Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Critical Benchmarks”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Progress on the reevaluation and validation of the n+233U neutron cross sections

The set of 233 U resonance parameters of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data library was adopted from the previous ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluation using the external levels to update the thermal values. Adoption of IAEA 2017 thermal standards ( σ f = 533.0 ± 2.2 b, σ c = 44.9 ± 0.9 b, and ν ‾ tot = 2.487 ± 0.011 ) and of the IAEA-recommended thermal-neutron induced prompt fission neutron spectrum (PFNS) with average PFNS energy of 2.030 ± 0.013 MeV requires a re-evaluation of 233 U neutron cross sections in the resolved resonance region. A newly produced evaluation is being tested on benchmarks carefully selected from the Handbook of International Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP) which are highly sensitive to 233 U data. An important goal of this work was to eliminate the strong negative gradient of the calculated effective multiplication factors with respect to the epithermal fission fraction observed in the validation of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library for those assemblies. A significant improvement in integral performance of critical 233 U solutions is observed for the newly proposed evaluation. Further work addressing the fast neutron region is needed.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

MUSiC: Critical Experiment with Bare Highly Enriched Uranium Shells Benchmark

The measurements of the Uranium Subcritical and Critical (MUSiC) experiment were performed from December 2020 through April 2021. The purpose of the experiment was to test a variety of multiplicity detection systems for a large range of multiplication values and to see how well they perform as the k eff of the MUSiC series of experiments approached the delayed critical window. Out of the ten configurations that were studied, two of them were super critical and were recently approved as benchmarks and they will be included in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICBESP) handbook. For each of the two experiments, uncertainties were evaluated six categories: (1) critical measurement, (2) mass, (3) composition, (4) positioning, (5) dimensions, and (6) temperature. The largest contribution to the overall uncertainty in each of the cases was due to the uncertainties in the dimensions of the HEU Rocky Flats shells. Simplified detailed models were created with an average bias of -130.5 pcm due to the removal various components surrounding the experiment. For MCNP6.2 models using ENDF-VIII.0 neutron cross section data, the average difference between the calculated and benchmark k effs was -54 pcm for the detailed model and -102 pcm for the simplified model.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Initial Delayed Critical Configuration of SHEBA I and Subcritical Measurements by Californium Source-Driven Noise Analysis

In September 1980, the initial delayed critical configuration of the Solution High-Energy Burst Assembly (SHEBA I) was assembled, and the US Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) staff performed near critical and subcritical measurements using the californium source-driven noise analysis (CSDNA) method at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Critical Experiments Facility. An unreflected 56 cm outside diameter stainless-steel cylindrical tank was partially filled with uranyl fluoride solution (235U enrichment was 4.95 wt %) until delayed criticality was achieved. Then, measurements were performed for various fuel solution heights from delayed critical to 60% of the height required for delayed criticality. The stainless-steel tank had an inside diameter of 54.6 cm and a height of 105 cm and was partially (20–36.5 cm) filled with an aqueous solution of uranyl fluoride (with a density of 2.162 g/cm 3 ). The density of the uranium in solution was 1.042 g/cm 3 , and the solution had a H/U atomic ratio of 20.43. The tank had a 6.35 mm wall thickness and an axial reentrant tube with an inside diameter of 6.02 cm and wall thickness of 0.165 cm. The tank was essentially unreflected on the top and sides because it was in a thin metal shed. The reactivity of the near–delayed critical configuration was −10.4 cents, which corresponds to a k eff value of 0.99922. In addition to the CSDNA measurements, the prompt neutron decay constants were determined from break frequency noise analysis (BNFA) measurements. The subcritical neutron multiplication factors from CSDNA and BFNA compared extremely well. These data can be used as the basis of International Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluation benchmark for the near-critical configuration, and the k eff values at various subcritical configurations can be used as subcritical benchmarks. Furthermore, the measured prompt neutron decay constants can be used as reactor physics benchmarks. This report documents the experimental information for the measurements performed so that, at a later date, researchers could perform the required uncertainty and calculational analyses and documentation to use these data for an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Program (ICSBEP) or Nuclear Energy Agency benchmarks. The measured prompt neutron decay constants can be used as the basis of a benchmark for the International Reactor Physics Evaluation Program (IRPhEP). The data from these measurements are available from the ORNL Records Management Services Department, and the logbook is available from ICSBEP at Idaho National Laboratory.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Design of Critical Experiments Involving Graphite elements at the IPEN/MB-01 Plate-Type Core

