Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “REACTOR CORE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Reactivity Coefficient Calculation for a Low-Power LEU Research Reactor

Core design studies on a 20-MW thermal power low enriched uranium (LEU) fueled research reactor are underway at the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) with the primary purpose of providing quality neutron beams for scientific research. The 'tank-in-pool' design pattern is adopted for the new reactor: A compact core composed of two horizontally split halves are surrounded by a cylindrical D{sub 2}O reflector tank, and the tank is itself surrounded by a large H{sub 2}O pool, which functions as thermal and biological shielding. The split core consists of 18 MTR-type fuel elements which are evenly distributed into two regions. The LEU fuel used in the study is the U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}-Al dispersion fuel with U-235 enrichment of 19.75%, the only NRC certified LEU fuel in the U.S. The core is cooled and moderated by H{sub 2}O, and separated from D{sub 2}O by zircaloy core boxes. Hafnium control blades are utilized as both criticality and safety control elements for the reactor. They are controlled by a mechanical driver located at the bottom of the core but with the fully withdrawn positions at the top of the core. In a standard reactor calculation, it is necessary to evaluate the reactivity coefficient with respect to some physical parameters such as fuel or moderator temperature. For nearly all reactor designs, negative reactivity coefficients are required for safety. As a light-water cooled thermal reactor, the new reactor is designed to work in an under-moderated mode with the most achievable reactivity. The core is required to have negative reactivity coefficients under any normal or abnormal circumstances such as over power transient, loss of coolant or reflector, etc. Therefore the reactivity coefficient addresses reactor safety concerns as well as provides valuable quantitative parameters for reactor safety analyses. In this summary, three typical reactivity coefficients for the low-power LEU core are calculated using the Monte-Carlo code MCNP-6: the moderator temperature coefficient (MTC), the fuel temperature coefficient (FTC), and the void coefficient (VC). A direct perturbation methodology is applied to calculate all these coefficients. The perturbed case is produced by manually perturbing a single physical property with respect to the reference case (the one with normal operational conditions), as the multiplication factor (i.e. k{sub eff}) of the perturbed case is calculated by MCNP. The corresponding reactivity coefficient is thereby determined by dividing the reactivity change over the associated parameter changes. Core design studies are underway at NIST to develop a low-power LEU fueled beam reactor to advance the neutron source capability at NCNR for the next century. The reactivity effect caused by moderator temperature, fuel temperature and void is investigated though a direct perturbation approach using the MCNP code. The MTC, FTC, and VC for a representative startup core is obtained and the negative effect characteristics of these coefficients are observed. The reactivity effects under several postulated abnormal scenarios are also investigated. The overall negative feedback to the reactivity at each situation is confirmed. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Advancing Core Safety of Gen IV and Gen IV + Reactors by Encompassing High-Temperature Resistant Materials - 18673

The paper focuses on the development of materials for Gen IV/IV+ reactor core. It discusses the advancement of materials studied and their application in different components of the reactor core and other auxiliary components which will help in the development of future generation reactors. The paper summarizes the material study showing the characteristic behavior of different materials (coated with FeB and FeB{sub 2}), towards irradiation at near high temperatures and high energy neutron flux condition. The project includes different materials which are coated on the boundaries with varied thickness of FeB and FeB{sub 2}. The samples included Carbon steel, Stainless steel 310, Stainless steel 316, Inconel 718. All above-mentioned samples were received by Prof. J. Szpunar, through an industry with coatings of FeB and FeB{sub 2} with varied thickness along with a bare sample of each material. The samples were irradiated at the University of Saskatchewan reactor, with fast neutron flux of 1.1x10{sup 11} n.cm{sup -2}.sec{sup -1}. I worked on all the samples but the paper particularly focuses on, two carbon steel samples results, received so far. The methodology for the project been followed for all the samples is as follow: 1. Received samples were first polished. 2. Vickers Hardness Test. 3. Mirror polished. 4. Etched with the appropriate etchant for the material. 5. Microscopic study of the etched surface. 6. SEM imaging. 7. Sent for irradiation. 8. The same set of material testing done after irradiation, with an EBSD run on the boundary and main surface. The two Carbon Steel samples (sample 21 and 19) analyzed, were irradiated for 14 hrs. Sample 21 was a bare sample and sample 19 had a coating of FeB, FeB{sub 2} with a ∼0.0010'' thickness. The methodology was followed for material testing before and after the irradiation. The advantage of FeB and FeB{sub 2} coatings are: 1. Higher hardness - 10 times (FeB-1775 and FeB{sub 2}-1450), 2. High-stress capacity, 3. Lower abrasion, 4. Low corrosion. Through the test results obtained before and after the irradiation, I was able to get a view of coating damage at the boundaries of sample 19. The bare sample don't show any difference after irradiation but the coated sample do show cracks in the FeB layer. Which can be seen in the SEM images of sample 19. The hardness results are promising, as hardness didn't change significantly. The hardness test was done on the substrate as the coating was significantly narrow to perform the test. Though the hardness test on coatings was performed by the possessor company which show hardness higher by a factor of 10 when compared to uncoated surfaces. The XRD results, reveal irradiation effect on the crystal lattice, making it deformed, which though is usual during irradiation. The overall analysis along with EBSD done on the two samples are favorable and promising. Though it still needs to be cleared out, whether the cracks on the coating were due to irradiation or due to etching after the samples were irradiated.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) Description and Capabilities

