Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “haloes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Low-Thrust Transfers from Distant Retrograde Orbits to L2 Halo Orbits in the Earth-Moon System

This paper presents a study of transfers between distant retrograde orbits (DROs) and L2 halo orbits in the Earth-Moon system that could be flown by a spacecraft with solar electric propulsion (SEP). Two collocation-based optimal control methods are used to optimize these highly-nonlinear transfers: Legendre pseudospectral and Hermite-Simpson. Transfers between DROs and halo orbits using low-thrust propulsion have not been studied previously. This paper offers a study of several families of trajectories, parameterized by the number of orbital revolutions in a synodic frame. Even with a poor initial guess, a method is described to reliably generate families of solutions. The circular restricted 3-body problem (CRTBP) is used throughout the paper so that the results are autonomous and simpler to understand.

trajectory design↗
NASA NTRS2017

Orbit Maintenance and Navigation of Human Spacecraft at Cislunar Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits

Multiple studies have concluded that Earth-Moon libration point orbits are attractive candidates for staging operations. The Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO), a member of the Earth-Moon halo orbit family, has been singularly demonstrated to meet multi-mission architectural constraints. In this paper, the challenges associated with operating human spacecraft in the NRHO are evaluated. Navigation accuracies and human vehicle process noise effects are applied to various station keeping strategies in order to obtain a reliable orbit maintenance algorithm. Additionally, the ability to absorb missed burns, construct phasing maneuvers to avoid eclipses and conduct rendezvous and proximity operations are examined.

Davis, Diane↗
NASA NTRS2017

Targeting Cislunar Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits for Human Space Exploration

Part of the challenge of charting a human exploration space architecture is finding locations to stage missions to multiple destinations. To that end, a specific subset of Earth-Moon halo orbits, known as Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits (NRHOs) are evaluated. In this paper, a systematic process for generating full ephemeris based ballistic NRHOs is outlined, different size NRHOs are examined for their favorability to avoid eclipses, the performance requirements for missions to and from NRHOs are calculated, and disposal options are evaluated. Combined, these studies confirm the feasibility of cislunar NRHOs to enable human exploration in the cislunar proving ground.

Williams, Jacob↗
NASA NTRS2018

Analysis of Cislunar Transfers from a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit with High Power Solar Electric Propulsion

As government and commercial interest in the exploration of the Moon and cislu- nar space has grown, Near Rectilinear Halo Orbits (NRHOs) have shown to be of particular interest as staging orbits for human exploration of the Moon. Once in such staging orbits, low thrust solar electric propulsion (SEP) can enable efficient transfer to other orbits in cislunar space. This paper captures ongoing analysis to design efficient transfers of a massive spacecraft from a L2 Southern NRHO to a Distant Retrograde Orbit, L1 Northern NRHO, and Flat L2 Halo Orbit using low thrust SEP. For each transfer type, reference transfer is designed for an assumed 39 t spacecraft with 26.6 kW SEP system. For each reference transfer, analysis is completed to understand the sensitivity of the transfer to changes in initial mass and SEP power and identify the optimal number of thrusters to use for a given combination of mass and power.

SEP↗
NASA NTRS2021

Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Combined kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements from BOSS CMASS and LOWZ halos

The scattering of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons off the free-electron gas in galaxies and clusters leaves detectable imprints on high resolution CMB maps: the thermal and kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effects (tSZ and kSZ respectively). We use combined microwave maps from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR5 and Planck in combination with the CMASS (mean redshifthzi¼0.55and host halo masshMviri¼3×1013M⊙) and LOWZ (hzi¼0.31,hMviri¼5×1013M⊙) galaxy catalogs from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS DR10 and DR12), to study the gas associated with these galaxy groups. Using individual reconstructed velocities, we perform a stacking analysis and reject the no-kSZ hypothes is at 6.5σ, the highest significance to date. This directly translates into a measurement of the electron number density profile, and thus of the gas density profile. Despite the limited signal to noise, the measurement shows at high significance that the gas density profile is more extended than the dark matter density profile, for any reasonable baryon abundance (formally>90σfor the cosmic baryon abundance). We simultaneously measure the tSZ signal, i.e., the electron thermal pressure profile of the same CMASS objects, and reject theno-tSZ hypothesis at10σ. We combine tSZ and kSZ measurements to estimate the electron temperature to20% precision in several aperture bins, and find it comparable to the virial temperature. In a companion paper, we analyze these measurements to constrain the gas thermodynamics and the properties of feedback inside galaxy groups. We present the corresponding LOWZ measurements in this paper, ruling out a null kSZ (tSZ)signal at 2.9ð13.9Þσ, and leave their interpretation to future work. This paper and the companion paper demonstrate that current CMB experiments can detect and resolve gas profiles in low mass halos and at high redshifts, which are the most sensitive to feedback in galaxy formation and the most difficult to measure any other way. They will be a crucial input to cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, thus improving our understanding of galaxy formation. These precise gas profiles are already sufficient to reduce the main limiting theoretical systematic in galaxy-galaxy lensing: baryonic uncertainties. Future such measurements will thus unleash the statistical power of weak lensing from the Rubin, Euclid and Roman observatories. Our stacking software Thumb Stack is publicly available and directly applicable to future Simons Observatory andCMB-S4 data.

