Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “battery separator”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Electrode Separation and Froth Flotation for the Recovery of Li-ion Battery Cathode Materials

Increasing use of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) will significantly increase the quantity of LIB waste generated from end-of-life batteries. Spent LiCoO 2 (LCO) battery cathodes contain significant quantities of valuable metals, making them good candidates for recycling. Typical recycling processes rely on high temperatures (pyrometallurgy) and chemical leachants (hydrometallurgy) to completely decompose the cathode and enable material recovery. Direct recycling processes and recovery of active material from electrode scrap do not benefit from such destructive recycling, and an efficient means of separating the cathode active material from the inactive components (e.g., polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder, conductive carbon) is needed. Here, we explore PVDF removal from LCO cathodes by two separate methods, evaluating their suitability for coupling to subsequent separation by froth flotation (FF). We show that washing electrodes in the solvent PolarClean (PC) dissolves PVDF away from LCO cathodes, enabling separation of the remaining LCO and conductive carbon by FF. The process is suitable for use with both pristine and cycled LCO electrodes, and the pristine recovered material can be used to prepare electrodes capable of cycling at 140 mAh/g. In conclusion, this demonstrates the suitability of coupled PC washing and FF separation for recycling both end-of-life batteries and scrap electrode material.

Batteries↗
NASA NTRS2004

Thermal characteristics of Lithium-ion batteries

Lithium-ion batteries have a very promising future for space applications. Currently they are being used on a few GEO satellites, and were used on the two recent Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity. There are still problem that exist that need to be addressed before these batteries can fully take flight. One of the problems is that the cycle life of these batteries needs to be increased. battery. Research is being focused on the chemistry of the materials inside the battery. This includes the anode, cathode, and the cell electrolyte solution. These components can undergo unwanted chemical reactions inside the cell that deteriorate the materials of the battery. During discharge/ charge cycles there is heat dissipated in the cell, and the battery heats up and its temperature increases. An increase in temperature can speed up any unwanted reactions in the cell. Exothermic reactions cause the temperature to increase; therefore increasing the reaction rate will cause the increase of the temperature inside the cell to occur at a faster rate. If the temperature gets too high thermal runaway will occur, and the cell can explode. The material that separates the electrode from the electrolyte is a non-conducting polymer. At high temperatures the separator will melt and the battery will be destroyed. The separator also contains small pores that allow lithium ions to diffuse through during charge and discharge. High temperatures can cause these pores to close up, permanently damaging the cell. My job at NASA Glenn research center this summer will be to perform thermal characterization tests on an 18650 type lithium-ion battery. High temperatures cause the chemicals inside lithium ion batteries to spontaneously react with each other. My task is to conduct experiments to determine the temperature that the reaction takes place at, what components in the cell are reacting and the mechanism of the reaction. The experiments will be conducted using an accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC), which uses a heat-wait-search mode until an exothermic reaction is detected. After an exotherm is found the calorimeter maintains an adiabatic environment around a bomb which holds the test sample. The ARC will help identify important reactions and what temperature these exothermic reactions take place at. In order fully understand the battery, we are first going to take apart the battery and test the individual components of the battery using the ARC. I will first conduct a test on the electrolyte solution by itself. We will then test the electrolyte solution with the anode. We would like to see how the electrolyte solution reacts with the anode and its binder material. The next would be the same test using the cathode instead of the anode. By comparing the results of the electrolyte, electrolyte with anode, and the electrolyte with the cathode we can determine the reactions that are taking place due to each component. Using the heat capacity of the each individual sample and the temperature by which the sample increases, kinetic and thermo-dynamical information can then be found. A Gas chromatograph could be used to help with the task of identifying the by-products at the end of each test. One way of increasing the cycle life is to increase the stability of the materials inside the

Hauser, Dan↗
NASA NTRS2004

Individual Pressure Vessel (PV) and Common Pressure Vessel (CPV) Nickel-Hydrogen Battery Performance Under LEO Cycling Conditions

LEO life cycle testing of Individual Pressure Vessel (PV) and Common Pressure Vessel (CPV) nickel-hydrogen cell packs have been sponsored by the NASA Aerospace Flight Battery Program. The cell packs have cycled under both 35% and 60% depth-of- discharge and temperature conditions of -5 C and +lO C. The packs have been on test since as early as 1992 and have generated a substantial database. This report will provide insight into performance trends as a function of the specific cell configuration and manufacturer for eight separate nickel-hydrogen battery cell packs.