A series of critical experiments were designed involving the use of characterized graphite elements in the new plate-type core of the IPEN/MB-01 reactor. Eleven configurations with different graphite quantities are considered, each producing distinct effects on neutron fluxes and offering opportunities to analyze varying sensitivities to k eff in the system. The analysis shows that the experiments can be performed with acceptably low k eff uncertainties considering an adequate characterization of the graphite elements to be used. The sensitivity results obtained using SCALE TSUNAMI calculations show that the experiments have a notable k eff sensitivity coefficient to graphite. In the configurations tested, the k eff sensitivity to graphite TSL is low. This experiment will be useful for criticality safety validation of applications using uranium fuel enriched to around 19.75 wt % 235 U, light water and graphite. It will also be useful to gain more insight into graphite material properties and their effect on k eff as a result of using the well-characterized graphite elements. The execution of the experiments is planned for the summer of 2025. The 11 designed configurations serve as a basis for the final design, and fewer configurations will be executed. Once executed, these critical experiments will be evaluated and submitted for publication in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook, supporting the DOE/NRC Collaboration for Criticality Safety Support for Commercial-Scale HALEU for Fuel Cycles and Transportation project goal.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Experiments to Measure the Effect of Tantalum on Critical Systems

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) collaborated to develop a capability to test the epithermal/intermediate cross sections of materials at the SNL critical experiment facility using the Seven Percent Critical Experiment (7uPCX) fuel. As a result, a new set of critical experiments has been designed to target the epithermal cross sections of tantalum (Ta) and is scheduled to be performed at SNL in 2023. These critical experiments will be evaluated for inclusion in the 2024 edition of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The focus of these critical experiments is to measure the effects of Ta on the critical array size. The critical array size will be determined by an approach-to-critical experiment with the number of fuel rods in the array as a free parameter. The core configurations are designed to optimize the reactivity worth of Ta and the overall percentage of Ta absorption rates in the epithermal/intermediate energy range (0.625 eV – 100 keV). The baseline core configuration includes 7uPCX fuel rods set at a triangular pitch of 1.016 cm and a central dry test region that utilizes a cadmium liner for filtering out thermal neutrons. The central test region has locations for 85 Ta rods set at a triangular pitch of 0.813 cm. The Ta reactivity worth for the case with 85 Ta rods is approximately 2.55%, with the percentage of Ta absorption rates within the intermediate energy range at nearly 90%.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Data Testing CIELO Evaluations with ICSBEP Benchmarks

We review criticality data testing performed at Los Alamos with a combination of ENDF/B-VII.1 + potential CIELO nuclear data evaluations. The goal of CIELO is to develop updated, best available evaluated nuclear data files for 1 H, 16 O, 56 Fe, 235,238 U and 239 Pu. because the major international evaluated nuclear data libraries don’t agree on the internal cross section details of these most important nuclides.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Review of Experimental Data for Validating Computer Codes Used in Shielding Calculations for Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Systems

