Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Revision of the Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation - 16315

On February 25, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Revision 1 of the Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation (CA BTP), culminating a six-year process. This revision provides updated guidance on the interpretation of paragraph 61.55(a)(8) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 'Determination of concentrations in wastes', as it applies to the classification of a variety of different types and forms of low-level radioactive waste (LLW) as Class A, B, or C waste. The waste class determines the minimum safety measures to be applied in order to provide reasonable assurance of safe disposal of the waste. The CA BTP is used by thousands of LLW generators, by the waste processing industry, by all operating LLW disposal sites in the U.S. and by Agreement States. The previous version of the CA BTP, published in 1995, was issued before the NRC adopted its risk-informed and performance-based regulatory policy. The revised CA BTP has been informed by that policy. The revised CA BTP also contains new guidance on acceptable methods that can be used to perform concentration averaging of LLW for the purpose of determining its waste class for disposal. This paper provides background information on why the CA BTP was issued and subsequently updated. This paper summarizes the new guidance found in the revised CA BTP. This paper also explains some of the key issues that required NRC's resolution, and the reasoning that underpins the major decisions reflected in Revision 1 of the CA BTP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Saltstone Facility Operating Experience with Mega-Vault Disposal Units - 19497

The Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) has been treating low-level waste aqueous salt solution at the Savannah River Site (SRS) since 1990. Salt solutions are transferred from a large-volume, underground storage tank via underground waste transfer line into the SPF. The waste is received into one of two receipt tanks and then transferred to a twin-shaft mixer where dry feeds are introduced to create a fresh grout slurry. The grout exits the mixer into a hold tank, which has a residence time of approximately two minutes. The slurry is then pumped via peristaltic pump through a grout transfer line to one of several disposal units in the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The transfer line length varies from 0.4 km to 0.8 km depending on disposal location. With the salt disposal mission at SRS accelerating via the operation of the Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (MCU) facility and the anticipated startup of the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), it is important that the SPF and SDF operate with minimal outage time and maximum facility availability. To this end, the design of the newest disposal units has incorporated the benefits of commercially available cylindrical concrete tank design on a very large scale to maximize economies of scale. This new design has been placed into radioactive service and the initial operational data will be compared with previous disposal operations along with an overview of how disposal unit design has significantly evolved since the initial construction in the early 1990's. Additionally, several processing facility modifications have either been implemented or developed in recent years to improve operating reliability and ensure facility availability once the SWPF becomes the primary waste generator providing feed for the SPF. These modifications, the issues driving their development, and an assessment of their effectiveness will also be discussed. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Idaho-Developed Technologies, Processes Offer Unique Solutions to Waste Management Challenges - 19281

