Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Nuclear Waste Management”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17

Closed Fuel Cycle Waste Treatment Strategy

This study is aimed at evaluating the existing waste management approaches for nuclear fuel cycle facilities in comparison to the objectives of implementing an advanced fuel cycle in the U.S. under current legal, regulatory, and logistical constructs. The study begins with the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) Integrated Waste Management Strategy (IWMS) as a general strategy and associated Waste Treatment Baseline Study (WTBS). The tenets of the IWMS are equally valid to the current waste management study. However, the flowsheet details have changed significantly from those considered under GNEP. In addition, significant additional waste management technology development has occurred since the GNEP waste management studies were performed. This study updates the information found in the WTBS, summarizes the results of more recent technology development efforts, and describes waste management approaches as they apply to both a nominal case study and near-term target reprocessing flowsheets. Many of the waste management technologies discussed also apply to other potential flowsheets that involve reprocessing. The report summarizes the waste arising from aqueous reprocessing of a typical light-water reactor (LWR) fuel to separate actinides for use in fabricating metal sodium fast reactor (SFR) fuel and from electrochemical reprocessing of the metal SFR fuel to separate actinides for recycle back into the SFR in the form of metal fuel. The primary streams considered and the recommended waste forms include: • Tritium separated from either a low volume gas stream or a high volume water stream. The recommended waste form is low-water cement in high integrity containers (HICs). • Iodine-129 separated from off-gas streams in aqueous processing. There are a range of potentially suitable waste forms. As a reference case, a glass composite material (GCM) formed by the encapsulation of the silver Mordenite (AgZ) getter material in a low-temperature glass is assumed. A number of alternatives with distinct advantages are also considered including a fused silica waste form with encapsulated nano-sized AgI crystals. • Carbon-14 separated from LWR fuel treatment off-gases and immobilized as a CaCO3 in a cement waste form. • Krypton-85 separated from LWR and SFR fuel treatment off-gases and stored as a compressed gas. • An aqueous reprocessing high-level waste (HLW) raffinate waste which is immobilized by the vitrification process in one of three forms: a single phase borosilicate glass, a borosilicate based glass ceramic, or a multi-phased crystalline synthetic rock (Synroc). • An undissolved solids (UDS) fraction from aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel that is either included in the borosilicate HLW glass or is immobilized in the form of a metal alloy in the case of glass ceramics or Synroc. • Zirconium-based LWR fuel cladding hulls and stainless steel (SS) fuel assembly hardware that are washed and super-compacted for disposal or as an alternative with high promise the purification and reuse (or disposal as low-level waste, LLW) of Zr by reactive gas separations. • Electrochemical process salt HLW which is incorporated into a glass bonded Sodalite waste form known as the ceramic waste form (CWF). • Electrochemical process UDS and SS cladding hulls which are melted into an iron based alloy waste form. Mass and volume estimates for each of the recommended waste forms based on the source terms from the reference mass balances are reported. In addition to the above listed primary waste streams, a range of secondary process wastes are generated by aqueous reprocessing of LWR fuel, metal SFR fuel fabrication, and electrochemical reprocessing of SFR fuel. These secondary wastes have been summarized and volumes estimated by type and classification. The important waste management data gaps and research needs have been summarized for each primary waste stream and selected waste process.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Working in partnership with the UK nuclear industry to package waste - 16263

Radioactive Waste Management (RWM) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), which is responsible for managing the effective clean-up of the UK's nuclear legacy. RWM is responsible for delivering a geological disposal facility and providing radioactive waste management solutions. To this end, RWM provides advice to waste owners to help them retrieve, condition and package waste now in ways that make them suitable for disposal later. To facilitate planning decisions and hazard reduction, RWM operates the Disposability Assessment process. This is used to provide advice to waste producing organisations on approaches to waste packaging and interim storage of packaged wastes. This advice is intended to ensure compatibility with future geological disposal requirements, as far as this is possible in advance of the availability of Waste Acceptance Criteria for a Geological Disposal Facility (GDF). As such, it is an enabler for early hazard reduction on UK nuclear sites through the facilitation of packaging. This paper explains how RWM is working with waste owners through the Disposability Assessment process to deliver optimised waste packaging solutions through proactive and early engagement. This includes specific examples of how the process has been used in a flexible way to contribute to accelerated and sustainable hazard reduction at UK sites using a partnership approach. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