Miller, Thomas B.↗
DOE OSTI2020

Synergistic Effect of High Sulfur Loading Layered Cathode, Ceramic Separator and Gel Electrolyte

Lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries are promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices as they are capable of providing higher energy density and lower cost in comparison to the state of the art Li-ion batteries. To gain these characteristics, there are challenges such as polysulfide crossover, large volume changes during cycling, and deposition of insulating lithium sulfide that need to be alleviated. A popular approach to address these issues is to control the structure and properties of the carbon cathode in order to influence the transport of polysulfides, surface area for reaction, and lithium sulfide deposition. Ceramic separators on the other hand can drastically affect ion diffusion and overall battery performance. Safety concerns regarding the flammable liquid electrolyte can be reduced by deploying gel electrolyte. Towards this direction, we developed a layer-on-layer cathode structure with sulfur-impregnated activated carbon alternating with graphene layer, which was fabricated by Air-assisted electrospray. A much higher sulfur loading compared to slurry cast cathodes can be provided in this method. Combining the new cathode with gel electrolyte can offer higher safety of the battery and capacity retention. Ceramic separator would compensate the reduced ion conductivity of the gel electrolyte and the combination of these variables will be very promising in improvement of battery performance and safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Recovery of High Value Anode Materials for a Closed Loop Li-ion Battery Recycling Process (Final Report)

Battery Resourcers’ goal with this Small Business Innovative Research Phase 1 project was to produce high quality and high purity graphite generated from its Li-ion battery recycling technology. Battery Resourcers’ technology recovers cathode material from a broad spectrum of Li-ion battery regardless of size, shape or chemistry. In Battery Resourcers existing model, the graphite is recovered to be used as a reductant and therefore the battery materials cost or recycling cost is not lowered by the recovery of the graphite. Currently, Battery Resourcers is piloting its lithium ion battery recycling process and the recovered LiNi 0.33 Mn 0.33 Co 0.33 O 2 (NMC111) or LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC111) cathode materials have shown that they can outperform existing commercial NMC111 cathode materials while being produced at a projected lower cost. Battery Resourcers and its subcontractor WPI have demonstrated the same success with the recovered graphite for anode materials. The success of this award will enable Battery Resourcers offer lowest cost anode materials while reducing the carbon footprint of the battery industry. This will potentially lower the cost of EV by lowering the upfront cost of the battery and the end of life disposal costs. The technical objectives of this Phase 1 research project are to purify the recovered graphite from Battery Resourcers leaching process and demonstrate it is viable to be used in new electric vehicle lithium ion batteries. This project demonstrated that Battery Resourcers can recover graphite with less than 2% impurities. To separate the graphite from other materials Battery Resourcers will employed new filtering techniques and chemical processing methods.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS1976

Development of single cell protectors for sealed silver-zinc cells, phase 1

A single cell protector (SCP) assembly capable of protecting a single silver-zinc (Ag Zn) battery cell was designed, fabricated, and tested. The SCP provides cell-level protection against overcharge and overdischarge by a bypass circuit. The bypass circuit consists of a magnetic-latching relay that is controlled by the high and low-voltage limit comparators. Although designed specifically for secondary Ag-Zn cells, the SCP is flexible enough to be adapted to other rechargeable cells. Eighteen SCPs were used in life testing of an 18-cell battery. The cells were sealed Ag-Zn system with inorganic separators. For comparison, another 18-cell battery was subjected to identical life test conditions, but with battery-level protection rather than cell-level. An alternative approach to the SCP design in the form of a microprocessor-based system was conceptually designed. The comparison of SCP and microprocessor approaches is also presented and a preferred approach for Ag-Zn battery protection is discussed.

