Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “giant planets.”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

Planet Formation

An overview of current theories of star and planet formation is presented. These models are based upon observations of the Solar System and of young stars and their environments. They predict that rocky planets should form around most single stars, although it is possible that in some cases such planets are lost to orbital decay within the protoplanetary disk. The frequency of formation of gas giant planets is more difficult to predict theoretically. Terrestrial planets are believed to grow via pairwise accretion until the spacing of planetary orbits becomes large enough that the configuration is stable for the age of the system. Giant planets begin their growth like terrestrial planets, but they become massive enough that they are able to accumulate substantial amounts of gas before the protoplanetary disk dissipates.

Lissauer, Jack↗

Formation of Planetary Systems

An overview of current theories of star and planet formation is presented. These models are based upon observations of the Solar System and of young stars and their environments. They predict that rocky planets should form around most single stars, although it is possible that in some cases such planets are lost to orbital decay within the protoplanetary disk. The frequency of formation of gas giant planets is more difficult to predict theoretically. Terrestrial planets are believed to grow via pairwise accretion until the spacing of planetary orbits becomes large enough that the configuration is stable for the age of the system. Giant planets begin their growth like terrestrial planets, but they become massive enough that they are able to accumulate substantial amounts of gas before the protoplanetary disk dissipates.

Lissauer, Jack J.↗

The Birth of Planetary Systems

An overview of current theories of star and planet formation is presented. These models are based upon observations of the Solar System and of young stars and their environments. They predict that rocky planets should form around most single stars, although it is possible that in some cases such planets are lost to orbital decay within the protoplanetary disk. The frequency of formation of gas giant planets is more difficult to predict theoretically. Terrestrial planets are believed to grow via pairwise accretion until the spacing of planetary orbits becomes large enough that the configuration is stable for the age of the system. Giant planets begin their growth like terrestrial planets, but they become massive enough that they are able to accumulate substantial amounts of gas before the protoplanetary disk dissipates.

Lissaur, Jack L.↗

SPRITE: NF4 Saturn Probe Mission

The giant planets in our solar system contain clues to the origin of the planets and the conditions that set up terrestrial planet formation. These will be key to also understanding exoplanet systems Comparative study of Giant Planet composition and structure maps gradients in time and space in our protoplanetary disk Jupiter will be well studied after Galileo/Juno, but which of its features (core size, circulation, etc.) are unique vs universal? Cassini will leave remaining knowledge gaps about Saturn that require in situ sampling and are needed to fit into the puzzle of solar system formation

planetary Science↗

Dynamic compression of water to conditions in ice giant interiors

Abstract Recent discoveries of water-rich Neptune-like exoplanets require a more detailed understanding of the phase diagram of H 2 O at pressure–temperature conditions relevant to their planetary interiors. The unusual non-dipolar magnetic fields of ice giant planets, produced by convecting liquid ionic water, are influenced by exotic high-pressure states of H 2 O—yet the structure of ice in this state is challenging to determine experimentally. Here we present X-ray diffraction evidence of a body-centered cubic (BCC) structured H 2 O ice at 200 GPa and ~ 5000 K, deemed ice XIX, using the X-ray Free Electron Laser of the Linac Coherent Light Source to probe the structure of the oxygen sub-lattice during dynamic compression. Although several cubic or orthorhombic structures have been predicted to be the stable structure at these conditions, we show this BCC ice phase is stable to multi-Mbar pressures and temperatures near the melt boundary. This suggests variable and increased electrical conductivity to greater depths in ice giant planets that may promote the generation of multipolar magnetic fields.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

Developing Atmospheric Retrieval Methods for Direct Imaging Spectroscopy of Gas Giants in Reflected Light I: Methane Abundances and Basic Cloud Properties

