SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This report describes the calculations and simulations to determine the optimal guide coatings for the NB5 (GP-SANS) beam line post beryllium reflector changeout. The reported guide performance meets the GP-SANS scientific requirements document.
When designing a novel reactor, nuclear experiments are essential to validate the predictive capability of modeling/simulation tools and to justify the investment of a full-scale prototype. Being able to accurately predict temperature reactivity coefficients is of high importance to reactor designers as it impacts the safety and performance of the system. Deimos is a proposed graphite-moderated, beryllium-reflected, high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fueled experiment for NCERC. Deimos is a valuable experiment for validating the predictive performance of modeling and simulation tools since it comprises a relatively thermal energy spectrum with 84% thermal neutrons causing fission, 15% epithermal neutrons causing fission, and 1% fast neutrons causing fission. Additionally, by electrically heating the experiment, reactivity can be validated at various temperatures. Deimos will serve as a testbed for future advanced reactor concepts.
The purpose of this proposal is to design a new integral critical experiment to investigate the effects of beryllium oxide and high assay low-enriched uranium fuels. this proposal considers using several existing resources at Sandia: (1) the Critical Experiments (SCX) facility and water tank, (2) spare UO 2 -BeO fuel for the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR), and 7uPCX fuel rods from previous benchmark experiments.
Our program focuses on the behavior of two-dimensional superconducting systems that have been placed in high magnetic fields and/or in contact with magnetic materials. Our specific research agenda is organized into two separate but related areas. The first is a study of disorder and correlation effects in extremely thin superconducting aluminum, beryllium, and rhenium films that have been subjected to very high magnetic fields. We are particularly interested in understanding how the coupling between the applied field and the electron spins affects the system’s ability to form superconducting state. We now have good evidence that as the electron spins in these superconductors attempt to align to the magnetic field, a new superconducting phase emerges near the critical field transition and that this phase has a significant influence on the character of the transition. Thus, the spin behavior near the transition is much more complex than expected. The second class of systems is proximity structures comprised of superconducting/ferromagnetic (SC/FM) and superconducting/heavy metal (SC/HM) bilayers. We have developed spin-resolved tunneling probes that give us a direct measure of the proximity-induced exchange field in the SC/FM structures, as well as the spin-orbit scattering rate in SC/HM structures. Recently we have demonstrated that the magnitude of the exchange field can be modulated with an external gate, thereby producing a magneto-electric response in the bilayers. We plan to optimize this magneto-electric effect by getting a better understanding of the microscopic mechanism of the interface-induce exchange field, as well as improving the gate barriers and/or the bilayer interface quality. The ultimate goal is to develop a device such as a voltage-controlled superconducting switch or a spin- polarized electron source with a voltage-tunable Zeeman splitting.
Problem: Advanced nuclear reactors come in many sizes, materials, and designs; Criticality experiments are necessary to understand, quantify, and validate these reactors. Approach: The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) operated by Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) conducts criticality experiments; Deimos is a graphite-moderated, beryllium-reflected, high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fueled experiment; Modeling and simulation is needed to design Deimos.
Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is developing a small microreactor to produce electrical power utilizing a small nuclear core and stirling engines for power output under the Microreactor Application Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) program. The MARVEL Reactor (Figure 1) will be installed in the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility. Walsh Engineering Services, PC (WES) has contracted with the INL to detail the final design. There are six main systems in the MARVEL, one of which is the Fuel and Core System (FCS). The FCS contains a subsystem–the Core Support Structures Subsystem (CSS)–that supports and orients each of the 36 nuclear fuel pins in the MARVEL Reactor System. The FCS (apart from the fixed Beryllium Oxide radial reflectors) is shown in light green and is depicted in more detail in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The main subject of this analysis is the lower grid plate, which is the principal item in the CSS which supports the fuel, see Figure 3. Additionally, the upper grid plate thermal expansion of the upper grid plate is presented in Appendix A.