This report presents a review of available radiochemical assay data and shielding benchmarks applicable to spent nuclear fuel (SNF) shielding calculations. The relevant information reviewed herein includes the Spent Fuel Composition (SFCOMPO) database, the Shielding Integral Benchmark Archive and Database (SINBAD), the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments, and published measurements of external dose rates of casks loaded with SNF. The relevant experimental data identified in this report may be used to support verification and validation of computer codes used in SNF cask/transport shielding applications, as well as development of calculation uncertainties. It should be noted that a relatively small subset of the identified experimental data (e.g., criticality alarm experiments) is available in a standard format established by the international community participating in experimental isotopic and shielding data evaluations. An effort of the SFCOMPO Technical Review Group (TRG) is underway to publish first isotopic evaluations of individual assay data using a standard data evaluation format. The SINBAD TRG has recently initiated benchmark evaluations and modernization of the database. Therefore, more relevant information is expected in the future that will enable users to select quality experimental data in depletion code and shielding code validations for SNF applications.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2012

OECD/NEA expert group on uncertainty analysis for criticality safety assessment: Results of benchmark on sensitivity calculation (phase III)

The sensitivities of the k{sub eff} eigenvalue to neutron cross sections have become commonly used in similarity studies and as part of the validation algorithm for criticality safety assessments. To test calculations of the sensitivity coefficients, a benchmark study (Phase III) has been established by the OECD-NEA/WPNCS/EG UACSA (Expert Group on Uncertainty Analysis for Criticality Safety Assessment). This paper presents some sensitivity results generated by the benchmark participants using various computational tools based upon different computational methods: SCALE/TSUNAMI-3D and -1D, MONK, APOLLO2-MORET 5, DRAGON-SUSD3D and MMKKENO. The study demonstrates the performance of the tools. It also illustrates how model simplifications impact the sensitivity results and demonstrates the importance of 'implicit' (self-shielding) sensitivities. This work has been a useful step towards verification of the existing and developed sensitivity analysis methods. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

HEU Systems at Low Temperatures [Slides]

This project is sponsored by the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) in collaboration with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) with a novel interest surrounding the transportation of fissile material: there is a concern regarding the inadvertent introduction of the material in a low-temperature environment. The low-temperature environment will be bounded down to temperatures not below -40 ºC, since this is the limit allotted for packages containing general radioactive material exposed to air. Eventually, the goal of the project is to conduct experiments spanning multiple fission energies at these low temperatures, concluding in an International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) benchmark.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2014

An Overview of the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project

Interest in high-quality integral benchmark data is increasing as efforts to quantify and reduce calculational uncertainties associated with advanced modeling and simulation accelerate to meet the demands of next generation reactor and advanced fuel cycle concepts. Two Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) activities, the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP), initiated in 1992, and the International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP), initiated in 2003, have been identifying existing integral experiment data, evaluating those data, and providing integral benchmark specifications for methods and data validation for nearly two decades. Data provided by those two projects will be of use to the international reactor physics, criticality safety, and nuclear data communities for future decades. An overview of the IRPhEP and a brief update of the ICSBEP are provided in this paper.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

SCALE 6.2.4 Validation: Radiation Shielding

For safe and reliable use of computer codes by the community, accuracy must be clearly evaluated. In particular, the nuclear reactor engineering and licensing field needs accurate tools for radiation shielding modeling. Monaco with Automated Variance Reduction using Importance Calculations (MAVRIC) is one such tool, with built-in variance reduction methods distributed within the SCALE code, and its validity is demonstrated in this report for the released version 6.2.4. Representative benchmarks corresponding to shielding analysis are selected for the validation study. Typical experimental results analyzed from those benchmarks include neutron fluxes, detector count rates, detector energy response functions, neutron and gamma doses, foil neutron activation rates and activities, neutron leakage fluxes, and skyshine dose rates. Thousands of points of comparison between experiment and calculation are presented in this work. Other than rare outliers typically explained by either a lack of information or large uncertainties in the experiment conditions, material, or dimensions, MAVRIC agrees well with the experiment results. MAVRIC is also compared to Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) calculations when available, and both codes generally produce good agreements within estimated uncertainties. The selected benchmarks are obtained from reliable sources such as the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook (ICSBEP Handbook), the Shielding Integral Benchmark Archive & Database (SINBAD), and other shielding validation work found in the literature. Additional datapoints and benchmarks will be added to future versions of this report to incrementally expand the shielding validation suite incrementally.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2017

