Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “decontamination”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) Batch 1

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal 1A (TCCR 1A) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR 1A unit processes dissolved salt fed from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST, IONSIV TM R9120-B, 30x60) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. In support of the TCCR 1A program, SRNL analyzed samples taken from Tank 11H (without tank mixing) before, during, and at the completion of TCCR 1A Batch 1 processing. Tank 11H serves as the receipt tank for the filtered and cesium removed product from the TCCR 1A system. Processing of Batch 1 commenced on January 13, 2022 and completed on February 17, 2022, after processing approximately 70,100 gallons. A pre-production sample was collected from the heel remaining in Tank 11H just before Batch 1 processing began. In addition, five interim surface samples were collected from Tank 11H during processing, and both a surface and a variable depth sample (VDS, ~7” from tank bottom) were collected just after processing completed. Analysis of all samples included density and gamma spectroscopy, in addition to a more comprehensive suite of analytes for the pre- and post-production samples. The density of the pre-production sample was the highest of all samples measured and was then observed to decrease for the first two interim samples, followed by becoming fairly consistent for the remainder of the samples (~1.3 g/mL). The density of 1.3 g/mL is similar to the density measured for one of the three Tank 10H qualification samples (HTF-10-21-126). The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease as additional decontaminated effluent from the TCCR columns was added to Tank 11H during processing; however, an increase in activity was observed during periods of no processing which can be attributed to leaching of 137 Cs from the known solids in Tank 11H. The Cs isotope concentrations in the Tank 11H postproduction surface sample were determined to be 99.7-99.8% lower than the concentrations measured in the Tank 10H feed as measured by mass spectrometry.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Environmental Monitoring Report, Calendar year 2020. Knolls Laboratory and Kesselring Site

The results of the effluent and environmental monitoring programs at the Knolls Laboratory and Kesselring Site are summarized and assessed in this report. Tables 1 - 4 summarize the major elements of the environmental monitoring programs at each site. Information regarding the U.S. Department of Energy – Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Separations Process Research Unit (SPRU) Disposition Project (SPRU DP), is also included in this report; however, the project was completed in 2020 and will no longer be reported in subsequent reports. DOE-EM will be continuing to perform other Decontamination & Decommissioning (D&D) work at Knolls Laboratory and Kesselring Site, which may require environmental monitoring, and will be included in this report, as warranted. Operations at the Knolls Laboratory, which includes SPRU and other DOE-EM activities, and the Kesselring Site continue to have no adverse effect on human health and the quality of the environment.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2022

An Adaptable and Comprehensive Project Assessment Tool

Most companies, agencies, and other real property owners require capital asset projects to pass some type of scrutiny before budgets and authority to expend funds for the design, construction and eventual operations are approved. This process typically involves management approval of key/critical decision(s) or a project’s passage through gates (or critical decisions). Cost, functionality, safety, and risk are just some of the factors typically considered during project assessment processes. This paper describes a tool that was developed and is used by the Department of Energy to facilitate this project assessment process. There are three versions of this tool for construction, decontamination and decommissioning (D&D), and environmental restoration/cleanup project types. The tool’s elements and associated criteria are tailored for each project type; although some elements, such as cost estimating and scheduling, are used in common. The tool is easy to use, requiring little or no training. It provides a common assessment tool for project self-appraisals and independent project reviews. It promotes efficiency and reduces disagreements and unnecessary effort. A comprehensive array of elements covers the gamut of cost, schedule, scope/technical, and safety/security ensuring that no important project attributes are overlooked. The tool is adaptable for use by any organization.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Removal of Tc-99, Zr-95, and Nb-95, From Solutions Obtained After Dissolution of Irradiated Mo Targets