A Python Package for Fuel Cycle and Waste Management Analysis - 19545

The future of nuclear power utilization in the United States may involve a transition from the once-through light water reactor fuel cycle to a so-called advanced fuel cycle. An advanced fuel cycle may offer improvements in natural resource utilization, reactor safety, and environmental impact. In addition, adoption of an advanced fuel cycle will result in changes in the amount, composition, and disposal of the nuclear wastes they produce. Characteristics intrinsic to the wastes themselves, such as mass and radioactivity at specific times, were used as waste management metrics in the Department of Energy 2014 Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Screening (FCES) study. Binning of these metrics informed fuel cycle according to relative potential benefit. However, waste properties alone cannot qualify management strategy. Therefore, comparing fuel cycles from the perspective of waste management can provide additional insights. To that end, an object-oriented Python package has been developed to perform fuel cycle waste management calculations. The package, named nwpy (short for Nuclear Waste analysis in Python), mimics the mass flow operations reported in the FCES study and interfaces with the ORIGEN-S code to assess metric data as reported in the FCES. In addition, this Python package determines the loading of waste streams into forms suitable for final disposal in a geological repository and uses such data for repository performance assessment. This work describes the Python package methodology, assumptions, and capabilities. As input data, the package requires information about the fuel cycle such as the mass of fuel discharged, the cooling time between reactor discharge and subsequent operations, and the separations process efficiencies and waste forms it produces. In addition, the isotopic composition of the reactor discharge stream, such as that available from the FCES database, is required. With that, it can perform prescribed mass flow and decay operations throughout the back end of the fuel cycle, the latter carried out by the ORIGEN-S code distributed with the SCALE6.2 software suite. The result is time-dependent data characterizing the waste on a per-package basis. Package loading for waste streams depends on the stream form (i.e. UNF vs. HLW, or glass HLW from aqueous reprocessing vs. ceramic HLW from electrochemical processing) and is based on literature review and engineering assumption. As an example of the application of the code, calculations for the areal footprint of direct-contact repositories for different fuel cycles is shown. Development is ongoing, and the package is expected to grow incorporating capabilities for waste management analyses such as waste transportation and radionuclide transport through the biosphere. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Citizen Science: Potential New Opportunity for Consent-Based Siting Processes - 16608

Citizen science is a global phenomenon, as millions of volunteers are collecting, analyzing, and sharing data that contribute to scientific knowledge. Recognizing its potential, the U.S. 2013 Open Government National Action Plan encouraged Federal agencies to harness American ingenuity toward helping address a broad range of scientific and societal challenges, specifically invoking crowd-sourcing and citizen science. The October 2015 Plan reinforced this charge, calling on agencies to increase public participation through both means. Thus, citizen science opportunities are actively being sought across a wide range of Federal programs. Meanwhile, all nations with commercial nuclear reactors face the challenge of managing the spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste produced. Consent-based siting of facilities to manage these materials is considered an essential aspect of this shared challenge. A variety of other agency programs have illustrated the role citizens can play in strengthening engagement, empowerment, and scientific research. With these same themes important to planning for nuclear waste management, citizen science could represent a potential new opportunity for this national effort. Online resources were investigated to understand the nature and range of citizen science projects and seek insights for possible new applications. Results show that volunteers are contributing to research in areas from archaeology to zoology, and extending from the ocean floor to outer space. A large number of the collaborations involve characterizing local environmental conditions and monitoring changes over time. This paper highlights insights from several projects that illustrate the contributions citizen scientists can make to advance scientific knowledge and assist national and international programs. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Getters for improved technetium containment in cementitious waste forms

A cementitious waste form, Cast Stone, is a possible candidate technology for the immobilization of low activity nuclear waste (LAW) at the Hanford site. This paper focuses on the addition of getter materials to Cast Stone that can sequester Tc from the LAW, and in turn, lower Tc release from the Cast Stone. Two getters which produce different products upon sequestering Tc from LAW were tested: Sn(II) apatite (Sn-A) that removes Tc as a Tc(IV)-oxide and potassium metal sulfide (KMS-2) that removes Tc as a Tc(IV)-sulfide species, allowing for a comparison of stability of the form of Tc upon entering the waste form. The Cast Stone with KMS-2 getter had the best performance with addition equivalent to ~0.08 wt% of the total waste form mass. The observed diffusion (D obs ) of Tc decreased from 4.6 ± 0.2 × 10 -12 cm 2 /s for Cast Stone that did not contain a getter to 5.4 ± 0.4 × 10 -13 cm 2 /s for KMS-2 containing Cast Stone. Finally, it was found that Tc-sulfide species are more stable against re-oxidation within getter containing Cast Stone compared with Tc-oxide and is the origin of the decrease in Tc D obs when using the KMS-2.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Legacy Waste Removal from Standpipes and Bunkers at Whiteshell Laboratories, Canada - 19040