INL Site cleanup contractor Fluor Idaho, LLC (Fluor Idaho) and its predecessors have developed a host of state-of-the-art technologies and specialized processes for nuclear waste handling, treatment, storage, and shipping. The cleanup program has also repurposed and upgraded previously idled Cold War-era buildings to treat and repackage both on- and off-site generated radioactive and hazardous wastes. And lastly, Fluor Idaho is using one-of-a-kind equipment to protect waste management personnel as they undertake their work to meet cleanup commitments that the Department of Energy (DOE) made to the state of Idaho. Such applications, although developed for Idaho's wastes, have the potential to benefit other facilities within the DOE Complex. Engineers and fabricators have teamed up to develop truly unique devices made of specialized metals, like stainless steel alloys, and more readily available materials such as Lexan. All waste types that Fluor Idaho manages daily - spent nuclear fuel, both high- and low-level wastes, and both remote-handled (RH) and CH-TRU - benefit from these innovations. Without question, the greatest number of specialized equipment, processes, and worker-protection technologies developed are for the retrieving, characterizing, repackaging, and shipping of TRU wastes, which makes sense considering the INL Site stores the most TRU waste in the DOE Complex. On the CH-TRU retrieval front, crews are using specially modified Gradall excavators to protect workers while they exhume Rocky Flats Plant wastes that were sent to Idaho in the 1950's and 1960's and buried in a shallow landfill. The excavators are supplied with extra Lexan windows to protect operators from the potential for flying debris during exhumation. On-board supplied air, pumped into the cab, and individual air supplies protect workers from inhalation hazards. Also on-board infrared cameras allow operators to detect heat generating from reactive metals at the dig face. At the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Facility (AMWTP), Brokk robotic arm operators use a 'super clam' claw, designed and built at the INL Site, on the remotely operated heavy equipment to size-reduce waste boxes, drums, concrete, and metal containing TRU constituents. The super clam is so powerful and dexterous that operators can crush a 55-gallon drum into the size of a basketball, but also delicately turn the pages of a magazine. Boxes too large to be sized at the AMWTP's box-lines are sent to the Accelerated Retrieval Project VII facility to be sized by Waste Management personnel. Such waste boxes, which sometimes contain 'flighty' plutonium-238 material, have forced the project to employ a heavily ventilated and filtered interior tent. Not all technologies developed for the Waste Management program are high-technology; in fact, one piece of equipment is so simple it's literally ingenious. Operators who inspect and repackage RH-TRU inside a hot cell at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center (INTEC) needed a backup plan in case the hot cell port couldn't be closed in the event of a power outage. Engineers and fabricators collaborated to develop a port cover actuator mechanism, which allows operators to open and close the cell's hatch cover with nothing more than a cordless drill. Also at INTEC, Maintenance Shop fabricators developed a Lexan container or 'pig' suitable for shielding neutron-emitting TRU waste sources. Lexan was chosen as the preferred shielded container material for this special type of waste because neutrons are best shielded with materials containing lots of hydrogen, such as plastics, which are composed of carbon and hydrogen molecules. Once approved for shipment, the high-activity waste will be loaded into specialty casks and shipped to WIPP for permanent disposal. Although all these technologies and processes were initially developed for resolving challenges at the INL Site, their applications could be far-reaching. Like the INL Site, many other facilities in the DOE Complex manage, treat, store, and ship TRU, low-and high-level wastes, and spent nuclear fuel. The technologies and processes developed in Idaho protect Waste Management personnel as they undertake their work, but these benefits could be utilized by other facilities and personnel doing similar work. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

ANSTO Synroc Wasteforms for the Immobilization of a Range of Mo-99 Production Wastes - 19326

Tc-99m, the most commonly used radioisotope in nuclear medicine, is produced from the decay of Mo-99 which is predominantly produced in reactors by irradiation of enriched uranium targets. This results in three waste streams, one of which is a uranium filter cake containing fission products. This filter cake could itself be treated as a waste stream, or processed to retrieve the enriched uranium for further use, thus producing additional waste streams during reprocessing. All wastes are considered intermediate-level wastes and require an appropriate wasteform design for termination. ANSTO is collaborating with NECSA (Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa) to develop wasteform and processing solutions for the treatment of intermediate level wastes (ILW) from the production of Mo-99. The work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) with technical support from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Here we highlight some of the outcomes of this collaboration which has seen the investigation and performance testing of a range of waste treatment technologies. Among the treatment options for the various waste streams, including the enriched uranium filter cake itself, were glass, glass-ceramic, ceramic and geopolymer wasteforms. All wasteforms were characterized (e.g., by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)) and their performance characteristics, for example compressive strength and aqueous durability, determined by standard methods and compared. Consideration has been given to the most suitable, practical and cost effective solutions for the immobilization of these Mo-99 wastes. This paper will discuss the down-selection of wasteforms and process technologies for Mo-99 wastes and compare these with regards to wasteform performance and process technology readiness. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Processing liquid organic wastes at the NNL Preston laboratory

