Thermodynamics of Tritium Trapping by Point Defects in Intermetallic Al 12 (TM) 2.35 Aluminide Coating Phase
Density functional theory simulations have been carried out to investigate the potential for tritium trapping by metal vacancies in intermetallic Al 12 (TM) 2.35 phase (TM = Fe, Cr, and Ni) as function of temperature and tritium partial pressure. It was found that tritium could be favorably trapped by Fe and Ni vacancies and not favorably trapped by Al and Cr vacancies. However, due to the presence of partially occupied Al sites in bulk Al 12 (TM) 2.35 , leading to the approximate number of ~255 Al atoms in the unit cell, 86 sites were found energetically favorable to the creation of an Al vacancy. While adding a tritium atom in an Al vacancy is not energetically favorable, the tritiated defect still has a negative Gibbs free energy because the energy gain for creating an Al vacancy overcome the energy cost of adding the tritium species. Based on the calculated Gibbs free energy, the first tritiation of a metal vacancy, at conditions relevant to in-reactor operations, should be more favorable for Al, followed Fe, Ni, and Cr vacancies. By comparing the behavior of tritium in Al 12 (TM) 2.35 with previously studied Fe-Al coating phases (i.e., FeNiAl 5 , Fe 4 Al 13 , and Fe 2 Al 5.6 ), we found that there is a correlation between interstitial tritium solubility and the potential for vacancy trapping. The current trend suggests that if the insertion of an interstitial tritium cost more than 0.3 eV, then trapping by metal vacancies should be preferred. By combining the simulations results obtained to date, we noticed different trapping mechanisms of tritium in the Al coating. Tritium is mostly trapped by Fe and Ni vacancies in the outer Fe-Al coating phase Al 12 (TM) 2.35 while tritium should be preferentially trapped by Al and Fe vacancies for the inner Fe-Al coating phases (FeNiAl 5 , Fe 4 Al 13 , Fe 2 Al 5.6 ). Altogether, these studies show that tritium interacts differently with the various Fe-Al aluminide phases, they also suggest that tritium trapping and retention could be more efficient if metal defects are present and if the solubility of interstitial tritium in the different phases is low.