In 1963 Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) founded the Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment (now Whiteshell Laboratories, WL) in Pinawa, Manitoba to conduct nuclear research. In 1997 AECL made a business decision to discontinue research programs and operations at WL. One of the major decommissioning tasks at WL is to remove radioactive waste from 171 in-ground standpipes and 7 Intermediate Level Waste bunkers located in the Waste Management Area (WMA). Veolia Nuclear Solutions, through its subsidiary Kurion (Canada) Inc., has been selected to design, fabricate, and commission a remote waste access and conditioning system to remediate the waste from the standpipes and ILW bunkers at WL. The agreement builds on Veolia Nuclear Solutions' successfully deploying similar technologies at other projects. This paper describes the bunkers and standpipes structures, the types of wastes stored, the potential hazards (flammable gas and pyrophoric materials), and the equipment proposed by Kurion for safely extracting, sorting, segregating and packaging this waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Prediction of the thermal-hydraulic-mechanical response of a geological repository at large scale and sensitivity analyses

To better understand the Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical (THM) response of the rock caused by the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) released heat in the Callovo-Oxfordian formation (COx) in the near-field and far-field areas, a series of coupled THM modelling is performed. This study presents a case study based on the French geological repository for HLW (Cigéo project) to better assess modelling of deep geological repositories (DGR) within the DECOVALEX-2019 framework. In this study, the proposed coupled THM model, implemented in the platform of COMSOL, is validated by comparing the modelled THM results for a point heat source in an infinite rock mass with an analytical solution. It is also validated by comparing its thermal component for the Base Case with accurate results calculated using another numerical method. To shorten the calculation time, the DGR is modelled using six cuboid blocks representing 162 HLW cells and only six central HLW cells of interest modelled in detail. This simplification is validated. This model can easily be used to model not only the near-field THM response of the rock but also the far-field THM response. The influence of the boundary conditions applied on the gallery wall, HLW cell walls, and external surfaces of the model and the influence of different vertical dimensions of the geometry are studied. The sensitivity analyses of the THM parameters of COx on the THM response at different locations are performed. Finally, the influence of using a 2-dimensional (2D) model to represent a 3-dimensional (3D) repository is also investigated.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Why SRS Matters - E Area

A video series presenting an overview of the Savannah River Site's (SRS) mission and operations. Each episode features a specific area/operation and how it contributes to help make the world safer. This episode features E Area's mission and operations.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Safeguarding Nuclear Waste - A Study in Risk Management and Overcoming Significant Challenges - 16439

Three years after what is commonly referred to as the 'Y-12 Incident', where three individuals trespassed and defaced a building at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Y-12 National Security Complex early on July 28, 2012, the DOE commissioned study after study to review security practices and internal risk management safeguarding protocols that preserves safety and a secure environment. These studies highlighted systemic organizational dysfunctions, critical leadership shortcomings, and communications failures. Much attention has been focused on risk management and security oversight practices. This analysis presents an update on the Department's Environmental Management (EM)-wide security leadership improvements designed to restore public confidence and explain how a deeper risk analysis has elevated security oversight into a common-core Department of Energy achievement. While EM is not the managing Program Office for Y-12, this event had a DOE-corporate wide impact. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Glass Design Using Machine Learning Property Models with Prediction Uncertainties: Nuclear Waste Glass Formulation

The United States Department of Energy is responsible for managing the legacy nuclear waste stored in underground tanks at the Hanford Site. The waste will be separately vitrified as low-activity waste and high-level waste fractions. Waste glass formulation algorithms have been traditionally developed using partial quadratic mixture property-composition models. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been used to predict glass properties and discover new glass materials for nuclear waste vitrification, and these advancements can be utilized to improve waste glass composition design. In this proof-of-principle study, ML algorithms such as Gaussian process regression (GPR) were used to interpolate glass properties (e.g., viscosity, electrical conductivity, chemical durability). After selecting appropriate sets of GPR hyper-parameters for each property, an optimization program was developed to formulate glass compositions to maximize waste loading while simultaneously satisfying property within constraints. The results of the ML-based waste loadings and glass compositions were compared to those obtained using the traditional methods. Comparing to the previous glass design framework, the ML-based optimization methods offer improved glass designs and a streamlined approach to generation of optimally designed data and near real-time updates.