Reflected light spectroscopy and photometry of cool, directly imaged extrasolar giant planets are expected to be performed in the next decade by space-based telescopes equipped with optical wavelength coronagraphs and integral field spectrographs, such as the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST). We are developing a new atmospheric retrieval methodology to help assess the science return and inform the instrument design for such future missions, and ultimately interpret the resulting observations. Our retrieval technique employs an albedo model coupled with both a Markov chain Monte Carlo Ensemble Sampler (emcee) and a multimodal nested sampling algorithm (MultiNest) to map the posterior distribution. This combination makes the global evidence calculation more robust for any given model, and highlights possible discrepancies in the likelihood maps. Here we apply this methodology to simulated spectra of cool giant planets. As a proof-of-concept, our current atmospheric model contains 1 or 2 cloud layers, methane as a major absorber, and a H2-He background gas. This 6-to-9 parameter model is appropriate for Jupiter-like planets and can be easily expanded in the future. In addition to deriving the marginal likelihood distribution and confidence intervals for the model parameters, we perform model selection to determine the significance of methane and cloud detection as a function of expected signal-to-noise, in the presence of spectral noise correlations. After internal validation, the method is applied to realistic reflected-light spectra of Jupiter, Saturn, and HD 99492 c, a likely observing target. We find that the presence or absence of clouds and methane can be determined with high accuracy, while parameters uncertainties are model-dependent.

spectroscopy↗

Irregular Satellites of the Planets

This proposal is directed towards the observational exploration of the irregular satellite systems of the planets. Primarily we use large-format CCD cameras on the world's largest telescopes, on Mauna Kea, to discover new irregular satellites and then to monitor their positions in order to ascertain their orbital characteristics. Separate observations are taken to determine the physical properties of the irregular satellites. The big picture science objective is to determine how these satellites were captures, and to use the properties of the satellites and their orbits to place constraints on early solar system (including formation) processes. Work in the first year has focussed on a major investigation of the Saturn irregular satellite system. We secured observing time on the Subaru and Gemini 8-m diameter telescopes in December 2004, January, February and March 2005 for the conduct of a deep, wide-area survey. This has resulted in the detection and orbit determination for 12 new satellites to be announced in the next week or two. Additional satellites were lost, temporarily, due to unusually poor weather conditions on Mauna Kea. These objects will be recovered and their orbits published next year. A separate survey of the Uranus irregular satellites was published (Sheppard, Jewitt and Kleyna 2005). Away from the telescope, we have discovered the amazing result that the four giant planets possess similar numbers of irregular satellites. This flies in the face of the standard gas-drag model for satellite capture, since only two of the giant planets are gas giants and the others (Uranus and Neptune) formed by a different process and in the absence of much gas. The constancy of the satellite number (each giant holds approximately 100 irregular satellites measured down to the kilometer scale) is either a coincidence, with different capture mechanisms at different planets giving by chance the same total numbers of irregular satellites, or indicates that the satellites were captured by a completely different process. We favor the latter (Jewitt and Sheppard 2005).

Jewitt, David↗

Planet Formation - Overview

Modern theories of star and planet formation are based upon observations of planets and smaller bodies within our own Solar System, exoplanets &round normal stars and of young stars and their environments. Terrestrial planets are believed to grow via pairwise accretion until the spacing of planetary orbits becomes large enough that the configuration is stable for the age of the system. Giant planets begin their growth as do terrestrial planets, but they become massive enough that they are able to accumulate substantial amounts of gas before the protoplanetary disk dissipates. These models predict that rocky planets should form in orbit about most single stars. It is uncertain whether or not gas giant planet formation is common, because most protoplanetary disks may dissipate before solid planetary cores can grow large enough to gravitationally trap substantial quantities of gas. A potential hazard to planetary systems is radial decay of planetary orbits resulting from interactions with material within the disk. Planets more massive than Earth have the potential to decay the fastest, and may be able to sweep up smaller planets in their path.

Lissauer, Jack J.↗

Effects of Variable Eccentricity on the Climate of an Earth-Like World

The Kepler era of exoplanetary discovery has presented the Astronomical community with a cornucopia of planetary systems very different from the one which we inhabit. It has long been known that Jupiter plays a major role in the orbital parameters of Mars and its climate, but there is also a long-standing belief that Jupiter would play a similar role for Earth if not for its large moon. Using a three dimensional general circulation model (3-D GCM) with a fully-coupled ocean we simulate what would happen to the climate of an Earth-like world if Mars did not exist, but a Jupiter-like planet was much closer to Earths orbit. We investigate two scenarios that involve evolution of the Earth-like planets orbital eccentricity from 0 to 0.066 on a time scale of 4500 years, and from 0 to 0.283 over 6500 years. We discover that during most of the 6500 year scenario the planet would experience a moist greenhouse effect when near periastron. This could have implications for the ability of such a world to retain an ocean on time scales of 109 years. More Earth-like planets in multi-planet systems will be discovered as we continue to survey the skies and the results herein show that the proximity of large gas giant planets may play an important role in the habitabilty of these worlds. These are the first such 3-D GCM simulations using a fully-coupled ocean with a planetary orbit that evolves over time due to the presence of a giant planet.