Imamura, M. S.↗
DOE OSTI2025

Stress Corrosion Cracking of NaSICON Membranes in Aqueous Electrolytes for Redox-Flow Batteries

The sodium super-ionic conductor (NaSICON) has versatile applications as a ceramic electrolyte for energy storage, where it can serve as an impermeable separator in solid-state batteries and redox flow systems. In particular, NaSICON systems have been proposed to be relatively stable in contact with water, making them compatible with aqueous battery chemistries. However, owing to their brittle nature and metal oxide constituents, stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) is an important failure mechanism that has not been previously explored. In this study, we assess the fracture toughness of NaSICON membranes in contact with aqueous solutions that are relevant to redox flow systems. Microindentation was performed to generate visible surface cracks and residual stress, which were observed to grow in length after exposure to aqueous solutions. This allows for a quantitative measurement of fracture toughness, which decreases after exposure to water. To contextualize these results, we develop a simplified model of the fracture behavior in aqueous redox-flow batteries that incorporate NaSICON membranes, illustrating the importance of SCC in cell design. This work provides quantitative insights into SCC as a failure mode in NaSICON, enhancing our understanding of the chemo-mechanical behavior of ceramic electrolytes in contact with aqueous solutions.

Zhang, Mengyao↗
DOE OSTI2022

Review of Multifunctional Separators: Stabilizing the Cathode and the Anode for Alkali (Li, Na, and K) Metal–Sulfur and Selenium Batteries

Alkali metal batteries based on lithium, sodium, and potassium anodes and sulfur-based cathodes are regarded as key for next-generation energy storage due to their high theoretical energy and potential cost effectiveness. However, metal–sulfur batteries remain challenged by several factors, including polysulfides’ (PSs) dissolution, sluggish sulfur redox kinetics at the cathode, and metallic dendrite growth at the anode. Functional separators and interlayers are an innovative approach to remedying these drawbacks. Here we critically review the state-of-the-art in separators/interlayers for cathode and anode protection, covering the Li–S and the emerging Na–S and K–S systems. The approaches for improving electrochemical performance may be categorized as one or a combination of the following: Immobilization of polysulfides (cathode); catalyzing sulfur redox kinetics (cathode); introduction of protective layers to serve as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) (anode); and combined improvement in electrolyte wetting and homogenization of ion flux (anode and cathode). It is demonstrated that while the advances in Li–S are relatively mature, less progress has been made with Na–S and K–S due to the more challenging redox chemistry at the cathode and increased electrochemical instability at the anode. Throughout these sections there is a complementary discussion of functional separators for emerging alkali metal systems based on metal–selenium and the metal–selenium sulfide. The focus then shifts to interlayers and artificial SEI/cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) layers employed to stabilize solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) in metal–sulfur solid-state batteries (SSBs). The discussion of SSEs focuses on inorganic electrolytes based on Li- and Na-based oxides and sulfides but also touches on some hybrid systems with an inorganic matrix and a minority polymer phase. The review then moves to practical considerations for functional separators, including scaleup issues and Li–S technoeconomics. The review concludes with an outlook section, where we discuss emerging mechanics, spectroscopy, and advanced electron microscopy (e.g. cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and cryo-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB))-based approaches for analysis of functional separator structure–battery electrochemical performance interrelations. Finally, throughout the review we identify the outstanding open scientific and technological questions while providing recommendations for future research topics.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Diagnostic-free onboard battery health assessment

Diverse usage patterns induce complex and variable aging behaviors in lithiumion batteries, complicating accurate health diagnosis and prognosis. Separate diagnostic cycles are often used to untangle the battery’s current state of health from prior complex aging patterns. However, these same diagnostic cycles alter the battery’s degradation trajectory, are time-intensive, and cannot be practically performed in onboard applications. Here, in this work, we leverage portions of operational measurements in combination with an interpretable machine learning model to enable rapid, onboard battery health diagnostics and prognostics without offline diagnostic testing and the requirement of historical data. We integrate mechanistic constraints within an encoder-decoder architecture to extract electrode states in a physically interpretable latent space and enable improved reconstruction of the degradation path. The health diagnosis model framework can be flexibly applied across diverse application interests with slight fine-tuning.

battery aging reconstruction↗
DOE OSTI2023

Direct Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide Using Nickel Hydroxide Batteries in a Membrane Electrode Assembly

