Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Criticality Safety”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Emulating Variable Uranium Enrichments With Radiation Signature Training Devices (RSTD)

Radiological signature training devices (RSTDs) are sealed sources (or assemblies of sources) that emulate the radiation signature of larger masses of special nuclear material for passive detection while maintaining a minimal logistical footprint in security, radiological safety, criticality safety, and transportation requirements. Previous work focused on emulation of large quantities of highly enriched uranium for search and field identification with radioisotope identification detectors and mobile systems. New work has expanded into investigating use of the RSTDs with laboratory safeguards tools, such as MGAU and FRAM, and emulating uranium spectra of multiple enrichments over more energy regions (particularly the x-ray region).

Blessinger, Christopher S.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Investigating the Effects of Exposure to Blue-Enriched Light or Peppermint Odor on Alertness, Mood, and Performance Upon Awakening from Deep Sleep at Night

Introduction: Sleep inertia refers the transient neurobehavioral impairments experienced immediately after waking from sleep. This period of reduced alertness and performance poses a significant safety risk to on-call workers who may be required to perform a safety-critical task immediately after waking (e.g., emergency services, health care, and military). In these operations, the need for a rapid return to full alertness is critical to mission safety and success. Several factors may exacerbate sleep inertia, resulting in greater impairment upon waking, including: waking from deep sleep, (i.e., slow wave sleep, SWS), waking at night, and waking following prior sleep loss. Awakenings under these conditions are common for on-call and extended shift workers who may need to perform safety-critical tasks soon after waking from unprotected sleep opportunities. Therefore, there is a need for evidence-based reactive countermeasures (i.e., used upon waking) to the cognitive consequences sleep inertia. Specifically, countermeasures that can rapidly restore alertness and performance immediately following sleep. A recent review of the literature on reactive countermeasures highlighted several research gaps and promising candidates for further investigation. The review also emphasized the need for countermeasures that are operationally viable and readily deployed in occupational settings. This study aims to address the identified gaps and limitations by assessing the efficacy of exposure to two known acute alerting stimuli - blue-enriched light and peppermint odor - to improve cognitive performance, alertness, and mood immediately after waking from SWS at night. Materials and Methods: Twelve participants completed a two-week within-subject, randomized, cross-over intervention study including two in-laboratory overnight visits. During each experimental week, the subjects experienced one intervention (light or peppermint) and a control condition upon awakening from SWS at night. The presentation order of the two conditions (intervention or control) at wake-up and the order of intervention (light or peppermint) by week was randomized by sex. Prior to each in-laboratory visit, participants maintained a sleep schedule of 8.5 h for 5 nights and 5 h for one night. Compliance with this sleep schedule was confirmed by actigraphy. In the laboratory, participants went to bed at their habitual bedtime and were monitored by standard polysomnography. After at least five minutes of continuous SWS, participants were awoken and exposed, in a randomized order, to either the control or intervention condition. During the hour after awakening from SWS (at 2, 17, 32, and 47 minutes after waking), participants completed a battery of tasks including a 5-minute psychomotor vigilance task (PVT), a subjective scale of alertness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, KSS), and visual analogue scales (VAS) of mood. Following this sleep inertia measurement period, all lights were turned off and participants were allowed to return to sleep. They were then awoken again from their subsequent SWS period and exposed to the alternative condition (control or intervention). Following this second awakening, participants were allowed to sleep until their habitual wake time and were then released from the laboratory. Participants then followed the at-home sleep schedule and returned to the laboratory for the second intervention (light or peppermint) following the procedures described above. The light intervention involved exposure to a blue-enriched light canvas illuminated for 1 hour at a distance of ~56 cm from the participant (~200 lux and ~60 melanopic lux at angle of gaze). For the peppermint intervention, peppermint oil was pipetted onto a mask, and participants inhaled the odor with the mask covering the nose and mouth for 1 minute. The control condition for both weeks involved a dim, red ambient light (<1 lux). An odorless mask, without any oil pipetted onto the mask, was also worn in the peppermint control condition. Results: Compared to the control condition, participants exposed to blue-enriched light had fewer PVT lapses (χ2 = 5.285, p = .022), reported feeling more alert (KSS: F1,77 = 4.955, p = .029; VASalert: F1,77 = 8.226, p = .005), and had improved mood (VAScheerful: F1,77 = 8.615, p = .004; VASdepressed: F1,77 = 4.649, p = .034; VASlethargic: F1,77 = 5.652, p = .020). Exposure to peppermint oil did not improve any outcome measures on any of the tasks compared to control condition (p > .05). Conclusions: We found that participants had fewer lapses of attention upon awakening when exposed to blue-enriched light compared to dim, red light. In addition, participants reported feeling more alert, more cheerful, less depressed, and less lethargic in the blue-enriched light condition. Brief exposure to a peppermint odor, however, did not appear to improve performance, alertness, or mood under the experimental conditions. Our null results in the peppermint condition may have been due to methodological limitations such as the duration and method of administration. Given the need to mitigate the potential impact of sleep inertia on safety-critical tasks in on-call operations, our findings suggest that blue-enriched light exposure upon awakening may help to improve performance and alertness during the sleep inertia period following awakening from deep, nocturnal sleep. We are currently exploring the potential mechanisms for the effect of light on cognitive performance upon awakening as well as investigating its application in real-world settings to explore the translational efficacy of this countermeasure to occupational environments. Continued exploration into light and other reactive countermeasures, and potentially their combination, is needed in order to provide evidence-based guidance on effective sleep inertia countermeasures to improve the alertness and performance of those required to perform safety-critical tasks soon after waking.