Stability↗

Gamma-ray burst constraints on the galactic frequency of extra-solar Oort clouds

With the strong CGRO/BATSE evidence that most gamma-ray bursts do not come from galactic neutron stars, models involving the accretion of a comet onto a neutron star (NS) no longer appear to be strong contenders for explaining the majority of bursts. If this is the case, then it is worth asking whether the lack of an observed galactic gamma-ray burst population provides a useful constraint on the number of comets and comet clouds in the galaxy. Owing to the previously unrecognized structural weakness of cometary nuclei, we find the capture cross sections for comet-NS events to be much higher than previously published estimates, with tidal breakup at distances R(sub b) approximately equals to 4 x 10(exp 10) cm from the NS. As a result, impacts of comets onto field NS's penetrating the Oort Clouds of other stars are found to dominate all other galactic NS-comet capture rates by a factor of 100. This in turn predicts that if comet clouds are common, there should be a significant population of repeater sources with (1) a galactic distribution, (2) space-correlated repetition, and (3) a wide range of peak luminosities and luminosity time histories. If all main sequences stars have Oort Clouds like our own, we predict approximately 4000 such repeater sources in the Milky Way at any time, each repeating on timescales of months to years. Based on estimates of the sensitivity of the CGRO/BATSE instrument and assuming isotropic gamma-ray beaming from such events, we estimate that a population of approximately 20-200 of these galactic NS-Oort Cloud gamma-ray repeater sources should be detectable by CGRO. In addition, if giant planet formation is common in the galaxy, we estimate that the accretion of isolated comets injected to the interstellar medium by giant planet formation should produce an additional source of galactic, nonrepeating events. Comparing these estimates to the three to four soft gamma-ray repeater sources detected by BATSE, one is forced to conclude that (1) comet impacts on NS's are inefficient at producing gamma-rays; or (2) the gamma-rays from such events are highly beamed; or (3) the fraction of stars in the galaxy with Oort Cloud like our own is not higher than a few percent.

Shull, J. Michael↗

Gamma-ray burst constraints on the galactic frequency of extrasolar Oort Clouds

With the strong Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory/Burst and Transient Source Experiment (CGRO/BATSE) evidence that most gamma-ray bursts do not come from galactic neutron stars, models involving the accretion of a comet onto a neutron star (NS) no longer appear to be strong contenders for explaining the majority of bursts. If this is the case, then it is worth asking whether the lack of an observed galactic gamma-ray burst population provides a useful constraint on the number of comets and comet clouds in the galaxy. Owing to the previously unrecognized structural weakness of cometary nuclei, we find the capture cross sections for comet-NS events to be much higher than previously published estimates, with tidal breakup at distances R(sub b) approx. equals 4 x 10(exp 10) cm from the NS. As a result, impacts of comets onto field NSs penetrating the Oort Clouds of other stars are found to dominate all other galactic NS-comet capture rates by a factor of 100. This in turn predicts that if comet clouds are common, there should be a significant population of repeater sources with (1) a galactic distribution, (2) space-correlated repetition, and (3) a wide range of peak luminosities and luminosity time histories. If all main sequence stars have Oort Clouds like our own, we predict approximately 4000 such repeater sources in the Milky Way at any time, each repeating on time scales of months to years. Based on estimates of the sensitivity of the CGRO/BATSE instrument and assuming isotropic gamma-ray beaming from such events, we estimate that a population of approximately 20-200 of these galactic NS-Oort Cloud gamma-ray repeater sources should be detectable by CGRO. In addition, if giant planet formation is common in the galaxy, we estimate that the accretion of isolated comets injected to the interstellar medium by giant planet formation should produce an additional source of galactic, nonrepeating, events. Comparing these estimates to the 3-4 soft gamma-ray repeater sources detected by BATSE, one is forced to conclude that (1) comet impacts on NSs are inefficient at producing gamma rays; or (2) the gamma rays from such events are highly beamed; or (3) the fraction of stars in the galaxy with Oort Clouds like our own is not higher than a few percent.