The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) is a unique, one-of-a-kind nuclear reactor facility operated by Sandia National Laboratories for the National Nuclear Security Administration that is considered by many to be a national treasure. There is no other research reactor in the world that has the attributes and capabilities comparable to that of the ACRR. The ACRR was specifically designed to meet the irradiation testing needs of the U.S. nuclear weapons program. The ACRR has four major attributes that make it unique: 1) a large dry central cavity; 2) an epithermal neutron flux; 3) a large pulsing capability; and 4) a fueled-ring external cavity with a larger dry cavity. This report presents the unique capabilities of the ACRR and documents some of the more important metrics associated with its operation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the Annular Core Research Reactor staff and the Radiation Metrology Laboratory staff for their support of this work.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2012

The SAS4A/SASSYS-1 Safety Analysis Code System

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 is a software simulation tool used to perform deterministic safety analysis of anticipated events as well as design basis and beyond design basis accidents for advanced nuclear reactors. This software can be used to assess the safety of a prescribed reactor design, but it cannot be used to configure a design to meet targeted performance objectives. Detailed, mechanistic models of steady-state and transient thermal,hydraulic, kinetic, and mechanical phenomena are employed to describe the response of the reactor core, the reactor primary and secondary coolant loops, the reactor control and protection systems and the balance-of-plant to accidents caused by changes in coolantflow, oss of heat rejection, or reactivity insertion. The consequences of single and double-fault accidents can be modeled, including fuel and coolant heating, fuel and cladding mechanical behavior, core reactivity feedbacks, coolant loop performance including natural circulation, and decay heat removal. Analyses are typically terminated upon demonstration of reactor and plant shutdown to permanently coolable conditions or upon violation of design basis margins. The objective of the analysis is to quantify accident consequences as measured by the transient behavior of system performance parameters, such as fuel and cladding temperatures, reactivity, and cladding strain. Originally developed for analysis of sodium cooled reactors with oxide fuel clad by stainless steel, the models In SAS4A/SASSYS-1 were subsequently extended and specialized to metallic fuel clad with advanced alloys and to several other coolant options including lead and LBE. METHOD OF SOLUTION: Each subassembly in the reactor core is represented with single or multiple-pin models. One channel represents one or more fuel pins and many channels are employed for a whole-core representation. Heat transfer in each pin is modeled with a two-dimensional (r/z) heat conduction equation. Single and two-phase coolant thermal-hydraulics are simulated with a unique, one-dimensional (axial) multiple-bubble liquid metal boiling model. The transient fuel and cladding mechanical oehavior models are integrated with fission product production,release, and transport models. UNIQUE FEATURES: The physical models in SAS4AJSASSYS-1 are highly detailed 1umerical representations of reactor accident conditions based on extensive laboratory and test reactor results. The models are specialized to liquid metal (sodium) cooled fast reactors with oxide or metallic fuel clad with stainless steel.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2017

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 VERSION 5.2 SAFETY ANALYSIS CODE SYSTEM