Decontamination of 99 Tc, Nb, and Zr impurities in dissolved irradiated Mo disks can be accomplished using Fe(II) precipitation. Here, we report bench-scale experiments and large-scale demonstrations on removal of 99 Tc (0.1 mM), 95 Nb, and 95 Zr from dissolved Mo disk simulant solutions. Tc removal is accomplished through the reduction and simultaneous immobilization of Tc(VII) by Fe(II), producing an insoluble, Tcincorporated Fe(II)-Fe(III) solid that is removed by filtration. Large-scale testing showed that Tc (97.6% ± 1.7%) is removed without affecting 99 Mo yields. Other important side reaction product impurities in irradiated Mo targets, namely various isotopes of Nb and Zr, are also removed (>99%) in this process. The effects of metal (Fe, Tc, Mo) concentrations, Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratio, pH, temperature, Fe addition method, and hydrogen peroxide addition were tested. The minimum amount of Fe(II) needed to remove up to 99% Tc is 10 mM and the optimal pH value for simultaneous removal of Tc, Nb, and Zr impurities is pH 13.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

User’s Manual for RESRAD-BUILD Code V.4: Vol. 1 – Methodology and Models Used in RESRAD-BUILD Code

The RESRAD-BUILD computer code models radionuclide release and transport in indoor environments and performs pathway analyses to evaluate the potential radiological dose and risk incurred by an individual who works or lives in a building contaminated with radioactive material or housing radioactively contaminated furniture or equipment. The code provides four geometries to characterize a radiation source: point, line, area, and volume, in which radionuclides are homogeneously distributed. Radionuclides contained in a source are considered to be released to the indoor air due to various processes including erosion (mechanically or weathering), diffusion (for tritium and radon in a volume source), or emanation (radon in a point, line, or area source). The release can proceed through different time phases with different rates. In RESRAD-BUILD Version 4.0, a dynamic ventilation model is implemented to simulate the fate and transport of source material particles and radionuclides after their releases. This dynamic ventilation model considers (1) air exchange between rooms in the building and between the rooms and the outdoor environment, (2) deposition from air to floor, (3) resuspension from the floor to the air, and (4) periodical vacuuming that reduces the floor deposition. The fate and transport modeling provides estimates of radionuclide concentrations in the source, in the air, and on the floor at different times, which are then integrated over the exposure duration for the calculation of radiation doses and cancer risks. A single run of the RESRAD-BUILD code can model a building with up to 9 rooms, 10 sources, and 10 receptors. The potential radiation dose and cancer risk incurred by each receptor are calculated for seven exposure pathways: (1) external radiation directly from the sources (accounting for shielding), (2) external radiation from radioactive particles deposited on the floors, (3) external radiation from airborne radionuclides, (4) inhalation of airborne radionuclides, (5) inhalation of radon and radon progenies, (6) inadvertent ingestion of radioactive particles directly from the source, and (7) ingestion of radioactive particles deposited on the floors. Various exposure scenarios can be modeled with RESRAD-BUILD, including but are not limited to, office worker, renovation worker, decontamination worker, building visitor, and resident. Both deterministic and probabilistic analyses can be performed to obtain results in both text reports and graphic displays.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Off-Gas Design and Testing from Advanced Chlorination Process

Chlorination of Zr alloy cladding with sulfur-chloride reagents is being considered as a means of separating the main metal from alloying elements, imbedded U, actinides, and fission and activation products to purify the Zr. This would allow the Zr to be disposed of as low-level nuclear waste or possibly be recycled. A multistage process was developed that involves several steps and waste streams. Recycling of sulfur-chloride reagents S 2 Cl 2 and SOCl 2 is planned to minimize the waste stream. The generation of off-gas and entrainment of volatiles is anticipated to be minimized. However, given the complex nature of spent nuclear fuel (SNF), some volatile components will be generated, including the solvents themselves; Cl 2 used for the regeneration of S 2 Cl 2 ; volatile fission product chlorides, such as Sb and 3 H; and chlorinated alloying components, such as Sn, Nb, Fe, and Mo. This report discusses the chemical phenomena that might give rise to volatile species and their planned capture. The volatility of the transition metals will depend on their oxidation state and the compounds that are formed, such as Zr tritide. Loading radionuclides in the process off-gas will depend on the inputs to the process. For instance, processing separated Zr to reduce waste will have a much lower loading of radionuclides than if alternative chlorination were used for decladding SNF. Much of the volatile process streams will be part of the solvent recycling, which may involve online scrubbing. Generally, a caustic scrubber should be included in the off-gas to remove acidic vapors (e.g., Cl 2 , SOCl 2 ). The decontamination procedures for removing these species could involve pretreatment (i.e., heating) options or reduction by contact with H 2 . This report discusses these options along with a framework for testing these alternatives in future experiments. Technologies for off-gas capture will leverage those developed in the Materials Recovery and Waste Forms program.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Screening Level Ecological Exposure Assessment Work Plan

