SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) provides updates on experiments done as part of the HYPATIA and MUSIC campaigns as well as CAAS-3S criticality alarm testing, criticality safety classes, warehouse inventory, and KRUSTY disassembly.
This set of slides summarizes progress, highlights, and issues related to the LANL design engineering effort for the IER 296 critical experiment. The experiment configuration described in Section 5.1.1 of CED-1 IRSN Preliminary Design for Thermal/Epithermal Experiments with MOX FUEL (TEX-MOX) is re-examined in a finite element analysis model using design geometry utilized in the Chlorine Worth Study (CWS) Experiments. Preliminary results and design considerations are presented. Additional analysis has been performed based on comments from the collaborative virtual meeting on 12JAN2023. Specifically, the fuel cladding and gas gap have been included in the thermal analysis.
This presentation covers why we should care about Cu nuclear data. It also covers the current state of Cu63 and Cu65 covariances and the Impact on specific critical experiments.
There is a strong need for new benchmarks to validate neutron thermal scattering laws (TSLs). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has designed a Pulsed-Neutron Die Away (PNDA) testbed for this purpose. The experiment has a deuterium-tritium (D-T) neutron generator that impinges a 10 -4 s, mono-energetic pulse of 14.1 MeV neutrons on a target sample. After the pulse, the neutron population moderates and establishes a thermal equilibrium within the sample, with a fundamental spatial mode and characteristic decay-time eigenvalue, ⍺. The ⍺ eigenvalue can be extracted from the experimental measurements of the time-dependent neutron flux coming off the surface of the sample and can then be used as an integral parameter (similar to k eff ) to validate nuclear data involved with neutron migration, thermalization, and absorption. For moderating materials and geometric configurations, the ⍺ eigenvalue is heavily dependent on thermal neutron scattering of the target material. For that reason, a PNDA experiment can have a higher sensitivity to TSLs than is commonly available with the k eff parameter in critical experiments.
This set of slides summarizes progress, highlights, and issues related to the LANL design engineering effort for the IER 296 critical experiment. FEA simulation results are presented for the fuel elements on an insulated surface. Preliminary responses for the meeting agenda are documented.
The Kilopower Project was initiated by NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate/Game Changing Development Program in fiscal year 2015 to demonstrate subsystem-level technology readiness of small space fission power in a relevant environment (Technology Readiness Level 5) for space science and human exploration power needs. The Kilopower Project centerpiece is the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY) test, which consists of the development and testing of a ground technology demonstrator of a 1-kW(electric)–class fission power system (FPS). The technologies to be developed and validated by KRUSTY are extensible to space FPSs from 1 to 10 kW(electric), which can enable modular surface FPSs for human exploration as well as higher-power future potential deep space science missions. The KRUSTY demonstration is cofunded by NASA and the U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration. The KRUSTY demonstration in the National Critical Experiment Research Center’s Device Assembly Facility was completed in the first quarter of 2018.
TREAT microreactor Experiment Cell (T-REXC). This facility will provide a test bed for microreactor developers to perform demonstration projects and critical experiments in an expedited manner. In addition to other systems, structures, and components (SSCs), T-REXC will provide beryllium oxide (BeO) reflector components that T-REXC users can incorporate into their equipment installation. This specification details supplier requirements associated with these BeO components.
The Measurements of Uranium Subcritical and Critical (MUSiC) experiment was a highly enriched uranium (HEU) experiment performed at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) executed between December 2020 and April 2021. The experiment intended to measure criticality and reactor kinetics parameters in a bare HEU system. The experiment concurrently measured radiation signatures from the system while utilizing different neutron source types. This was an attempt to benchmark both detectors and analysis techniques against one another for identical measurements. The experiment consisted of the Rocky Flats HEU hemi-shells constructed into ten configurations spanning between deeply subcritical (about 14 kgs) to supercritical (about 60 kgs). Two of the ten configurations were supercritical and the other eight were subcritical. The two supercritical configurations, often referred to as the critical configurations, were documented into an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmark evaluation and submitted to the technical review group (TRG). The subcritical configurations of the MUSiC experiment were examined using three different detection systems. The systems include: the NoMAD He-3 neutron detector which consists of 15 He-3 tubes surrounded by a polyethylene matrix, a liquid scintillator system called the Rossi-α Measurement Rapid Organic Discriminating Detector (RAM-RODD), and a trans-stilbene organic scintillator array (OSCAR) provided by the University of Michigan. The NoMAD and RAM-RODD data are planned to be evaluated in two separate ICSBEP evaluations utilizing neutron noise methods such as Feynman Variance-to-Mean, Rossi-α and the pulsed neutron source method. Each of the subcritical configurations were examined using three different source types including: a Cf-252 source in the center, with only the intrinsic neutron source in the HEU, and with an external D-T neutron generator.
