Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “nuclear fuel materials”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

NMDQi Nuclear Materials Discovery and Qualification Initiative Conference Overview

The Nuclear Materials Discovery and Qualification Initiative (NMDQi) is designed to accelerate nuclear materials qualification to fulfill the promises of early and advanced reactor technologies as a safe, clean, and low-cost baseload energy. Materials development and qualification in the nuclear industry is by definition challenging due to stringent safety requirements, limited availability of specialized facilities for materials irradiation and testing, and the challenging high-temperature, high-radiation environment. NMDQi will establish tools and capabilities that will greatly accelerate the nuclear fuels and materials development process. These tools will provide both computationally informed insights and high-throughput infrastructure with the goal of completing qualification in a single pass. In this approach, materials must be fabricated with a range of properties of interest so that materials performance can be examined in parallel, rather than with multiple discrete specimens. Advanced manufacturing (AM) techniques, which can produce complex component geometries, microstructures, and compositions, are ideal. The improved process monitoring and control that AM can provide are ideal for ensuring and reducing material variability, which will be particularly important as standards committees pursue regulations for AM components. However, gaining these benefits requires overcoming the substantial barrier of qualifying AM processes and the resulting materials and components for supporting research campaigns and eventually nuclear service.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Evaluating design safety margins in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers graphite core components design-by-analysis assessments

Graphite is an important material being used for core components in next-generation high-temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactors. The selection of graphite grade for a specific Designer is a complex task, dependent on reactor conditions, component functionality, and required reliability. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) provides two semi-probabilistic design-by-analysis assessments to evaluate graphite core components against design reliability targets. The simplified assessment uses a 2-parameter Weibull distribution to describe the graphite grade’s tensile-strength distribution to establish component stress limits. The full assessment uses the 3-parameter Weibull distribution and a modified Weakest-Link Theory approach to calculate a component design probability of failure. The paper defines recommended assessment rules, which are the as-written simplified assessment and the full assessment with parameter lower bounds, the modulus update with threshold reduction, and the 2027 grouping rules. Code rules are applied to three grades: 2114, IG-110, and NBG-18. The baseline margin calculation is developed using the experimental tensile dogbone specimen. Percent margin is defined as the percent reduction in the median experimental load to obtain the allowable load per ASME assessments. Under the recommended rules, the SRC–1 margin in the simplified assessment ranged from 40.2 % to 52.7 % among the grades in this study and from 36.1 % to 49.8 % in the full assessment. The full assessment only decreases the margins by 2.5–4.5 % for the SRC-1 components and 0–1.5 % for the SRC-2 components for this baseline case. Margin is inversely related to material median strength (i.e., the strongest grade, 2114, has the lowest margin).

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

NSUF FY 2024 Annual Report: Microscopy and Characterization Suite (MaCS) and National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II)

The Microscopy and Characterization Suite (MaCS) laboratory at the Center for Advanced Energy Studies (CAES) and the National Synchrotron Light Source-II (NSLS-II) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) partner with the Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF). This partnership provides funding that allows researchers to access these facilities at no cost for studying irradiation effects on nuclear fuels and materials. Through NSUF, both MaCS and NSLS-II support post-irradiation examination (PIE) and irradiation activities for NSUF Rapid Turnaround Experiments (RTE) and NSUF Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research (CINR) awards. This report details the work completed at these facilities for NSUF competitively selected awards during fiscal year 2024.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Evaluation of The NSUF Reactor Activation and Damage (RAD) Calculator: Assessing the Accuracy of the Activation Calculator

Nuclear Science User Facilities developed an activation calculator as part of the Combined Material Experiment Toolbox project. The activation calculator estimates the radionuclide concentration in an irradiated sample to indicate when and where the samples may best be examined to only help with scoping the experiment. To verify the accuracy of the calculator, the results from the specific gamma dose rate [mrem/hr/g] at various cooldown times were compared to equivalent results generated in ORIGEN. Most elements were tested as a sample composed solely of that element. These samples were exposed to thirteen different lengths of irradiation in all reactor positions included in the calculator. For elements of interest (i.e., ones currently included in the Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library), 83% of the test cases fell within the allowed tolerance for this scoping tool of ±50%. The overall error is logarithmic with irradiation length and is almost completely independent of reactor position. The primary source of error is missing nuclear data and reactions. NSUF believes that the RAD Calculator can be deployed to the user community because it is designed to provide estimates to aid researchers in planning experiments, and users are cautioned about the limitations of the calculator.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Fabrication and Characterization of Single-Particle Compacts