This work plan is part of an effort to complete an updated evaluation of the potential for adverse effects from miscellaneous treatment unit emissions to potential ecological receptors within and surrounding Site 200. It will address potential pathways between air emissions from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL) Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF), single emission stack, and ecological receptors (i.e., plants and wildlife) present onsite and within a one-mile radius from the DWTF stack. This work plan outlines the procedures by which data collected as part of the previous investigations will be evaluated to assess risks to ecological receptors. It presents the problem formulation, initial conceptual site models, methods for characterizing exposure, toxicity, and risks that will be used if a more detailed “baseline” ecological risk assessment (BERA) is required.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

U.S. Efforts in Support of Examinations at Fukushima Daiichi - November 2022 Meeting Notes and Information Request Status

Information obtained from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (Daiichi) is required to inform future Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D) activities, improving the ability of the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated (TEPCO Holdings) to characterize potential hazards and to ensure the safety of workers involved with cleanup activities. This information also has important implications for the safety and operation of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. This document summarizes results from the Fiscal Year 2023 (FY2023) U.S. effort to review Daiichi information and extract insights to enhance the safety of existing and future nuclear power plant designs. This U.S. effort, which was initiated in 2014 by the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, is completed by a group of experts in reactor safety and plant operations that identify examination needs and evaluate recent Daiichi examination data to address these needs. Fukushima-related information and associated discussions during these meetings benefit operating, new, and advanced reactors. Significant safety insights have been and are continuing to be obtained in several areas: system and component performance, radionuclide surveys and sampling, debris end-state location, combustible gas effects, and plant operations and maintenance. In addition to reducing uncertainties related to severe accident modeling progression, these insights have and continue to be used to update guidance for severe accident prevention, mitigation, and emergency planning. Furthermore, Daiichi-related activities, such as code modeling improvements and analysis, testing, and new technology deployment efforts, have the potential to offer additional benefits to the operating fleet and new LWR and non-LWR designs. U.S. evaluations of obtained examination information and input regarding future Daiichi examinations are of interest to several organizations within Japan. Since its inception, the U.S. has provided consensus input for high priority time-sequenced examination tasks and supporting research activities. In their Mid-to-Long-term Examination Plan for 1F investigations, TEPCO included all remaining U.S. consensus information requests and additional information requests they identified. TEPCO periodically provides reports on the status of these requests (reflecting D&D priorities, new insights from investigations, and new technologies that become available). Hence, U.S. experts agreed that it was appropriate for TEPCO to track and prioritize these information requests as D&D progresses. U.S. experts will continue to review and comment on the information obtained from examinations and, as needed, provide additional details and relevant background material to support future examinations. As documented in this report, several other items, such as additional details on information requests pertaining to ex-vessel examinations, relevant references from prior research, additional documents to provide insights regarding recent investigation findings, and reviews of recently released documents, were agreed to during the FY2023 meeting.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Mercury Speciation During Vitrification of LAW