Shull, J. Michael↗

Debris Disk Structure and Morphology as Revealed by Aggressive STIS Multi-Roll Coronagraphy: A New Look at Some Old Friends

We present new imaging results from a well-selected sample of II circumstellar debris disks, all with HST pedigree, using STIS visible-light 6-roll PSF-template subtracted coronagraphy (PSFTSC). These new observations, pushing HST to its highest levels of coronagraphic performance, simultaneously probe both the interior regions of these debris systems, with inner working distances < app 8 AU for half the stars in this sample (corresponding to the giant planet and Kuiper belt regions within our own solar system), and the exterior regions far beyond. These new images enable direct inter-comparison of the architectures of these exoplanetary debris systems in the context of our own Solar System: These observations also permit us, for the first time, to characterize material in these regions at high spatial resolution and identify disk sub-structures that are signposts of planet formation and evolution; in particular, asymmetries and non-uniform debris structures that signal the presence of co-orbiting perturbing planets, and dynamical interactions (e.g., resulting in posited small grain stripping and disk "pollution") with the ISM. We focus here on recently acquired and reduced images of he circumstellar debris systems about: AU Mic (edge-on, and @ 10 pc the closest star in our sample), HD 61005, HD 32297 and HD 15115 (all with morphologies strongly suggestive of ISM wind interactions), HD 181327 & HDI07146 (close to face-on with respectively narrow and broad debris rings), and MP Mus (a "mature" proto-planetary disk hosted by a cTTS). All of our objects were previously observed in the near-IR with inferior spatial resolution and imaging efficacy, but with NICMOS r = 0.3" inner working angle (IWA) comparable to STIS multi-roll coronagraphy. The combination of new optical and existing near-IR imaging can strongly constrain the dust properties, thus enabling an assessment of grain processing and planetesimal populations. These results will directly inform upon the posited planet formation mechanisms that occur after the approximately 10 My epoch of gas depletion, a time in our solar system when giant planets were migrating and terrestrial planets were forming, and directly test theoretical models of these processes. These observations lmiquely probe both into the interior regions of these systems and are sensitive to and spatially resolve low surface-brightness (SB) material at large stellocentric distances with spatial resolution comparable to ACS and with augmenting NICMOS near-IR disk photometry in hand.

Grady, Carol A↗

KMT-2019-BLG-0371 and the Limits of Bayesian Analysis

We show that the perturbation at the peak of the light curve of microlensing event KMT-2019-BLG-0371 is explained by a model with a mass ratio between the host star and planet of q ∼ 0.08. Due to the short event duration (t(sub E) ∼ 6.5 days), the secondary object in this system could potentially be a massive giant planet. A Bayesian analysis shows that the system most likely consists of a host star with a mass M(sub h) = 0.09(+0.14/-0.05) M⨀ and a massive giant planet with a mass = M(sub h) = 7.70(+11.34/-3.90) M(sub Jup). However, the interpretation of the secondary as a planet (i.e., as having M(sub p) < 13M(sub Jup)) rests entirely on the Bayesian analysis. Motivated by this event, we conduct an investigation to determine which constraints meaningfully affect Bayesian analyses for microlensing events. We find that the masses inferred from such a Bayesian analysis are determined almost entirely by the measured value of θ(sub E) and are relatively insensitive to other factors such as the direction of the event (l,b), the lens–source relative proper motion μ(sub rel), or the specific Galactic model prior.