glass formulation, machine learning, constraints, ↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 34, No. 1, January-March 1993]

Nuclear Safety is a review journal that covers significant developments in the field of nuclear safety. Its scope includes the analysis and control of hazards associated with nuclear energy, operations involving fissionable materials, and the products of nuclear fission and their effects on the environment. Primary emphasis is on safety in reactor design, construction, and operation; however, the safety aspects of the entire fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing, nuclear waste disposal, handling of radioisotopes, and environmental effects of these operations, are also treated. Table of Contents for this issue follows. GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 1 An Integrated Regional Approach To Risk Management of Industrial Systems, S. Chakraborty and R. Stratton; 9 Annual Technical Meeting of the NRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program, E. G. Silver; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 13 Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria as Severe Accident Design Criteria and Policy for the New Production Reactor-Heavy Water Reactor, P. T. Rhoads; 20 Proposed Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria for the Heavy Water Reactor-New Production Reactor Containment, K. D. Bergeron, S. E. Slezak, and C. E. Leach; 33 Quasi-Static Core Liquid Level Depression and Long-Term Core Uncovery During a PWR LOCA, Y. Kukita, R. R. Schultz, H. Nakamura, and J. Katayama; 49 LIRA: An Advanced Containment System to Minimize the Accidental Radioactivity Releases, A. Turricchia; 63 Errata to “A Review of Hydrogen Production During Melt/Water Interaction in LWRs,” Vol. 33, No. 4; CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION: 64 The Nuplex 80+™ Advanced Control Complex from ABB Combustion Engineering, F. Ridolfo, D. Harmon, and K. Scarola; DESIGN FEATURES: 76 A Scheme for Passive Isolation of the Containment of a Reactor, A. K. Ghosh, V. V. Raj, and K. Kakodkar; 84 Utility Requirements for Safety in the Passive Advanced Light-Water Reactor, T. U. Marston, W. H. Layman, and G. Bockhold, Jr.; WASTE AND SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT: 91 Activities Related to Waste and Spent Fuel Management, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 103 Testing Deficiencies in Auxiliary Systems Feedwater Systems, J. D. Kueck; 110 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; 113 Selected Safety-Related Events, Compiled by G. A. Murphy; 115 Operating U.S. Power Reactors, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 133 General Administrative Activities, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; 145 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Queener; 150 Proposed Rule Changes as of Sept. 30, 1992; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 75 Harvard Short Course on Risk: Science, Assessment, and Management; 102 International Conference on Reactor Physics and Reactor Computations; 102 The Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Waste Reprocessing and Waste Management [RECOD ’94]; 132 International Symposium on the Radiological Exposure of the Population of the European Community from Radioactivity in the Mediterranean Sea [MARINA-MED]; 162 International High-Level Radioactive Waste Conference ‘Technology Integration—Above and Below”; 154 The Authors; 158 Indexes to Nuclear Safety, Volume 33.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

INTRINSIC DOSIMETRY: A POTENTIAL NEW TOOL FOR NUCLEAR FORENSICS INVESTIGATIONS

Thermoluminescence (TL) dosimetry was used to measure dose effects on the raw stock material of borosilicate container glass from different geographical locations. Effects were studied at times up to 60 days post-irradiation at doses from 0.15 to 20 Gy. The minimum detectable dose using this technique was estimated to be 0.15 Gy which is roughly equivalent to a 24 hr irradiation 1 cm from a 50 ng source of 60Co. Two peaks were identified in the TL glow curve, a relatively unstable peak around 125°C and a more stable peak around 225°C. Differences in TL glow curve shape and intensity were also observed for the glasses from different geographical origins. We investigate radiation induced defects in glass to further develop the technique of intrinsic dosimetry–the measurement of the total absorbed dose received by the walls of a container holding radioactive material. Intrinsic dosimetry is intended to be used as an interrogation tool to provide enhanced pathway information on interdicted or newly discovered waste containers of unknown origin or history by considering the total absorbed dose received by a container in tandem with the physical characteristics of the radioactive material housed within that container. One hypothetical scenario is presented to illustrate the application of intrinsic dosimetry to waste management and nuclear forensics.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Development and Maintenance of a Comprehensive Radioactive Waste Management Basis - 16349

