Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “VS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

DAP: Cosmic Plastics D33/6120 vs. Sumitomo Bakelite 52-01

As soon as you lay eyes on the two data sheets for these materials, Cosmic D33/6120 and Sumitomo Bakelite 52-01, there are some pretty clear differences in mechanical, thermal, electrical, and physical properties. There are three distinct hypotheses relating to why the plastics are so distinctly different from one another: 1. unique composition; 2. different molding procedure; and 3. separate molding parameters A closer look into each of these hypotheses is necessary in explaining why the Sumitomo Bakelite and Cosmic DAPs are so different from one another.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Experimental Assessment of Elastic Modulus vs. Relative Density for Stretch- and Bend-Dominated Lattices

This project was designed to study the possibility of using structural properties of lattices to replicate the material properties of certain hard to manufacture designs and use topology optimization to determine the lattice type and density required to mimic these properties. The integration of additively manufactured lattice structures with topology optimization highlights the need for well characterized mechanical properties and uncertainty analyses to insure these optimized structures respond as predicted. Stereolithographically printed octet and rhombic dodecahedron lattices were manufactured at 10%, 25% and 65% density by volume. As a separate task, yet integrated into this work, finite element analysis (FEA) was used to predict the printed lattice’s mechanical properties, which were then compared to our experimental results. After comparing FEA and experimentallymeasured elastic moduli, it was determined that the FEA provides highly reliable predictions for the modulus of these printed lattice structures. These lattices also exhibited greater tensile stiffness than that of the solid material demonstrating the flexibility that lattices provide to designing parts with designer structural properties. The accurate printing and reliable modeling of these lattices will enable topology optimization of complex parts from well-characterized rhombic dodecahedron and octet lattice structures of varying densities.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Noble Gas Management: SBMOF 1 vs. NUCON Carbon

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), in collaboration with Flibe Energy, Inc., demonstrated the fabrication of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) into engineered beads to manage off-gases released from molten salt reactors. Among the many MOF options, SBMOF 1 was selected as an ideal sorbent to manage off-gases released from a molten salt reactor because its pore size is optimal. The SBMOF 1 was synthesized and fabricated into engineered particles using three different methods, with and without polymers. All the engineered particles were exposed to Co-60 radiation (1,000 kGy) to demonstrate their radiation stability. Single column breakthrough experiments were performed at different temperatures, activation conditions, flow rates, and off-gas compositions to optimize the Xe capacity at the breakthrough point and at saturation. The Xe loading in SBMOF 1 was compared with that of standard solid sorbent (Nucon carbon) under identical conditions. Based on the single column experiments, SBMOF 1 outperforms the Nucon carbon at all the temperatures and reduces the mass (to as little as 55%) of sorbent needed to achieve the same performance as carbon. The bed volume is also reduced, down to 48% of that of Nucon carbon, when the MOF is used. These results clearly demonstrate improvement in the amount of adsorbent needed and show a reduction in bed volume compared to traditional sorbent material.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Spiner vs EOSPAC6: capabilities, performance, and accuracy considerations

The Cross-Cutting Capabilities Project (XCAP) has significant interest in collecting and implementing a common set of libraries to be used across the various production hydro-codes at LANL. A common set of libraries will help facilitate comparisons between codes. In addition to minimizing variables for comparisons and physics validation, efforts toward optimization and porting of packages for future architectures will be more efficient. As part of this push Singularity is being considered as an inclusive materials interface library. One crucial part of this library is the importing, inverting, and interpolation of equation of state (EOS) data. Currently the Lagrangian Applications Project (LAP) and Safety Applications Project (SAP) are using EOSPAC6 for delivery EOS data. The Eulerian Applications Project (EAP) has historically used TEOS and more recently an implementation of Singularly via a package called Spiner for EOS interpolation. Singularity currently has the option of using several analytical EOS models, directly employing SESAME via Spiner, or directly using SESAME via EOSPAC6 (not optimized yet). Assuming Singularity moves forward as a common platform for the implementation of materials models, a decision will need to be made on which EOS interpolation package XCAP should move forward with, given resources and people are finite. We will attempt to address pros and cons of Spiner and EOSPAC6 and the trade-offs that should be considered during the decision making process. This report is intended as an ASC-PEM-EOS perspective on what is needed in an EOS interpolation package. Performance and Accuracy sections will mostly address data from comparison studies in LA-UR-22-22699.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
DOE OSTI2024

U-235 vs Pu-239 Heating [Slides]

Problem: Despite Pu-239 having a larger Fission cross section than U-235, simulations and experiments have shown that U heats more than Pu during a reactor pulse.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Track vs Shower Discrimination in the Event Reconstruction of the ICARUS Experiment

The ICARUS collaboration has employed the 760-ton T600 liquid argon TPC detector in a successful three-year physics run at the underground LNGS laboratory, performing a sensitive search for LSND-like anomalous appearance in the CERN Neutrino to Gran Sasso beam, which contributed to the constraints on the allowed neutrino oscillation parameters to a narrow region around 1 eV. After a significant overhaul at CERN, the T600 detector has been installed at Fermilab. The detector commissioning phase lasted until June 2022, then ICARUS moved to data taking for neutrino oscillation physics collecting events from the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) and the Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) beam off-axis. The initial experiment goals are to either confirm or refute the claim by Neutrino-4 short-baseline reactor experiment, perform measurements of neutrino cross sections with the NuMI beam and several Beyond Standard Model searches. Then, ICARUS will jointly search for evidence of sterile neutrinos with the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND). In this contribution, we discuss recent changes to the standard TPC event reconstruction that uses Pandora, a pattern recognition software common to liquid argon-based detectors. In particular, we performed a new training of the Boosted Decision Tree (BDT) employed to separate track-like and shower-like reconstructed particles using Monte Carlo simulations of neutrino events from BNB in ICARUS. We compare the discrimination capabilities of the old and new BDT training and discuss further improvements of this algorithm.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