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and INL have developed a GRIFFIN steady state neutronics model for the multiphysics simulations of the Kilopower Reactor Using Sterling TechnologY (KRUSTY) microreactor in the Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE). The reliability of such deterministic neutronics models can be validated by comparing with computations from Monte Carlo codes (e.g. MCNP, SERPENT, OpenMC, Shift, etc). Furthermore, potential modeling/design improvements can be identified by incorporating uncertainty quantification (UQ), which can be performed by MOOSE’s Stochastic Tools Module (STM). KRUSTY is a prototype for a 5-kW thermal nuclear-powered space reactor. Its primary components consist of nuclear fuel, heat pipes, a control rod, a reflector, and the shielding. The fuel consists of 3 stacked U-7.65Mo cylinders with a hole in the center for the control rod. 8 liquid sodium heat pipes transfer fission energy from the solid fuel block to the Sterling power conversion system where the energy is extracted, and the cooled sodium flows back to the core via capillary action . The movable Boron Carbide control rod regulates the neutron population during startup or when a reactor temperature boost is needed . The beryllium oxide reflector is in 3 places in the reactor; it surrounds the core axially, it lies beneath the core on a platen, and it is present in the shim. The axial and lower reflectors rest on an adjustable stainless-steel platen that moves upward to cover the fuel and help the reactor reach criticality. Lastly, radial stainless steel surrounds the core offering protection from radiation exposure .
During this LDRD project, our team developed a technology which enables the fabrication of novel nanostructures replicating seashell – “nature’s toughest material”. The resulting coatings exhibit high thermal stability up to 1650°C, which exceeds the hardness of Spectra® by ~44%, as well as the compressive strength of aluminum by ~57%. Coatings made with this technology are stronger, environmentally friendly, more sustainable, and more versatile than other comparable materials. Beryllium wafers, the current, most favorable shielding material in terms of thermal and mechanical properties, are very toxic and cost hundreds of times more than the new material developed in this project. The coatings on silicon wafer and stainless steel, respectively, have been tested as ride-along on the Z machine and clearly outperform the bare substrate. Use of this technology will have a profound global impact for pulsed power and fusion energy development, debris mitigation for spacecraft and satellites, durability of drill bits used in deep well drilling and tunnel boring operations, thermal protection of aircraft and manned spacecraft, and various other thermal and mechanical protection applications.
Beam-intercepting devices such as beam windows and particle-production targets are critical components of accelerator target facilities for High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments. The high-power, pulsed structure of the particle beams used for these experiments leads to thermal shock and high-cycle fatigue in addition to radiation damage resulting from the accumulated particle fluence. This can lead to degradation of the target system s mechanical and thermal properties; considerably reducing their lifetimes and presenting substantial challenges to reliable operation of multi-MW class facilities. Recently several major accelerator facilities have been forced to operate at reduced power levels due to target survivability concerns. Furthermore, at Fermilab it is planned to increase the neutrino production beam power up to 2.4 MW in coming years. Therefore, timely R&D on the irradiated behavior of target system materials is critical to efficient operation of accelerator facilities and full utilization of recent accelerator power upgrades for HEP research. This talk will begin with an overview of high-power targetry, and the significant challenges presented by beam power increases expected for future HEP experiments. We will then cover several past materials irradiation studies that have been completed by the High-Power Targetry R&D group at Fermilab and its collaborators on common accelerator and target materials such as graphite, beryllium, titanium, and tungsten. Finally, we will conclude with a discussion of two novel materials investigations under way within the group; high-entropy alloys for beam window applications, and electrospun nanofibers to serve as particle production targets.