Emmanuel Schaan↗
NASA NTRS2021

A Search for the 3.5 keV Line from the Milky Way's Dark Matter Halo with HaloSat

Previous detections of an X-ray emission line near 3.5 keV in galaxy clusters and other dark-matter-dominated objects have been interpreted as observational evidence for the decay of sterile neutrino dark matter. Motivated by this, we report on a search for a 3.5 keV emission line from the Milky Way's galactic dark matter halo with HaloSat. As a single pixel, collimated instrument, HaloSat observations are impervious to potential systematic effects due to grazing incidence reflection and CCD pixelization, and thus may offer a check on possible instrumental systematic errors in previous analyses. We report nondetections of a ~3.5 keV emission line in four HaloSat observations near the Galactic center. In the context of the sterile neutrino decay interpretation of the putative line feature, we provide 90% confidence level upper limits on the 3.5 keV line flux for a field centered 18.6 degrees from the Galactic center and the corresponding 7.1 keV sterile neutrino mixing angle: F ≤ 0.077 ph/((sq. cm)(s)(sr)) and sin^2(2θ) ≤ 4.25 x 10^(-11). The HaloSat mixing angle upper limit was calculated using a modern parameterization of the Milky Way's dark matter distribution, and in order to compare with previous limits, we also report the limit calculated using a common historical model. The HaloSat mixing angle upper limit places constraints on a number of previous mixing angle estimates derived from observations of the Milky Way's dark matter halo and galaxy clusters, and excludes several previous detections of the line. The upper limits cannot, however, entirely rule out the sterile neutrino decay interpretation of the 3.5 keV line feature.

E. M. Silich↗
NASA NTRS2022

Computing Halo Orbits In Bicircular Model Using Energy Balancing Method

The orbits around the Lagrange points L1 and L2 of the Sun-Earth-Moon system are chaotic and unstable by nature. In this work, we describe a simple method to control Halo Orbits with a single maneuver at the XZ-plane crossing for each revolution of the orbit in the Bicircular Problem. Examples of up to 500 revolutions of the Halo Orbit are controlled using this method. With optimization and adjustment of the maneuver design, the 𝚫V can be significantly reduced. The simplicity of the method and the infrequency of the maneuvers make this a good candidate for future autonomous control of libration orbits.

Lo, Martin W.↗
NASA NTRS2023

What Do Halo Cmes Tell Us About Solar Cycle 25?

It is known that the weak state of the heliosphere due to diminished solar activity in cycle 24 backreacted on coronal mass ejections (CMEs) to make them appear wider for a given speed. One of the consequences of the weak state of the heliosphere is that more CMEs appear as halo CMEs (HCMEs), and halos are formed at shorter heliocentric distances. Current predictions for the strength of solar cycle (SC) 25 range from half to twice the strength of SC 24. We compare the HCME occurrence rate and other properties during the rise phase of cycles 23, 24, and 25 to weigh in on the strength of SC 25. We find that HCME and solar wind properties in SC 25 are intermediate between SCs 23 and 24, but closer to SC 24. The HCME occurrence rate, normalized to the sunspot number, is higher in SCs 24 and 25 than in SC 23. The solar wind total pressure in SC 25 is ∼35% smaller than that in SC 23. Furthermore, the occurrence rates of high-energy solar energetic particle events and intense geomagnetic storms are well below the corresponding values in SC 23, but similar to those in SC 24. We conclude that cycle 25 is likely to be similar to or slightly stronger than cycle 24, in agreement with polar-field precursor methods for cycle 25 prediction.

Solar coronal mass ejections↗
NASA NTRS2000

Halo Orbit Mission Correction Maneuvers Using Optimal Control

This paper addresses the computation of the required trajectory correction maneuvers (TCM) for a halo orbit space mission to compensate for the launch velocity errors introduced by inaccuracies of the launch vehicle.