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 is a software simulation tool used to perform deterministic safety analysis of anticipated events as well as design basis and beyond design basis accidents for advanced nuclear reactors. This software can be used to assess the safety of a prescribed reactor design, but it cannot be used to configure a design to meet targeted performance objectives. Detailed, mechanistic models of steady-state and transient thermal, hydraulic, kinetic, and mechanical phenomena are employed to describe the response of the reactor core, the reactor primary and secondary coolant loops, the reactor control and protection systems and the balance-of-plant to accidents caused by changes in coolant flow, oss of heat rejection, or reactivity insertion. The consequences of single and double-fault accidents can be modeled, including fuel and coolant heating, fuel and cladding mechanical behavior, core reactivity feedbacks, coolant loop performance including natural circulation, and decay heat removal. Analyses are typically terminated upon demonstration of reactor and plant shutdown to permanently coolable conditions or upon violation of design basis margins. The objective of the analysis is to quantify accident consequences as measured by the transient behavior of system performance parameters, such as fuel and cladding temperatures, reactivity, and cladding strain. Originally developed for analysis of sodium cooled reactors with oxide fuel clad by stainless steel, the models In SAS4A/SASSYS-1 were subsequently extended and specialized to metallic fuel clad with advanced alloys and to several other coolant options including lead and LBE. METHOD OF SOLUTION: Each subassembly in the reactor core is represented with single or multiple-pin models. One channel represents one or more fuel pins and many channels are employed for a whole-core representation. Heat transfer in each pin is modeled with a two-dimensional (r/z) heat conduction equation. Single and two-phase coolant thermal-hydraulics are simulated with a unique, one-dimensional (axial) multiple-bubble liquid metal boiling model. The transient fuel and cladding mechanical behavior models are integrated with fission product production,release, and transport models. UNIQUE FEATURES: The physical models in SAS4AJSASSYS-1 are highly detailed 1umerical representations of reactor accident conditions based on extensive laboratory and test reactor results. The models are specialized to liquid metal (sodium) cooled fast reactors with oxide or metallic fuel clad with stainless steel.«

Fanning, Thomas↗
DOE OSTI2022

Controlling a power output of a nuclear reaction without control rods

A nuclear power system includes a reactor vessel that includes a reactor core mounted therein. The reactor core includes nuclear fuel assemblies configured to generate a nuclear fission reaction. The reaction vessel does not include any control rod assemblies therein. The nuclear power system further includes a riser positioned above the reactor core, a primary coolant flow path, a primary coolant that circulates through the primary coolant flow path to receive heat from the nuclear fission reaction and release the received heat to generate electric power in a power generation, and a control system communicably coupled to the power generation system and configured to control a power output of the nuclear fission reaction independent of any control rod assemblies.

Callaway, Allyson↗
DOE OSTI2022

Predicting deviations in ex-core detector response in Krsko NPP during an earthquake with Monte-Carlo neutron transport methods

To study the response of ex-core detectors during an earthquake, an approach using Monte Carlo code MCNP was developed. As a first step to predict the response of the ex-core detectors a detailed MCNP model of the Krsko reactor core was created. A detailed MCNP core model was used to calculate 3D power distributions inside the core. Calculated power distributions were verified by comparison to the CORD-2 calculations, which is currently used for core design calculation verification of the Krsko nuclear power plant. Due to the outside the core position of the neutron detectors, the hybrid code ADVANTG is used to generate weight windows to speed up neutron transport outside the reactor core. To be able to use ADVANTG, fixed neutron source had to be reconstructed from the criticality core calculation. It was found that the power range ex-core detector movement has a negligible effect on the value of the thermal neutron flux at the active part of the detector. However, the 5 cm radial movement of the intermediate-range detector leads to 7 % - 8 % change in thermal neutron flux within the active intermediate-range detector region. The analysis continued with the evaluation of the effect of core barrel movement on the ex-core detector response. It was determined that the 2 mm core barrel radial oscillation can lead to ∼ 4% change in thermal neutron flux within the active detector region. It was evaluated that reactor core movement inside the baffle can lead up to ∼ 1.9% and ∼ 1.3% deviation in power-range and intermediate-range detector signal respectively. Analysis showed that the mechanical movement of ex-core neutron detectors could not explain the fluctuations in the ex-core detector signal. However, combined core barrel and reactor core inside baffle oscillations could be a probable reason for the observed fluctuations in the ex-core detector signal during an earthquake. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Critical Experiments Targeting the Epithermal/Intermediate Cross Sections of Tantalum

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have collaborated to develop a capability to test the epithermal/intermediate cross sections of materials at the SNL critical experiments facility using the Seven Percent Critical Experiment (7uPCX) fuel. The Sandia Critical Experiments Program provides a specialized facility for performing water moderated and reflected critical experiments with UO 2 fuel rod arrays. The facility offers the ability to modify the core configuration and reactor tank to evaluate various reactor cores for pitch, moderator characteristics, and other criteria. A history of safe operations and flexibility in reactor core configuration has resulted in the completion of nine sets of critical benchmark experiments that have been documented in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook. The experiment described here is expected to be evaluated for inclusion in the 2024 edition of the ICSBEP Handbook.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2012

