Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “doe”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

The U.S. DOE-EM international program - 15026

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) conducts international collaboration activities in support of U.S. policies and objectives regarding the accelerated risk reduction and remediation of the environmental cleanup legacy resulting from the nations' nuclear weapons program and government sponsored nuclear energy research. The EM International Program, supported out of the EM Office of the Associate Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary pursues collaborations with foreign government organizations, educational institutions and private industry to assist in identifying technologies and promote international collaborations that leverage resources and link international experience and expertise. The primary objective of the International Program is to work closely with the various technical program offices within EM (e.g., tank waste and nuclear materials management, groundwater and soil remediation, deactivation and decommissioning) to identify collaborative opportunities related to innovative technologies, as well as best management practices, that support successful completion of the EM mission. This objective is directly aligned with the current DOE Strategic Plan 2014 - 2018, issued in April 2014. In mid-fiscal year (FY) 2014, the International Program awarded several collaborative projects for work scope spanning waste management, tank waste management, groundwater and soil remediation, deactivation and decommissioning (D and D), disposal operations, and nuclear materials disposition initiatives to nine foreign organizations. These projects include both technical and non-technical activities, with opportunities for continuation into FY 2015 and beyond. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE nuclear separation technologies - 15148

Realizing that challenges are facing US actinide science, separations, and waste form research and development activities including meeting future manpower needs, the U.S Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Environmental Management (EM), Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) jointly co-sponsored a workshop entitled 'Separations Technologies: 'Going from Where We Are to Where We Want to Be' on nuclear separations technologies in Bethesda, Maryland (July 2011) to identify common needs and potential requirements in separations technologies and opportunities for program partnerships. Recognizing the different mission requirements of the sponsoring programs, participants were able to identify areas with common uses and related applications. The two follow-on technical workshops held during the Fall 2012 addressed both the chemical aspects and the physical aspects of nuclear separations. Each workshop consisted of technical discussions regarding future work relevant to DOE goals. The large number of subject matter experts from the national laboratories, academia, and headquarters staff developed a long list of existing and new technology developments in the areas of aqueous separations, pyrochemical processing, waste forms, fuel technology etc... Each of these workshops identified the current state of knowledge or technology, the resources needed, technology development opportunities, and the objectives to reach the desired end-state(s). A consolidated report with its eight appendices will be issued at the end of December 2014 summarizing the outcomes of these workshops. Some examples of these findings will be presented in our contribution. It is clear that, in the current environment of decreasing budgets it is illogical for NE, EM and NNSA to develop its own home-grown technology. Therefore, there is a strong case to be made for leveraging limited resources in order to accomplish all objectives while significantly reducing development costs. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assessment of defense-related uranium mines in the United States and other US DOE office of legacy management domestic and international uranium initiatives - 15335

US DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM) has taken several initiatives to improve domestic uranium mining and milling operations in the United States and to contribute to the management of legacy uranium mining and milling sites around the world. Initiatives include completing the 2014 Report to Congress on Defense-Related Uranium Mines, managing the Title X Uranium and Thorium Program with the Office of Environmental Management, and assisting IAEA with uranium issues in member state countries. The 2014 Report to Congress identified abandoned uranium mines (AUMs) in the United States that provided uranium ore to the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) between 1947 and 1970. The report identified AUM locations, reclamation/remediation status, radiological risks and other hazards, costs for reclamation and remediation, and potential prioritization schemes for mine cleanup. To develop reclamation and remediation cleanup cost estimates and assess risks, AUMs were grouped into six categories by tons of uranium ore produced, ranging from Small (less than 91 metric tons [100 tons]) to Very Large (greater than 453,900 metric tons [500,000 tons]). Radiological risk was calculated using the RESRAD computer code for five exposure scenarios: offsite resident, onsite resident, occasional visitor, recreational visitor, and mine reclamation worker. Results indicate that 69 percent of the AUMs are in Colorado and Utah and 23 percent are in Arizona, Wyoming, and New Mexico; and that the majority of the AUMs (68 percent) were considered Small or Small/Medium production mines, producing less than 908 metric tons (1,000 tons) of uranium ore. Although New Mexico has fewer AUMs (247) than the other states in the Colorado Plateau region, AUMs in that state (primarily those in the Grants Mineral Belt) produced 45 percent of the 79.5 million tons of AEC-purchased uranium ore. About 50 percent of the AUMs are on public land managed by the US Bureau of Land Management; 435 AUMs are on the Navajo Nation. Risk estimates for the onsite resident scenario (plausible on tribal and non-federal land) could result in an incremental cancer risk greater than 10{sup -4}. Radon inhalation was the dominant contributor to radiological risk for the five exposure scenarios evaluated. Different state and federal agencies are conducting cleanup of some AUMs under various remedial and legal authorities. Activities constituting mine 'reclamation' may reduce radiological risks to humans to acceptable levels for many mines on federal public lands if the occasional visitor and recreational visitor exposure scenarios are assumed. Addressing physical hazards (e.g., open shafts) at mines where conditions could cause serious injuries is typically a priority of public land management agencies. At locations where mine-related groundwater contamination occurs, it is a significant contributor to cleanup costs. However, most Small and Small/Medium AUMs were likely developed above the water table, and some wet mines are located in areas where groundwater has high, naturally occurring levels of the same constituents (including radioactive elements) that are typically associated with uranium mines. LM is also administering, with the US DOE Office of Environmental Management, the Title X program, which was developed by Congress to reimburse private companies (i.e., those that held active operating licenses prior to 1978) for a portion of their reclamation costs for mill sites that processed ore sold to AEC. LM recently updated the program guidance document and established internal protocols for annually auditing companies. LM is assisting IAEA on two different initiatives: assisting developing countries with training on the basic steps to take to perform reclamation of uranium mines, and developing technical guidance and case studies related to safety and environmental assessments and post-closure management of uranium legacy sites as part of the IAEA Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites initiative. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