sleep inertia↗
DOE OSTI2025

Final Design for Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) with Lithium Absorbers to Provide Validation Benchmarks for Y-12 Electrorefining Facility

One of the main goals of the Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) project is to use existing Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) assets to create critical experiment plutonium and uranium test beds for materials important to criticality safety that have insufficient benchmark evaluations. The plutonium test bed experiments were completed in 2018 and are published in the 2020 edition of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The uranium test bed assemblies were completed in 2023 and accepted in the 2024 edition of the ICSBEP Handbook. The Nuclear Criticality Safety (NCS) group at Y-12 National Security Complex has identified programmatic need for validation cases for uranium electrorefining operations at Y-12. The electrorefining operation credits lithium enriched in 6 Li in addition to 35 Cl as absorbers in the design criticality safety evaluation for precluding criticality under upset conditions in the large and geometrically unfavorable electro-refiner. There is, however, inadequate experimental validation for the 6 Li absorbers. As an extension of the TEX uranium test bed, TEX-Cl critical experiments were performed with sodium chloride salt to address the 35 Cl thermal absorption as well as other validation needs at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). These experiments were completed in 2024 and accepted into the 2025 ICSBEP Handbook. To continue the methodology used in TEX-Cl, TEX-Li aims to accomplish the same. The overall design of both experiments was to use commercially available, high purity, salts with polyethylene moderator and HEU plates to configure a critical assembly. Three experiments are planned for TEX-Li using encapsulated lithium carbonate (Li 2 CO 3 ), with natural 6 Li abundance. For all experiments, the highly enriched uranium (HEU) Jemima plates will be used as fissile material. Multiple layers will be stacked together with encapsulated Li 2 CO 3 alternated with polyethylene in standard configurations. Standard stacking was found to be optimal in matching the different sensitivity profiles provided by the Y-12 models. Three configurations are proposed with varying polyethylene moderation and a constant 1/4” absorber thickness. The first uses 11 layers of 5/4” polyethylene, the second uses 9 layers of 3/4” polyethylene, and the third uses 10 layers of 1/2” polyethylene. Calculations showed that some alternative forms of lithium-based materials provided slightly less-optimal sensitivity profiles when compared to lithium carbonate but come with other drawbacks. These alternatives included lithium aluminate (LiAlO 2 ), Aluminum-2050 alloy, Aluminum-8090, Aluminum-2095, lithium hydride (LiH), and lithium fluoride (LiF). Lithium aluminate and aluminum-2050 provided comparable sensitivity profiles when compared to lithium carbonate and can be used instead if lithium carbonate cannot be readily procured. After a broad material study, lithium carbonate outperformed any alternative material with a balance in affordability and workability. The assessment of experimental uncertainties of the non-absorber and absorber components was predicted to be 0.00089 and 0.00093 Δk eff , respectively. The largest uncertainties may be reduced with precision dimensional inspection of the components. Many of the parts and equipment for IER 575 have already been fabricated or procured for previous projects and therefore do not contribute significantly to the overall cost of this experiment. This includes the Jemima plates and Comet critical assembly machine, which are existing NCSP assets, as well as the aluminum platen and polyethylene reflector rings, which were fabricated and authorized for the TEX experiment involving HEU with polyethylene. Lithium carbonate containers will be procured by LANL and will be filled by LLNL. The total material costs for TEX-Li experiments are estimated to be on the order of $\$$47,400. Precision inspection, including dimensional, mass, density, and impurity, is recommended for all components for an estimated cost of $\$$12,000.

