Nacelle/Diverter Integration into the Design Optimization Process Using Pseudo, Warped, and Real Nacelles
The computational results of the optimized complete configurations, including nacelles and diverters, are presented in terms of drag count improvement compared with the TCA baseline configuration at Mach 2.4, C(sub L)=0.1. The three candidate designs are designated by the organization from which they were derived. ARC represents the Ames Research Center 1-03 design, BCAG represents the Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group's design from Seattle, and BLB represents the design from Boeing Long Beach. All CFD methods are in unanimous agreement that the Ames 1-03 configuration has the largest performance improvement, followed closely by the BCAG configuration, with a much smaller improvement attained by Boeing Long Beach. The Ames design was obtained using the single-block wing/body code SYN87-SB with its "pseudo" nacelle option-an elaborate technique for incorporating nacelle/diverter effects into the design optimization process. This technique uses AIRPLANE surface pressure coefficient data with and without the nacelles/diverters. Further details of this method are described. It is reasonable to expect that further improvements could be achieved by including the "real" nacelles directly into the optimization process by use of the newly-developed multiblock optimization code, SYN107-MB, which can handle full configurations.