U.S. DOE's environmental management site-specific advisory board: 20 years of effective community involvement - 15377

This paper provides an overview of the U.S. DOE's Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board from its roots in the early 1990's at the Keystone Center to its current activities. The Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board has a unique mandate to provide input regarding the cleanup of nuclear legacy sites in the United States. Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board comprises eight local boards. The Office of Environmental Management has made public participation a fundamental component of its cleanup mission and has found that the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board has contributed greatly to bringing community input regarding values and priorities to the cleanup decision-making processes. Public participation that involves ongoing community engagement has inherent challenges; the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board operates with additional challenges that reflect the political and technical nature of U.S. DOE's work. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Implementation of Enhanced Attenuation at the DOE Mound Site OU-1 Landfill: Accelerating Progress and Reducing Costs - 16270

A field demonstration of enhanced attenuation (EA) was initiated in 2014 to expedite the remediation of industrial solvents in the groundwater impacted by the former landfill Operable Unit 1 (OU-1) at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Mound, Ohio, Site. EA uses active engineering solutions to alter the target site so that the contaminant plume will passively stabilize and shrink. For OU-1, the EA was implemented by targeted injection of an electron donor (vegetable oil) to create 'structured geochemical zones'. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the altered subsurface system encounter alternating anaerobic and aerobic environments along the plume flow path. The effect of these structured geochemical zones is effective and rapid degradation of parent compounds such as trichloroethene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE), and daughter compounds such as cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride. EA at Mound OU-1 provides a transition to natural attenuation and is an alternative to the baseline pump-and-treat (P and T) system. Industrial solvents (primarily TCE) and other VOCs that originated from the former solid-waste landfill contaminated the groundwater in the Buried Valley Aquifer beneath the Mound site. A groundwater P and T system was initiated in 1996 to control the plume, and a soil vapor extraction system was installed and operated from 1997 to 2003 to remove the bulk of the VOC sources from the vadose zone. Physical removal of the landfill waste and contaminated soil was performed between 2006 and 2010. Approximately 76,100 cubic meters (99,500 cubic yards) of material were removed from the OU-1 landfill area. Operation of the groundwater P and T system continued throughout this period. The principles and technical basis of the ongoing EA field demonstration were developed by the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council. The goal of the EA implementation is to provide a bridge between active groundwater treatments and monitored natural attenuation. EA relies on understanding and manipulating the contaminant mass balance. Technologies are applied to sustainably reduce the contaminant loading from the source and/or increase the rate of natural attenuation processes within the plume. In 2014, a core team that included DOE, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Ohio EPA, and technical support organizations evaluated remedial options for OU-1. During the 2014 evaluation, the team projected a cleanup time frame for the baseline P and T system of 26 additional years and a cleanup time frame for the EA remedy of 13 years. On the basis of that evaluation, EPA approved the implementation of the EA remedy that required the shutdown of the P and T system. The combination of technologies implemented for OU-1 EA included (a) neat vegetable oil in the vadose zone in the former landfill and (b) emulsified vegetable oil within the footprint of the groundwater plume. In the first part of the deployment, neat oil spreads laterally and forms a thin layer on the water table beneath residual soil sources to intercept and reduce future VOC loading and to reduce oxygen inputs to the local groundwater. In the second part of the deployment, emulsified oil forms active bioremediation anaerobic treatment zones within the plume footprint to degrade existing groundwater contaminants (via reductive dechlorination, co-metabolism, or both) and stimulates long-term attenuation capacity in the down-gradient aerobic plume (via co-metabolism). The results from the first year of the field demonstration indicate that the dissolved TCE and PCE plumes have decreased in size and mass. Statistical tests indicate that the VOC concentrations in the majority of the source-area wells are decreasing. The VOC concentrations throughout the plume are projected to be below the target maximum contaminant level of 2 to 5 μg/L within 5 to 10 years-sooner than the design projection of 13 years. The biogeochemistry and microbial community within the structured geochemical zones are consistent with the design and appear to be stable. At Mound OU-1, EA has accelerated progress toward the remedial action objectives and reduced costs. Ongoing monitoring will determine whether the EA remedy has transitioned the site into monitored natural attenuation status and whether the EA will continue to be effective, timely, and sustainable. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE Grand Junction Office Marks 75 Years of Contribution to the Nation's Defense Program - 18380