The centerpiece of the Kilopower Project, i.e., the Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY (KRUSTY) test, consists of the development and testing of a ground technology demonstration of a small fission power system based on a 1-kW(electric) space science power requirement. The KRUSTY test was authorized by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office. Authorization was obtained by adding an amendment to the existing regulatory documents for the National Criticality Experiments Research Center to cover the KRUSTY experiment. This amendment was reviewed and approved by the DOE. The most important safety question for the experiment was the addition of over 2 $ of excess reactivity to the reactor system. This amount of excess reactivity meant that the analyst could postulate accidents where the reactor went prompt critical, leading to physical shock or melting of the fuel. This paper analyzes these accidents using computer calculations and examines the controls used to mitigate them. The estimation of the impacts both on accident progression and consequences of reactivity insertion events was a significant part of obtaining approval for the KRUSTY experiment. The regulatory approval of KRUSTY was one of the first to be obtained for a completely new reactor concept in many decades.
In September 1980, the initial delayed critical configuration of the Solution High-Energy Burst Assembly (SHEBA I) was assembled, and the US Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) staff performed near critical and subcritical measurements using the californium source-driven noise analysis (CSDNA) method at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Critical Experiments Facility. An unreflected 56 cm outside diameter stainless-steel cylindrical tank was partially filled with uranyl fluoride solution (235U enrichment was 4.95 wt %) until delayed criticality was achieved. Then, measurements were performed for various fuel solution heights from delayed critical to 60% of the height required for delayed criticality. The stainless-steel tank had an inside diameter of 54.6 cm and a height of 105 cm and was partially (20–36.5 cm) filled with an aqueous solution of uranyl fluoride (with a density of 2.162 g/cm 3 ). The density of the uranium in solution was 1.042 g/cm 3 , and the solution had a H/U atomic ratio of 20.43. The tank had a 6.35 mm wall thickness and an axial reentrant tube with an inside diameter of 6.02 cm and wall thickness of 0.165 cm. The tank was essentially unreflected on the top and sides because it was in a thin metal shed. The reactivity of the near–delayed critical configuration was −10.4 cents, which corresponds to a k eff value of 0.99922. In addition to the CSDNA measurements, the prompt neutron decay constants were determined from break frequency noise analysis (BNFA) measurements. The subcritical neutron multiplication factors from CSDNA and BFNA compared extremely well. These data can be used as the basis of International Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluation benchmark for the near-critical configuration, and the k eff values at various subcritical configurations can be used as subcritical benchmarks. Furthermore, the measured prompt neutron decay constants can be used as reactor physics benchmarks. This report documents the experimental information for the measurements performed so that, at a later date, researchers could perform the required uncertainty and calculational analyses and documentation to use these data for an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Program (ICSBEP) or Nuclear Energy Agency benchmarks. The measured prompt neutron decay constants can be used as the basis of a benchmark for the International Reactor Physics Evaluation Program (IRPhEP). The data from these measurements are available from the ORNL Records Management Services Department, and the logbook is available from ICSBEP at Idaho National Laboratory.
This study was conducted to validate the SCALE/Polaris v6.3.0–PARCS v3.4.2 code procedure with the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VII.1 AMPX 56-group library for pressurized water reactor (PWR) analysis, by comparing simulated results with measured data for critical experiments and operating PWRs. Uncertainties of the SCALE/Polaris–PARCS code procedure for PWR analysis were evaluated in the validation for the PWR key nuclear parameters such as critical boron concentrations, reactivity, control bank work, temperature coefficients, and pin and assembly power peaking factors.