35Cl↗
DOE OSTI2022

Integral Experiment Final Design for Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) using Highly Enriched Uranium with Polyethylene at Low Temperature (IER-479 CED-2 Report)

The goal of IER-479 is to design uranium critical experiments that can be used to validate low temperature cross sections and criticality safety analyses over multiple neutron energy regimes. Currently, there are no benchmarks in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) handbook at temperatures lower than room temperature (International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook, 2019). However, there are many needs for validation of criticality safety analysis at lower temperatures, including meeting transportation requirements and operations conducted outside or in unheated facilities. Additionally, NCSP has funded North Carolina State (NCSU) to generate new thermal scattering laws, including at lower temperatures, and the lack of integral benchmarks impedes data testing of these new cross sections. To address these needs, this report will present a critical experiment design covering various fission energy regimes with a goal temperature of -40°C (-40°F), which is based on the lower bound of expected non-cryogenic operational temperatures. The goal of the U.S. Nuclear Criticality Safety Program’s (NCSP) Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) is to design and conduct new critical experiments to address high priority nuclear data needs from the nuclear criticality safety and nuclear data communities. The TEX program includes two series of baseline experimental configurations, one based on plutonium fuel (plutonium-aluminum Zero Power Physics Reactor (ZPPR) plates) and the other based on uranium fuel (highly enriched uranium (HEU) plates), that are moderated with varying thickness of polyethylene to create assemblies which span the thermal, intermediate, and fast fission energy regimes. The configurations are designed to be easily modified (for example, to add diluent materials of interest) to allow for efficient generation of additional benchmark configurations and allow for added nuclear data testing utility when comparing modified configurations to baseline configurations. The goal of IER-479 is to use the TEX-HEU concept (stack of HEU plates and polyethylene moderators) to design a critical experiment that can be used to validate low temperature cross sections and criticality safety analyses.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS2012

Modeling and Analysis of Mixed Synchronous/Asynchronous Systems

Practical safety-critical distributed systems must integrate safety critical and non-critical data in a common platform. Safety critical systems almost always consist of isochronous components that have synchronous or asynchronous interface with other components. Many of these systems also support a mix of synchronous and asynchronous interfaces. This report presents a study on the modeling and analysis of asynchronous, synchronous, and mixed synchronous/asynchronous systems. We build on the SAE Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL) to capture architectures for analysis. We present preliminary work targeted to capture mixed low- and high-criticality data, as well as real-time properties in a common Model of Computation (MoC). An abstract, but representative, test specimen system was created as the system to be modeled.

Driscoll, Kevin R.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Initial Efforts Organizing WPNCS SG-8: Preservation of Expert Knowledge and Judgement Applied to Criticality Benchmarks

The Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (WPNCS) under the guidance of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) has over 20 years of experience addressing concerns related to static and transient configurations encountered within the nuclear fuel cycle: fuel fabrication, transportation, reprocessing, storage, and geological disposal. One of the cornerstone activities of the WPNCS is the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP), which was established to identify a comprehensive set of criticality benchmark data, evaluate the data, including quantification of overall uncertainties; compile the data into a standardized format, perform sample calculations utilizing modern nuclear data sets and codes utilized in nuclear criticality safety, and formally document the work into a single source of verified benchmark data. Annually, members of the ICSBEP Technical Review Group (TRG) contribute evaluated benchmark data that undergoes comprehensive technical review prior to publication in the ICSBEP Handbook. In the years since the ICSBEP was established, there has been much work to prepare benchmark data to support validation activities in nuclear criticality safety. The 2020 edition of the ICSBEP Handbook contains acceptable benchmark specifications for 5,053 critical, subcritical, or near-critical configurations in 582 benchmark evaluations. Modern benchmark development benefits from decades of experienced international participants, a well-established handbook format, supplementary guides to deal with uncertainty quantification, and a comprehensive review process based upon independent reviews from international experts. The ICSBEP Handbook also contains 838 configurations deemed unacceptable to support criticality safety efforts. They are recorded, with the reasoning for their rejection, to preserve the experimental data, prevent reevaluation of data that are incomplete or contain known errors, and/or to potentially allow future reevaluation of the experiment pending the identification of sufficient data to resolve identified inconsistencies and errors. Users of the ICSBEP Handbook today might notice that the rigor and quality of modern criticality safety benchmarks is much greater than those prepared within the initial decade of the project. Benchmarks with 1s uncertainties in k eff greater than 1% were traditionally rejected unless they were identified as unique experiment types that encompassed materials, fuels, or designs not available from other benchmark experiments. However, benchmarks developed using modern experimental techniques and practices typically have uncertainties on the order of a few tenths of a percent. There have been ongoing efforts to improve the overall quality of previously published benchmark evaluations. Seventy-eight evaluations, containing approximately 600 configurations, have been revised just within the past decade. An additional eleven benchmarks are under revision for updated release in the 2020 edition of the ICSBEP Handbook. If some of the historic benchmarks were resubmitted in their current form to the TRG today, they would be rejected due to lack of data, missing components in the uncertainty analysis, or incomplete benchmark model development. The use of historic criticality safety benchmarks that underestimate the total uncertainty, lack properly quantified biases, or provide inadequate benchmark specifications do not sufficiently support modern criticality safety and nuclear data efforts. Although the ICSBEP Handbook is recognized by regulating bodies to support criticality safety, users are required to justify their reasons to ignore historic benchmark data and include additional safety margins within their designs. Discussions were held at the WPNCS 23rd Annual Meeting in September 2019 regarding the aforementioned issues. The resultant decision was to establish Subgroup 8 (SG-8): Preservation of Expert Knowledge and Judgement Applied to Criticality Benchmarks. The current activities of SG-8 are discussed herein.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Performance of the Initial Implementation of the Shift Monte Carlo Code in SCALE 6.3

