Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Geothermal Systems”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2014

National Geothermal Data System: Case Studies on Exploration and Development of Potential Geothermal Sites Through Distributed Data Sharing

The NGDS released version 1 of the system on April 30, 2014 using the US Geoscience Information Network (USGIN) as its data integration platform. NGDS supports the 2013 Open Data Policy, and as such, the launch was featured at the 2014 Energy Datapalooza. Currently, the NGDS features a comprehensive user interface for searching and accessing nearly 41,000 documents and more than 9 million data points shared by scores of data providers across the U.S. The NGDS supports distributed data sharing, permitting the data owners to maintain the raw data that is made available to the consumer. Researchers and industry have been utilizing the NGDS as a mechanism for promoting geothermal development across the country, from hydrothermal to ground source heat pump applications. Case studies in geothermal research and exploration from across the country are highlighted.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2013

NATIONAL GEOTHERMAL DATA SYSTEM: AN EXEMPLAR OF OPEN ACCESS TO DATA

The formal launch of National Geothermal Data System (NGDS – www.geothermaldata.org) in 2014 will provide open access to technical geothermal-relevant data from all of the Department of Energy- sponsored geothermal development and research projects and geologic data from all 50 states. By making data easily discoverable and accessible this system will open new exploration opportunities and shorten project development. The prototype data system currently includes multiple data nodes, and nationwide data online and available to the public, indexed through a single catalog under construction at http://search.geothermaldata.org. Data from state geological surveys and partners includes more than 5 million records online, including 1.48 million well headers (oil and gas, water, geothermal), 732,000 well logs, and 314,000 borehole temperatures and is growing rapidly. There are over 250 Web services and another 138 WMS (Web Map Services) registered in the system as of August, 2013. Additional data record is being added by companion projects run by Boise State University, Southern Methodist University, and the USGS. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory is managing the Geothermal Data Repository, an NGDS node that will be a clearinghouse for data from hundreds of DOE-funded geothermal projects. NGDS is built on the US Geoscience Information Network (USGIN) data integration framework, which is a joint undertaking of the USGS and the Association of American State Geologists (AASG). NGDS is fully compliant with the White House Executive Order of May 2013, requiring all federal agencies to make their data holdings publicly accessible online in open source, interoperable formats with common core and extensible metadata. The National Geothermal Data System is being designed, built, deployed, and populated primarily with grants from the US Department of Energy, Geothermal Technologies Office. To keep this operational system sustainable after the original implementation will require four core elements: continued serving of data and applications by providers; maintenance of system operations; a governance structure; and an effective business model. Each of these presents a number of challenges currently under consideration.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2023

Hydrophobic, Thermal-shock Resistant Lightweight Cement Composites in Hybrid Thermal Energy-Storage Geothermal Well System

Under the DOE EERE Geothermal Technology Office (GTO)-funded project in FY 2019-2022, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) aimed to develop hydrophobic thermal-shock resistant lightweight well cement composites suitable for temporarily storing a curtailed hot working fluid incurred from excess geothermal-, solar-, and wind-generated energies in underground reservoirs thermal energy storage sites. This storage energy systems are designed to provide energy during the periods between energy-harvesting and -requiring periods. One key factor to the success of this project was hydrophobicity of cement composites. The hydrophobic composites not only upgrade thermal insulating properties of water-saturated composites for minimizing heat loss in upper well surface regions, but also provide improved mechanical properties related to thermal-shock resistance and the protection of carbon steel (CS) casing against corrosion.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

RePED 250: A Revolutionary, High Drilling Rate, High-T Geothermal Drilling System and Companion Power Electronics

