douglas 30P30N multielement airfoil and a NASA High-Lift Common Research Model. Results show that the WMLES approaches implemented in the FV and FE discretization methods produce consistent solutions and are capable of capturing key aerodynamic characteristics and flow structures for high-lift configurations at a wide range of angles of attack including maximum-lift conditions. In the 30P30N example, correct trends in the variations of integrated aerodynamic forces and moments, surface pressure distributions, and boundary-layer profiles are captured as the Reynolds number is increased.

CFD; turbulence modeling; High-Lift flow simulatio↗
NASA NTRS2025

Hardware in the Loop Performance of Terrestrial Powered Descent Dual Quaternion Guidance With A Custom First-Order Solver

The Safe & Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) program continues to push the development of advanced descent and landing technologies. This paper will focus on the improvements made to the SPLICE Dual Quaternion Guidance (DQG) algorithm, which is a critical software component for generating approach phase and hazard avoidance trajectories. The trajectory performance of SPLICE DQG will be evaluated in preparation for a terrestrial flight test that incorporates a hazard avoidance maneuver. Additionally, the implementation of a customized first order Proportional-Integral Projected Gradient solver will be reviewed, along with preliminary execution results on the SPLICE Descent and Landing Computer (DLC).

SPLICE↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation Assessment of Loci/GGFS Gas Granular Flow Solver Predictions of Ejecta from Physics Focused Ground Test

NASA is preparing to return humans to the Moon to establish a sustained Lunar presence through the Artemis program. One area of concern for Lunar landers is the plume surface interaction (PSI) environment that poses several risks during a propulsive landing. Understanding the PSI environment caused by the landers is therefore important to designing successful landing missions. Towards this end, a two-phase, gas granular flow solver, Loci/GGFS, has been developed to predict the cratering and ejecta physics expected during a Lunar landing. The focus of this paper is on a validation assessment of Loci/GGFS predictions of ejecta with monodisperse glass beads (MGB). The validation assessment is performed with respect to the Physics Focused Ground Test 1 (PFGT1) conducted at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in 2021. It is found that Loci/GGFS predicts similar initial cratering and ejecta features, with predictions of average velocities that are within 25% of experimental values.

Plume Surface Interaction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Transition Aero-Propulsive Analysis of a Tilt-Wing eVTOL Aircraft Using a Surface-Vorticity Solver

This work uses FlightStream, a surface-vorticity solver, to perform an aero-propulsive analysis on the NASA LA-8 aircraft through the transition flight regime. Aerodynamic force and moment coefficient predictions for forward and transition flight of the airframe without propulsors are compared with wind tunnel data. Powered transition cases are simulated using Conway actuator disks to model the propellers and results are compared with response surface equations derived from wind tunnel data. The approach described in the paper provides mid-fidelity solutions at a reduced computational cost compared to volumetric CFD, which allows for rapid transition flight analyses and optimization in the early design stages. The best prediction results were observed in forward flight and high-speed transition. Mid-transition results were not as close in magnitude but the trends exhibited reasonable agreement with experimental data.

Advanced Air Mobility↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Initial Validation of a Gas-Granular Flow Solver Using a Subscale, Reduced Pressure Plume Surface Interaction Ground Test

With NASA’s goal to land the next humans on the lunar surface in the next few years, it is vitally important to have a better understanding of the plume surface interaction (PSI) between the landing vehicles and the lunar regolith. The Fluid Dynamics Branch at NASA/MSFC has previously used the gas-granular flow solver Loci/GGFS to qualitatively predict crater formation due to PSI effects in a lunar (near vacuum) ambient environment. In this paper, validation of Loci/GGFS crater width and depth predictions in ambient near-lunar conditions are provided using experimental data collected at MSFC during the Physics-Focused Ground Test 1 (PFGT-1) campaign in 2022. To observe sensitivity to soil models, simulations were conducted with both monodisperse glass bead (MGB) and BP-1 lunar regolith simulant soil models in Loci/GGFS. Crater depth and width comparisons are made with PFGT-1 Run 56, which used BP-1 soil. The Loci/GGFS BP-1 soil model performed slightly better with a mean predicted crater depth within 10% of the experiment. Both soil models predicted crater width within 10%. Cratering occurred more quickly with the MGB soil model. Mesh and spatial order sensitivity are also examined for the BP-1 soil model.

Validation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled LES of a Swept Wing with Leading-Edge Ice Using LAVA Curvilinear, Unstructured, and Cartesian Solvers

Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (LES) of a swept wing with leading-edge ice build up is performed using three mesh paradigms and associated flow solvers and compared to experimental results. The study focuses on an 8.9% scale model of the CRM65 swept wing featuring both high-fidelity and smooth leading-edge ice shapes. The assessment is conducted using the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework using the three actively supported meshing paradigms in LAVA: structured curvilinear overset, unstructured, andCartesian. For the iced configurations, these paradigms use hybrid body-fitted/source-term immersed-boundary, body-fitted, and ghost-cell immersed-boundary strategies, respectively.The unstructured and Cartesian mesh paradigms are particularly attractive for complex ice shapes as they avoid the manual mesh generation effort associated with the curvilinear approach. For the high-fidelity ice shape, good agreement with the experiment can be obtained with all three strategies; however, the curvilinear method is particularly sensitive to the source-term immersed-boundary timescale and span wise mesh resolution, and the Cartesian implementation is sensitive to the choice of numerical flux. For the smooth ice, larger discrepancies are observed across all methods. However, a mesh refinement study guided by flow visualizations leads to an improved comparison with the experiment that is particularly pronounced for the unstructured mesh paradigm.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation Assessment of Loci/GGFS Gas Granular Flow Solver Predictions of Ejecta From Physics Focused Ground Test