On July 26, 2016, the former US Department of Energy (DOE) Grand Junction Office was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in recognition of its important, historic roles in the Manhattan Project and the Cold War. The work done from Grand Junction, Colorado, was an important component of the nation's defense program; however, because of the classified nature of the work, little of this history was originally available to the public. In 1943, the privately-owned site that later became the Grand Junction Office was purchased by the US government for the Colorado Area Office for the US Army Corps of Engineers Manhattan Engineer District (MED). The Colorado Area Office's mission was to procure and process uranium as part of a nationwide effort to build an atomic bomb. This race to build a bomb ahead of Nazi Germany became known as the Manhattan Project. Approximately 14% of the uranium obtained for the Manhattan Project was from Colorado Plateau ore-the largest source of domestic uranium ore known at the time. Uranium extracted from vanadium mill tailings was concentrated into uranium oxide, or 'yellowcake,' and shipped by rail to a facility in Tonawanda, New York, for further refinement. At the conclusion of World War II, the military MED mission ended, and the Grand Junction site became the principal US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) office for acquiring and exploring for domestic uranium. The Colorado Raw Materials Office's primary objective was to increase the stockpile of fissionable material as rapidly as possible. To do that, AEC incentivized private industry and invited individual prospectors to locate uranium ores on public lands of the Colorado Plateau. Seemingly overnight, the small city of Grand Junction was transformed into a booming, modern metropolis and the national center of uranium exploration. Program operations in Grand Junction later included those of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) program, the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA), vicinity properties cleanup, decontamination and decommissioning, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of legacy sites. In 2001, DOE transferred most of the original Grand Junction 55.7-acre site to the Riverview Technology Corporation, a business-development nonprofit sponsored by Mesa County and the City of Grand Junction. The US Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management continues to operate from leased facilities onsite. The Office of Legacy Management will host the 2018 Long-Term Stewardship Conference in Grand Junction on August 20-23. Conference attendees are invited to participate in a special 75. anniversary celebration at the Grand Junction Office where they will have the opportunity to learn more about the office's historic past, its ongoing and expanding work, and its goals of informing future generations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

U.S. DOE's Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board: Public Engagement in Cleanup - 18709

This paper provides an overview of the U.S. DOE's Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB) from its roots in the early 1990's at the Keystone Center to its current activities. The EM SSAB has a unique mandate to provide input regarding the cleanup of nuclear legacy sites in the United States. Chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the EM SSAB comprises eight local boards. The Office of Environmental Management (EM) has made public participation a fundamental component of its cleanup mission and has found that the EM SSAB has contributed greatly to bringing community input regarding values and priorities to the cleanup decision-making processes. Public participation that involves ongoing community engagement has inherent challenges; the EM SSAB operates with additional challenges that reflect the political and technical nature of U.S. DOE's work. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Panel Session 52: US DOE Featured Site Idaho - Managing a Multi-Mission Site (4/5)