Geothermal drilling in the United States is drastically slower and more costly than Oil and Gas (O&G) drilling, primarily due to the additional challenges in geothermal wells: hard rock types and high temperatures. The Repetitive Pulsed Electric Drill (250°C) (RePED-250), developed by Tetra Corporation has the potential to change this with a novel electro-crushing technology. RePED-250 releases pulses of electricity through the rock, which causes it to break in tension, instead of compression like conventional rotary drilling. The tensile strength of hard rocks like granite is only ~5% of their compressive strength, requiring less energy, time, and wear on the bit compared to conventional drilling. The RePED drill bit has no moving parts, uses drilling mud to remove rock fragments, and uses standard drill pipe, enabling a direct transition from conventional drilling systems. The objective of this project is to move RePED technology towards commercial readiness for high-temperature geothermal applications. This involves: 1) Creating high-temperature, high power electronic components for the RePED drill capable of operating at the high temperatures of a geothermal well. The target is a 250°C ambient environment. Specifically, capacitors, high voltage switches, and a downhole generator capable of generating the necessary power. 2) Demonstrating RePED’s effectiveness drilling through hard rock (granite) and examining its pathway to commercialization and effect on the US geothermal market. Work on this project has led to significant improvement over the state-of-the-art for all the examined electronics, through design, modeling, and testing of these novel components, though some additional development is still needed to deploy these high-temperature parts in a geothermal well. Besides their use in RePED-250, each component has applications in other industries where the stability of electronics at high-temperature is needed. To address the second barrier to commercialization, a 9” hole was drilled through a sample block of granite, demonstrating the tool’s effectiveness in hard rock. The team investigated RePED-250’s effect on well cost and the geothermal industry, through various techno-economic models described in the report.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2016

Development of an Ultrasonic Phased Array System for Wellbore Integrity Evaluation and Near-Wellbore Fracture Network Mapping of Injection and Production Wells in Geothermal Energy Systems

This paper documents our progress developing an ultrasound phased array system in combination with a model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm to inspect the health of and characterize the composition of the near-wellbore region for geothermal reservoirs. The main goal for this system is to provide a near-wellbore in-situ characterization capability that will significantly improve wellbore integrity evaluation and near well-bore fracture network mapping. A more detailed image of the fracture network near the wellbore in particular will enable the selection of optimal locations for stimulation along the wellbore, provide critical data that can be used to improve stimulation design, and provide a means for measuring evolution of the fracture network to support long term management of reservoir operations. Development of such a measurement capability supports current hydrothermal operations as well as the successful demonstration of Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS). The paper will include the design of the phased array system, the performance specifications, and characterization methodology. In addition, we will describe the MBIR forward model derived for the phased array system and the propagation of compressional waves through a pseudo-homogenous medium.

MBIR↗
DOE OSTI2018

GeoVision Analysis Supporting Task Force Report: Geothermal Hybrid Systems

This report documents findings from the Hybrid Systems Task Force of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) Geothermal Vision Study (GeoVision Study). The GeoVision Study projects and quantifies the future electric and nonelectric deployment potentials of geothermal technologies within a range of scenarios in addition to their impacts on U.S. jobs, the economy, and environment. The Hybrid Systems Task Force is one of seven task forces within the GeoVision Study with the others being Exploration and Confirmation, Potential to Penetration, Thermal Applications, Reservoir Maintenance and Development, Institutional Market Barriers, and Social and Environmental Impacts. A summary of the study is captured in DOE’s report, GeoVision: Harnessing the Heat Beneath Our Feet. The Hybrid Systems Task Force investigated geothermal hybrid systems that have potential to increase the utilization of geothermal resources and/or decrease the costs of geothermal power generation. Applications evaluated include: hybrid thermal power generation in which geothermal energy is coupled with solar or fossil heat sources; use of geothermal energy to provide process heat for thermal desalination or CO 2 capture from fossil power plants; analysis of compressed air energy storage augmented with geothermal energy; as well as an assessment of potential mineral recovery from geothermal brines. This report additionally discusses areas of research and development that should be pursued to enhance the ability of geothermal hybrid systems to provide valuable benefits in operational flexibility, reduction of project risks, increased energy security, and the ability to recover critical and strategic materials.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

On the Feasibility of Deep Geothermal Wells Using Numerical Reservoir Simulation

This study examines the geothermal energy extraction potential from the basement rock within the Denver–Julesburg Basin, focusing on the flow performance and heat extraction efficiency of different geothermal well configurations. It specifically compares U-shaped, V-shaped, inclined V-shaped, and pipe-in-pipe configurations against enhanced geothermal system setups. Through numerical modeling, we evaluated the thermal behavior of these systems under various operational scenarios and fracture conditions. The results suggest that while closed-loop systems offer moderate temperature increases, Enhanced geothermal system configurations show substantial potential for high-temperature extraction. This underscores the importance of evaluating well configurations in complex geological settings. The insights from this study aid in strategic geothermal energy planning and development, marking significant advancements in geothermal technology and setting a foundation for future explorations and optimizations.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2013