In accordance with DOE Order 435.1, 'Radioactive Waste Management', radioactive facilities and activities must have a documented basis of operation consisting of procedures, and physical and administrative controls that ensure protection of workers, the public, and the environment. To fulfill this requirement, Department of Energy (DOE) facilities are required to have an approved Radioactive Waste Management Basis (RWMB) which provides assurance that controls are developed, documented, and implemented for management of radioactive waste. The required elements of the RWMB vary with the type of waste management operation or facility and the types of hazards associated with the facility. Therefore, a graded approach is used per DOE guidance. The Idaho National Laboratory Waste Management Program (WMP) has developed and implemented a thorough RWMB for each of its five operational areas in addition to facility specific DOE Order 435.1 compliance tables which served as a tool for developing each RWMB. With approximately 40 facilities generating and/or managing radioactive waste, the WMP has encountered several challenges in keeping RWMBs current and accurate, in addition to ensuring facilities are continually maintaining compliance in evolving conditions in support of programs and projects in a continuously expanding research environment. Prior to initial radioactive waste generation, nuclear facility management must demonstrate compliance via the facility safety basis and approved laboratory-wide and facility specific documents which are then incorporated into the RWMB and subsequently approved by the DOE-Idaho Operations field office designated point of contact. The WMP has incorporated several areas of improvement to its RWMB management strategy to help facilities maintain compliance in new and changing conditions. Improvements included providing ad hoc facility management training for new facility managers, adding a reviewer from the WMP during the environmental checklist process, and performing annual RWMB reviews which involve not only facility management, but also Waste Generator Services support personnel, and other support organizations, as applicable. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low Activity Waste Glass Optimization with Property Models from Machine Learning, Part 2: Experimental Validation and Active Learning

The United States Department of Energy is responsible for managing legacy nuclear waste stored in underground tanks at the Hanford Site. To treat the waste, it is planned as the current baseline to separately vitrify low-activity waste (LAW) and high-level waste fractions. Previously, machine learning (ML) based glass property models (e.g., chemical durability, viscosity, electrical conductivity and SO3 solubility) were developed with prediction uncertainties. A waste glass optimization approach was then established to enable the capability of using these ML models in LAW glass formulation. In this study, the previous ML models were first experimentally validated, and the results were incorporated back into the database to update the ML models. The updated models and formulations showed increased waste loading while reducing the failure rate, demonstrating improved predictive accuracy, reduced uncertainties, and the effectiveness of active learning in guiding high-dimensional, nonlinear LAW glass design. This represents the first experimental validation of ML based LAW glass formulation, with practical benefits such as higher waste loading, shorter mission duration, and lower operational risk.

Lu, Xiaonan (ORCID:0000000179708148)↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 34, No. 1, January-March 1993]

Nuclear Safety is a review journal that covers significant developments in the field of nuclear safety. Its scope includes the analysis and control of hazards associated with nuclear energy, operations involving fissionable materials, and the products of nuclear fission and their effects on the environment. Primary emphasis is on safety in reactor design, construction, and operation; however, the safety aspects of the entire fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing, nuclear waste disposal, handling of radioisotopes, and environmental effects of these operations, are also treated. Table of Contents for this issue follows. GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 1 An Integrated Regional Approach To Risk Management of Industrial Systems, S. Chakraborty and R. Stratton; 9 Annual Technical Meeting of the NRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program, E. G. Silver; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 13 Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria as Severe Accident Design Criteria and Policy for the New Production Reactor-Heavy Water Reactor, P. T. Rhoads; 20 Proposed Deterministic Severe Accident Criteria for the Heavy Water Reactor-New Production Reactor Containment, K. D. Bergeron, S. E. Slezak, and C. E. Leach; 33 Quasi-Static Core Liquid Level Depression and Long-Term Core Uncovery During a PWR LOCA, Y. Kukita, R. R. Schultz, H. Nakamura, and J. Katayama; 49 LIRA: An Advanced Containment System to Minimize the Accidental Radioactivity Releases, A. Turricchia; 63 Errata to “A Review of Hydrogen Production During Melt/Water Interaction in LWRs,” Vol. 33, No. 4; CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION: 64 The Nuplex 80+™ Advanced Control Complex from ABB Combustion Engineering, F. Ridolfo, D. Harmon, and K. Scarola; DESIGN FEATURES: 76 A Scheme for Passive Isolation of the Containment of a Reactor, A. K. Ghosh, V. V. Raj, and K. Kakodkar; 84 Utility Requirements for Safety in the Passive Advanced Light-Water Reactor, T. U. Marston, W. H. Layman, and G. Bockhold, Jr.; WASTE AND SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT: 91 Activities Related to Waste and Spent Fuel Management, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 103 Testing Deficiencies in Auxiliary Systems Feedwater Systems, J. D. Kueck; 110 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; 113 Selected Safety-Related Events, Compiled by G. A. Murphy; 115 Operating U.S. Power Reactors, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 133 General Administrative Activities, Compiled by M. D. Muhlheim and E. G. Silver; 145 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Queener; 150 Proposed Rule Changes as of Sept. 30, 1992; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 75 Harvard Short Course on Risk: Science, Assessment, and Management; 102 International Conference on Reactor Physics and Reactor Computations; 102 The Fourth International Conference on Nuclear Waste Reprocessing and Waste Management [RECOD ’94]; 132 International Symposium on the Radiological Exposure of the Population of the European Community from Radioactivity in the Mediterranean Sea [MARINA-MED]; 162 International High-Level Radioactive Waste Conference ‘Technology Integration—Above and Below”; 154 The Authors; 158 Indexes to Nuclear Safety, Volume 33.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