The Windscale Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor (WAGR) Decommissioning Project A Close Out Report for WAGR Decommissioning Campaigns 1 to 10 - 12474

The reactor core of the Windscale Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactor (WAGR) has been dismantled as part of an ongoing decommissioning project. The WAGR operated until 1981 as a development reactor for the British Commercial Advanced Gas cooled Reactor (CAGR) power programme. Decommissioning began in 1982 with the removal of fuel from the reactor core which was completed in 1983. Subsequently, a significant amount of engineering work was carried out, including removal of equipment external to the reactor and initial manual dismantling operations at the top of the reactor, in preparation for the removal of the reactor core itself. Modification of the facility structure and construction of the waste packaging plant served to provide a waste route for the reactor components. The reactor core was dismantled on a 'top-down' basis in a series of 'campaigns' related to discrete reactor components. This report describes the facility, the modifications undertaken to facilitate its decommissioning and the strategies employed to recognise the successful decommissioning of the reactor. Early decommissioning tasks at the top of the reactor were undertaken manually but the main of the decommissioning tasks were carried remotely, with deployment systems comprising of little more than crane like devices, intelligently interfaced into the existing structure. The tooling deployed from the 3 tonne capacity (3te) hoist consisted either purely mechanical devices or those being electrically controlled from a 'push-button' panel positioned at the operator control stations, there was no degree of autonomy in the 3te hoist or any of the tools deployed from it. Whilst the ATC was able to provide some tele-robotic capabilities these were very limited and required a good degree of driver input which due to the operating philosophy at WAGR was not utilised. The WAGR box proved a successful waste package, adaptable through the use of waste box furniture specific to the waste-forms generated throughout the various decommissioning campaigns. The use of low force compaction for insulation and soft wastes provided a simple, robust and cost effective solution as did the direct encapsulation of LLW steel components in the later stages of reactor decommissioning. Progress through early campaigns was good, often bettering the baseline schedule, especially when undertaking the repetitive tasks seen during Neutron Shield and Graphite Core decommissioning, once the operators had become experienced with the equipment, though delays became more pronounced, mainly as a result of increased failures due to the age and maintainability of the RDM and associated equipment. Extensive delays came about as a result of the unsupported insulation falling away from the pressure vessel during removal and the inability of the ventilation system to manage the sub micron particulate generated during IPOPI cutting operations, though the in house development of revised and new methodologies ultimately led to the successful completion of PV and I removal. In a programme spanning over 12 years, the decommissioning of the reactor pressure vessel and core led to the production 110 ILW and 75 LLW WAGR boxes, with 20 LLW ISO freight containers of primary reactor wastes, resulting in an overall packaged volume of approximately 2500 cubic metres containing the estimated 460 cubic metres of the reactor structure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Inter-module fuel shuffling

A method of loading fuel in multiple reactor cores associated with a plurality of fuel cycles. The method includes, in a first fuel cycle, loading a first reactor core with a first fuel assembly selected from a first batch of fuel, loading the first reactor core with a first partially spent fuel assembly from a second batch of fuel, loading a second reactor core with a second fuel assembly from the first batch of fuel, and loading the second reactor core with a second partially spent fuel assembly from the second batch of fuel. In a second fuel cycle, which is performed after a completion of the first fuel cycle, the method includes loading the second reactor core with a fresh fuel assembly, and loading the second reactor core with the first fuel assembly from the first batch of fuel.

Kitto, Allyson↗
DOE OSTI2024

Accuracy Enhancement of Nuclear Power Plant Simulators Utilizing High Accuracy Simulation Predictions