The Shift Monte Carlo code will be introduced in SCALE 6.3 as an alternative to the KENO V.a, KENO-VI, and Monaco codes. Calculations were performed to establish the performance of Shift for criticality safety analyses within the criticality safety analyses sequence (CSAS) based on models in the Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID). This test suite contains over 600 critical experiment models covering a broad range of fissile materials and neutron energy spectra. The comparisons presented include calculated k eff values and runtime performance for serial calculations and a selection of parallel calculations. Comparisons are presented for multigroup (MG) and continuous-energy (CE) calculations for KENO V.a and KENO-VI models. Results generated with a beta version of SCALE 6.3 indicate excellent agreement in k eff values between KENO and Shift. The largest differences in the average k eff value calculated for the 15 categories of KENO V.a models are 0.00020 ± 0.00011 Δ k for MG calculations and 0.00011 ± 0.00005 Δ k for CE calculations. Similar comparisons in three categories using KENO-VI result in the largest differences for MG calculations: as 0.00004 ± 0.00003 Δ k , and -0.00002 ± 0.00003 Δ k for CE. The preliminary results also indicate that Shift is faster than KENO on a per particle basis, especially for fast spectrum systems. The uncertainty per history is also higher, however, so the Monte Carlo figure of merit is higher for KENO for thermal and intermediate spectrum systems. As expected, Shift generally has better speedup than KENO for parallel calculations, regardless of neutron energy spectrum.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

IER-539 CED-1: Preliminary Design of a New Horizontal Split Table

This report presents the preliminary design (CED-1) of IER-539, focused on a new Horizontal Split Table (HST) critical assembly machine. The Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) funds critical experiment R&D and its Mission and Vision document identifies a long-standing technical gap of a general purpose HST. HSTs have historically been used for experiments that are impractical to assemble on a vertical lift machine (VLM), usually due to their large physical size or weight. While many HSTs were historically employed in the US (including at LLNL), there are currently no surviving HSTs in the US. While there are two critical experiments facilities remaining in the US, the National Critical Experiments Research Center (NCERC) operated by LANL and the Critical Experiments Facility (CX) operated by SNL, these facilities are not equipped with a general purpose HST. There are a number of experiment designs that require an HST, including needs for Defense Programs and Nuclear Energy. Lack of an HST constraints the national ability to perform large and heavy experiments. Large footprints are needed to successfully create mockup experiments for advanced reactors (mock-up cold critical reactor cores, which is a urgent need for new reactor designs using novel materials and longer cycle lengths), to create solution experiments in lattices, or to test nuclear data of heavy metals. A new HST is a vital piece of criticality experiment infrastructure that would allow for the conduct of integral critical experiments to address needs in the nuclear criticality safety, nuclear data, and other DOE stakeholder communities.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2022

IER-517: Molybdenum Optimized Benchmark System Demonstrating Integral Correlations (MOBY DICK)

Nuclear criticality experiments are essential to the validation of nuclear data used in simulation software. The quality of nuclear data becomes paramount as simulation software becomes more relied upon for criticality safety studies and designs of nuclear systems. To improve the quality of nuclear data, experimenters can design critical experiments that are sensitive to isotope reaction pairs in materials of interest. The efforts conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD-NEA) Working Party on Nuclear Criticality Safety (WPNCS) Subgroup 8: Preservation of Expert Knowledge and Judgement Applied to Criticality Benchmarks (SG8) to categorize benchmarks according to their usefulness for nuclear data validation have been of great importance. Based on the OECD studies benchmark experiments included in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook are concisely used by nuclear data evaluators, criticality safety engineers and others to validate nuclear data and simulation results. A lack of benchmarks sensitive to molybdenum in the (ICSBEP), particularly in the intermediate range, was noted by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), and Y-12 National Security Site prompting them to submit a joint integral experiment request to the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) in 2019. The request included both HEU and Plutonium systems in order to validate differential nuclear data focusing on the intermediate energy range but also includes thermal and fast configurations. This document represents the preliminary design work for a series of molybdenum integral experiments known as Molybdenum Optimized Benchmark System Demonstrating Integral Correlations (MOBY DICK).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