DEVELOPING THE NATIONAL GEOTHERMAL DATA SYSTEM ADOPTION OF CKAN FOR DOMESTIC & INTERNATIONAL DATA DEPLOYMENT

The National Geothermal Data System (NGDS) De- sign and Testing Team is developing NGDS software currently referred to as the “NGDS Node-In-A-Box”. The software targets organizations or individuals who wish to host at least one of the following: • an online repository containing resources for the NGDS; • an online site for creating metadata to register re- sources with the NGDS • NDGS-conformant Web APIs that enable access to NGDS data (e.g., WMS, WFS, WCS); • NDGS-conformant Web APIs that support dis- covery of NGDS resources via catalog service (e.g. CSW) • a web site that supports discovery and under- standing of NGDS resources A number of different frameworks for development of this online application were reviewed. The NGDS Design and Testing Team determined to use CKAN (http://ckan.org/), because it provides the closest match between out of the box functionality and NGDS node-in-a-box requirements. To achieve the NGDS vision and goals, this software development project has been inititated to provide NGDS data consumers with a highly functional inter- face to access the system, and to ease the burden on data providers who wish to publish data in the sys- tem. It is important to note that this software package constitutes a reference implementation. The NGDS software is based on open standards, which means other server software can make resources available, and other client applications can utilize NGDS data. A number of international organizations have ex- pressed interest in the NGDS approach to data access. The CKAN node implementation can provide a sim- ple path for deploying this technology in other set- tings.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

National Geothermal Data System Hub Deployment Timeline (Appendix E-1-d)

Excel spreadsheet describing activity, spending, and development for the four data hubs (Arizona Geoloical Survey, Kentucky Geological Survey, Illinois Geological Survey, and Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology) serving data for the National Geothermal Data System under the State Contributions to the National Geothermal Data System Project.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Building the Next Generation of Regional Geothermal Potential Maps: Examples from the Great Basin Region, Western USA

Over the past decade research has greatly advanced our understanding of structurally controlled geothermal systems and the potential for “deep stratigraphic reservoirs” in the Great Basin region, western USA. For example, studies have shown that structurally controlled geothermal systems are associated with specific structural settings, such as terminations of major normal faults, accommodation zones, pull-aparts in strike-slip faults, displacement transfer zones, or step-overs in range-front faults. However, we know that not every structure (e.g., termination of a major normal fault or step-over in a range-front fault) hosts an active geothermal system. Recent research has also shown that regional strain rate model as determined from GPS geodesy, the composition of that strain (extensional versus shear or compressive strain), recency of Quaternary faulting, and slip and dilation tendency of faults correlate positively with the distribution of both high and low-temperature, structurally controlled geothermal systems within the Great Basin. Combining these strain data and fault slip history data sets with existing temperature gradient data, heat flow data, spring temperatures, fluid geothermometry, and geophysical data provides an effective platform for evaluating the geothermal potential of respective structural plays. Recent studies focused on deep stratigraphic reservoirs indicate the best conditions for economically viable development are associated with thick sedimentary basins with low-thermal-conductivity sedimentary cap rocks overlying permeable host rocks (e.g. carbonates) and co-located with areas of high heat flow. Some of the factors that contribute to the potential for deep stratigraphic reservoirs and conventional structurally controlled geothermal systems apply to both types of resources, and in some places the potential for these two types of resources overlap in space, suggesting the potential for hybrid reservoirs (structurally controlled deep stratigraphic reservoirs). Effective and complete evaluation of geothermal potential in the Great Basin should include parameters that cover both types of resources. In this study, two areas with a combined area of 26,000 km 2 were evaluated for geothermal resource potential, equating to <4% of the total 680,000 km 2 size of the Great Basin region. Within these two study areas, 73 potential structural targets and 8 potential deep sedimentary target areas were identified. Four of the 73 potential structural target areas are associated with known thermal anomalies. All 73 structural target areas were ranked according to multiple data sets.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2021

Interpretation of hydrothermal conditions, production-injection induced effects, and evidence for enhanced geothermal system-type heat exchange in response to >30 years of production at Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah, USA