Organic compounds of various kinds have been used in the nuclear industry for numerous duties in uranium chemical, metal and ceramic processing plants. In the course of the various operations undertaken, these organic compounds have become contaminated with uranic material, either accidentally or as an inevitable part of the process. Typically, the chemical/physical form and/or concentration of the uranic content of the organics has prevented disposal. In order to address the issue of contaminated liquid organic wastes, the National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) has developed a suite of treatments designed to recover uranium and to render the waste suitable for disposal. The developed processes are operated at industrial scale via the NNL Preston Laboratory Residue Processing Plant. The Oil Waste Leaching (OWL) Process is a fully industrialised process used for the treatment of contaminated oils with approximately 200 tonnes of uranium contaminated oil being treated to date. The process was originally developed for the treatment of contaminated tributyl phosphate and odourless kerosene which had been adsorbed onto sawdust. However, over the years, the OWL process has been refined for a range of oils including 'water emulsifiable' cutting oils, lubricating oils, hydraulic oils/fluids and 'Fomblin' (fully fluorinated) oils. Chemically, the OWL process has proved capable of treating solvents as well as oils but the highly volatile/flammable nature of many solvents has required additional precautions compared with those required for oil treatment. These additional precautions led to the development of the Solvent Treatment Advanced Rig (STAR), an installation operated under an inert atmosphere. STAR is a small 'module' (100 dm{sup 3} volume) which allows the treatment of both water miscible and immiscible solvents. This paper discusses the challenges associated with the treatment of liquid organic wastes and the process developments which have allowed a wide range of materials to be successfully treated. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Implementing a Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste Capability in the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant - 18332

The original design of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) requires that all waste be processed through the Pretreatment (PT) Facility in order to separate the low-activity waste and high-level waste streams. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has developed a sequenced approach to completing the WTP Project, beginning with feeding some liquid waste directly to the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, bypassing the PT Facility. Sending low-activity waste from the tank farms to the LAW Facility is referred to as direct-feed LAW (DFLAW). Under this plan, low-activity waste will be pretreated in the Hanford tank farms for cesium and solids separation to meet LAW Facility waste acceptance criteria and produce an acceptable low-activity waste product. The waste feed will then be transferred to the LAW Facility where it will be immobilized in glass, poured into stainless steel containers, and then transported by truck to the Integrated Disposal Facility, a mixed low-level waste disposal site located in the Hanford 200 East Area. The DFLAW operation will deliver about 1 million gallons of double-shell tank waste for treatment each year of operation, and nominally produce 21 metric tons of immobilized low-activity waste glass per day. The resultant freed space in the double-shell tanks will support safe tank farm operations and staging of additional waste for treatment. In December 2016 DOE executed a contract modification and approved a change to the project's performance baseline to complete the LAW Facility, Balance of Facilities (BOF), and Analytical Laboratory (LAB) and incorporate modifications needed to allow direct feed of low-activity waste to the LAW Facility. The contract modification and revised performance baseline support completion and hot commissioning of WTP facilities needed for DFLAW operations is as early as January 2022. DOE has made significant progress on design, equipment procurements, and civil construction of modifications required to implement the DFLAW capability in the WTP, including progress on civil construction of a new effluent management facility, which will process secondary liquid waste resulting from LAW Facility vitrification operations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Phase 2 Report--Mercury Behavior In The Defense Waste Processing Facility

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the DWPF processing history in regards to mercury, document the mercury results obtained on the product and condensate samples, and provide further recommendations based on the data obtained.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Experimental study of the tritium distribution in the effluents resulting from the sodium hydrolysis

Within the framework of the dismantling of fast breeder reactors in France several processes are under investigation regarding sodium disposal. One of them, called ELA (radioactive sodium waste treatment process), is based on the implementation of the sodium-water reaction, in a controlled and progressive way, to remove residual sodium. This sodium contains impurities such as sodium hydride, sodium oxide and tritiated sodium hydride. The hydrolysis of these various chemical species leads to the production of a liquid effluent, mainly composed of an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide, and a gaseous effluent, mainly composed of nitrogen (inert gas), hydrogen and steam. The tritium is distributed between these effluents, and, within the gaseous effluent, according to its forms HT and HTO (tritiated water). HTO being 10,000 times more radio-toxic than HT, a precise knowledge of the mechanisms governing the phase distribution of tritium is necessary. This paper presents the first experimental results from a parametric study on the tritium distribution between the various effluents generated during hydrolysis operations. A series of experiments have been performed in order to study the influence of water flow rate, argon flow rate, initial mass and specific activity of the hydrolyzed sodium sample. An important influence of the total tritium concentration in the hydrolyzed sample has been highlighted. As for the phenomena suspected to be responsible for the phase change of tritiated water, in the studied range of parameters, vaporization induced by the heat of reactions seems to be dominant over the evaporation induced by the inert gas flow rate.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2013