More recently, reactor core simulators for core designs associated with commercial nuclear power plants that utilize what is believed to be higher fidelity models have been developed. Features such as neutronics models that utilize transport equation solvers with fine spatial meshes and many energy-groups, thermal-hydraulic models that utilize sub-channel solvers with fine spatial mesh and capable of treating a wide range of fluid conditions, and fuel-coolant chemistry interaction models capable of treating CRUD deposition are to be found in these higher fidelity core simulators. These reactor core simulators require access to higher performance computers, characterized by many processors, cores and large memory. So associated with utilization of these simulators is access to high performance computers and ability to accommodate in one’s workflow longer execution times. By contrast, currently used core simulators by the nuclear industry can execute on engineering workstations and have execution times of seconds to minutes. The desirability for having short execution times is not only desired for support of time critical tasks but supports the mental process of decision making by engineers. The goal of the work reported upon here has the objective of retaining the fidelity of higher fidelity models while retaining the ability to utilize engineering workstations. Beyond the core simulator goal, additional goals of this work include incorporating the just described core simulator capability into a Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) simulator, and to incorporate the resulting capability into an environment supportive of design and operational decision making associated with nuclear power stations. The model selected for the core neutronics model is the NESTLE code, for the core thermal-hydraulic model is the CTF code utilizing coarse mesh, and for the NSSS model is the RELAP5-3D code. WSC’s proprietary 3KEYMASTERTM platform is being used to provide software coupling, user interface, visualization, and reporting. The NESTLE core neutronics simulator was first integrated with the CTF core thermal-hydraulic simulator using CTF developed communication commands which are also used for CTF to communicate with RELAP5-3D under WSC’s proprietary 3KEYMASTERTM platform. To assure NESTLE prediction consistency with higher fidelity core neutronic simulators, buffer codes have been created to automatically generate from output files written by the VERA core simulator the NESTLE nodal neutronic parameter’ library, geometry, and pin-power reconstruction input files, thereby avoiding a number of challenges associated with utilizing lattice physics codes and providing consistency with VERA predictions. To treat absorber rod effects a multi-set library is utilized, where a set refers to a specific absorber rod fully inserted pattern. A coarse spatial mesh CTF model was developed with features added that support using CTF as envisioned in the engineering quality simulator. A hybrid meshing approach was implemented to allow for automated construction of models with mixed levels of refinement. Specifically, a core model could resolve some assemblies at a nodal level (4 subchannels per assembly) and others at a pin-resolution (one subchannel per coolant subchannel in the assembly). The intention is that this will allow for better resolution of limiting conditions such as DNBR and PCT, which are based on local rod and subchannel conditions. Further development was done of features that enhance the capabilities for the envisioned engineering quality simulator that has been developed, but now for RELAP-3D. The RELAP5-3D code development includes ability to model more than 999 components and the addition of the cross-channels turbulence mixing model and the void drift model that are implemented in CTF, aiming to achieve closer prediction agreement of the two codes for transient simulations, specifically, more accurate matches of the overall mass, momentum, and energy exchanges of both the liquid and gas phases between the neighboring core assemblies. Graphics were also developed for the Instructor Station for this project under WSC’s proprietary 3KEYMASTERTM platform to facilitate design and operational decision making.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2016

A High-Fidelity Approach for the Simulation of Flow-Induced Vibration

Flow-induced vibration (FIV) is a widespread problem in energy systems becausethey rely on fluid movement for energy conversion. Vibrating structures may be damaged as fatigue or wear occur. Given the importance of reliable components in the nuclear industry, flow-induced vibrations have long been a major concern in the safety and operation of nuclear reactors. In particular,nuclear fuel and steam generators have been known to suffer from flow-induced vibrations and related failures. Over the past five years, the Nuclear EnergyAdvanced Modeling and Simulation program has developed the integrated multiphysics code suite SHARP. The goal of developing such a tool is to perform multiphysics modeling of the components inside a reactor core, the full reactor core or portions of it, and be able to achieve that with various levelsof fidelity. This flexibility allows users to select the appropriate level of fidelity for their computational resources and design constraints.In particular SHARP contains high-fidelity single-physics codes for structural mechanics and fluid mechanics calculations: the structural mechanics implicit code Diablo and the computational fluid dynamics spectral element code Nek5000. Both codes are state-of-the-art.highly scalable (up to millions of processors in the case of Nek5000) tools that have been extensively validated. These tools form a strong basis on which to build an FIV modeling capability.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Developing Materials for Extreme Environments and Their Use in Nuclear Waste Canisters and Reactors - 20559

