Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Powder”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

In-Situ Process Monitoring, Synchronization, and Mapping Laser Powder Bed Fusion Builds of Ti6Al4V

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) parts. Precise monitoring of the LPBF-AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps, the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals, managing very large datasets, and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power & position Ti-6Al-4V LPBF are described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection and optical microscopy observations. Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗

Additive Manufacturing Model-Based Process Metrics: Reduced Order Modeling of the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. In this work, we describe a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach that has been developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes, termed the AM moment measure method. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology and terminology of the approach will be described, and computed build maps will be calculated and compared for various laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) builds of Ti-6Al-4V. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗

Powder Bed Fusion Laser Beam Metals Additive Manufacturing: Process Monitoring Approaches for Qualification and Certification

The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of powder bed fusion laser beam metal (PBF-LB/M) additively manufactured (AM) parts. Precise monitoring of the PBF-LB/M AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps; the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals; managing very large datasets; and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power and position throughout a complex PBF-LB/M AM build will be described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection, x-ray computed tomography (XCT). Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality. The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. This presentation will describe an additive manufacturing model-based process metric (AM-PM) computational method that is a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology of the approach will be described and mapped to the porosity observed from XCT for a complex PBF-LB/M build. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the PBF-LB/M AM build quality and microstructure variability.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion↗

Towards Integrated Computational Materials Engineering for Quantifying Performance Impacts of Microstructure and Defect Interactions in Powder Bed Fusion Parts

Powder bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) enables the creation of parts with complexity and functionality levels that were previously impossible with traditional manufacturing methods. By modifying the laser power, hatch spacing, or the numerous other processing parameters, the PBF process supports the production of a wide set of materials and geometries. However, that same process parameter design flexibility causes the process-design space of PBF to be massive and expensive to explore experimentally. Another challenge is quality variation across a build. As a part is being built, geometric variance between locations, such as at a thin-wall section vs. the bulk material, may cause the specified processing parameters to no longer be acceptable for producing defect-free printing. Furthermore, if the processing parameters deviate during the print process, it is difficult to assess if the part will still perform satisfactorily. Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) provides a way to understand and address these various challenges. This talk will present advancements in process-structure simulations of PBF at NASA Langley Research Center. The ability to simulate grain-scale PBF microstructures using the Physically Based Monte Carlo method will be demonstrated and compared to experimental measurements. Techniques for simulating three-dimensional lack-of-fusion and keyhole porosity defects based on the specific processing conditions and approaches for integrating the two porosity prediction techniques alongside the computational microstructure evolution models will be shown. Finally, the integration of simulated PBF microstructures, embedded process defects, and crystal plasticity finite element models to elucidate the interaction of porosity and microstructure on micromechanical fields will be demonstrated. These integrated techniques demonstrate an example of using ICME to relate processing to performance for PBF AM materials. With continued maturity, it is hoped that such ICME approaches will lead to next-generation computational-materials supported qualification and certification of AM parts.

Additive manufacturing↗

Observations of Keyhole Porosity and Comparisons to Analytical Models for Ti-6Al-4V Powder Bed Fusion

Keyhole porosity defects are a common concern in powder bed fusion (PBF) processing. Keyhole porosity prediction models have generally fallen into two categories – high fidelity computational fluid dynamics simulations and low fidelity analytical or empirical models based on keyhole vibration dynamics. The low computational cost of low fidelity models allows them to better approach part-scale predictions. However, studies on low fidelity modeling techniques are limited by the lack of experimental data to assess the validity of the calibration over a wide range of processing conditions. This work extracts and quantifies keyhole porosity across 14 laser velocities, two laser powers, and six+ repetitions for a total of 176 independent trials. The measured porosity data are compared to low fidelity keyhole models to assess their success in predictive porosity occurrence. This work impacts the field by providing independent validation of keyhole porosity models for PBF for use in part-scale defect prediction.

powder bed fusion↗

Development of Laser Powder Bed Fusion NASA HR-2 for Hydrogen Sensitive Liquid Rocket Engine Applications

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been involved in the development and maturation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) for space applications since the late 2000’s. AM has provided new design and manufacturing opportunities to reduce cost and schedule, consolidate parts, and optimize performance. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is one of the most commonly used AM processes to fabricate components that have complex shape and need fine feature resolution. Due to exposure to high pressure gaseous hydrogen, mechanical property degradation caused by hydrogen environment embrittlement (HEE) is a critical concern for many materials in liquid hydrogen propulsion systems. NASA has identified the need to develop and advance new materials in unique engine applications using liquid hydrogen as a propellant. One such material being developed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center is L-PBF NASA HR-2 (Hydrogen Resistant-2), a high-strength Fe-Ni-based superalloy resistant to HEE. The chemistry of NASA HR-2 was formulated to meet requirements for key liquid rocket engine (LRE) components that operate in high-pressure hydrogen environments. Initial development and material characterization found NASA HR-2 has excellent L-PBF printability and its microstructure evolves well after heat treatment. This new alloy has undergone fundamental metallurgical evaluations, heat treatment studies, detailed microstructure characterization, and mechanical testing across a range of temperatures. Tensile testing was performed in pressurized gaseous hydrogen (GH2) environment to assess its resistance to HEE. L-PBF NASA HR-2 has an average yield stress of 95 ksi, ultimate tensile stress of 165 ksi, and very high fracture elongation at 34 - 36% when tested in a 5 ksi high pressure hydrogen environment. The tensile property data confirms hydrogen has little influence on its ductility, strength, and fracture behavior. L-PBF NASA HR-2 is a promising option for many hydrogen sensitive LRE components that require exceptional resistance to HEE. The development of L-PBF NASA HR-2 is funded under the grants provided by Jacobs TIPI program and the Liquid Engine Office at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. This paper will provide an overview of the L-PBF process development, material characterization, mechanical and thermophysical properties, and LRE hardware development for NASA HR-2.