Binary lens microlensing↗

KMT-2019-BLG-0371 and the Limits of Bayesian Analysis

We show that the perturbation at the peak of the light curve of microlensing event KMT-2019-BLG-0371 is explained by a model with a mass ratio between the host star and planet of q ∼ 0.08. Due to the short event duration (t {sub E} ∼ 6.5 days), the secondary object in this system could potentially be a massive giant planet. A Bayesian analysis shows that the system most likely consists of a host star with a mass M{sub h}=0.09{sub −0.05}{sup +0.14}M{sub ⊙} and a massive giant planet with a mass M{sub p}=7.70{sub −3.90}{sup +11.34}M{sub Jup}. However, the interpretation of the secondary as a planet (i.e., as having M {sub p} < 13M {sub Jup}) rests entirely on the Bayesian analysis. Motivated by this event, we conduct an investigation to determine which constraints meaningfully affect Bayesian analyses for microlensing events. We find that the masses inferred from such a Bayesian analysis are determined almost entirely by the measured value of θ {sub E} and are relatively insensitive to other factors such as the direction of the event (ℓ, b), the lens–source relative proper motion μ {sub rel}, or the specific Galactic model prior.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗

The Growth of Planets From Planetesimals

Modern theories of star and planet formation, which are based upon observations of the Solar System and of young stars and their environments, state that planets grow from circumstellar disks of gas and dust. Interstellar dust and/or disk condensates settle towards the midplane of the disk and agglomerate into kilometer-sized solid bodies known as planetesimals. These planetesimals then interact with one another via gravitational forces and collisions. Terrestrial planets are believed to grow via pairwise accretion until the spacing of planetary orbits becomes large enough that the configuration is stable for the age of the system. Giant planets begin their growth in the same manner as do terrestrial planets, but they become -massive enough that they are able to accumulate substantial amounts of gas before the protoplanetary disk dissipates. Models for the formation of our Solar System and of the giant planets found in recent radial velocity searches are discussed.

Lissauer, Jack J.↗

Large Primtive Asteroids: Thermal and Dynamical Context

Primitiveasteroids, most of which are located in the outer belt and Jupiter’s Trojan clouds, provide information related to the origin and evolution of the solar system and the conditions in which the solar nebula was formed. These asteroids are widely thought to be the origin of the least-altered car-bonaceous chondrite that allow us to put crucial con-straints on the current dynamical and thermal theories of the formation and evolution of the early solar sys-tem. The nature of surface composition of large and low-albedo asteroids, like (1) Ceres, (10) Hygiea and (52) Europa, is still under intense debate and different interpretations have beenput forth to explain the ab-sorption features in these objects (e.g.,[1, 2, 3,4,5,6]). Laboratory and spectroscopic experiments on me-teorites that represent all nine carbonaceous chondrite types also found no spectral matches for these large asteroids (e.g.,[7]). Previous studies of asteroid Ceres (the largest primitive asteroid in the solar system) have been conducted to constrain and estimate its surface composition (e.g., [2, 5]). Using linear mixing,[2]found hydroxide brucite, serpentines, and carbonates, to be consistent with Ceres’ ground-based spectra.[5]estimated the surface composition of Ceres and found evidence of widespread NH3-phyllosilicates across its surface using best-fit solutions to Dawn’s NIR spectra. The presence of NH3-phyllosilicates implies that mate-rial from the outer solar system was incorporated into large primitive asteroids, either during their formation at great heliocentric distance or by incorporation of material transported into the Main Belt region. Here we presentnew largeand primitive asteroidsthat share the same spectral similaritieswith the largest asteroid in the solar system, Ceres.We also present the context of these new observations in terms oftheirthermal and dynamicalevolution.Large Primitive Asteroids: Dynamical and Thermal Context:Orbital Distribution of LargePrimitiveAsteroids: Constraining the mineralogy and surface composition of large primitive asteroids will place crucial con-straints on existing dynamical and thermal theories of the formation of the early solar system. We identified several additional asteroids in the Europa-like group in addition to asteroids Europa, Euphrosyne, and Patien-tia, that wereidentified in [8]using NASA IRTFtele-scope (e.g.,Figure 1). These new asteroids along with the already-observed Ceres-and Europa-like group members are localized in the 2.8 < a < 3.4 AU region and characterized by larger sizes, showing an interest-ing orbital distribution (Figure 2). Ceres-likeand Eu-ropa-like groups, which include the largest asteroids in the solar system, show an interesting orbital distribu-tion. These groups are located in the 2.6 < a < 3.6 AU region that contains the snow-line. The snow-line’s location may have been driftedinwards due to the disk’s cooling and evolution[9,10]. Recent dynamical models[11,12]suggested that a substantial fraction of primitive asteroids originated between or beyond the giant planets (a > 5 AU), where water ice would have been stable, and then implanted in the outer Main Belt region because of the giant planets’ growth.Figure 1. Two asteroids, 94 Aurora and 423 Diotima, showing spectra similar to asteroids (1)Ceres and (52)Europa.Thermal modeling and evolution of primitive aster-oids:Primitive water-rich asteroids are thought to be originally composed of mixtures of anhydrous materi-als and water ice that waslater melted by heating sources such as the decay of 26Al, reacting with anhy-drous materials to form H2O/OH-rich minerals. Calcu-lations of the evolution of the temperature and struc-ture of icy planetesimals were performedusing a 1D finite differences thermal evolution model[13, 14] for 26Al-heated planetesimals. In particular, thermally activated compaction due to hot pressing of bodies with an initially unconsolidated porous structure is included. An ice-rich initial composition that leads to a material dominated by phyllosilicates upon aqueous alteration (with 25 vol% H2O and a rock fraction that contains 85 vol% phyllosilicates and 15 vol% olivine upon aque-ous alteration, similar to CIand CM chondrites) was assumed. Atypical initial porosity of 40%[15] is re-duced following the change of the strain rate that is calculated as Voigt approximation from the strain rates of components[16]. Material properties (thermal con-ductivity, density, heat capacity, etc.) correspond to the composition assumed and are adjusted with tempera-ture and porosity. Melting of the water ice as well as water-rock separation are included[14]. Both short-and long-lived radionuclides are consideredas heat sources. Figure 3 shows the maximum temperature calculated as a function of radius and accretion time. A variety of internal structures is obtained, ranging from primordial (no melting of water ice) over partially melted or partially differentiated (melting of water ice, hydration, formation of a rocky core and water ocean below an undifferentiated layer) to completely differ-entiated ones (rocky core, water mantle, Enceladus-like case). The heating and differentiation of planetesi-mals is determined by the availability of 26Al, i.e., by the accretion time t0 relative to the formation of the calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs), such that maximum temperatures and structures vary stronglyfor t0< 6 Myr rel. to CAIs. However, for a later accre-tion only the size of the body determines its maximum tempera-ture and structure due to the nearly constant heating by long-lived radionuclides. Average densities of Ceres-and Europa-like group membersimply high-ly porous interiors and, consequently, relatively late accretion at t0> 3 Myr rel. to CAIs with a maximum temperature of < 600 K (Figure3)

