Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “VS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Multidecadal Changes in Lower Stratospheric Ozone: Variability Vs. Trends

As upper stratospheric ozone appears to be recovering as a result of decreasing chlorine loading following the implementation of the Montreal Protocol and its amendments and in agreement with model projections, several recent studies report an apparent decline of ozone concentrations in the lower stratosphere in the last two decades, particularly in the extratropics. Our previous work as well as at least two other studies provide evidence that this decline results from transport changes rather than an intensification of chemical depletion. It remains unclear whether these changes represent long-term internal variability or are a consequence of a climate forcing. Here we perform free-running ensembles of the recent past (1980-2016) using the Goddard Earth Observing System Model (GEOS) at the cubed sphere C180 (approximately half degree) resolution. Two suites of 10-member ensembles are performed, one in which observed sea surface temperature (SSTs) are fully prescribed, and the other in which the linear SST trend over the recent past is removed so as to only retain internal variability. We evaluate the trends in both ozone as well as two idealized tracers with prescribed uniform loss that are used to isolate the role of transport from chemistry and emissions. Probability-distribution-functions of the trends in both ozone and idealized tracers are compared among ensemble members and with observed trends in order to evaluate the likelihood of recent observed declines in lower stratospheric ozone, relative to large internal variability. Moreover, comparisons among simulations with and without imposed SST trends indicate the extent to which dynamically-driven ozone trends reflect forced trends or internal variability in lower stratospheric dynamics.

Wargan, Krzysztof↗
NASA NTRS2014

Mars: The First Billion Years - Warm and Wet vs Cold and Icy?

Today Mars is a cold, dry, desert planet. Liquid water is not stable on its surface. There are no lakes, seas, or oceans, and rain falls nowhere at no time during the year. Yet early in its history during the Noachian epoch, there is geological and mineralogical evidence that liquid water did indeed flow on its surface creating drainage systems, lakes, and possibly, seas and oceans. The implication is that early Mars had a different climate than it does today, one that was based on a thicker atmosphere with a more powerful greenhouse effect that was capable of producing an active hydrological cycle with rainfall, runoff, and evaporation. Since Mariner 9 began accumulating such evidence, researchers have been trying to understand what kind of a climate system could have created greenhouse conditions favorable for liquid water. Unfortunately, the problem is not yet solved.

Cold Early Mars↗
NASA NTRS2017

Magnetic Field Sensing with 4H SiC Diodes: N vs P Implantation

We explore the magnetic sensing capabilities of two 4H-SiC n+p diodes fabricated by NASA Glenn which only differ in the implanted ion species, nitrogen and phosphorus, and the implant activation annealing time. We use low- and high-field electrically detected magnetic resonance (EDMR) to investigate the defect structure used to sense magnetic fields as well as to evaluate the sensitivity. In addition, we expose these devices to high energy electron radiation to evaluate the defect sensing capability in a harsh radiation environment. The results from this work will allow us to tailor our processing methods to design a more optimal 4H-SiC pn diode for magnetic field sensing in harsh environments.

Cochrane, Corey J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Comparison of Evaluation Techniques for in-School Programs vs. Adult-oriented Planetarium Programs

Children in school are familiar with constant testing, and the test is often a gate to a desired goal (e.g., certification of completion of a particular grade level). However, adults in a planetarium setting are often nonchalant about learning in this informal venue, and can be almost offended when asked to complete a test of their knowledge, even when the "test" is called a "survey", the emphasis is on how well the presenter explained the material, and a space-oriented handout is offered as a premium for completing the survey. In this presentation, surveys given during 2019 and early 2020 will be shared, along with answers from the respondents. These will be compared with surveys returned after an in-school presentation. An example question from the planetarium survey, with a few answers follows: "Did you learn anything new from this presentation, and if so, what was it?" Answers included: names of patterns/shapes of collections of stars, star locations, how sun and stars work in southern hemisphere. Future work will involve assessing programming for the planetarium at the University of North Alabama, which is used for college-level students and for the general public. For comparison, identical (or nearly so) surveys will be administered to attendees of Von Braun Astronomical Society's (in Huntsville, Alabama) programs.

Education↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Progress in Red vs. Green Propellant Operations: ASCENT Load Operations Lessons Learned

The Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM) [1] is a NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) effort to establish via demonstration ASCENT propellant (Advanced Space Craft Energetic Non-Toxic propellant, formerly referred to as AF-M315E) ground operations through on –orbit performance. ASCENT was developed by Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) as an increased energy density, reduced toxicity and reduced hazard monopropellant formulation relative to hydrazine. The GPIM team was led by Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corporation (BATC) as Program Management and Principal Investigator with AFRL, Aerojet-Rocketdyne (AR), the United States Space Force Space and Missile Systems Center (USSF/SMC), NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC), NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), and NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC) as Co-Investigators. The AFRL co-investigator role in the GPIM program was to develop the Propellant Ground Support Equipment (PGSE), associated Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Check Lists (CL), propellant load, propellant specification standard conventions and analysis methods, decontamination and waste disposal practices. This paper will discuss lessons learned in documentation, crew composition and readiness, equipment readiness, propellant readiness and potential improvements in the PGSE design.

Anthony P Zuttarelli↗
NASA NTRS1998

SIM vs. SOS: A Space Interferometry Trade Study

This study was undertaken at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory to identify salient features of two competing instrument designs and to select the design that best meets the goals of the Space Interferometry Mission.

trade-study↗
NASA NTRS2018

Definition of Modeling vs. Programming Languages

Modeling languages (like UML and SysML) are those used in modelbased specification of software-intensive systems. Like programming languages, they are defined using their syntax and semantics. However, both kinds of languages are defined by different communities, and in response to different requirements, which makes their methodologies and tools different. In this paper, we highlight the main differences between the definition methodologies of modeling and programming languages. We also discuss the impact of these differences on language tool support. We illustrate our ideas using examples from known programming and modeling languages. We also present a case study, where we analyze the definition of a new modeling language called the Ontology Modeling Language (OML). We highlight the requirements that have driven OML definition and explain how they are different from those driving typical programming languages. Finally, we discuss how these differences are being abstracted away using new language definition tools.

Elaasar, Maged↗