Determination of critical experiment correlations for experiments involving highly enriched uranium solutions

Quantifying the correlations among critical experiments has become a topic of interest over the last 10-15 years. The correlations arise from the shared use of fissile material, non-fissile materials, fixtures, and procedures in multiple experiments or multiple experiment series. A Monte Carlo sampling technique proposed as a viable technical method to evaluate these correlations has been implemented within the SCALE 6.2 Sampler sequence. This paper presents the investigation of the use of this new tool and technique for highly enriched uranium solution experiments. One of the first attempts to quantify the correlations among critical experiments examined a series of highly enriched solution experiments, including the HST-001 series. These correlations are included in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook, and they form a basis for methodology comparisons. Results generated using the Sampler implementation are compared with these previously published results. Additional studies involving the HST-001 experiment series are also presented. A range of different assumptions of the independence of the geometry components, enrichments, and other material compositions are implemented to investigate the impact of these assumptions on the correlation coefficients. These effects are investigated with these experiments because the calculation time is shorter for the solution experiments than for the low-enriched lattice experiments discussed in a companion paper. The magnitude of the effects of different independence assumptions on the correlation coefficients is important to establish which parameters must be clearly identified as shared or unique for accurate correlation determinations. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Testing of ENDF/B-VIII.0 in the GNDS format with LLNL transport codes - 25606

ENDF/B-VIII.0 was released in the Evaluated Nuclear Data Format and the Generalized Nuclear Data Structure format (GNDS), a new international standard for storing nuclear data developed under the auspices of the Nuclear Energy Agency Working Party on Evaluation Cooperation Subgroup 38. GNDS relies on modern coding practices, and offers a structured, flexible and physics-based standard for storing and exchanging nuclear data to address limitations in legacy nuclear data formats such as ENDF-6. GNDS supports the storage of evaluated nuclear data as well as processed data suitable for both deterministic (i.e., multi-group) and Monte Carlo transport codes. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has implemented a complete suite of codes to test GNDS data. Simulations for the ENDF/B-VIII.0 cross-section library in GNDS format are presented. Deterministic and Monte Carlo radiation transport simulations with the Ardra and Mercury codes respectively, are validated against reactivities in fast criticality safety benchmark assemblies. Finally, Mercury simulations of {sup 238}U(n,f), {sup 237}Np(n,f) and {sup 239}Pu(n,f) reaction rates in Godiva, Jezebel and Flattop are compared to MCNP results and measured data. (authors)

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗
DOE OSTI2013

The SCALE Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data - VALID

The Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) at ORNL contains high quality, independently reviewed models and results that improve confidence in analysis. VALID is developed and maintained according to a procedure of the SCALE quality assurance (QA) plan. This paper reviews the origins of the procedure and its intended purpose, the philosophy of the procedure, some highlights of its implementation, and the future of the procedure and associated VALID library. The original focus of the procedure was the generation of high-quality models that could be archived at ORNL and applied to many studies. The review process associated with model generation minimized the chances of errors in these archived models. Subsequently, the scope of the library and procedure was expanded to provide high quality, reviewed sensitivity data files for deployment through the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (IHECSBE). Sensitivity data files for approximately 400 such models are currently available. The VALID procedure and library continue fulfilling these multiple roles. The VALID procedure is based on the quality assurance principles of ISO 9001 and nuclear safety analysis. Some of these key concepts include independent generation and review of information, generation and review by qualified individuals, use of appropriate references for design data and documentation, and retrievability of the models, results, and documentation associated with entries in the library. Some highlights of the detailed procedure are discussed to provide background on its implementation and to indicate limitations of data extracted from VALID for use by the broader community. Specifically, external users of data generated within VALID must take responsibility for ensuring that the files are used within the QA framework of their organization and that use is appropriate. The future plans for the VALID library include expansion to include additional experiments from the IHECSBE, to include experiments from areas beyond criticality safety, such as reactor physics and shielding, and to include application models. In the future, external SCALE users may also obtain qualification under the VALID procedure and be involved in expanding the library. The VALID library provides a pathway for the criticality safety community to leverage modeling and analysis expertise at ORNL.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2013