The paper focuses on the development of materials which can be utilized in extreme industrial environments. The paper discusses the advancement of materials and their application in components which are utilized in extreme industrial environments as such that of the nuclear field and especially in the nuclear waste field. Nuclear power plants have become an indispensable part of the electricity generation, medical, food processing and many other industries. Though burning small amount of fuel as compared to conventional power plants, they also create waste which is not easy to handle as other types of wastes. The nuclear waste sitting at the bottom of spent fuel tanks around the globe has raised public concerns on how it will be dealt with. Europe has started to give an answer by working on geological repositories. Though till yet, waste has been cooled in spent fuel tanks and after processing, is precisely placed in nuclear waste canisters and casks and transported to sites across the country for further cooling and storage. Though in all this process there had been a great deal of advancement on the type of casks and canisters used and the processes for transporting nuclear material and waste. Often reports about radioactive material leakage, moisture content inside barrels etc. has surfaced. Be it official or unofficial report, there seems a technical failure on how the nuclear waste has been stored and placed at facilities around the globe. The other aspect of this material development is to be beneficial for nuclear reactors. As the technology gets advanced, nuclear reactors change their titles from Gen II to Gen III and so on. The new fleet of upcoming reactors will be exceptionally safer, reliable and more efficient. But these benefits will also bring drawbacks with them. As these reactors will operate at high temperature (above 800 degree Celsius) they also ask for advancement in materials used in the reactor core, fuel used, reactor control etc. The paper tries to answer such concerning questions. The work shows the study done on different material that can be better candidates for extreme environments. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Analysis on the Heat Transfer Phenomena Inside the Scaled-Down VHTR RCCS Riser Experiment

Very High Temperature gas-cooled Reactor (VHTR) that is one of GEN-IV reactors has been developed for the purpose of hydrogen production. VHTR is characterized by high operating temperature and stepped-up inherent safety given by passive safety systems such as Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS). In case the active heat removal system losses its capability, RCCS significantly contributes to the inherent safety of VHTR by removing the decay heat transferred from the reactor core to the reactor vessel. Therefore, the performance of RCCS is the key parameter to ensure the safety of the reactor. Several computation and experiment researches on the performance of RCCS have been conducted. There are two types of RCCS depending on its coolant; one is the air-cooled type and the other is water-cooled type. This study focused on the former type. Due to the excessive height of the prototype RCCS, experiment facilities were constructed in reduced scale. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) constructed the quarter-scale RCCS experiment facility, NACEF and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) has constructed half-scale experiment facility, NSTF. University of Wisconsin (UW) also has the quarter-scale experiment facility and Texas A and M University has conducted separate effect test on the jet effect at the upper plenum of RCCS. From the reduced scale experiment result, the performance of RCCS such as a heat removal rate of RCCS and a peak temperature of reactor vessel were evaluated. When the reduced-scale result is applied to the prototype, however, a distortion could be brought about due to the reduced height of RCCS in the experiments. Especially, if the heat transfer regime inside the riser which roles as a heat exchanger to discharge the decay heat into the atmosphere is not identical, the riser wall temperature and the consequent reactor vessel temperature of the prototype could be incorrectly predicted. Thus, the convective heat transfer phenomena inside the riser duct both in the reduced scale and in the prototype is necessary to be investigated. In this study, the preliminary analysis on the heat transfer phenomena inside the RCCS riser was conducted. The subjects of the analysis were the prototype RCCS riser of PMR 200, and its scaled-down experiment facilities, NACEF. First, the geometry, flow and thermal conditions of the riser in PMR200 RCCS and NACEF were introduced with a scaling method. And then, the heat transfer regimes and the heat transfer coefficient corresponding to each condition were predicted using correlation and CFD calculation. Finally, planned activities including the experiment was introduced. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2016

DNB evaluation of PWR steam-line break event using Westinghouse and CASL coupled code systems

ANCKVIPRE and the VERA-CS code systems have been successfully applied to predicting PWR core response with respect to departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) at the limiting time step of a postulated hot zero power (HZP) main steam-line break (MSLB) event with and without offsite power available. ANCKVIPRE links the ANC code with the VIPRE-W code. ANC is Westinghouse's multi-dimensional nodal diffusion code for all nuclear core design calculations. It predicts core reactivity, assembly power, rod power, detector thimble flux, and other relevant core characteristics. VIPRE-W is the Westinghouse version of a thermalhydraulic subchannel code developed for light water reactor core design applications. The reactor core simulation was based on input of the core boundary conditions from RETRAN system transient and STAR-CCM+ CFD core inlet distribution calculations. To account for the asymmetric power distribution in the reactor core due to the broken steam pipe in one loop and the stuck RCCA, both ANCKVIPRE and the VERA-CS models were set up for the whole reactor core. The advanced modeling and simulations confirmed that the HZP MSLB high-flow case with offsite power available is more limiting with respect to the DNB acceptance criterion, consistent with the limiting case analyzed in the 4-loop plant Safety Analysis Report (SAR). The results also demonstrated that the currently NRC-approved Westinghouse coupled code system such as ANCKVIPRE remains conservative.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