The programmatic objective of the advanced low enriched uranium (aLEU) fuel Project within the Office of Nonproliferation Research and Development (NA-22) is to advance the development of nuclear reactor designs, fuel materials, and fabrication technologies capable of meeting a number of challenging customer requirements, including reactor stability, extended lifetime, and power density without refueling, while using only low-enriched uranium (i.e., less than 20% enrichment of 235 U). The tandem requirements of delivering sufficient power density and maintaining fuel performance over the course of a multidecade fuel lifetime tightly constrain the field of potential fuel options. Monolithic fuel forms (e.g., fuel pellets) provide maximized density of fissile material, but they may face challenges in maintaining their structure and performance over the long reactor lifetimes envisioned in this program. Dispersion fuel forms with an inert matrix provide enhanced long-term stability but sacrifice fissile material density, and they may not provide sufficient power density over the reactor lifetime with the limit of low enrichment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

PRO-X Parallelization Study

The proliferation resistance optimization (PRO-X) program is actively supporting the design of nuclear systems by developing a framework to both optimize the fuel cycle infrastructure for nuclear reactor (including both advanced reactors (ARs) and research reactors (RRs)) and minimize the potential for production of weapons-usable nuclear material (Figure 1). One area of interest is in the impact a modular approach to bulk handling fuel cycle facilities could have on meeting safeguards requirements to identify future areas of growth within the proliferation resistance space. This study evaluates how changing the number of streams within a fuel cycle facility could impact a facilities ability to meet both domestic and international safeguards requirements.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Drying of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Considerations and Examples

A recently revised American Society for Testing and Materials consensus standard guide for drying of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) provides considerations and guidance for preparing SNF for its safe storage in a sealed dry storage system. The standard discusses (1) needs for drying, (2) techniques to dry, and (3) demonstration of adequate dryness. No specific approach is prescribed since the effective techniques and needs for drying depend on the specifics of the fuel and dry storage system. Here, this paper discusses these topics using examples for both Zr-alloy-clad commercial SNF and for aluminum-alloy-clad research reactor SNF. Residual water can include free water (liquid and/or vapor), physisorbed water bound to internal surfaces, and chemisorbed water incorporated into surface films, such as (oxy)hydroxides. The potential impacts of these residual waters are corrosion/oxidation, radiolytic breakdown into gaseous and/or reactive species, and canister pressurization. For commercial SNF, inadvertent free water, even up to large amounts (e.g., 10+ mol), is not predicted to cause adverse corrosion degradation, except possible fuel oxidation for breached SNF. For aluminum-clad SNF, the production of radiolytic hydrogen with contribution from the chemisorbed water in its hydrated oxides is a primary consideration. For both SNF systems, canister pressurization is predicted to be well within the canister design, and flammability would not pose a safety concern using an oxygen limit of 5 vol % criterion. (Flammability control can be achieved by limiting either hydrogen or oxygen, and an oxygen limit is expected to be easier to meet in the presence of radiolytic H 2 generation.) The two primary technologies for SNF drying, vacuum drying and forced-gas dehydration, are described herein, and drying tests and campaigns using these methods are cited. Dryness criteria and the methods used to detect and measure residual (free) water are also discussed.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Towards Thermomechanical Processing of Alloy 709: Progress in Defining High-Temperature Deformation-Recrystallization "Space"

The Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Program has established a multi-year plan to develop Alloy 709 advanced stainless steel, generate the data package and develop material-specific design parameters in qualifying it as a new structural material for Class A construction in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, High Temperature Reactors (ASME 2025). In collaboration with material vendors, the Advanced Materials Development activities under ART have successfully scaled the Alloy 709 plate form production from a laboratory heat of 500 pounds to commercial heats totaling 133,000 pounds of Alloy 709 plate fabricated from three heats. The goal of the overall Alloy 709 development program is to establish the necessary microstructural and mechanical properties relationship for Alloy 709 to ultimately develop fabrication parameters for other product forms such as bars, pipes, and forgings using the available ART Alloy 709 materials. This study will enable its deployment in the industry as an advanced construction material for high-temperature components. The objective of this Alloy 709 development work in FY 2025 is to experimentally determine the high-temperature deformation-recrystallization response of the Alloy 709 heats and to experimentally generate true stress-true strain data for Alloy 709 using the available commercial heat plate materials. Integral to this work is the previous characterization of the as-rolled materials and the determination of an effective solution-annealing process, which was reported in Y. Wang et al., 2023, and the evaluation of the effect of controlled cooling on the resultant precipitation in these commercial heats. This report summarizes and builds on the results of the previous reports to assess the high-temperature deformation behavior as a function of deformation temperature, strain and strain rate using commercial Alloy 709 heat 58776-3RB fabricated by G. O. Carlson and heat 529900-02 fabricated by Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) Specialty Rolled Products.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

