Critical behavior of lattice gauge theory Rydberg simulators from effective Hamiltonians
Not provided.
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not provided.
Not Available
Here, we classify phases of a bosonic lattice model based on the computational complexity of classically simulating the system. We show that the system transitions from being classically simulable to classically hard to simulate as it evolves in time, extending previous results to include on-site number-conserving interactions and long-range hopping. Specifically, we construct a complexity phase diagram with easy and hard “phases” and derive analytic bounds on the location of the phase boundary with respect to the evolution time and the degree of locality. We find that the location of the phase transition is intimately related to upper bounds on the spread of quantum correlations and protocols to transfer quantum information. Remarkably, although the location of the transition point is unchanged by on-site interactions, the nature of the transition point does change. Specifically, we find that there are two kinds of transitions, sharp and coarse, broadly corresponding to interacting and noninteracting bosons, respectively. Our Letter motivates future studies of complexity in many-body systems and its interplay with the associated physical phenomena.
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
For a considerable time, large datasets containing problem instances have proven valuable for analyzing computer hardware, software, and algorithms. One notable example of the value of large datasets is ImageNet [1], a vast repository of images that has been instrumental in testing numerous deep learning packages. Similarly, in the domain of computational chemistry and materials science, the availability of extensive datasets such as the Protein Data Bank [2], the Materials Project [3], and QM9 [4] has greatly facilitated the evaluation of new algorithms and software approaches, while also promoting standardization within the field. These well-defined datasets and problem instances, in turn, serve as the foundation for creating benchmarking suites like MLPerf [5] and LINPACK [6], [7]. These suites enable fair and rigorous comparisons of different methodologies and solutions, fostering continuous advancements in various areas of computer science and beyond.