This report details an assessment of the hazards and safety impacts related to front-end operations of molten salt reactors (MSR) as well as an assessment of existing safety guidance. Publicly available information was evaluated to make recommendations to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for guidance development and information gathering needs. Five different MSR technologies were evaluated along with information from 1960’s about the Atomic Energy Commission programs for the Aircraft Reactor Experiment and Molten Salt Reactor Experiment. Primary areas of evaluation include fuel cycle facilities, transportation and at reactor fuel mixing operations up to reactor startup. In general, there was difficulty synthesizing publicly available information due to the early stage of the MSR development and proprietary information associated with the reactor technology companies analyzed. There are a few specific recommendations from this report. One overarching paradigm shift that the NRC needs to evaluate is the possibility of collocating fuel cycle facilities with operating MSRs. Although there is no specific prohibition to this in the NRC regulations, the collocation of the fuel cycle facilities with the operating MSR presents a novel approach compared to the light water reactor baseline. More guidance and research into thorium operations and regulation is needed. The hazards associated with the stability of stored fuel constituents need to be evaluated. Some reactor fuel cycles use beryllium, and its use and the associated hazards need further analysis. NRC-approved designs for transportation packages for shipping molten salt fuels and factory-built and fueled reactors are not available.
This technical report is in submission of completion of the Level 3 milestone number M3AT24OR1101032, titled “Complete Degradation of Be 2 C at conditions expected in molten salt environments,” for the AT-24OR110103 “Beryllium Carbide as moderator for MSRs—ORNL” WBS number 2.04.11.01 within the larger Advanced Reactor Technologies program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This effort is an initial study of the viability of Be 2 C as a future neutron moderator for molten salt reactors and other high-temperature reactors. The research was awarded funding in September 2022, and this Level 2 milestone presents the work that completed by the end of July 2023. This work is a collaboration between Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of Michigan. This report discusses the status of this effort and planned work before the final reporting.
Future energy production by sustainable clean energy technologies will be influenced by the availability and projected supply risks of critical minerals. In this report we discuss this context from the perspective of a sustainable nuclear energy technology and the benefits from the deployment of advanced manufacturing. In the past, the demand of critical minerals in the energy sector was minor, but in recent years renewable energy systems do force a substantial increase in the requirements for critical minerals which further induces pressure on the supply of critical minerals such as chromium, cobalt, nickel, niobium, tantalum, titanium, tungsten, vanadium, and zirconium for nuclear energy technology. The demand of critical minerals for nuclear technology is, besides beryllium and hafnium, minor and less than 1 % of the world supply. This alleviates the negative impact as the nuclear industry may not be able to provide the most compelling priority for the suppliers and to other policymakers looking at the overall needs. In this draft report, detailed background information is provided on the mineralogy of the identified critical minerals, supply chain risks followed by the discussion of specific minerals applicable to material relevant to nuclear energy technology. Briefly, the impact of advanced manufacturing on savings of critical minerals and electric energy is discussed and its effect to nuclear energy technology evaluated. This report will be followed with a final report providing a strategic vision for executable actions to implement the savings through advanced manufacturing, which will be further explored in the upcoming months. The Gen-IV relevant critical minerals will also be evaluated in the context of the AMMT programs material priorities as identified in the material score cards, to determine priorities for future actions. Material savings will become even more substantial when commercial Gen-IV reactor technology becomes available because of their needs for structural materials with higher content in alloying elements for enhanced high-temperature properties and improved corrosion resistance. The requirement for critical minerals in nuclear technology (in kg/MWe) will therefore significantly increase by 2050, even though its contribution to the worldwide electric energy production capacity will remain at about 5 %. The share of nuclear on world’s electric energy production is, on grounds of high utilization and availability 10.2 % and is expected to increase to 12 % by 2050. Advanced manufacturing could aid the deployment of Gen-IV nuclear technology since critical materials savings of up to 30 % seems possible, promoting nuclear energy as a true sustainable clean energy technology together with hydroelectric power.