NASA is preparing to return humans to the Moon to establish a sustained Lunar presence through the Artemis program. One area of concern for Lunar landers is the plume surface interaction (PSI) environment that poses several risks during a propulsive landing. Understanding the PSI environment caused by the landers is therefore important to designing successful landing missions. Towards this end, a two-phase, gas granular flow solver, Loci/GGFS, has been developed to predict the cratering and ejecta physics expected during a Lunar landing. The focus of this paper is on a validation assessment of Loci/GGFS predictions of ejecta with monodisperse glass beads (MGB). The validation assessment is performed with respect to the Physics Focused Ground Test 1 (PFGT1) conducted at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in 2021. It is found that Loci/GGFS predicts similar initial cratering and ejecta features, with predictions of average velocities that are within 25% of experimental values.

Plume Surface Interaction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbo-Design: Open-Source Radial Equilibrium Turbomachinery Solver: Part I - Turbines

Advances in 3D Geometrical Designs and Cooling have played a significant role in improving the efficiency of turbomachinery. However, these advancements must be effectively translated back to the modeler. Machine learning can facilitate this transition. Specifically, machine learning–based loss models can bridge the gap between 3D and 1D designs, enabling modelers not only to predict velocity triangles but also to extract additional geometric features. Currently, the design tools used at NASA have not been updated to support such integration—until now. TurboDesign is an open-source, Python-based framework that replaces TD2 (LEW-11029-1) and AXOD2 (LEW-16323-1), both of which are radial equilibrium solvers for axial turbines. The goal of this update is to enable the integration of machine learning loss models into radial equilibrium equations. Additionally, TurboDesign is designed to support radial machines. This paper presents the governing equations, the assumptions underlying the code, the integration of legacy loss models, an example of machine learning model integration, and a validation comparison with CFD. All code, tutorials, and documentation are available at: https://www.github.com/nasa/turbo-design

Radial Equilibrium↗
NASA NTRS2016

Development of a High-Order Space-Time Matrix-Free Adjoint Solver

The growth in computational power and algorithm development in the past few decades has granted the science and engineering community the ability to simulate flows over complex geometries, thus making Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tools indispensable in analysis and design. Currently, one of the pacing items limiting the utility of CFD for general problems is the prediction of unsteady turbulent ows.1{3 Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods, which predict a time-invariant mean flowfield, struggle to provide consistent predictions when encountering even mild separation, such as the side-of-body separation at a wing-body junction. NASA's Transformative Tools and Technologies project is developing both numerical methods and physical modeling approaches to improve the prediction of separated flows. A major focus of this e ort is efficient methods for resolving the unsteady fluctuations occurring in these flows to provide valuable engineering data of the time-accurate flow field for buffet analysis, vortex shedding, etc. This approach encompasses unsteady RANS (URANS), large-eddy simulations (LES), and hybrid LES-RANS approaches such as Detached Eddy Simulations (DES). These unsteady approaches are inherently more expensive than traditional engineering RANS approaches, hence every e ort to mitigate this cost must be leveraged. Arguably, the most cost-effective approach to improve the efficiency of unsteady methods is the optimal placement of the spatial and temporal degrees of freedom (DOF) using solution-adaptive methods.

Adjoint↗
NASA NTRS2023

Implementation, Realization and an Effective Solver of Two-Equation Turbulence Models

Currently, when the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are solved using turbulence modeling, most often the one-equation model of Spalart and Allmaras is used. Then, it is only necessary to solve the RANS equations in conjunction with a single transport equation for modeling turbulence. For this model, considerable assessment and analysis has been performed, allowing the possibility of a reliable solution method for an eddy viscosity required to compute the Reynolds stresses in the RANS equations. Such evaluation along with analysis has not been achieved to realize similar performance with two-equation models of the k-w type. The primary objective of this paper is to present and discuss the components of an effective numerical algorithm for solving the RANS equations and the two transport equations of k-w type turbulence models. All the important details of the turbulence model as actually implemented are given, which is sometimes not done in various papers considering such modeling. The viability and effectiveness of this solution algorithm are demonstrated by solving both two-dimensional and three-dimensional aerodynamic flows. In all applications, a linear rate of convergence without oscillations or other evidence of unstable behavior is observed. This behavior is also particularly true when the proposed algorithm is applied to systematically renewed mesh sequences, which is generally not observed with algorithms solving more than one transport equation. Thus, numerical integration errors are systematically reduced, allowing for a significantly more reliable assessment of the effectiveness of the turbulence model. Additionally, in this paper, analysis of the solution algorithm, including linear stability, is also performed for a particular flow problem.

Turbulence↗