Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Multigrid”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17

Application of the multigrid amplitude function method for time-dependent transport equation using MOC

An efficient numerical method for time-dependent transport equation, the mutigrid amplitude function (MAF) method, is proposed. The method of characteristics (MOC) is being widely used for reactor analysis thanks to the advances of numerical algorithms and computer hardware. However, efficient kinetic calculation method for MOC is still desirable since it requires significant computation time. Various efficient numerical methods for solving the space-dependent kinetic equation, e.g., the improved quasi-static (IQS) and the frequency transform methods, have been developed so far mainly for diffusion calculation. These calculation methods are known as effective numerical methods and they offer a way for faster computation. However, they have not been applied to the kinetic calculation method using MOC as the authors' knowledge. Thus, the MAF method is applied to the kinetic calculation using MOC aiming to reduce computation time. The MAF method is a unified numerical framework of conventional kinetic calculation methods, e.g., the IQS, the frequency transform, and the theta methods. Although the MAF method is originally developed for the space-dependent kinetic calculation based on the diffusion theory, it is extended to transport theory in the present study. The accuracy and computational time are evaluated though the TWIGL benchmark problem. The calculation results show the effectiveness of the MAF method. (authors)

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Optimal Polynomial Smoothers and One‐Sided V‐Cycles for Poisson Problems

The solution to the Poisson equation arising from the spectral element discretization of the incompressible Navier‐Stokes equations needs robust preconditioning strategies. One such strategy is multigrid. To realize the potential of multigrid methods, effective smoothing strategies are needed. Chebyshev polynomial smoothers, in conjunction with pointwise Jacobi or additive Schwarz methods (ASMs), prove to be an effective smoother. Other polynomial smoothers, however, may provide superior convergence to the multigrid preconditioner. The authors compare the standard Chebyshev polynomial smoothers to both the novel fourth‐kind Chebyshev polynomial smoothers proposed by Lottes as well as smoothers based on the polynomial of best uniform approximation to as proposed by Kraus, Vassilevski, and Zikatanov. At the cost of symmetry, further improvements may be made. For example, a order polynomial smoother on both sides of the V‐cycle may be substituted with an order polynomial smoother on one side at no additional cost. The choice of omitting the postsmoother in favor of higher‐order polynomial presmoothing is advantageous in cases where the multigrid approximation property constant is large. The authors consider a 2D model problem based on finite differences to motivate the choice of polynomial smoother, order, and whether to apply postsmoothing for the target application of high‐order ‐geometric multigrid methods for GPU architectures. Results from both domains demonstrate the substantial improvement of these approaches over the standard Chebyshev polynomial smoother with a symmetric V‐cycle.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Parallel time integration software

This package implements an optimal-scaling multigrid solver for the (non) linear systems that arise from the discretization of problems with evolutionary behavior. Typically, solution algorithms for evolution equations are based on a time-marching approach, solving sequentially for one time step after the other. Parallelism in these traditional time-integrarion techniques is limited to spatial parallelism. However, current trends in computer architectures are leading twards system with more, but not faster. processors. Therefore, faster compute speeds must come from greater parallelism. One approach to achieve parallelism in time is with multigrid, but extending classical multigrid methods for elliptic poerators to this setting is a significant achievement. In this software, we implement a non-intrusive, optimal-scaling time-parallel method based on multigrid reduction techniques. The examples in the package demonstrate optimality of our multigrid-reduction-in-time algorithm (MGRIT) for solving a variety of parabolic equations in two and three sparial dimensions. These examples can also be used to show that MGRIT can achieve significant speedup in comparison to sequential time marching on modern architectures.

Source record↗

Parallel time integration software

This package implements an optimal-scaling multigrid solver for the (non) linear systems that arise from the discretization of problems with evolutionary behavior. Typically, solution algorithms for evolution equations are based on a time-marching approach, solving sequentially for one time step after the other. Parallelism in these traditional time-integrarion techniques is limited to spatial parallelism. However, current trends in computer architectures are leading twards system with more, but not faster. processors. Therefore, faster compute speeds must come from greater parallelism. One approach to achieve parallelism in time is with multigrid, but extending classical multigrid methods for elliptic poerators to this setting is a significant achievement. In this software, we implement a non-intrusive, optimal-scaling time-parallel method based on multigrid reduction techniques. The examples in the package demonstrate optimality of our multigrid-reduction-in-time algorithm (MGRIT) for solving a variety of parabolic equations in two and three sparial dimensions. These examples can also be used to show that MGRIT can achieve significant speedup in comparison to sequential time marching on modern architectures.

Source record↗

Nonoverlapping block smoothers for the Stokes equations

Overlapping block smoothers efficiently damp the error contributions from highly oscillatory components within multigrid methods for the Stokes equations but they are computationally expensive. This paper is concentrated on the development and analysis of new block smoothers for the Stokes equations that are discretized on staggered grids. These smoothers are nonoverlapping and therefore desirable due to reduced computational costs. Traditional geometric multigrid methods are based on simple pointwise smoothers. However, using multigrid methods to efficiently solve more difficult problems such as the Stokes equations leads to computationally more expensive smoothers, for example, overlapping block smoothers. Nonoverlapping smoothers are less expensive, but have been considered less efficient in the literature. In this paper, we develop new nonoverlapping smoothers, the so-called triad-wise smoothers, and show their efficiency within multigrid methods to solve the Stokes equations. In addition, we compare overlapping and nonoverlapping smoothers by measuring their computational costs and analyzing their behavior by the use of local Fourier analysis.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Low-order preconditioning of the Stokes equations