Direct air capture (DAC) is a growing field responding to the need to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Several technologies are being developed today attempting to meet this need. The technology furthest in development are temperature swing adsorption technologies which have recently moved out of the pilot plant scale.1 This presentation looks to present an electrochemical device as alternative to these technologies. The electrochemical device proposed is a pair of nickel hydroxide (Ni(OH)2) battery electrodes which produce hydroxide (OH-). The hydroxide reacts with carbon dioxide (CO2) to create carbonate (CO32-) and bicarbonate (HCO3-). These carbonates can be transported from the cathode across an anion exchange membrane to the anode where they are evolved back into CO2 due to a pH reduction at the anode. This builds on work that optimized a Hydroxide Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (HEMFC) for CO2 capture, showing the efficacy of an electrochemically mediated pH swing carbon capture device.2,3 The benefit of the nickel hydroxide battery approach is the low energy cost associated with separation. Because a pair of nickel hydroxide batteries undergo the same electrochemical reaction, low potentials, and thus low energy cost is required. Experiments have shown device level energy requirements of less than 1 MWh ton-1CO2. Most of the energy required by the device produces the pH gradient used to capture and release CO2. The biggest hurdle for this electrochemical approach is increasing the flux of CO2 to allow for more compact devices. Strategies for managing the transient charge and discharge behavior of the battery system will be discussed. Focus will be on improving flux to reduce the overall cost of the device.

Buchen, James↗
DOE OSTI2025

Reciprocal Ternary Molten Salts Enable the Direct Upcycling of Spent Lithium‐Nickel‐Manganese‐Cobalt Oxide (NMC) Mixtures to Make NMC 622

Cathode active material is the most valuable component of spent lithium‐ion batteries, accounting for ≈30% of their overall value. Direct recycling of cathode materials involves recovering, regenerating, and reusing them without breaking down their chemical structure. This approach maximizes the added value of the cathode compound and reduces manufacturing costs by avoiding the need for virgin material production. However, one key challenge in scaling direct recycling from lab to industry is the requirement for highly purified cathode materials, contrasting with the low purity of black mass generated from battery shredding. No efficient separation process currently exists to isolate different lithium‐nickel‐manganese‐cobalt oxides (NMCs) from each other. Thus, direct recycling technologies that can operate with mixtures of multiple NMC stoichiometries will be best‐suited for industrial adoption. This study explores the direct recycling of NMC mixtures into NMC 622 using a “reciprocal ternary molten salts (RTMS)” system. Ionothermal relithiation and upcycling within the RTMS system successfully restore the layered structure, lithium content, and electrochemical performance of degraded NMCs, yielding results comparable to pristine NMC 622 (P‐NMC 622).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS1986

Reinforcing the Separators for Lithium/Carbon Cells

Fabrication of lithium/carbon batteries simplified by attachment of perforated nickel-foil, graphite-cloth, or graphite-paper backings to glass-fiber separators. Both nickel and carbon backings appear viable. Because perforated nickel foil already manufactured by electroforming, no obstacle to creation of very thin, very porous nickel foil to serve as backing: Thicknesses of 20 micrometers with porosities above 50 percent practicable.

Du Fresne, E. R.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Efficient separation and coprecipitation for simplified cathode recycling