This panel focused on discussions related to managing a multi-mission site. The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site supports Department of Energy (DOD) Environmental Management (EM), Nuclear Energy (NE), Homeland Security, and the US Navy. Missions cross boundaries in areas such as spent nuclear fuel, waste management, and shared services. The EM mission is split between two separate contracts: the research component with the INL and the execution component with the Idaho Cleanup Project (ICP). Panelists discussed the unique aspects of managing a multi-mission site and their challenges and lessons learned. Presentation proposed: Managing a Multi-Mission Site (Robert Boston, US DOE (USA), Juan Alvarez, Battelle - Idaho National Laboratory (USA), John Zimmerman, US DOE Idaho Operations Office (USA), Frederick Hughes, Fluor Idaho, LLC (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

01-16 DOE Authorization Strategy

DOE-STD-1189-2016 Process Standard – Stage Gates Establishment of Regulatory Requirements Clarity of Path Forward Integration of Safety and Design Reduce Project Risk by Establishing Regulatory Certainty through formal regulatory approvals. Flexibility in risk analysis and presentation methods. ANSI/ANS 15.21, DOE-STD-3009, LMP/TICAP

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO 2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale

While the majority of shale formations will serve as reservoir seals for stored anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrocarbon-bearing shale formations may be potential geologic sinks after depletion through primary production. Here in this paper we present the United States-Department of Energy-National Energy Technology Laboratory (US-DOE-NETL) methodology for screening-level assessment of prospective CO 2 storage resources in shale using a volumetric equation. Volumetric resource estimates are produced from the bulk volume, porosity, and sorptivity of the shale and storage efficiency factors based on formation-scale properties and petrophysical limitations on fluid transport. Prospective shale formations require: (1) prior hydrocarbon production using horizontal drilling and stimulation via staged, high-volume hydraulic fracturing, (2) depths sufficient to maintain CO 2 in a supercritical state, generally >800 m, and (3) an overlying seal. The US-DOE-NETL methodology accounts for storage of CO 2 in shale as a free fluid phase within fractures and matrix pores and as an sorbed phase on organic matter and clays. Uncertainties include but are not limited to poorly-constrained geologic variability in formation thickness, porosity, existing fluid content, organic richness, and mineralogy. Knowledge of how these parameters may be linked to depositional environments, facies, and diagenetic history of the shale will improve the understanding of pore-to-reservoir scale behavior, and provide improved estimates of prospective CO 2 storage.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A review of the behavior of radioiodine in the subsurface at two DOE sites

The 129 I isotope has a half-life of nearly 16 million years, creating a potential risk to receptors when 129I is present in groundwater and effective remedies are needed to mitigate its potential risk in the environment. This paper not only provides an in-depth review of various processes and reactions that control the fate and transport of iodine, but also describes how this information can be used for in situ management of iodine. The majority of the iodine fate and transport studies have been conducted at the US Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford and Savannah River sites, where radioisotopes of iodine were inadvertently released into the environment during weapons production. Site-specific remediation technologies are currently being evaluated as part of the DOE cleanup mission. The sites are markedly different in terms of climate (arid vs. sub-tropical), major geochemical parameters (pH ~ 7.5 vs. 4) and mineralogy (carbonate vs. Fe/Al oxide dominated), but they share the same network of processes and reactions that control iodine fate and transport. These include adsorption to minerals and sediments, interactions with organic matter, electron transfer reactions with minerals and microbes, and precipitation. In conclusion, this process-based network serves as basis for regional scale model calculations to predict plume spreading and/or dissipation, design efficient remediation techniques and conduct contamination management activities.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

The DOE E3SM coupled model version 1: Overview and evaluation at standard resolution