n this work, laboratory and engineering-scale tests were conducted that mimic the reactive environment of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) low activity waste (LAW) melter and off-gas system in order to assess the speciation of mercury at select points in the processing system. The experimental protocols, test equipment, feed materials used, and rationale for testing are detailed in the Test Plan for this work. Particular attention was paid to the amount and speciation of mercury in submerged bed scrubber (SBS) solutions, which are intended to be recycled back to the melter feed at the WTP. Results are presented from detailed mercury analysis of these solutions using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1630 and modifications to this method for dimethyl mercury and methyl mercury as well as EPA Method 1631 and modifications to this method for total, dissolved, elemental, suspended, and ionic mercury. Testing was conducted in two separate sets of experiments: (1) One set of tests (crucible-scale furnace tests) that involved heating small batches of mercury-spiked melter feed in crucibles to determine the amount of mercury retained in the glass and the species of mercury in the exhaust gases; (2) A second set of tests (DM10 melter tests) was planned that involved creating LAW melter plenum gas compositions using the DM10 melter system, injecting mercury into the off-gas stream, and passing that stream though a reactor that simulates various plenum gas conditions. Operational issues led to the need to use one of the VSL DM100 melters in place of the planned DM10 melter for these tests. The speciation of mercury after exposure to those conditions was monitored. In both sets of tests, the exhaust gases were run through a scrubber that was intended to mimic the LAW SBS in order to determine how much of the mercury exiting the melter would be retained in the primary off-gas system fluids and in what form. After passing through the SBS, the exhaust stream was analyzed to determine particulate, ionic, elemental, and total mercury passing downstream of the SBS. In tests employing gases derived from the DM100 melter that were spiked with elemental mercury, the processing system provided gas temperatures and residence times that are representative of the WTP LAW vitrification system in order to assess the effect of those conditions on mercury speciation. The Decontamination Factor (DF) across the system in the tests with mercury-spiked DM100 melter exhaust was determined using the analytical data from EPA Method 30B (Fluegas Adsorption Mercury Speciation (FAMS TM )) exhaust samples and the amount of mercury detected in the SBS solutions. Mercury species used in melter feed crucible scale tests were divalent (chloride and iodide), monovalent (chloride and fluoride), and elemental mercury. Individual tests included only a single form of mercury in the feed. The results for total mercury mass balances in the crucible tests are also presented.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cultural Resource Management Plan for Brookhaven National Laboratory

The Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP) for Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) provides an organized guide that describes or references the facets and interrelationships of cultural resources at BNL. Management strategies included within this CRMP are designed to adequately identify the cultural resources that BNL and DOE consider significant and to acknowledge associated management actions. A principal objective of the CRMP is to reduce the need for additional regulatory documents and to serve as the basis for a formal agreement between the DOE and the New York State Historic Preservation Officer (NYSHPO). The BNL CRMP is designed to be a “living document.” Each section includes identified gaps in the management plan, with proposed goals and actions for addressing each gap. The plan will be periodically revised to incorporate new documentation. The current (2023) update incorporates new findings and/or updated text based on completed or ongoing projects related to cultural resources at BNL since inception of the last updated CRMP in 2013. Historically, Brookhaven National Laboratory had little need for cultural resource management because many of its buildings were less than 50 years old. Most of the features that are potentially eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places were protected simply by avoiding the features. Compliance with cultural resource laws and regulations has included archeological surveys, such as those associated with the 1977 Final Environmental Impact Statement for Brookhaven National Laboratory and the 1978 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proton-Proton Storage Accelerator Facility (ISABELLE). In 1979, World War I trenches associated with the former Camp Upton and located near ISABELLE were determined to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places; however, many of these trenches had been destroyed by construction work. In 1991, the NYSHPO provided BNL with a letter indicating that only three structures and features were likely to be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Between 1991 and 1999, little work associated with cultural resource management was accomplished. Beginning in 1999, awareness for the need of a program to manage cultural resources grew out of the realization that over half of the buildings at BNL were either 50 years old or were reaching that age and were, therefore, subject to the requirements in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. This fact, concomitant with the decontamination and decommissioning of the Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor (BGRR) and the subsequent determination of BGRR’s eligibility for listing as an historical site, fueled the need for developing and implementing a more structured program for managing cultural resources at BNL.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Low Activity Waste Tuning Feed Material Testing VSL-18R4350-1 (Final Report)

