Soiling, cleaning, and abrasion: The results of the 5-year photovoltaic glass coating field study
Not Available
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not Available
A simple method to evaluate (e.g., screen and rank) the performance of coatings that are fully or partially anti-soiling (AS) is lacking within the PV industry. Artificial soiling may be used as a rapid and economical assessment approach, offering an efficient alternative to time-intensive, site-specific field testing. In this study, we present an artificial soiling method to replicate the anti-soiling performance rankings of two groups of coated glass samples supplied by two manufacturers (group C with CA, CP, and CS coatings; group A with AC coating). These are compared to field aging in two climates: semi-arid Lemoore, California over 4 months, and the hot desert in Mesa, Arizona over 7 months. Both field and indoor performance ranking utilize the transmittance ratio, defined as the optical transmittance between a coated sample and an uncoated reference in each group, as an evaluation metric to assess the effectiveness of the artificial soiling approach in replicating field soiling. It is critical to mimic the dominant field meteorological conditions associated with soiling-prone days and vulnerable times of day during the soiling season. Our results reveal that the use of artificial soiling for field performance ranking among coatings strongly depends on the soil type (composition and particle distribution), dust surface density, and prevalent environmental factors (wetting saturation by humidity, dew condensation extent, and prior weathering history of the coating). The similar rank order relative to the field suggests that the artificial soiling approach presented may be used for down-selecting anti-soiling coatings prior to prolonged field validation.
External contamination ("soiling") of the incident surface is a major limiting factor for solar technologies. A 5-year field glass coupon study was conducted to better understand external contamination and its effects; compare cleaning methods and the use of preventative coatings; and explore the abrasion resulting from cleaning to advise on accelerated abrasion testing. Test sites included the cities of Dubai (UAE), Kuwait City (Kuwait), Mesa (AZ), Mumbai (India), and Sacramento (CA). Through the 5-year cumulative study, dry brush, water spray, and wet sponge and squeegee cleaning methods were compared to no cleaning. Optical microscopy was used to obtain images, including representative color images, grayscale images for object analysis, and oblique images for coating integrity assessment. A thresholding protocol was developed to analyze and distinguish specimens using the ImageJ software. Optical performance was quantified using a spectrophotometer, including comprehensive optical characterization (transmittance, reflectance, and absorptance in addition to forward- and back-scattering). Atomic force microscopy was used to verify the abrasion damage morphology, including the width and depth of surface scratches. Analysis of the results included correlation of optical performance and particle area coverage, rank order (by coating or location), and the acceleration factor for abrasion damage. The efficacy of external cleaning was more readily distinguished from the effectiveness of antisoiling coatings. The acceleration factor for dry brush cleaning of a porous silica coating was found to be on the order of unity.