This work documents the first version of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) new Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SMv1). We focus on the standard resolution of the fully--coupled physical model designed to address DOE mission-relevant water cycle questions. Its components include atmosphere and land (110km grid spacing), ocean and sea ice (60km in the mid-latitudes and 30km at the equator and poles), and river transport (55km) models. This base configuration will also serve as a foundation for additional configurations exploring higher horizontal resolution as well as augmented capabilities in the form of biogeochemistry and cryosphere configurations. The performance of E3SMv1 is evaluated by means of a standard set of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Characterization of Klima (CMIP6 DECK) simulations consisting of a long pre-industrial control, historical simulations (ensembles of fully coupled and prescribed SSTs) as well as idealized CO 2 forcing simulations. The model performs well overall with biases typical of other CMIP-class models, although the simulated Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation is weaker than many CMIP-class models. While the E3SMv1 historical ensemble captures the bulk of the observed warming between pre-industrial (1850) and present-day, the trajectory of the warming diverges from observations in the second half of the 20th century with a period of delayed warming followed by an excessive warming trend. Using a two-layer energy balance model, we attribute this divergence to the model's strong aerosol-related effective radiative forcing (ERF ari+aci = -1.65 W m -2 ) and high equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS = 5.3 K).

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Fuel Cell Benchmarked Against US DOE 2017 Technical Targets

Chemically modified single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) with varying degrees of functionalization were utilized for the fabrication of SWNT thin film catalyst support layers (CSLs) in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), which were suitable for benchmarking against the US DOE 2017 targets. Use of the optimum level of SWNT -COOH functionality allowed the construction of a prototype SWNT-based PEMFC with total Pt loading of 0.06 mg Pt /cm 2 - well below the value of 0.125 mg Pt /cm 2 set as the US DOE 2017 technical target for total Pt group metals (PGM) loading. This prototype PEMFC also approaches the technical target for the total Pt content per kW of power (<0.125 g PGM /kW) at cell potential 0.65 V: a value of 0.15 g Pt /kW was achieved at 80°C/22 psig testing conditions, which was further reduced to 0.12 g Pt /kW at 35 psig back pressure.

77 NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY↗

The U.S. DOE ARM User Facility Establishes a New Site for Studies of Land–Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in the Southeastern United States

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility has established a new site in the Bankhead National Forest (BNF) in northern Alabama that will gather data on how clouds, the land surface, and aerosols interact at a hierarchy of scales important to understanding and simulating the Earth system. Starting its operations in October 2024, the BNF site provides a multi-year opportunity for scientists to unravel complex land-atmosphere interactions. A suite of ground-based sensors, elevated tower-based instrumentation, and aerial facilities will enable scientists to investigate those interactions from within the canopy to the clouds. The Southeastern United States was recommended by the DOE ARM and its collaborators in the broader community as an important region to address their common scientific questions given the region’s abundant surface-forced convective clouds and mesoscale convective systems that pose ongoing challenges in Earth system models. The region is also home to significant terrain complexity and land-use heterogeneity that will unleash new understanding of anthropogenic and biogenic aerosol processes, boundary-layer aerosol-cloud interactions, and the interactions between the terrestrial ecosystem and coupled aerosol-cloud-radiation processes.

Aerosols↗

Characterization of Representative Materials in Support of Safe, Long Term Storage of Surplus Plutonium in DOE-STD-3013 Containers

The Surveillance and Monitoring Program is a joint Los Alamos National Laboratory/Savannah River Site effort funded by the Department of Energy-Environmental Management to provide the technical basis for the safe, long-term storage (up to 50 years) of over 6 metric tons of plutonium stored in over 5,000 DOE-STD-3013 containers at various facilities around the DOE complex. The majority of this material is plutonium that is surplus to the nuclear weapons program, and much of it is destined for conversion to mixed oxide fuel for use in US nuclear power plants. The form of the plutonium ranges from relatively pure metal and oxide to very impure oxide. The performance of the 3013 containers has been shown to depend on moisture content and on the levels, types and chemical forms of the impurities. The oxide materials that present the greatest challenge to the storage container are those that contain chloride salts. Other common impurities include oxides and other compounds of calcium, magnesium, iron, and nickel. Over the past 15 years the program has collected a large body of experimental data on 54 samples of plutonium, with 53 chosen to represent the broader population of materials in storage. This paper summarizes the characterization data, moisture analysis, particle size, surface area, density, wattage, actinide composition, trace element impurity analysis, and shelf life surveillance data and includes origin and process history information. Limited characterization data on fourteen nonrepresentative samples is also presented.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Final report for DOE Grant No. DE-SC0006609 - Persistence of Microbially Facilitated Calcite Precipitation as an in situ Treatment for Strontium-90