Halo Orbit trajectory error correction optimal con↗
NASA NTRS1997

Halo Orbit Generation Using the Center Manifold

In recent years, halo orbits around the Sun-Earth Lagrange points, L1 and L2, have become extremely opular for NASA missions due to the ideal observation environment and low launch energy.

periodic↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Trajectory Design Considerations for Low Lunar Orbit to Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit Transfers

NASA’s Artemis program plans to use a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) to stage assets for a lunar exploration campaign. While the proximity operations in the NRHO are simple and very similar to flat-space dynamics, the far-field ren-dezvous has considerations that are non-intuitive, especially to those that may be steeped in the dynamics of rendezvous in Keplerian orbits. This paper will discuss some key drivers to the delta-V performance of far-field rendezvous from Low Lunar Orbit to the Gateway space station in its 9:2 resonant south-ward NRHO.

NRHO↗
NASA NTRS2023

Trajectory Design Considerations for Lunar Surface to Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit Rendezvous

NASA’s Artemis program plans to use a 9:2 resonant southward Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) at the Earth-Moon’s L2 libration point to stage assets for a sustained lunar exploration campaign. This architecture includes the use of the Gateway space station positioned in this orbit. While the proximity operations in the NRHO are similar to field-free space dynamics, the far-field rendezvous aspect of the problem is more complicated. We analyze the key drivers of the ΔV performance of the far-field rendezvous problem from low lunar orbit to the Gateway. We find that lunar latitudinal libration is a driving factor to ΔV performance for surface ascent missions that rendezvous with the NRHO, and that transfer time from low lunar orbit to NRHO affects more aspects of the geometry and performance than expected from rendezvous in Keplerian orbits.

NRHO↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Rephasing and Loitering Strategies in the Gateway Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit

NASA's Gateway plans to operate in an L2 9:2 lunar synodic Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) for nominal operations. During the mission's lifetime, scenarios may arise where rephasing within the NRHO or loitering in an alternate trajectory are advantageous. This investigation discusses two strategies to perform this rephasing in the NRHO over a relatively short timespan. The first method uses two maneuvers to shift the phase along a single transfer arc. The second strategy employs four maneuvers, leveraging an intermediate orbit for rephasing. An optimization strategy is formulated to construct locally optimal solutions in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem (CR3BP) and verified in a higher-fidelity ephemeris model.

NRHO↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Orbit Determination Comparison Study and Demonstration for Rendezvous and Docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit from the Lunar Surface

For the upcoming NASA Artemis III mission and those that follow, both the Human Landing System (HLS) and Orion programs are invested in understanding the impacts of ground tracking performance in supporting rendezvous and docking in a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Several critical questions must be answered to ensure mission success and crew safety and an assortment of analysis tools are being incorporated to address them. Two of these tools, LINCOV and MONTE, are currently providing program decision making results through HLS Insight, HLS NASA-collaborations, and Orion/Gateway cross-program analysis. To ensure consistency in the orbit determination performance, a comparison trade-study is performed using a low-lunar orbit to NRHO rendezvous scenario anticipated for the upcoming Artemis missions. An overview of the two analysis tools is provided along with a detailed step-by-step evaluation of the core capabilities and models related to the orbit determination process. This incremental comparison effort reveals both tools produce consistent solutions for the criteria investigated to within 0.3\% difference in the absolute position state estimate at key decision making epochs with all errors sources activated.

orbit determination↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recovery from Missed Thrust During Low Thrust Insertion of NASA's Gateway into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit

Various strategies are assessed by which the first two elements of Gateway could recover from missed thrust events during insertion into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Recovery strategies are assessed in terms of their ability to maintain the desired NRHO insertion epoch ad well as their cost in terms of additional time and ∆v required to reach the NRHO. Strategies utilize a 50 kW Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) system onboard the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Recovery solutions are found that, in the event of a missed thrust arc during the Insertion Phase of the Gateway Lunar Transit, deliver the space-craft into the NRHO within three additional revolutions (roughly 21 days) and 80 m/s ∆v.

low thrust↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Recovery from Missed Thrust During Low Thrust Insertion of NASA's Gateway into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit

Various strategies are assessed by which the first two elements of Gateway could recover from missed thrust events during insertion into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Recovery strategies are assessed in terms of their ability to maintain the desired NRHO insertion epoch ad well as their cost in terms of additional time and ∆v required to reach the NRHO. Strategies utilize a 50 kW Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) system onboard the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Recovery solutions are found that, in the event of a missed thrust arc during the Insertion Phase of the Gateway Lunar Transit, deliver the space-craft into the NRHO within three additional revolutions (roughly 21 days) and 80 m/s ∆v.

low thrust↗