High level waste (HLW) from the Hanford tank farms will be retrieved and transferred to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). The waste will be pretreated to separate the soluble chemical salts (mostly sodium nitrate/nitrite and sodium hydroxide) from the bulk of the radioactive materials. This decontaminated salt solution is the low activity waste (LAW) stream which constitutes most of the total waste volume. The remaining HLW contains most of the radioactive materials but a fraction of the volume. Each of these waste streams is directed to an independent processing facility where the waste is mixed with glass forming chemicals (mostly silica and borax or boric acid) and fed into the melters for stabilization by conversion into glass. The molten glass is poured into stainless steel containers to produce packages for disposal: local shallow burial for the LAW containers and a future geologic repository for the HLW containers. The LAW facility melters produce significant quantities of NOx-laden off-gas that require abatement in accordance with 10 CFR 830 and air emission requirements. The NOx emissions also pose a safety risk. The LAW facility commissioning sequence requires that the melters be operated and process control loops tuned prior to introducing waste or waste feed materials that produce NOx. Therefore, a temporary or permanent system architecture is needed that provides a feed supply to the melters for the purpose of melter testing and off-gas tuning that does not result in the production of significantly hazardous off-gas products.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

RCT Continuing Training: Radiological Emergency Response

Objectives: 1) List the revised initial response and supplemental actions while responding to a major injury inside of a radiological area; 2) List the initial response and supplemental actions while responding to a minor injury inside of a radiological area; 3) List the initial response and supplemental actions for responding to a Continuous Air Monitoring (CAM) alarm; 4) List the initial response and supplemental actions for responding to a radioactive spill; 5) List the initial response and supplemental actions of responding to an Area Radiation Monitor (ARM) alarm; 6) List the initial response and supplemental actions of an Electronic Personal Dosimeter (EPD) dose and dose rate alarm; 7) List the initial response and supplemental actions of responding to a Stationary Contamination Monitor (SCM) alarm; 8) Identify the methods to perform personnel decontamination.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2022

Updated Economic Model for Estimation of GDP Losses in the MACCS Offsite Consequence Analysis Code RDEIM Model Report for MACCS v4.2

This report updates the Regional Disruption Economic Impact Model (RDEIM) GDP-based model described in Bixler et al. (2020) used in the MACCS accident consequence analysis code. MACCS is the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) used to perform probabilistic health and economic consequence assessments for atmospheric releases of radionuclides. It is also used by international organizations, both reactor owners and regulators. It is intended and most commonly used for hypothetical accidents that could potentially occur in the future rather than to evaluate past accidents or to provide emergency response during an ongoing accident. It is designed to support probabilistic risk and consequence analyses and is used by the NRC, U.S. nuclear licensees, the Department of Energy, and international vendors, licensees, and regulators. The update of the RDEIM model in version 4.2 expresses the national recovery calculation explicitly, rather than implicitly as in the previous version. The calculation of the total national GDP losses remains unchanged. However, anticipated gains from recovery are now allocated across all the GDP loss types – direct, indirect, and induced – whereas in version 4.1, all recovery gains were accounted for in the indirect loss type. To achieve this, we’ve introduced new methodology to streamline and simplify the calculation of all types of losses and recovery. In addition, RDEIM includes other kinds of losses, including tangible wealth. This includes loss of tangible assets (e.g., depreciation) and accident expenditures (e.g., decontamination). This document describes the updated RDEIM economic model and provides examples of loss and recovery calculation, results analysis, and presentation. Changes to the tangible cost calculation and accident expenditures are described in section 2.2. The updates to the RDEIM input-output (I-O) model are not expected to affect the final benchmark results Bixler et al. (2020), as the RDEIM calculation for the total national GDP losses remains unchanged. The reader is referred to the MACCS revision history for other cost modelling changes since version 4.0 that may affect the benchmark. RDEIM has its roots in a code developed by Sandia National Laboratories for the Department of Homeland Security to estimate short-term losses from natural and manmade accidents, called the Regional Economic Accounting analysis tool (REAcct). This model was adapted and modified for MACCS. It is based on I-O theory, which is widely used in economic modeling. It accounts for direct losses to a disrupted region affected by an accident, indirect losses to the national economy due to disruption of the supply chain, and induced losses from reduced spending by displaced workers. RDEIM differs from REAcct in in its treatment and estimation of indirect loss multipliers, elimination of double-counting associated with inter-industry trade in the affected area, and that it is intended to be used for extended periods that can occur from a major nuclear reactor accident, such as the one that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi site in Japan. Most input-output models do not account for economic adaptation and recovery, and in this regard RDEIM differs from its parent, REAcct, because it allows for a user-definable national recovery period. Implementation of a recovery period was one of several recommendations made by an independent peer review panel to ensure that RDEIM is state-of-practice. For this and several other reasons, RDEIM differs from REAcct.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2023