The Roosevelt Hot Springs hydrothermal system is located at the base of the Mineral Mountains in southwestern Utah on the eastern side of the Basin and Range. Hydrothermal activity is related to relatively recent bimodal magmatism, and the system is hosted in coarsely crystalline rock made of Oligocene–Miocene granitoids and Precambrian gneiss. The hydrothermal plume covers ~5 km 2 , with a maximum temperature of 268 °C at ~750 m depth, and a vertically extensive fault-fracture mesh east of the Opal Mound fault controls the upflow of hydrothermal fluids. Power generation (currently 38 MWe gross) began in 1984, and up through 2016, four wells were used for fluid production, and three wells were used for edge-field injection. Chemical analyses of produced fluids show that modern reservoir fluid compositions are similar to but more concentrated than those at the start of production, having near-neutral pH, total dissolved solids of 7000–10,000 mg/kg, and ionic ratios of Cl/HCO 3 ~50–100, Cl/SO4 ~50–100, and Na/K ~4–5. Chemical geothermometers indicate equilibration temperatures that mainly range between 240° and 300 °C. Early production induced a steep drop in pressure (~3.0–3.5 MPa), which was accompanied by a 250–300 m lowering of piezometric levels in wells and development of a shallow steam zone across the system. Hydrothermal fluid compositions evolved continuously in response to production-related steam-loss and injection breakthrough, which is reflected by gradual increases in chloride of up to 35% and stable isotope ratios of up to ~2‰δ 18 O and ~10‰δD. Simple mixing model calculations suggest that there has been a significant amount, ~10–20 MW th , of sustained multi-decadal heat mining and enhanced geothermal system (EGS)–type heat transfer by the injectate as it returns to the production zone. Overall, the two factors that have sustained long-term power production (currently 38 MWe gross) are the increased upflow of deep chloride water and, to a lesser extent, the mining of heat at <1 km depth.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2019

Three-dimensional geologic mapping to assess geothermal potential: examples from Nevada and Oregon

Geologic structure plays an important role in controlling fluid flow in geothermal systems. In particular, very complex structural settings, consisting of many closely spaced and intersecting faults, host many geothermal systems. To elucidate the key geologic factors that affect fault-controlled geothermal circulation, it is critical to precisely characterize the structural and stratigraphic geometries in these complex settings. Here, we present a methodology and the results of 3D geologic analyses of two geothermal systems in the Basin and Range, USA. This methodology is a quantitative and geologically focused technique that can be used to precisely characterize geothermal areas, in a time when future geothermal growth demands increased exploration precision and efficiency. Surficial and subsurface geologic and geophysical data are synthesized in the construction of detailed 3D geologic maps of geothermal areas. Based on these 3D geologic maps, we examine several geologic attributes that control permeability development and geothermal fluid flow along faults. We use the stress state of faults and the distribution of structural discontinuities (i.e., fault intersections and fault terminations) to identify locations of upflow along faults in these geothermal systems. These results and the methodology presented herein are directly applicable to structurally controlled geothermal fields in the Basin and Range and worldwide. As development focus shifts toward blind geothermal resources, integration of precisely characterized subsurface structural information into exploration methods will be increasingly critical to continued growth in geothermal exploration and development.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2015

Geothermal Resource Potential Assessment White Pine County, Nevada, NBMG Report 55

Geothermal resources can potentially contribute toward the renewable energy portfolio of White Pine County (WPC) in two ways: first through the direct conversion of heat energy into electricity, and the second by way of direct-use applications in which thermal energy is used as a source of heat for buildings, greenhouses, and related structures. Several known geothermal areas within WPC lie proximal to the Southwest Intertie power line currently under construction. A potential source of electricity could come from conventional geothermal systems associated with young faults and regions of active crustal deformation. These systems have a total installed capacity in the Great Basin region of nearly 1,000 MWe. White Pine County hosts several geothermal systems of this type, but none are currently producing electricity. White Pine County has relatively low rates of crustal deformation relative to western NV or the Wasatch region of Utah (e.g., faulting accommodating crustal extension). However, based on a review of the geology in the region, we conclude that sustained and reasonable exploration efforts could result in the discovery and development of one or more electricity-grade geothermal systems, with potential generation capacity at each system in the range of 1–20 MWe. In addition, a new and unproven type of potential geothermal resource termed “deep stratigraphic reservoirs” or “hot sedimentary aquifers” has recently been proposed in the western United States. White Pine County, and in particular, the northern Steptoe Valley, has some of the most promising potential for electricity generation from this type of reservoir in the United States. Preliminary calculations suggest that as much as 500 MWe of baseload electricity in the northern Steptoe Valley could be produced from this type of reservoir using wells reaching depths of 2 to 4 km. The economic feasibility remains unproven, but initial estimates are encouraging. Based on observed surface temperatures and flow rates of springs, several geothermal systems in WPC also have the potential for direct use, including the heating of buildings and greenhouses. Such uses could reduce the consumption of electricity generated from fossil fuels and could lead to economic expansion by extending the growing season for certain agricultural products and reducing utility costs.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS1974