Integral Benchmark Data for Nuclear Data Testing Through the ICSBEP & IRPhEP

The status of the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) and International Reactor Physics Experiment Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) was last discussed directly with the nuclear data community at ND2007. Since ND2007, integral benchmark data that are available for nuclear data testing have increased significantly. The status of the ICSBEP and the IRPhEP is discussed and selected benchmark configurations that have been added to the ICSBEP and IRPhEP Handbooks since ND2007 are highlighted.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Jemima Plate Characterization

The HEU Jemima plates have been utilized in numerous International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) evaluations. ICSBEP evaluations are a vital com ponent of nuclear data validation for applications across the nuclear community. In the past, different combinations of mass, caliper measurements, and drawing dimensions have been used to define the HEU Jemima plates in ICSBEP evaluations. Some of these combinations result in large density ranges (17 g/cm 3 to 19 g/cm 3 ) or unrealistic densities (greater than 19 g/cm 3 ). Additionally, oxidation of the plates has led to questioning the flatness of each plate, which can add additional gaps in experiment configurations. This work proposes a standardized method of defining the commonly used HEU Jemima plates across different experiments.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Minimum critical masses and their uncertainties for several fissile nuclides and reflectors - 14296

A systematic effort was undertaken to reevaluate the minimum critical mass for several fissile nuclides and reflectors. This was done using MCNP6 in combination with several modern nuclear data libraries, viz. ENDF/B-VII.1, JENDL-4.0 and JEFF-3.1.1. This combination was benchmarked extensively against criticality safety benchmarks. The procedure to extract the minimum critical mass from the MCNP6 calculations was carefully implemented, so that it would have a negligible impact on the accuracy of the end results. All parts of the calculation, i.e. nuclear data processing, MCNP6 models, and post-processing, were applied consistently for all cases, involving varying fissile nuclides and reflectors. Results for the minimum critical mass were generated for {sup 233,235}U, {sup 236,239,241}Pu, {sup 242m}Am, {sup 243,245,247}Cm, and {sup 249,251}Cf, for the case of water moderation and water reflection. For {sup 235}U, the minimum critical mass was also calculated for cases with other reflectors, such as beryllium, heavy water, graphite, lead, and concrete. The results for the water reflection cases are in good agreement with most of the literature values, but for the cases with reflectors such as graphite, lead, or concrete, there are sizable differences. The accuracy of the results was assessed in two ways. First, a comparison was made with criticality safety benchmark results, by selecting benchmarks that resemble the minimum mass systems the most. It was clear that for {sup 233,235}U and {sup 239}Pu with water reflection, the differences in minimum critical masses between the libraries are consistent with the differences obtained for benchmark cases. The difference between the benchmark calculations and the benchmark values is then an indication of the accuracy with which one can simulate comparable systems. Secondly, sensitivity runs were performed with the new MCNP6 sensitivity option, based on ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data. For each fissile nuclide, the sensitivity of k{sub eff} to cross sections such as capture, fission, elastic, inelastic was calculated for the minimum critical mass case. The same was done for the {sup 1}H and {sup 16}O cross sections in the moderator and reflector. The uncertainty in k{sub eff} was calculated by combining the sensitivity profiles with the appropriate ENDF/B-VII.1 covariance matrix, using the SUSD code. As a final step, the uncertainty in k{sub eff} can be translated to an uncertainty in the minimum critical mass. (author)

42 ENGINEERING↗