A well-known strategy for building effective preconditioners for higher-order discretizations of some PDEs, such as Poisson's equation, is to leverage effective preconditioners for their low-order analogs. In this work, we show that high-quality preconditioners can also be derived for the Taylor–Hood discretization of the Stokes equations in much the same manner. In particular, we investigate the use of geometric multigrid based on the Q 1 iso Q 2 /Q 1 discretization of the Stokes operator as a preconditioner for the Q 2 /Q 1 discretization of the Stokes system. We utilize local Fourier analysis to optimize the damping parameters for Vanka and Braess–Sarazin relaxation schemes and to achieve robust convergence. Furthermore, these results are then verified and compared against the measured multigrid performance. While geometric multigrid can be applied directly to the Q 2 /Q 1 system, our ultimate motivation is to apply algebraic multigrid within solvers for Q 2 /Q 1 systems via the Q 1 iso Q 2 /Q 1 discretization, which will be considered in a companion paper.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Reaching bandwidth saturation using transparent injection parallelization

Although logically available, applications may not exploit enough instantaneous communication concurrency to maximize network utilization on HPC systems. This is exacerbated in hybrid programming models that combine single program multiple data with OpenMP or CUDA. We present the design of a “multi-threaded” runtime able to transparently increase the instantaneous network concurrency and to provide near saturation bandwidth, independent of the application configuration and dynamic behavior. The runtime offloads communication requests from application level tasks to multiple communication servers. The servers use system specific performance models to attain network saturation. Our techniques alleviate the need for spatial and temporal application level message concurrency optimizations. Experimental results show improved message throughput and bandwidth by as much as 150% for 4 KB messages on InfiniBand and by as much as 120% for 4 KB messages on Cray Aries. For more complex operations such as all-to-all collectives, we observe as much as 30% speedup. This translates into 23% speedup on 12,288 cores for a NAS FT implemented using FFTW. We observe as much as 76% speedup on 1500 cores for an already optimized UPC+OpenMP geometric multigrid application using hybrid parallelism. For the geometric multigrid GPU implementation, we observe as much as 44% speedup on 512 GPUs.

Chaimov, Nicholas↗

The MueLu Tutorial

The MueLu tutorial is written as a hands-on tutorial for MueLu, the next generation multigrid framework in Trilinos. It covers the whole spectrum from absolute beginners’ topics to expert level. Since the focus of this tutorial is on practical and technical aspects of multigrid methods in general and MueLu in particular, the reader is expected to have a basic understanding of multigrid methods and its general underlying concepts. Please refer to multigrid textbooks (e.g. [1]) for the theoretical background.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Spatially adaptive stochastic methods for fluid–structure interactions subject to thermal fluctuations in domains with complex geometries

We develop stochastic mixed finite element methods for spatially adaptive simulations of fluid–structure interactions when subject to thermal fluctuations. To account for thermal fluctuations, we introduce a discrete fluctuation–dissipation balance condition to develop compatible stochastic driving fields for our discretization. We perform analysis that shows our condition is sufficient to ensure results consistent with statistical mechanics. We show the Gibbs–Boltzmann distribution is invariant under the stochastic dynamics of the semi-discretization. To generate efficiently the required stochastic driving fields, we develop a Gibbs sampler based on iterative methods and multigrid to generate fields with O(N) computational complexity. Our stochastic methods provide an alternative to uniform discretizations on periodic domains that rely on Fast Fourier Transforms. To demonstrate in practice our stochastic computational methods, we investigate within channel geometries having internal obstacles and no-slip walls how the mobility/diffusivity of particles depends on location. Our methods extend the applicability of fluctuating hydrodynamic approaches by allowing for spatially adaptive resolution of the mechanics and for domains that have complex geometries relevant in many applications.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

Massively parallel solvers for elliptic partial differential equations in numerical weather and climate prediction

The demand for substantial increases in the spatial resolution of global weather and climate prediction models makes it essential to use numerically efficient and highly scalable algorithms to solve the equations of large-scale atmospheric fluid dynamics. For stability and efficiency reasons, several of the operational forecasting centres, in particular the Met Office and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in the UK, use semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian time-stepping in the dynamical core of the model. The additional burden with this method is that a three-dimensional elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) for the pressure correction has to be solved at every model time step and this often constitutes a significant proportion of the time spent in the dynamical core. In global models, this PDE must be solved in a thin spherical shell. To run within tight operational time-scales, the solver has to be parallelized and there seems to be a (perceived) misconception that elliptic solvers do not scale to large processor counts and hence implicit time-stepping cannot be used in very high-resolution global models. After reviewing several methods for solving the elliptic PDE for the pressure correction and their application in atmospheric models, we demonstrate the performance and very good scalability of Krylov subspace solvers and multigrid algorithms for a representative model equation with more than 1010 unknowns on 65 536 cores on the High-End Computing Terascale Resource (HECToR), the UK's national supercomputer. Here, we tested and optimized solvers from two existing numerical libraries (the Distributed and Unified Numerics Environment (DUNE) and Parallel High Performance Preconditioners (hypre)) and implemented both a conjugate gradient solver and a geometric multigrid algorithm based on a tensor-product approach, which exploits the strong vertical anisotropy of the discretized equation. We study both weak and strong scalability and compare the absolute solution times for all methods; in contrast to one-level methods, the multigrid solver is robust with respect to parameter variations.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