The Colorado School of Mines Nevada geothermal study

Geothermal systems in the Basin and Range Province of the western United States probably differ in many respects from geothermal systems already discovered in other parts of the world because of the unique tectonic setting. To investigate this, a study of the geothermal occurrences at Fly Ranch, approximately 100 miles north of Reno, Nevada, has been undertaken. Ample evidence for a geothermal system exists in this area, including the surface expression of heat flow in the form of hot springs, an extensive area of low electrical resistivity, and a high level of seismicity along faults bounding the thermal area. However, geophysical and geological studies have not yet provided evidence for a local heat source at depth. Additional detailed geophysical and geological studies, as well as drilling, must be completed before the geothermal system can be described fully.

Keller, G. V.↗
DOE OSTI2015

Regional and Local Geothermal Potential Evaluation: Examples from the Great Basin, USA, Iceland and East Africa

In both tectonically and magmatically mediated geothermal systems, geologic structures play a crucial role in focusing geothermal fluid circulation in the upper crust. In a variety of geothermal provinces worldwide, normal and strike-slip faults, caldera related faults, as well as fractures and fissures related to dikes and other magmatic intrusions generate the fracture permeability utilized for geothermal circulation. Localities where the above structures intersect and interact are characterized by the most robust generation and maintenance of fracture permeability, and therefore are the most favorable conduits for geothermal circulation. We present an evaluation of the structural geometries that tend to generate high density faulting and fracturing and an evaluation of the orientations of those structures with respect to the ambient stress conditions in three regions of high geothermal potential; The Great Basin, USA, Iceland, and east Africa. These analyses provide first-order constraints on areas that have favorable conditions for permeability and where future exploration for geothermal resources could be focused. In the Great Basin, USA, fault step-overs, fault terminations and accommodation zones are among the most common structural settings of known geothermal activity. Analysis of the geometry of these structures with respect to the ambient stress conditions reveals locations where faults associated with these structures are favorably oriented for enhanced fracture permeability. In magmatically active extensional provinces, like Iceland and east Africa, heat associated with shallow magmatic intrusions beneath volcanic centers drives geothermal circulation in near-surface fracture permeability conduits. Accentuated fault and fracture density and fracture permeability is generated by both axially oriented faults and fractures associated with axial rift zones and radially oriented structures near volcanic centers. Although heat from magmatic intrusion is most robust at volcanic centers, a high density of young intrusions may actually result in decreased permeability through closing of fracture networks. The locations of these three types of features; axial faults and fractures, radial structures, and young magmatic intrusions, all play a critical role in determining the most favorable locations for fracture permeability and fluid flow in magmatic geothermal systems. Within and around the margins of volcanic centers, where radial structures associated with volcanic centers interact and intersect with axially oriented structures associated with axial extension are the most favorable locations for fracture permeability and geothermal fluid circulation in magmatic extensional geothermal systems.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2024

Abstract for CRADA between National Energy Technology Laboratory and Shell International Exploration & Production, Inc

Introducing CO₂ into geothermal systems as a working fluid in reservoirs can enhance geothermal conductivity, production, and pressure maintenance. A cross-disciplinary interaction of geothermal reservoir stimulation and CO₂ utilization satisfies renewable energy demands and operations that support sustainable energy infrastructure. Challenges to implementing CO₂-stimulated geothermal enhancement (CS-GE) include (1) accurately characterizing and imaging CO₂-stimulated geothermal reservoirs; (2) quantitatively inferring CS-GE evolution under current and future engineered conditions for cost effective operations; and (3) monitoring resources by improving observational methods to advance the understanding of complex geothermal systems for sweep efficiency and, ultimately, cost effectiveness. NETL and Shell will collaborate under this CRADA to develop software to image key features, including CO₂-stimulated fracture imaging, CO₂ fluid sweep imaging and heat transfer and exchange imaging by leveraging available datasets and applying advanced Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML), multi-level data analytics and data/information fusion to better understand the comprehensive mechanisms of CO₂-stimulated geothermal systems.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