The Measurement of Uranium Subcritical and Critical (MUSiC) was performed at the DOE’s National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) located in the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS). The measurement utilized the Rocky Flats shells to perform benchmark measurements of similar highly enriched uranium (HEU) systems that span a wide range of reactivities. The Rocky Flats (RF) shells are 93.16% U-235 enriched metal hemishells that can be stacked concentrically. Ten configurations were measured with effective multiplication factors spanning between deeply subcritical (~ 0.64) through delayed critical. Details of the measured configurations are listed in Table 1. This unique set of measurements with its large span of reactivies is being used to determine the range over which neutron noise techniques such as Feynman variance-to-mean, Rossi-alpha, and pulsed neutron source techniques can be accurately employed for a bare HEU system. The results of the measurements will be published as a benchmark in The International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The results will support the growing amount of subcritical benchmark data, such as the SCRaP measurements, that is available to the community. The measurements were performed using several different detector systems for the purposes of cross-validation and obtaining detector independent results. Four detector systems were deployed, three by the NCERC team and one from the University of Michigan. The detector systems included a Neutron Multiplicity Array Detector (NoMAD) system (similar to the MC-15), four small volume 0.635 cm (Ø) × 7.59 cm 3 He detectors (ideal for measuring prompt neutron decay constants due to their fast recovery speed), the Rossi Alpha Measurements – Rapid Organic (n, γ) Discrimination Detector (RAM-RODD), and the Organic Scintillator Array (OSCAR). RAM-RODD is an array of eight 5.08 cm (Ø) × 5.08 cm EJ-309 organic scintillator detectors. OSCAR is a University of Michigan system and is an array of twelve 5.08 cm (Ø) × 5.08 cm stilbene detectors. Details of measurements performed with OSCAR will be discussed in a separate talk. The focus of this work is preliminary results obtained by RAM-RODD for the 8 subcritical configurations. Additional details on the measurements and on the setup and deployment of RAM-RODD will be discussed. Preliminary neutron noise analysis results including Rossi-alpha and Feynman-alpha will also be presented.
This report presents the final design (CED-2) of IER-501, a testbed for pulsed-neutron die-away (PNDA) experiments at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The PNDA experiments will be high-quality benchmarks that serve to optimize and validate thermal neutron scattering laws (TSLs), which are high-priority nuclear data for the Department of Energy’s Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). This CED-2 was guided by experimental results gathered from a prototype experimental set-up rather than with detailed simulations as is typically done for criticality experiments. The report presents the PNDA design and its equipment, and it documents the methodology used to postprocess the measured data. It discusses how experimental configurations influenced the decay-constant eigenvalue, or the integral parameter, of the experiment. The studied variations included the distance from the target to the generator, the orientation of the generator relative to the box, the orientation of the target to the generator, the effect of HDPE lining in the shielding box, the settings of the generator, and finally the benefits of using a low-scatter facility. From these results, a final configuration for the target, detectors, shielding box, and neutron generator was chosen. Two factors particularly influenced the chosen configuration: the reproducibility of the experiment’s geometry for benchmark modeling, and the minimization of measured neutrons scattered off the shielding box.
As one of the six advanced reactor concepts selected by the 2002 Generation IV roadmap as a technology meriting future research, Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) attracted broad attention and multiple private and public entities are working towards its commercialization. Facing stringent regulatory requirements, validations of computational codes used to calculate and prove the safety characteristics of MSRs play a key role. This project developed the world-first, MSR-related reactor physics benchmark based on a series of zero-power experiments conducted at the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE). The benchmark was successfully reviewed by the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) committee and is available in the IRPhEP handbook starting form the 2019 edition. To benchmark experimental data from the MSRE, a three-dimensional high-fidelity model was developed using the Monte Carlo neutron transport code Serpent 2 and ad-hoc methods have been implemented to account for the unique feature of fuel salt motion. The calculated effective multiplication factor, k eff , for the first criticality experiment, when 235 U was progressively added to the fuel salt in order to achieve criticality with stationary salt and isothermal conditions, was 1.02132 (±3 pcm). The total uncertainty for experimental k eff was estimated to be 420 pcm. The calculated k eff is 2.154% larger than the experimental and benchmark model value, which is approximately five times the benchmark model uncertainty. It is to be noted that, for systems containing large volume of graphite (or other carbonaceous materials), Monte Carlo codes tend to overestimate the keff of the benchmark model by 1% to 2%. The bias is possibly due to uncertainties in the impurity content of the graphite blocks, uncertainty in the neutron capture cross section of carbon or uncertainty in the properties of nuclear-grade graphite. The calculated reactivity coefficient of 235 U concentration (0.2228 ± 0.0014, represented as the change of reactivity over the relative change of 235 U mass in loop) matches well with the experimental value (0.223 ± 0.006), strengthening the confidence on the accurate representation of the fuel salt composition in the MSRE benchmark. Additional reactivity effect calculations, including the control rod bank worth, reactivity effects of fuel circulation and isothermal and fuel temperature coefficients show good agreement with the experimental values (within 1σ) as well.