MRPP UO x Product Recover System Upgrade

The Material Recovery Pilot Plant (MRPP) produces U 3 O 8 /OU 3 product in powder form. This product must be collected, and cyclonic separators are an efficient method for collecting particles from an air stream. However, the M10 SafeVac currently installed at MRPP has design flaws and is failing. A new, semi-custom cyclonic separator from Hanningfield has been designed and ordered to replace the SafeVac. The Hanningfield model will be more efficient and better designed to suit the recovery at MRPP, increasing the quality of research produced at the plant. Unit cost is $118,000 with a 24 week lead time. It is expected to be operational by January 2025.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Irradiation Experiments and Thermal Analysis for Reactor System Design and Analysis at INL

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is the nation's lead nuclear laboratory working to enhance reactor systems' safety, security, economics, and efficiency. Research and development (R&D) programs at INL support the current fleet of nuclear reactors for safer operation and newer reactors technology design, development, demonstration, and deployment. A major focus of INL's mission is the reactor system design and analysis supported by the irradiation experiments and thermal analysis of advanced and current-generation nuclear fuels and materials. The irradiation experiments and thermal analysis provide a deeper understanding of basic radiation damage processes that can determine the basis for performance improvements and verification of modeling assumptions. These experiments and analyses include experiment management: design, fabrication, characterization, irradiation, and post-irradiation examination. This research involves thermal, neutronic, and material investigation using the INL's Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) and Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facilities. The results from these experiments and analysis are required to develop the regulatory basis for deploying new or modified fuels and materials. This seminar talk will also provide a general overview of the INL's research facilities, ongoing research programs, core capabilities, and opportunities for students and faculties.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Application of Electrochemical Methods to Molten Salt Reactors: Draft TLR Documenting Assessment of Electrochemical Monitoring

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is developing the regulatory framework and technical expertise to support regulatory review of advanced non-water reactors, including molten salt reactors (MSRs). In an MSR, it is essential that the salt chemistry be maintained in a desired range in terms of redox potential for reliable operation and mitigation of corrosion to structural materials in the reactor, particularly the reactor vessel and heater exchanger. Measuring the redox potential of the salt in the reactor would also allow for the material lifetimes to be predicted more accurately, and chemical issues to be diagnosed more quickly. In addition to the chemical composition analysis by ICP-MS, electrochemical methods including potentiometry and linear wave scanning (LSC) were also used in molten salt reactor experiment (MSRE) for redox potential monitoring purposes. Electrochemcial methods offers unique advantages such as quick turnaround in results and unique capability of in-line monitoring of redox potential, and are considered popular electroanalytical techniques that can be used to monitor redox potentials and salt chemistry including impurities. The last two decades have seen significant advances in science and engineering of electrochemical methods for potential application to molten salts. The primary goal of this report is to assist NRC in understanding the monitoring of the salt chemistry by electrochemical methods and provide NRC reviewers with necessary information and tools to support regulatory review of MSR designs. This reports consists of two majors parts—Part 1, chemical potential of molten salts and effects by fission process in MSR; Part 2, assessment of electrochemical methods for application to MSRs. The TRLs of the typical relevant electrochemical methods for molten salts were evaluated based on the DOE TRL guidelines and upon a review of the current status of the electrochemical methods for two typical salt systems, fluoride and chloride, for MSRs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Evaluation of Engineered Form MOFs CaSDB and HKUST-1

Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) have studied different sorbents for the purpose of separating krypton (Kr) and xenon (Xe). PNNL has researched various metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that have characteristics theoretically suitable for the separation. Based on computational analysis, PNNL chose Calcium–4,4’–sulfonyl dibenzoate (CaSDB) and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology MOF1 (HKUST–1). The raw MOFs are supplied in a powder form and must be incorporated into a robust engineered form to be viable for gas separation. In 2016, PNNL produced an engineered form of CaSDB by compressing and grinding the raw MOF material. This form was sent to INL for adsorption testing. Gentle mechanical agitation of the compressed form produced a large amount of powder, resulting in the conclusion that the form was not viable for the application. In 2019, INL successfully produced two engineered forms, CaSDB–EF1 and HKUST–EF2, by incorporating the active MOF powders into a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) binder. PNNL also produced two engineered forms, CaSDB–10pmma and HKUST–10pmma, by using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as a binder. Surface area analysis indicated that the forms could be viable for separations in which the CaSDB–EF1 retained 84% of the raw CaSDB surface area and CaSDB–10pmma retained 48%. HKUST–EF2 retained all the raw HKUST–1 surface area, whereas HKUST–10pmma retained only 28%. Mechanical stability testing demonstrated that the PMMA forms formed a fine powder whereas, the PAN forms did not. In general, adsorption testing showed that CaSDB–10pmma had a lower Xe breakthrough capacity than CaSDB–EF1, but a higher saturation capacity at both room temperature and at 253 K. The CaSDB MOF was intended to be used as a room temperature sorbent to capture Xe. However, both CaSDB engineered forms displayed relatively short initial break through times. Reduced temperature increased the Xe capacity of both engineered forms. HKUST–1 was expected to be effective only at sub-zero temperatures. At 195 K, HKUST–10pmma had an initial Xe breakthrough capacity of 119 mmol/ kg, compared to HKUST–EF2 at 339 mmol/ kg. The saturation capacities were 275 and 383 mmol/ kg, respectively. HKUST–10ppm also had a lower Kr capacity of 1.7 mmol/kg, whereas the HKUST–EF had a Kr capacity of 3 mmol/ kg. Test results indicate that the PAN engineered forms are a more suitable choice for the complete separation of Xe and Kr, due to the increase in initial breakthrough capacity. CaSDB allows rapid breakthrough of Kr and Xe regardless of the type of engineered form. At 253 K, it is more viable, but is still not the most effective sorbent. HKUST–EF2 demonstrated viability for Xe capture at 195 K, which may merit further study, however it may be cost prohibitive.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Leveraging the High Flux Isotope Reactor for nuclear fuel development: a review of experiments, facilities, and capabilities

Materials testing reactors (MTRs) have been used to develop in-core nuclear fuels and materials since the outset of the nuclear power industry. However, the closure of prominent MTRs worldwide and protracted construction timelines for new facilities have increased reliance on existing infrastructure for near-term irradiation testing needs. One facility that can support these needs is the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. HFIR boasts the highest steady-state neutron flux in the Western Hemisphere and, among other roles, has been used to rapidly administer high fluences on fuels and materials for fission and fusion reactor applications. This paper reviews HFIR facilities and infrastructure, fuel-bearing irradiation experiments conducted in HFIR, and select nonfueled experiments that demonstrate advanced techniques transferable to fuels experiments. Collectively, these examples underscore HFIR's potential role as a nuclear fuels testbed supporting both the existing reactor fleet and advanced reactor fuel development.

Fuel qualification↗

FIB-ToF-SIMS characterization of irradiated U-10Zr

Post-irradiation examination (PIE) is critical for the performance assessment and qualification of nuclear fuels. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is a powerful materials characterization technique that allows for elemental and isotopic mapping with a depth resolution greater than EDS and EPMA. However, it has not yet been applied to PIE of metallic nuclear fuel. Here, in this work, we characterize an fast neutron spectrum irradiated U-10Zr fuel sample using a time-of-flight SIMS (ToF-SIMS) system connected to a FIB/SEM system, which allows for flexible sample analysis compared to a dedicated ToF-SIMS instrument. Analysis of the resulting hyperspectral micrograph data was aided by the development of an unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithm that iterates on existing methods to segment the 3D micrographic datasets based on the similarity of mass spectra. The results showed that the FIB-ToF-SIMS instrument was potentially capable of spatially resolving closed fission gas bubbles in 3D by continued ion sputtering of the analyzed volume. Additionally, the ML algorithm proved useful in revealing the chemical segregation of light fission products (those with an atomic mass between approximately 85–105 amu, such as ruthenium and rhodium) plus matrix zirconium, heavy fission products (those with an atomic mass between approximately 135–150 amu, such as the lanthanides) and uranium. Future studies are planned to conduct FIB-ToF-SIMS analysis on more irradiated U-Zr samples to study the constituent redistribution.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Optical vibrational spectroscopic signatures related to U 3 O 8 production processes