A Canadian Solution for Management of Mixed Liquid Waste - 13384

Mixed liquid wastes (MLW) from Canadian nuclear facilities consist of solvents, PCB (Poly Chlorinated Biphenyls) and non-PCB contaminated oils and aqueous wastes. Historically, MLW drums were shipped to a licensed US facility for destruction via incineration. This option is relatively expensive considering the significant logistics and destruction costs involved. In addition, commercial waste destruction facilities in US cannot accept PCB wastes from non-US jurisdictions. Because of this, Kinectrics has recently developed a novel and flexible process for disposing both PCB as well as non-PCB contaminated MLW within Canada. This avoids the need for cross-border shipments which significantly reduces the complexity and cost for waste disposal. This paper presents an overview of the various approaches and activities undertaken to date by Kinectrics for successfully processing and disposing the MLW drums. A summary of the results, challenges and how they were overcome are also presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Progress on Resuming Full Construction on the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's High-Level Waste Facility - 16283

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) restricted certain engineering, procurement and construction work on the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's (WTP) High-Level Waste (HLW) Facility in 2012 and early 2013 because of unresolved technical issues, and a need to align the nuclear safety basis with the design as the HLW Facility technical issues were resolved. The DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) needed a way to minimize the government's risk exposure, while continuing limited critical path construction work and resolving the technical and safety basis issues. ORP issued the Plan for Evaluation and Decision to Proceed for the High-Level Waste Facility in October 2013 to establish the process to evaluate the WTP contractor's progress on resolving the issues and to identify actions and deliverables needed to facilitate an ORP decision to resume production activities. This process provided for a phased resumption of HLW engineering, procurement and construction activities, with two decision points: Decision 1: Authorization to resume design/production engineering along with limited procurements and construction ramp-up. Decision 2: Full authorization to resume engineering, procurement and construction. In August 2014, ORP provided authorization for the WTP contractor to resume all engineering work necessary to finalize the design of the HLW Facility. The decision to proceed with production engineering in the HLW Facility was based on significant progress in resolving technical issues and improving work processes to align the HLW design and safety basis. ORP is working closely with the WTP contractor to facilitate decisions for resuming procurement of HLW Facility equipment with safety functions, and resuming full construction in the most complex process cells in the Facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Data Quality Objectives for Direct LAW Feed Acceptance and Qualification - 17122

The Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility has been designed to operate under two scenarios. In the primary operating scenario, the Pretreatment Facility configuration, waste is first processed through the WTP Pretreatment Facility. Then the low-activity liquid is transferred to the WTP LAW Facility for vitrification. Alternately, under a direct feed operating scenario, known as Direct Feed LAW (DFLAW), the supernatant portion of the tank waste, referred to as the LAW feed, is treated in a Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) prior to transfer of treated feed to LAW Facility. The DFLAW scenario is a strategy to begin treating Hanford tank wastes as soon as 2022. A program has been established as part of One System to integrate and align the waste feed acceptance and qualification requirements for processing in the LAWPS and the LAW facility. One key activity of the program is the development of integrated data quality objectives (DQO) using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance for the DQO process. [1] The integrated approach focused on one sampling event that will provide sufficient and necessary data to meet both LAWPS and LAW Facility criteria. Existing data and historical information were taken into account to develop sampling and data collection requirements necessary to meet waste acceptance criteria and processing requirements for both LAWPS and LAW Facility. Using a conceptual model for the sampling and decision process, the seven steps of the DQO process were completed. This paper discusses the details of the integrated DQO process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 120: Roundtable: Waste Management - Energy Facilities Contractor Operating Group (EFCOG WM)