NASA HR-2↗

Development of Laser Powder Bed Fusion NASA HR-2 for Hydrogen Sensitive Liquid Rocket Engine Applications

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been involved in the development and maturation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) for space applications since the late 2000’s. AM has provided new design and manufacturing opportunities to reduce cost and schedule, consolidate parts, and optimize performance. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) is one of the most commonly used AM processes to fabricate components that have complex shape and need fine feature resolution. Due to exposure to high pressure gaseous hydrogen, mechanical property degradation caused by hydrogen environment embrittlement (HEE) is a critical concern for many materials in liquid hydrogen propulsion systems. NASA has identified the need to develop and advance new materials in unique engine applications using liquid hydrogen as a propellant. One such material being developed at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center is L-PBF NASA HR-2 (Hydrogen Resistant-2), a high-strength Fe-Ni-based superalloy resistant to HEE. The chemistry of NASA HR-2 was formulated to meet requirements for key liquid rocket engine (LRE) components that operate in high-pressure hydrogen environments. Initial development and material characterization found NASA HR-2 has excellent L-PBF printability and its microstructure evolves well after heat treatment. This new alloy has undergone fundamental metallurgical evaluations, heat treatment studies, detailed microstructure characterization, and mechanical testing across a range of temperatures. Tensile testing was performed in pressurized gaseous hydrogen (GH2) environment to assess its resistance to HEE. L-PBF NASA HR-2 has an average yield stress of 95 ksi, ultimate tensile stress of 165 ksi, and very high fracture elongation at 34 - 36% when tested in a 5 ksi high pressure hydrogen environment. The tensile property data confirms hydrogen has little influence on its ductility, strength, and fracture behavior. L-PBF NASA HR-2 is a promising option for many hydrogen sensitive LRE components that require exceptional resistance to HEE. The development of L-PBF NASA HR-2 is funded under the grants provided by Jacobs TIPI program and the Liquid Engine Office at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. This paper will provide an overview of the L-PBF process development, material characterization, mechanical and thermophysical properties, and LRE hardware development for NASA HR-2.

NASA HR-2↗

Convolution-Based Numerical Solutions of Transient Temperature Fields during Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Theory, Accuracy, and Computational Cost

Powder bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing has found numerous applications in the aerospace domain. However, components fabricated via PBF have a complex time-temperature history that significantly impacts subsequent mechanical performance. This study examines convolution-based numerical solutions of transient temperature fields that support simulations involving arbitrary beam shapes and paths during PBF. The convolutional approach is verified through comparisons with analytical solutions of the temperature field. The computational speed and accuracy of the method are assessed through comparisons with other explicit and implicit numerical techniques. In addition, the straightforward translation of the approach from a CPU to a GPU implementation and the resultant performance improvement are presented. The role of the technique in predicting microstructure evolution during PBF (for a greater process-structure-property-performance framework) is also demonstrated. This work supports the development of computational materials methods for understanding and controlling the time-temperature history during PBF.

powder bed fusion↗

Fatigue Behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fused HAYNES 214: Effects of Different Surface Treatments

In this study, under NASA’s Rapid and Analysis Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT) project, effects of different surface post-treatments on surface texture and fatigue behavior of L-PBF Alloy 214 were investigated. Various subtractive SPTs including abrasive flow machining (AFM), machining (M), shot peening (SP), vapormatt (VM), dry electropolishing (DE), chemical milling (CM), chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP), electro chemical (ECP) were applied to study the variations of the surface texture, microstructure and uniaxial fatigue behavior under fully reversed strain-controlled condition at four different strain amplitudes of 0.005, 0.004, 0.003, and 0.0025 mm/mm. The insights gained regarding the relationship between structural and mechanical properties for different SPTs can help establish guidelines for selecting the most effective process to enhance the performance of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) Alloy 214, especially for critical aerospace applications.

Post-Processing↗

Thin transparent films formed from powdered glass

Glass film less than five mils thick is formed from powdered glass dispersed in an organic liquid, deposited on a substrate, and fused into place. The thin films can be cut and shaped for contact lenses, optical filters and insulating layers.

Source record↗