A new sub-thermal neutron transmission capability at RPI LINAC has been used to validate Be (metal). NNL transmission measurements validated NCSU Be and Be+Sd TSLs for ENDF/B-VIII.1 and showed improvements WRT ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0. Amplitude differences highlighted the importance of sample characterization. Additional measurement is in progress for CY2022. PNDA is being developed as an alternative to critical experiment validation.
The TSUNAMI-1D and TSUNAMI-3D sequences for generating k eff sensitivity coefficients were first released in SCALE 5 in 2004. Several other tools were introduced in the same release, including primarily the TSUNAMI-IP code for uncertainty analysis and similarity assessments. The TSUNAMI sequences added capabilities for identifying important reactions and data for systems using sensitivity coefficients and also introduced new quantitative tools for rigorously assessing the similarity of systems. Over time, the capabilities of these tools have grown, and their use has expanded into other areas such as nuclear data assessment and nuclear covariance data testing. This paper discusses applications of the TSUNAMI tools for sensitivity calculations, sensitivity/uncertainty (S/U)-based validation, and nuclear data testing. This paper is one of a series of papers at this conference on the development and use of TSUNAMI tools. The other papers address the development of the TSUNAMI methods and the use of TSUNAMI for critical experiment design and optimization.
A key challenge for the introduction of any design changes, e.g., advanced fuel concepts, first-of-a-kind nuclear reactor designs, etc., is the cost of the associated experiments, which are required by law to validate the use of computer models for the various stages, starting from conceptual design, to deployment, licensing, operation, and safety. To achieve that, a criterion is needed to decide on whether a given experiment, past or planned, is relevant to the application of interest. This allows the analyst to select the best experiments for the given application leading to the highest measures of confidence for the computer model predictions. The state-of-the-art methods rely on the concept of similarity or representativity, which is a linear Gaussian-based inner-product metric measuring the angle—as weighted by a prior model parameters covariance matrix—between two gradients, one representing the application and the other a single validation experiment. This manuscript emphasizes the concept of experimental relevance which extends the basic similarity index to account for the value accrued from past experiments and the associated experimental uncertainties, both currently missing from the extant similarity methods. Accounting for multiple experiments is key to the overall experimental cost reduction by prescreening for redundant information from multiple equally-relevant experiments as measured by the basic similarity index. Accounting for experimental uncertainties is also important as it allows one to select between two different experimental setups, thus providing for a quantitative basis for sensor selection and optimization. The proposed metric is denoted by ACCRUE, short for Accumulative Correlation Coefficient for Relevance of Uncertainties in Experimental validation. Using a number of criticality experiments for highly enriched fast metal systems and low enriched thermal compound systems with accident tolerant fuel concept, the manuscript will compare the performance of the ACCRUE and basic similarity indices for prioritizing the relevance of a group of experiments to the given application.
This paper overviews the initial results of a new project at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory -- supported via an internal seed funding program -- focused on the development of a novel computational capability, called MAPPER, to support model validation. The MAPPER development aims to eliminate the need for empirical criteria, such as similarity indices, often employed to identify applicable experiments for given application conditions. To achieve that, MAPPER employs an information-theoretic-based approach, based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence principle, to combine responses of available or to-be-built experiments with application responses of interest using a training set of samples generated using randomized execution of the experiments and the application high fidelity analysis models. These samples are condensed using reduced order modeling techniques in the form of a joint probability distribution function (PDF) connecting each application response of interest with a new effective experimental response. The initial focus of the MAPPER capability will be to support the confirmatory analysis required for criticality safety analysis of storage facilities which require k-eff biases to be known for safe operation. This paper reports some of the initial results obtained with MAPPER as applied to a set of critical experiments for which existing similarity-based methods have been shown to provide inaccurate estimates of the biases.