D Takir↗

Structure and evolution of gaseous protoplanets

The evolutionary stages of a giant planet are reviewed, starting with the formation of the solar nebula and ending at the present time. The general mechanism for formation of a giant planet is assumed to involve the accumulation of solid material to form a core which grows to a critical mass, after which rapid accretion of the gaseous envelope occurs. The object then evolves at constant mass to its present state. Detailed numerical simulations of these evolutionary phases, under the assumption of spherical symmetry are reviewed, with particular attention to formation time scales, chemical composition, rotation, and satellite formation.

Bodenheimer, Peter↗

Planetary and Stellar Data Products Expected From The Kepler Mission

The Kepler Mission is a Discovery-class mission scheduled to be launched in the 2006-2007 time frame. It is a wide field of view photometer with a 95 m aperture designed to attain a photometric precision of 2 parts in 10^5 for the 12th magnitude stars. It will continually observe 100,000 main-sequence stars from 9th to 14th magnitude for a period of four years with a cadence of 4/hour. This database should be unique in its photometric precision, cadence, and duration of observations. Several hundred terrestrial-size planets will be detected if they are common around solar-like stars. Based on the current results of Doppler-velocity searches, over a thousand giant planets will also be found. A guest investigator program is planned that would provide the opportunity to observe thousands of other objects in the 105 square degree FOV. Such objects could include stars with micro-variability, other intrinsic variables, cataclysmic variables, eclipsing binaries (including x-ray binaries), and possibly AGN. A ground-based program to classify all 225,000 stars in the FOV and to do a detailed examination of a subset of the stars that show planetary companions is planned. Doppler-velocity observations will be made to find the presence of giant planets not seen in transit. The data will be rapidly released to the community for follow up observations and for changes to the guest investigator program.

Borucki, W. J.↗