Subsurface radionuclide and metal contaminants throughout the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) complex pose one of DOE's greatest challenges for long-term stewardship. One promising stabilization mechanism for divalent ions, such as the short-lived radionuclide 90 Sr, is co-precipitation in calcite. We have previously found that nutrient addition can stimulate microbial ureolytic activity, that this activity accelerates calcite precipitation and co-precipitation of Sr, and that higher calcite precipitation rates can result in increased Sr partitioning. We have conducted integrated field, laboratory, and computational research to evaluate the relationships between ureolysis and calcite precipitation rates and trace metal partitioning under environmentally relevant conditions, and investigated the coupling between flow/flux manipulations and precipitate distribution. A field experimental campaign conducted at the Integrated Field Research Challenge (IFRC) site located at Rifle, CO was based on a continuous recirculation design; water extracted from a down-gradient well was amended with urea and molasses (a carbon and electron donor) and re-injected into an up-gradient well. The goal of the recirculation design and simultaneous injection of urea and molasses was to uniformly accelerate the hydrolysis of urea and calcite precipitation over the entire inter-wellbore zone. The urea-molasses recirculation phase lasted, with brief interruptions for geophysical surveys, for 12 days and was followed by long-term monitoring which continued for 13 months. A post experiment core located within the inter-wellbore zone was collected on day 321 and characterized with respect to cation exchange capacity, mineral carbonate content, urease activity, ureC gene abundance, extractable ammonium (a urea hydrolysis product) content, and the 13 C isotopic composition of solid carbonates. It was also subjected to selective extractions for strontium and uranium. Result of the core characterization suggest that urea hydrolysis occurred primarily within the upper portion of the inter-wellbore zone and that strontium was mobilized from cation exchange sites and subsequently co-precipitated with new calcium carbonate.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Midwestern Regional Center of the Doe National Institute for Climatic Change Research

The goal of NICCR (National Institute for Climatic Change Research) was to mobilize university researchers, from all regions of the country, in support of the climatic change research objectives of DOE/BER. The NICCR Midwestern Regional Center (MRC) supported work in the following states: North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio. The MRC of NICCR was able to support nearly $\$ $8 million in climatic change research, including $\$ $6,671,303 for twenty projects solicited and selected by the MRC over five requests for proposals (RFPs) and $\$ $1,051,666 for the final year of ten projects from the discontinued DOE NIGEC (National Institute for Global Environmental Change) program. The projects selected and funded by the MRC resulted in 135 peer-reviewed publications and supported the training of 25 PhD students and 23 Masters students. Another 36 publications were generated by the final year of continuing NIGEC projects supported by the MRC. The projects funded by the MRC used a variety of approaches to answer questions relevant to the DOE’s climate change research program. These included experiments that manipulated temperature, moisture and other global change factors; studies that sought to understand how the distribution of species and ecosystems might change under future climates; studies that used measurements and modeling to examine current ecosystem fluxes of energy and mass and those that would exist under future conditions; and studies that synthesized existing data sets to improve our understanding of the effects of climatic change on terrestrial ecosystems. In all of these efforts, the MRC specifically sought to identify and quantify responses of terrestrial ecosystems that were not well understood or not well modeled by current efforts. The MRC also sought to better understand and model important feedbacks between terrestrial ecosystems, atmospheric chemistry, and regional and global climate systems. The broad variety of projects the MRC has supported gave us a unique opportunity to greatly improve our ability to predict the future health, composition and function of important agricultural and natural terrestrial ecosystems within the Midwestern Region.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Oak Ridge National Laboratory DOE Site Sustainability Plan (SSP) with FY 2013 Performance Data

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is both the largest science and energy laboratory of the US Department of Energy (DOE) and one of the oldest national laboratories still operating at its original site. These characteristics provide the Sustainable Campus Initiative (SCI) both a unique opportunity and a unique challenge to integrate sustainability into facilities and activities. As outlined in this report, SCI is leveraging the outcomes of ORNL’s DOE-sponsored research and development programs to maximize the efficient use of energy and natural resources across ORNL. Wherever possible, ORNL is integrating technical innovations into new and existing facilities, systems, and processes with a widespread approach to achieving Executive Order 13514. ORNL continues to pursue and deploy innovative solutions and initiatives to advance regional, national, and worldwide sustainability and continues to transform its culture and engage employees in supporting sustainability at work, at home, and in the community. Table 1 summarizes ORNL's FY 2013 performance and planned actions to attain future goals. ORNL has achieved numerous successes during FY 2013, which are described in detail throughout this document.

Nichols, Teresa A.↗