This Roundtable focused on the WM EFCOG working group as they met to discuss a variety of issues of importance to US DOE waste management operations. The purpose of the WM EFCOG is to seek out and promote the best management and operating practices, cost effective technologies and disposal options for all waste streams generated at US DOE facilities whether destined for US DOE or commercial facilities. Each site representative provided a radioactive waste management lessons learned briefing. Panelists with presentations: Savannah River Site (SRS) Solid Waste Program Update (Kerri Crawford); Idaho Clean-up Project Status (Frederick Hughes); West Valley Demonstration Project Update - EFCOG Waste Management Working Group (John Rendall); Key Project Challenges and Successes (Kalli Shupe); EFCOG WMWG Challenging Waste Subgroup Update (Tammy Monday); CH TRU Difficult Waste Stream Processing Challenges (Daniel Pancake); Argonne Building 350 Clean-up Success Using Effective Work Control (Daniel Dilday); Problematic Waste Streams on the Oak Ridge Reservation (John Wrapp)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Overview of Innovative Canadian Solutions for Management of Mixed Liquid Waste - 19359

Historically, Mixed Liquid Waste (MLW) drums from Canadian facilities were shipped to a licensed US facility for destruction via incineration. In order to address the various challenges and complexities associated with this approach, Kinectrics developed a flexible process for disposal of both Poly Chlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) and non-PCB contaminated MLW within Canada. The objective of this paper is to present project case studies that provide an overview of the various approaches employed since 2010 by Kinectrics for management of MLW within Canada. Various innovative approaches to processing a variety of MLW, key results, recent developments, successes, challenges and lessons learned are discussed. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Regulatory Framework for Salt Waste Disposal and Tank Closure at the Savannah River Site - 13663

The end of the Cold War has left a legacy of approximately 37 million gallons of radioactive waste in the aging waste tanks at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site (SRS). A robust program is in place to remove waste from these tanks, treat the waste to separate into a relatively small volume of high-level waste and a large volume of low-level waste, and to actively dispose of the low-level waste on-site and close the waste tanks and associated ancillary structures. To support performance-based, risk-informed decision making and to ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its current and past contractors have worked closely with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to develop and implement a framework for on-site low-level waste disposal and closure of the SRS waste tanks. The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides DOE the authority to manage defense-related radioactive waste. DOE Order 435.1 and its associated manual and guidance documents detail this radioactive waste management process. The DOE also has a requirement to consult with the NRC in determining that waste that formerly was classified as high-level waste can be safely managed as either low-level waste or transuranic waste. Once DOE makes a determination, NRC then has a responsibility to monitor DOE's actions in coordination with SCDHEC to ensure compliance with the Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 61 (10CFR61), Subpart C performance objectives. The management of hazardous waste substances or components at SRS is regulated by SCDHEC and the EPA. The foundation for the interactions between DOE, SCDHEC and EPA is the SRS Federal Facility Agreement (FFA). Managing this array of requirements and successfully interacting with regulators, consultants and stakeholders is a challenging task but ensures thorough and thoughtful processes for disposing of the SRS low-level waste and the closure of the tank farm facilities. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Update on SRNL Support of Saltstone Sampling and Analysis - 16325

At the Savannah River Site, low-level waste is immobilized in cementitious waste form known as saltstone. The saltstone Performance Assessment models the performance of the waste form and other aspects of the Saltstone Disposal Facility over ten thousand years after closure to determine the transport history of radionuclides and other hazardous constituents in low-level waste. As part of an ongoing Performance Assessment Maintenance Plan, Savannah River Remediation with Savannah River National Laboratory, has designed a sampling and analyses plan to correlate the properties of field-emplaced samples and samples processed and cured in the laboratory. As part of the plan, SRR has retrieved field-emplaced samples from SDU 2A. Prior to analyzing the field emplaced samples, SRNL is developing the strategy, protocols and equipment necessary to retrieve, store in an inert environment, and analyze the three sample sets of interest outlined in the analysis plan. To date, the simulant saltstone samples have been analyzed for hydraulic conductivity, porosity, density, and other properties. This paper will give an update to the current protocols and equipment being utilized at Savannah River National Laboratory for storing and analyzing the field-emplaced and simulant samples, results from the simulant saltstone analyses, as well as analysis plans for the samples retrieved from the Saltstone Processing Facility and the field-emplaced samples. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Use of Uncertainty in Modeling DFLAW Treatment at Hanford - 17115