Hydrometallurgical recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries is among the most promising recovery approaches. The current hydrometallurgical method for battery recycling faces challenges such as complex separation and precipitation processes, and environmental concerns from the use of caustic inorganic acid and hazardous hydrogen peroxide. Our proposed modified method, namely polyol-metallurgy, uses citric acid in ethylene glycol as dual-function green solution to overcome these obstacles. This bifunctional solution leaches valuable metal ions from cathode materials (e.g., LiCoO 2 ), and then acts as chelating agents to selectively precipitate cobalt through an esterification reaction, without the need for additional precipitation agents. The leaching efficiency of cobalt and lithium reaches 99.55% and 97.65%, respectively, and more than 96% of cobalt could be directly self-precipitated and recovered. Further, the unique characteristics of the dual-function solution also avoids impurities from Al foils and PVDF/carbon black films, enabling the simple separation process. Therefore, the process can be completed in one-pot system with efficient leaching, separation and coprecipitation, making it more efficient and feasible for operation than existing alternatives.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Conducting Polymers Meet Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have attracted increased interest because of the high theoretical energy density, low cost, and environmental friendliness. Conducting polymers (CPs), as one of the most promising materials used in Li–S batteries, can not only facilitate electron transfer and buffer the large volumetric change of sulfur benefiting from their porous structure and excellent flexibility, but also enable stronger physical/chemical adsorption capacity toward polysulfides (LiPSs) when doped with abundant heteroatoms to promote the sulfur redox kinetics and achieve the high sulfur loading. This review firstly introduces the properties of various CPs including structural CPs (polypyrrole (PPy), polyaniline (PANi), polyethylene dioxothiophene [PEDOT]) and compound CPs (polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and poly(acrylic acid) [PAA]), and their application potential in Li–S batteries. Furthermore, the research progress of various CPs in different components (cathode, separator, and interlayer) of Li–S batteries is systematically summarized. Finally, the application perspective of the CPs in Li–S batteries as a potential guidance is comprehensively discussed.

Chen, Xin↗
DOE OSTI2025

What is the Role of Relative Humidity on Conductivity in Polymer Electrolytes?

Ion transport properties in polymer electrolytes have been widely studied under rigorously dry and highly water-swollen conditions. However, the transition between these extremes, i.e., the low hydration regime, is still poorly understood at the molecular level and relevant to applications ranging from battery electrolytes to electrophoretic separations. Here, in this study, we apply atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to probe the role of hydration on ion mobilities and conductivities in LiTFSI-doped polyethers at low water content (less than 10% water by volume), which corresponds to 0−80% relative humidity conditions. With increasing water content, Li + ions exhibit two distinct regimes in their mobilities. At low water content, the majority of the Li + ions are weakly hydrated (two or fewer water molecules per Li + ion), maintaining strong interactions with their polymer solvation cage, and therefore exhibit only a weak increase in mobility relative to dry conditions. As water content increases, Li + ions form complete hydration shells, residing within water-rich domains that promote faster mobilities. Further, Li + mobilities increase more significantly in polymer electrolytes composed of more hydrophilic polymers and higher salt concentrations due to the formation of larger water-rich domains. In contrast, TFSI − has comparatively weak interactions with both the polymer and water, exhibiting a monotonic increase in mobility as a function of water content. Overall, these results help clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying ionic mobilities and conductivities in polymer electrolytes at low water content.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Three-chamber electrochemical reactor for selective lithium extraction from brine

Efficient lithium recovery from geothermal brines is crucial for the battery industry. Current electrochemical separation methods struggle with the simultaneous presence of Na + , K + , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ because these cations are similar to Li + , making it challenging to separate effectively. We address these challenges with a three-chamber reactor featuring a polymer porous solid electrolyte in the middle layer. This design improves the transference number of Li + (t Li+ ) by 2.1 times compared to the two-chamber reactor and also reduces the chlorine evolution reaction, a common side reaction in electrochemical lithium extraction, to only 6.4% in Faradaic Efficiency. Employing a lithium-ion conductive glass ceramic (LICGC) membrane, the reactor achieved high t Li+ of 97.5% in LiOH production from simulated brine, while the concentrations of Na + K + , Mg 2+ , and Ca 2+ are below the detection limit. Electrochemical experiments and surface analysis elucidated the cation transport mechanism, highlighting the impact of Na + on Li + migration at the LICGC interface.

Science & Technology - Other Topics↗
DOE OSTI2021

3D-Printable Inks for Energy and Environmental Applications

Partnering additive manufacturing (3D printing) with functional nanomaterial-based inks has the potential to push the properties and performance of advanced materials beyond previous capabilities. This is particularly true in energy and environmental applications. Graphene, 2D materials, and ceramic-based inks, when coupled with 3D printing technologies like Direct Ink Writing (DIW), also called “robocasting,” have shown promise to greatly enhance the performance of batteries, supercapacitors, reactors, and separator devices. Robocasting enables the printing of large-scale electrodes for energy applications with micron resolution by using high concentration viscous inks.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