Characterization of Salt Waste Processing Facility August 2022 Tank 201 sample

Two Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Tank 201 samples were collected from the replacement of the decontaminated salt solution (DSS) coalescer at different times; one in December of 2021 and the other in August 2022. The December 2021 sample was collected after nitric and water flushing of the DSS Coalescer. The Aug 2022 sample was collected after water flushing only. The December 2021 Tank 201 solids were previously characterized and documented. SWPF requested the characterization of the August 2022 Tank 201 sample, and the comparison of the characterization results for these two Tank 201 solids collected at different dates.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Mo-99 Concentration and processing by Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange

Normally derived from its transient-equilibrium parent molybdenum-99 ( 99 Mo) (t½ = 66 h), the short-lived isotope technetium-99m ( 99m Tc) (t ½ = 6.0 h) is the most widely used medical isotope in diagnostic imaging today. The National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) Material Management and Minimization (M3) program—established under the auspices of the American Medical Isotope Production Act—has been tasked with facilitating the work of domestic 99 Mo suppliers that do not use highly enriched uranium (HEU). Superconducting electron linear accelerators that employ high-Z converter targets can generate bremsstrahlung photons and neutron fluxes that can induce photonuclear reactions and uranium (U) fission. Argonne, in collaboration with industrial partners, has been developing the process chemistry for superconducting linear accelerator (LINAC)-irradiated triuranium octoxide (U 3 O 8 ) targets to produce 99 Mo. In short, the process involves dissolving the irradiated targets in nitric acid, which simultaneously releases valuable fission products (xenon and iodine). After adjusting the acid concentration, producers process the feed using tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP), then mix the raffinate derived from this extraction cycle with a phosphinic acid such as Cyanex 272 or di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (HDEHP), which is selective for Mo (molybdenum liquid liquid extraction [MoLLE]). In the next step, a concentration column comprising an anion exchange platform is used to decontaminate the remaining fission products, generating a pure 99 Mo stream in sodium hydroxide (NaOH)/sodium chloride (NaCl).

