DOE OSTI2019
In the summer of 2017, a series of measurements were performed at the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) in collaboration with the Japanese Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) to measure the reactivity worth of voids in an array of lead and plutonium. This experiment, called Jupiter, measured multiple configurations of an array of aluminum boxes containing plutonium, aluminum, and lead plates. For some configurations, a selection of the lead interstitial plates were swapped with aluminum spacer frames to create “voids” in the lead interstitial material. Comparing the excess reactivity of the systems provides an empirical value of the lead void reactivity worth. These measurements were part of a larger collaboration to measure lead void reactivity worth with multiple nuclear material types and enrichments. This included other measurement series with both highly-enriched uranium (HEU), and a mixture of HEU and natural uranium to simulate low-enriched uranium (LEU). These data sets will be useful to the JAEA for a potential lead-bismuth cooled accelerator driven system. Additionally, there are not very many benchmarks in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) handbook sensitive to lead cross sections. Given that lead is widely used as a radiation shield and is part of new reactor designs, having more benchmarks in the ICSBEP handbook to better support cross section validation is important. Additional integral experiments could also aid in determining whether improvements have been made in new lead cross section evaluations. A benchmark evaluation for this experiment is being proposed in order to help fulfill these needs. Such evaluations contain both measured data, results from detailed transport code models, and analyses of the uncertainties associated with each. Examples of these uncertainties include the uncertainty in the measured excess reactivity, the composition of components, or their positioning within the model. This means it is easier to make comparisons between the measured and simulated data and better understand where improvements can be made to nuclear data.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