The Liquid Salt Test Loop (LSTL) at the US Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was developed to demonstrate technology for high-temperature fluoride salt systems (Figure 1). The LSTL is primarily constructed using Inconel 600 alloy and operates at temperatures of up to 700°C. The facility is loaded with 165 kg of LiF-NaF-KF salt (FLiNaK). This salt provides a relevant test environment for de-risking technology while avoiding the costs and hazards associated with beryllium-based or uranium-bearing salts. FLiNaK is also an advantageous salt for the secondary side of molten salt reactors. The facility’s major components include a centrifugal pump for salt circulation, an air-based heat exchanger to reject heat, a suite of instrumentation, and trace heating to prevent salt freezing. Additional heating is available through an induction heater rated at 200 kW. The relatively large heating and cooling capability enables the formation of a temperature gradient across the loop (i.e., a hot and a cold side), which is important for chemistry and corrosion studies. The LSTL is a unique US capability for high-temperature molten halide salt testing. Although some efforts are underway at universities, the LSTL’s scale, co-located purification system, and relatively large power differentiates it from other testing systems. Furthermore, unlike efforts within industry, access to the DOE-supported facility and communication of results, which are generally disseminated publicly, result in a broad significance in the molten salt reactor community.
The intent of this project was to determine appropriate methodologies for analysis of lithium isotopes for 1) quasi-online monitoring of isotope separations, and 2) high-precision characterization of end-products, including lithium fluoride and lithium-beryllium fluoride (FLiBe). Traditionally, isotopic analysis requires the use of expensive, sophisticated instrumentation with often relatively long analytical timelines. We determined that the use of cheaper, smaller, and easier-to-operate instruments are sufficient for rapid analysis of lithium isotopes to monitor isotope separation efficiencies. In addition, we found that the analytical precision afforded by these lower-cost instruments is comparable to the more sophisticated (i.e., more expensive) instrumentation when the isotopic composition of lithium becomes highly depleted in 6Li. This finding will ultimately help lower costs of manufacturing of depleted lithium that is required for operation of certain designs of Generation IV nuclear reactors.
The Facility to Alleviate Salt Technology Risks (FASTR) at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was developed to demonstrate technology for high-temperature chloride salt systems (Figure 1). FASTR is primarily constructed using alloy C-276 and is designed to operate at temperatures of up to 725°C. The facility is loaded with 250 kg of NaCl-KCl-MgCl 2 salt. This salt provides a relevant test environment for de-risking technology while avoiding the costs and hazards associated with beryllium-based or uranium-bearing salts. The facility’s major components include a centrifugal pump for salt circulation, an air-based heat exchanger to reject heat, a suite of instrumentation, and trace heating to prevent salt freezing. The salt was purified in 2020 and 2022, and the pumped loop first operated in December 2022. FASTR is a unique US capability for high-temperature molten halide salt testing. FASTR’s scale, co located purification system, and relatively large power (465 kW) differentiates it from other testing systems. Furthermore, access to the DOE-supported facility and efficient communication of results— which are generally disseminated publicly—distinguish FASTR as being broadly significant throughout the molten salt reactor community. FASTR is similar to ORNL’s Liquid Salt Test Loop (LSTL), although FASTR contains chloride-based salt instead of the fluoride-based salt (LiF-NaF-KF) found in LSTL. Furthermore, FASTR is approximately 2× larger than LSTL in terms of pipe size and length, power, salt volume, flow rate, and number of thermocouples. The LSTL first operated in 2016. At the end of FY23, there was a suspected gas leak in the LSTL that halted operation. At the start of FY24, a leak in the LSTL pump’s tank gas space was confirmed. Because the gas-space leak prevented operation of LSTL, FY24 efforts were focused on operation of FASTR. This report summarizes the progress made during FY24 in support of the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) work package, AT-24OR070202 Salt Loop and Capability for Testing Sensors and Off Gas Components.