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2023

Cesium Removal from SY-101 Tank Waste Using Crystalline Silicotitanate

The newly operational Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system removes radioactive cesium-137 ( 137 Cs) and solids from tank waste supernate in the 200 east area of the Hanford site. Efforts to expand the removal capabilities to the 200 west area are underway by a system anticipated to be called the West Area Risk Management (WARM) system. Laboratory-scale ion exchange processing using expected WARM unit operations were conducted to contribute toward Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) establishing accurate process flowsheets for the individual feed campaigns planned for the west area supernate pretreatment. This report describes the small-scale ion exchange testing with 8.0 L of filtered supernate from tank 241-SY-101 (referred to as SY-101) at 16 °C (62 °F) to demonstrate processing conditions that would be prototypic of what the WARM system may experience. One of the waste acceptance criteria (WAC) for the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste Facility is that the waste must contain less than 3.18×10 -5 Ci 137 Cs per mole of Na. For the SY-101 tank waste to meet this criterion, only 0.44% of the influent 137 Cs concentration may be delivered to the WTP; this requires a Cs decontamination factor of 227. Testing with SY-101 matched current TSCR prototypic operations where a lead-lag configuration is used until the lag column reached the WAC limit. Neither the lead nor lag columns reached the WAC, so a polish column was never utilized during this test. Feed was processed at 1.9 bed volumes (BVs) per hour; the flowrate, in terms of contact time with the crystalline silicotitate (CST) bed, matched the current flowrate at TSCR (an expected flowrate to be used at WARM). The lead column only reached 0.09% Cs breakthrough after processing ~1363 BVs of feed. Cesium breakthrough from the lag column was not observed during the entire processing. Table S.1 and Figure S.1 summarize the observed column performance and relevant Cs loading characteristics. Table S.1 and Figure S.1 also summarize the measured SY-101 Cs load performance.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Review of Mercury Sequestration in Cementitious Waste Forms

Decontaminated salt solution from Tank 50 at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is known to contain dissolved mercury species which are present as hydroxides and oxides. These species are reported in analytical measurements as the organic cation [CH 3 Hg] + and the inorganic cation Hg 2+ . The salt solution is mixed with cementitious reagents, blast-furnace slag (BFS) and thermally beneficiated Class F fly ash in the Saltstone Processing Facility and pumped into engineered Saltstone Disposal Units, (SDUs), to produce a solidified waste form. The solidified waste form, saltstone, encapsulates and chemically stabilizes the mercury and other contaminants, sequestering them from release into the environment. With the discovery of methylmercury in the salt solution, testing was performed to determine the extent to which saltstone prepared with methylmercury (MeHg) retains mercury in the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Results from this testing indicated that the amount of mercury extracted remained below the regulatory limit, and that the saltstone formulation with a greater proportion of BFS performed slightly better at retaining Hg in the solid.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Benchmark Analysis for the Optical Dilatometry Method Using Silicon Carbide Temperature Monitors

The main objective of this project was to conduct a benchmark analysis for the optical dilatometry method by using NSUF’s SiC temperature monitors: two (2) SiC temperature monitors provided by NSUF’s BSU-8242 experiment and two (2) SiC temperature monitors provided by NSUF’s GE-Hitachi experiment. Per the BSU-8242 experiment, KGT-3597 and KGT-3591 had a design temperature of 400°C and an exposure of 3 dpa. Per the GE-Hitachi experiment, KGT-3341 and KGT-3336 had a design temperature of 290°C +/- 50°C and an exposure of 0.5–1 dpa. The KGT-3336 SiC monitor was split into two pieces during the decontamination process, making the dilatometry method the only way to analyze both those pieces. The BSU-8242 monitors revealed peak irradiation temperatures under the design temperature, and the GE-Hitachi monitors revealed peak irradiation temperatures within the design temperature range. The optical dilatometry method measured the peak irradiation temperature of BSU-8242 KGT-3597 to be 330°C, while the resistivity method measured the peak irradiation temperature of BSU-8242 KGT-3591 to be 320°C +/- 20°C. The optical dilatometry method measured the peak irradiation temperatures of the pieces of GE-Hitachi KGT-3336 to be 260°C (for the larger piece) and 220°C (for the smaller piece), while the resistivity method measured the peak irradiation temperature of GE-Hitachi KGT-3341 to be 300°C, with an accuracy range of -50°C to +20°C. Both methods of SiC temperature monitor analysis produced very similar peak irradiation temperatures for each pair of SiC passive monitors from the two experiments, BSU-8242 and GE-Hitachi. The results show dilatometry method to be a reliable and less time-intensive process for determining irradiation temperatures from passive SiC thermometry.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