SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Shale”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Quantifying atmospheric reactive nitrogen concentrations, dry deposition, and isotope dynamics surrounding a Marcellus Shale well pad
Not Available
Chemical and isotopic evolution of flowback fluids from the Utica Gas Shale Play, Eastern Ohio USA
For this work, hydraulic fracturing flowback fluids were collected from two Utica/Point Pleasant well pads in eastern Ohio. One site was in the wet gas zone (UPPW), while the site ~50 km south consisted of four wells on the same pad in the dry gas zone (UPPS). Samples of input fluids also were collected before and during hydraulic fracturing. Flowback fluids are Na-Ca-Cl brines with total dissolved salt (TDS) concentrations that increase over several months from ~100 to 200 g/L. The slightly higher TDS of the dry gas fluids are in part due to recycled flowback used as input fluids, and in part due to lower volume of water used in hydraulic fracturing. Concentrations of most major ions (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Na + , Sr2 + , Fe, Mn, Cl – , Br – ) are similar for the five wells sampled, although small but systematic changes occur in the major element ratios over time. Most notably, an increase in the Sr/Cl ratio corresponds to an increase in the 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratio in the fluids, suggesting interactions with a more radiogenic Sr source in the subsurface. Dissolved Ba concentrations and Ra activities were different between the two sites, reflecting a high SO 4 2– fluid used at the UPPW site, and water-rock reactions occurring during hydraulic fracturing at the UPPS site. Water oxygen (δ 18 O) and hydrogen (δD) isotopes for input fluids used in the UPPW4 well and fresh water used for the UPPS wells fall on the Global Meteoric waterline (GMWL). Flowback fluids from both sites are relatively enriched in δ 18 O and δD compared to the input, but do not appear to follow a simple mixing trend, suggesting reaction and isotopic exchange with carbonates and fractionation due to imbibition in the rock. Cl isotopes, δ 37 Cl in the FP fluids varied from ~ –0.43 to +0.13‰, the largest variation was observed in the earlier stages of flowback, while in the later stages δ 37 Cl exhibited a small but systematic increase over time, suggesting diffusion control of isotopic composition. Some of the trace species measured (dissolved Fe, Mn, thiosulfate and organic acids) do not follow the same trends as the major ions, suggesting contributions from input fluids, or microbially mediated reactions are exerting control on their concentrations. Input water chemistry exerts an important control on the Sr and Ba concentrations in flowback water. High SO 4 2– in the input fluids used for hydraulically fracturing the wet gas well leads to precipitation of barite-celestite in flowback fluids.
The molecular model of Marcellus shale kerogen: Experimental characterization and structure reconstr
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cyclical water vapor sorption-induced structural alterations of mine roof shale
Not Available
Quantifying pore scale and matrix interactions of SCCO2 with the Marcellus shale
Not Available
Stress-dependent fracture permeability measurements and implications for shale gas production
Not Available
A new vanadium species in black shales: Updated burial pathways and implications
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Experimental CO2 interactions with fractured Utica and Marcellus Shale samples at elevated pressure
Not Available
Semi-supervised learning for shale image segmentation with fast normalized cut loss
Not provided.
Surrogate models for development of unconventional shale reservoirs by an integrated numerical approach of hydraulic fracturing, flow and geomechanics, and machine learning
We develop well-completion surrogate models by taking an integrated workflow of hydraulic fracturing, flow, geomechanics, and machine learning simulation. There are three steps in the proposed workflow. First, history-matching processes are conducted with the field data including pumping and production data for characterization. Second, full-physics simulation is performed with various parameters of the field development (e.g., cluster spacing, clusters per stage, pumping rates and times, amount of proppant, and well spacing) to generate multiple simulation results by changing the parameters of the completion design with well-known hydraulic fracturing, reservoir, geomechanics simulators to calculate fracture geometry, reservoir depressurization, induced stress changes. The workflow is demonstrated over a field in the Southern Midland Basin. Here, we take two completion scenarios: a single well case followed by a multi-well case. Finally, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) machine learning algorithm is employed to create surrogate models that can replicate the full-physics simulation results. Furthermore, results show that the trained models applied in the single well and multi-well cases for a particular geological system can provide good accuracy close to those provided by full-physics simulations. Specifically, the site-specific surrogate models can predict fracture parameters (length, height, and surface area) and cumulative production accurately with computational efficiency, suggesting our proposed workflow can be used as a pragmatic tool for expediting the well completion optimization process.
History-matching shale reservoir production with a multi-scale, non-uniform fracture network
Not Available