Fourth-generation diffraction-limited synchrotron light sources (DL-SLS) present a compelling platform for advanced light source applications due to their ultra-low emittance (around tens of picometers), sub-micrometer beam stability, and high repetition rates (greater than 1 MHz). Despite these advantages, fundamental limitations, such as long bunch durations (tens of picoseconds), large relative energy spread (~10⁻³), and low peak current (<300 A), have hindered their effectiveness in free-electron laser (FEL) applications. Using a low-gain three-dimensional (3D) model based on NSLS-II upgrade lattice parameters, we demonstrate that a 6% single-pass gain is achievable with an optimized transverse gradient undulator (TGU). Concurrently, recent advances in X-ray optics—specifically, a four-mirror bow-tie resonator utilizing diamond mirrors and beryllium compound refractive lenses (CRLs)—enable total round-trip losses below 4% and an output coupling efficiency near 1%, rendering a Storage Ring based X-ray FEL oscillator (XFELO) a realistic possibility. In the 3D framework, the TGU effectively mitigates the detrimental effects of large energy spread by spatially dispersing the beam, leading to enhanced gain relative to conventional one-dimensional (1D) models. We establish both analytical and numerical connections between the 1D and 3D descriptions, leveraging GENESIS simulations to map equivalent gain conditions. While 1D resonance is defined in the energy domain, the 3D TGU system shifts the resonance dependence to transverse gradient and dispersion parameters. Once optimized, this framework allows predictive modeling using 1D formulas, which can then be validated through full 3D simulations.
As part of efforts to prepare for potential and ongoing safety reviews for licensing of advanced non-light-water reactor fuel cycles, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) tasked Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to prepare an assessment on the state of knowledge of potential chemical processes at fuel cycle facilities supporting the front end of these fuel cycles, and to assess the associated regulatory guidance. This report provides a technical assessment of chemical process safety considerations to support NRC licensing reviews of fabrication processes for tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) based, metallic-based, and salt-based fuels. The assessments involved collecting publicly available information on the fuel fabrication processes to (i) identify the operational process steps, characteristics and chemicals involved, (ii) identify the physical safety considerations and health safety considerations during licensing reviews of the various process steps, and (iii) collect information to support assessments of severity of accidents and potential mitigative measures to be implemented. The assessment provides a foundational basis on chemical process safety considerations for advanced fuel fabrication activities, although it is recognized that licensing reviews may necessitate design-specific considerations. The specific conditions under which chemical hazards emerge will require process-specific considerations, highlighting the importance of process-informed interpretation. The assessment also determined that exposure guidelines and limits to assess the consequences of acute exposures are limited for some chemicals, although alternative limits and supplementary information from databases or safety data sheets provide sufficient information to evaluate consequences of acute exposures. In addition, it was identified that metallic and salt fuel fabrication processes may involve beryllium, which is an exposure hazard. The regulatory framework for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities, per 10 CFR Part 70 Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material, is deemed robust and flexible to address the chemical safety considerations in this report. A review was conducted on various regulatory guidance and technical basis documents. This included reviewing NUREG-1520, Revision 2, Standard Review Plan for Fuel Cycle Facilities License Applications – Final Report and the process descriptions in Appendix A of NUREG/CR-6410, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility Accident Analysis Handbook, to address advanced fuel types. As new fuels will involve process-specific chemical uses, process-specific considerations are provided in this report. Additionally, it is noted that the U.S. Department of Energy protective action criteria database includes Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits (TEELs) for process-specific chemicals. This report provides technical information to support chemical safety assessments of new advanced fuel cycle facilities and identifies technical and safety information to support licensing reviews. No regulatory barriers were identified for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities.
A comparison of 300 MWt HEU and HALEU NTP cores using different fuel forms is presented to demonstrate trends and potentially inform fuel development. Compared to HEU, HALEU cores require additional in-core moderation. Beryllium was chosen as the reference in-core moderator material; metal hydrides may also be considered. Typical NTP fuel forms such as carbide and carbonitride solid solutions, carbide-graphite composites, CERMETs and CERCERs were considered together with less typical fuel forms such as UC and U metal. Be-moderated HALEU cores are heavier than HEU cores (1.9-2.7 and 0.9-2.0 metric tons, respectively). Furthermore, HALEU loading is very sensitive to the amount of in-core moderation which translates into tight fabrication tolerances. HALEU cores requires more reactivity control mechanisms than HEU cores to compensate for temperature feed-back. Using enrichments only slightly above HALEU (e.g., 25%) may provide a compromise between the administrative preference for using HALEU and the engineering preference for simplifying the reactor systems by, for example, not using in-core moderators.