Average or mean is understood by most; standard deviation (SD) is understood by few. Certainty is easy to model; uncertainty is not. The flowsheet simulation, described in this paper, placed uncertainties in the G2 model of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's (WTP) Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) process for performance and sensitivity evaluations. G2 is a dynamic material balance model that starts and proceeds with operating logic until all the feed is processed. Dynamic material balance is achieved by tracking the flows, storage, and change of all materials within the plant as time increments. Processing equipment and limitations of the flowsheet are modeled (e.g., equipment types, piping, volumes, flowrates, efficiencies, and physical and chemical environments that impact separations, phase equilibriums, and chemical reactions). Operating logic represents the rules and strategies of a running plant. The G2 model simulated both certainty and uncertainty scenarios for comparison purposes. For the uncertainty scenarios, process decisions were made using presumed values to simulate various operational measurement errors and process variabilities. Presumed means that the known G2 values are adjusted to replicate measurement errors and variabilities. These include: 1) volume measurement, 2) sample analysis, 3) melter decontamination factor (DF), 4) glass former weighing, and 5) glass former composition variations. The errors were randomly generated in accordance with SD values of measurement devices, laboratory methods, and glass former composition ranges. The G2 model runs give insight on the DFLAW process' controllability and the expected range of glass properties. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Engineering Options Assessment Report. Nitrate Salt Waste Stream Processing

This report examines and assesses the available systems and facilities considered for carrying out remediation activities on remediated nitrate salt (RNS) and unremediated nitrate salt (UNS) waste containers at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The assessment includes a review of the waste streams consisting of 60 RNS, 29 above-ground UNS, and 79 candidate below-ground UNS containers that may need remediation. The waste stream characteristics were examined along with the proposed treatment options identified in the Options Assessment Report . Two primary approaches were identified in the five candidate treatment options discussed in the Options Assessment Report: zeolite blending and cementation. Systems that could be used at LANL were examined for housing processing operations to remediate the RNS and UNS containers and for their viability to provide repackaging support for remaining LANL legacy waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Savannah River National Laboratory Collaborative Innovation Pilot Team - 17560

The Collaborative Innovation (COIN) program was established by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) in March 2016. The goal of the SRNL COIN program is to identify innovative options to significantly reduce program and project risks (improve safety, reduce schedule and cost) of high priority Department of Energy Environmental Management, National Nuclear Security Administration, and Nuclear Energy missions. The COIN Advisory Board selected as the target outcome of the first COIN effort a 50% improvement to the Savannah River Site (SRS) H-Canyon spent nuclear fuel (SNF) processing 'baseline,' or current plan, as defined in the SRS Nuclear Materials Planning Roadmap. A small team of SRNL and Savannah River Nuclear Solutions personnel with pertinent experience and expertise was co-located and largely sequestered for eight weeks to identify improvements to H-Canyon processing of SNF. Following the process defined in the SRNL COIN Charter, the COIN Pilot Team analyzed the baseline for processing SNF through H Canyon; generated alternative ideas; tested seemingly viable ideas by reaching out to other subject-matter experts; and identified options for consideration for implementation by the COIN Advisory Board. The COIN Pilot produced a number of important outcomes, including important lessons learned for subsequent COIN efforts. The two principal outcomes are these: 1. The COIN Pilot Team conducted a comprehensive examination of the individual unit operations, the integrated system, and external interfaces to produce a timeline of H-Canyon processing and sampling times that had not previously existed. The general timeline served as the baseline from which the Pilot Team identified processing improvements. In addition, the timeline has already been employed in other planning efforts. 2. The COIN Pilot Team determined that innovations to the H-Canyon Dissolving unit operation alone could increase the number of SNF bundles processed through H Canyon by the target of 50%, but with little margin for error. To ensure that the gains in throughput in the Dissolving unit operation would be maintained throughout the facility, the Pilot Team identified four additional improvements to create greater efficiency and flexibility in downstream H-Canyon unit operations. The COIN Pilot Team's innovations reduce the processing time of a single batch of SNF through H Canyon from about 70 days to about 50 days. This talk will review the COIN process and the results of the pilot of the process. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