Uranium ore concentrates are materials found early within the nuclear fuel cycle and contain high concentrations of uranium in an easily transported form, making the concentrates a likely target for illegal diversion. These concentrates are typically converted to U 3 O 8 for further processing and, therefore, may lose specific physicochemical characteristics in determining the materials’ source and processing history. In this work, we explore the Raman spectra of eight oxide samples produced from various uranium ore concentrates and processing pathways to examine the presence of spectroscopic signatures relating to each sample's process history. Samples produced from amine extraction and dialkylphosphoric acid extraction processes show unique characteristics due to high concentrations of α-UO 3 , whereas samples calcinated from metallic diuranates do not form pure α-U 3 O 8 because of metallic ion inclusions. Pure α-U 3 O 8 oxide samples are obtained through calcination of ammonium diuranate, ammonium uranyl carbonate, and metastudtite intermediates. The Raman spectra of these oxide samples show close agreement with pristine α-U 3 O 8 spectra. However, deviations from the pristine spectra are observed in the 300–460 cm -1 spectral range. In conclusion, these deviations are unique identifying signatures that were likely created by lasting effects from the process history. Spectral center of mass calculations indicate grouping of samples based on processing history.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The MPACT 2020 Milestone: Safeguards and Security by Design of Future Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities.

The Materials Protection, Accounting, and Control Technologies (MPACT) campaign, within the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, has developed a Virtual Facility Distributed Test Bed for safeguards and security design for future nuclear fuel cycle facilities. The purpose of the Virtual Test Bed is to bring together experimental and modeling capabilities across the U.S. national laboratory and university complex to provide a one-stop-shop for advanced Safeguards and Security by Design (SSBD). Experimental testing alone of safeguards and security technologies would be cost prohibitive, but testbeds and laboratory processing facilities with safeguards measurement opportunities, coupled with modeling and simulation, provide the ability to generate modern, efficient safeguards and security systems for new facilities. This Virtual Test Bed concept has been demonstrated using a generic electrochemical reprocessing facility as an example, but the concept can be extended to other facilities. While much of the recent work in the MPACT program has focused on electrochemical safeguards and security technologies, the laboratory capabilities have been applied to other facilities in the past (including aqueous reprocessing, fuel fabrication, and molten salt reactors as examples). This paper provides an overview of the Virtual Test Bed concept, a description of the design process, and a baseline safeguards and security design for the example facility. Parallel papers in this issue go into more detail on the various technologies, experimental testing, modeling capabilities, and performance testing.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

The effect of neutron irradiation on conventional and nanocrystalline nickel: NSUF Work Package UA-22PN080501 Milestone M3UA-22PN0805012 (Final Report)

Even though nanocrystalline materials (20-100 nm) present an unprecedented potential, scientific knowledge related to the effect of neutron irradiation on the mechanical properties and microstructure is still scarce. Most of the past studies were conducted using ion irradiation which may not have the same effect as neutron irradiation because of the smaller irradiation volume and the higher dose rate. To reach a firm conclusion on the potential of nanocrystalline materials for nuclear reactor applications, extensive study of model metals with different stacking fault energy (SFE) is required to elucidate their behavior in radiation environments. Nanocrystalline copper and nickel are typically chosen because they are commonly used as model FCC metals in studies of radiation effects. Nickel is an FCC metal with a high stacking-fault energy (~125 mJ/m 2 ) compared to copper (~45 mJ/m 2 ). Hence, microcrystalline and nanocrystalline nickel samples were irradiated in the INL’s Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), as a part of FY08 North Carolina State University NSUF Irradiation Experiment# 96 to evaluate the irradiation behavior of these materials. The objective of this FY20 NSUF project# 19122 is to perform PIE (at PNNL NSUF facility) on previously ATR-neutron irradiated (1.2 and 2.6 dpa; 80-89°C) nanocrystalline and microcrystalline nickel samples to investigate the changes in mechanical properties and microstructures and evaluate whether nanocrystalline nickel is relatively more radiation resistant compared to conventional microcrystalline nickel. To perform PIE at PNNL, sixteen neutron irradiated specimens (microcrystalline and nanocrystalline) were transferred from the NSUF Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library at INL. Experimental techniques such as SEM/EBSD, XRD, TEM, Vickers microhardness and tensile testing were employed to characterize the effect of neutron irradiation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline nickel and compared them with corresponding characteristics of microcrystalline nickel.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