An Assessment of the Nevada Test Site for Low-Level Waste Management

This report presents a summary of description information, facilities, and operating practices at the Nevada Test Site. It is concluded that NTS is not only a feasible location for surface and near-surface storage of low-level wastes, but also a potential site for underground storage of higher level wastes.

052002* -- Nuclear Fuels-- Waste Disposal & Storag↗

The New TN{sup R} MW Cask System Focused on Facilities End-of-Life Waste Management - 16627

When preparing for the decommissioning of a nuclear facility, during its 'end of life' management and while performing the actual dismantling operations, one has to consider a large diversity of nuclear waste in term of types, volumes and activities. Customers are frequently faced with the obligation to undertake multiple and costly waste management operations including handling, reconditioning or re-transferring from one package to another, for example when moving from on-site storage to transportation. To address this issue, a new - highly flexible - cask system named TN{sup R} MW is being developed. This cask has a total weight of 10 T and is compliant with the 2012 IAEA regulations. It is developed on a flexible concept basis, adaptable to the various nuclear needs, including: from IP2 to B(U) / B(U)F; onsite/ international transportation; long term interim storage. Licensing and manufacturing of number of items of this TN{sup R} MW family is underway. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Use of Automation in Low Level Waste Storage and Management - 19227

The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) generates Low Level Waste (LLW) and Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) from various site operations such as the operation of a research Reactor and the manufacture of Molybdenum 99. The Low Level Solid Waste (LLSW) generated is stored at ANSTO before and after conditioning. The current process flow involves the storage of LLSW waste before conditioning on racks, handled using forklifts. When the unconditioned waste is ready for conditioning, it is transferred to another facility, where volume reduction and packaging is carried out. Once conditioned, the waste is placed in further storage, pending dispatch to the proposed Australian National Radioactive Waste Management Facility (NRWMF). A new purpose built facility has been constructed, adjacent to the LLSW processing facility, for the storage and management of LLSW in both unconditioned and conditioned forms. This new facility will streamline the waste management process and significantly enhance the safety and efficiency of the process. In line with international best practises, the new facility utilises automation solutions to minimise the build footprint, and minimise the use of forklifts and other mobile plant. Most importantly, it applies the principle of ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) to minimise operator activities in areas where radioactive material is stored and eliminates double handling of the waste. The automation for unconditioned waste utilises an Automated Storage and Retrieval System (ASRS), a vertical stacker crane within high density racking, to provide easy storage and retrieval for processing and/or routine inspections. This system allows operators to control it from outside of the storage area whilst utilising integrated software that allows for the required tracking of the unconditioned waste. From the ASRS storage area, unconditioned waste will have a smooth transition to the processing facility which is located adjacent to the ASRS system. Once conditioned, the waste is catalogued and returned to a designated storage area within the new facility using an automated building gantry crane with a target delivery system to eliminate the need for operators in the main storage bay. The waste will be held here in preparation for dispatch to the future repository. The utilisation of the ASRS for the purpose of storing LLSW is an innovative use of automation that will eliminate operators from active areas, reduce dose rates received and integrate with the waste tracking software. Furthermore, the system has significant advantages with operational efficiencies increased, reduced double handling of nuclear waste and maximum use of building footprint. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